@real_seeking @WhySoCeasarian @dancingfun @lookveld1970 Ivermectin produces results consistent with a drug that does not work for SARS-CoV-2, unlike vaccines, dexamethasone, etc. https://t.co/bQjXVirVUm https://t.co/cBbvpvnGGO [https://t.co/SjTloS3hgu]
@thebadstats @PhilippMarkolin Re: "I'll tell you what, have me on the podcast and we can talk about some of the Covid and Ivermectin claims you've made over the last year. Cowards are too afraid to have discussions with people who disagree with them, right
@BretWeinstein @thebadstats Re: "Do you consider yourself a coward? That’s certainly how I see you." 😑 "The lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses based on summary data alone are inherently unreliable [...] [...] Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz [...]" https://t.co/r
14/C Non-expert ivermectin fans often cited 'aMAzInG SucCEsS!!' in Uttar Pradesh (in India), various African nations, etc., without accounting for, for example, better death registration in northern Africa + South Africa. https://t.co/bjdHnFWbg2 https://
@TnAlistair @ArthurMclean13 @profnfenton @DrSusanOliver1 But that's the best one can expect from non-expert ivermectin fans who disinform. 🤷♂️ https://t.co/CviHuKUAmD https://t.co/vQofadiEi4 https://t.co/bQjXVirVUm https://t.co/dRh180rdub https://t.co/lt
@larschristens @SamolejJ @Bigsmiffy438 @profnfenton @DrSusanOliver1 @GidMK @K_Sheldrick 1) It was more than one study; it's *at least* Niaee et al. and Elgazzar et al. https://t.co/YGGejGTCGl 2) Removing those studies changes the conclusion. https://t.c
@paulsounds @hypoautonomic @DocMCohen @CaulfieldTim @jonathanstea @RyanMarino @GidMK @meganranney @ImogenRCoePhD @crackedscience @DrLindaMD Re: "I have tried looking at the scientific studies on ivermectin, and I couldn't make heads or tails of it" When y
@TheSpaniard14 @PhillyPharmaBoy @The_Ouroboros__ @SteveMazzie @kdkseven @danaturalleague @jenny2x4 Let me know when you finally decide to honestly admit that: 1) You asked for a study showing ivermectin was not effective. 2) You were cited several such st
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @TigerlillySusan @TripleAries328 @joshua_chupik @ClayTravis @JonathanSarfat1 In reality, ivermectin produces results co…
@TigerlillySusan @TripleAries328 @joshua_chupik @ClayTravis @JonathanSarfat1 In reality, ivermectin produces results consistent with a drug that does not work for SARS-CoV-2, unlike vaccines, dexamethasone, etc. https://t.co/bQjXVirVUm https://t.co/cBbvp
@ballardsigns @TravAlvord @I_Am_JohnCullen Ivermectin produces results consistent with a drug that does not work for SARS-CoV-2, unlike vaccines, dexamethasone, etc. https://t.co/bQjXVirVUm https://t.co/cBbvpvnGGO [https://t.co/SjTloS3hgu] https://t.co/M
@SeanUrban @Dominos20076133 @boulware_dr Re: "why else would people say it works?" Because of fraudulent + low-quality studies. https://t.co/P3VCeKma9n https://t.co/CviHuKUAmD https://t.co/dRh180rdub https://t.co/bQjXVirVUm https://t.co/7BwmA975nY http
Great piece! 👏 Biased primary studies yield biased meta-analysis. "The lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses based on summary data alone are inherently unreliable" (Lawrence 2021) @NatureMedicine https://t.co/AU55rSnZDh
And still ivermectin produces results consistent with a drug that does not work for SARS-CoV-2, unlike vaccines, dexamethasone, etc. h/t @balkraix https://t.co/bQjXVirVUm https://t.co/cBbvpvnGGO [https://t.co/SjTloS3hgu] https://t.co/MkqYVCgOJe https://
@martinzietek @TigerlillySusan @JonathanSarfat1 @GidMK You really need to learn not to believe ivmmeta's lies. Ivermectin produces results consistent with a drug that does not work for SARS-CoV-2, unlike vaccines, dexamethasone, etc. https://t.co/cBbvpvn
RT @madfall1213: Ivermectin Didn’t Save Japan From Covid-19 by @GidMK https://t.co/UQWv248RUR イベルメクチンの教訓 The lesson of ivermectin: meta-an…
@Arta77639046 Great. I'm sure you'll find new people to try to fool with your denialism + contrarianism on ivermectin, vaccines, etc. 🙂 https://t.co/Cdge5VoXbz https://t.co/7BwmA975nY https://t.co/UlEdP6H2y5
@Arta77639046 So we can assume ivermectin has no more clinical potential for cancer than it did when non-expert ivermectin fans (erroneously) said it had clinical potential for COVID-19. https://t.co/sZtrSo2TGK https://t.co/cBbvpvFhym [https://t.co/SjTl
@howtoappl @Instablocked @real_seeking @wayne_uga @StoneJulian1112 @ArizonaRangr45 Mentioning Mexico does not change the fact that ivermectin produces results consistent with a drug that does not work for SARS-CoV-2, unlike vaccines, dexamethasone, etc. h
https://t.co/v6jNMesRLA this?
RT @madfall1213: The lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses based on summary data alone are inherently unreliable | Nature Medicine https://t.…
@DuckDodgeParry @Dominos20076133 @boulware_dr Cool story, bro. Ivermectin still produces results consistent with a drug that does not work for SARS-CoV-2, unlike vaccines, dexamethasone, etc. https://t.co/sZtrSol2US https://t.co/cBbvpvoewm [https://t.c
@TakeThatOG Oh wait, recently-made low-follower troll account. Bye. https://t.co/QukDuWnJaB https://t.co/pkgoVo35uY https://t.co/SmY6huXPRV
@CAnneHale1 @TakeThatOG @walidgellad Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials trump uncontrolled, unverified anecdotes + case reports. https://t.co/pkgoVo35uY https://t.co/OZsN0A577E https://t.co/ukWQRAgOTR https://t.co/bliHYWlpyV https://t.co/RePS
RT @madfall1213: Ivermectin Didn’t Save Japan From Covid-19 by @GidMK https://t.co/UQWv248RUR イベルメクチンの教訓 The lesson of ivermectin: meta-an…
RT @alexandrosM: Further, they are consistently defending TOGETHER as the gold standard, despite many flaws, and say nothing about the fail…
RT @alexandrosM: Further, they are consistently defending TOGETHER as the gold standard, despite many flaws, and say nothing about the fail…
RT @alexandrosM: Further, they are consistently defending TOGETHER as the gold standard, despite many flaws, and say nothing about the fail…
RT @alexandrosM: Further, they are consistently defending TOGETHER as the gold standard, despite many flaws, and say nothing about the fail…
RT @alexandrosM: Further, they are consistently defending TOGETHER as the gold standard, despite many flaws, and say nothing about the fail…
RT @alexandrosM: Further, they are consistently defending TOGETHER as the gold standard, despite many flaws, and say nothing about the fail…
RT @alexandrosM: Further, they are consistently defending TOGETHER as the gold standard, despite many flaws, and say nothing about the fail…
RT @alexandrosM: Further, they are consistently defending TOGETHER as the gold standard, despite many flaws, and say nothing about the fail…
Further, they are consistently defending TOGETHER as the gold standard, despite many flaws, and say nothing about the failure to share IPD as promised. I thought "the consequent potential for patient harm on a global scale demands nothing less"? https:/
@Jikkyleaks Kyle really doesn't like early #Covid treatment. https://t.co/Z41UFxNTD5
RT @madfall1213: The lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses based on summary data alone are inherently unreliable | Nature Medicine https://t.…
@Mr_Magoo5 @ArtysHouse @real_seeking @MTnutz @BlaylockMooky @NessunDormaEra @Truth_in_Number @blyrangez @alrightdave2 @cardseers Yup. Produces results consistent with a drug that does not work for SARS-CoV-2, unlike vaccines, dexamethasone, etc. https://t
Tell me you're an #UrgencyOfNumbskulls without telling me you're an #UrgencyOfNumbskulls https://t.co/WSclUOP4OK
@mike10010100 @real_seeking @merchmont11 It's amazing how when expert publish reliable studies, ivermectin produces results consistent with a drug that does not work for SARS-CoV-2, unlike vaccines, dexamethasone, etc. https://t.co/sZtrSokv5k https://t.c
@RosemarieVerbr1 @ThomasInLeiden @Elswood3 @Food4ears @KlaasvanDijk5 @ErikCumps @Jeron_in_Spain @Dieren_Doc @jorgje Research klopt vaak niet @Elswood3 https://t.co/59V73MAjho
@real_seeking @Adrian7745 @PierreKory @elonmusk @Covid19Critical @sciam @GidMK @brownstoneinst Stop promoting failed treatments, vaccine denialist. https://t.co/pkgoVnLuDq
@HighwayBob @trskah @real_seeking @vicki_langer Ivermectin produces results consistent with a drug that does not work for SARS-CoV-2, unlike vaccines, dexamethasone, etc. https://t.co/sZtrSokv5k https://t.co/cBbvpvnGGO [https://t.co/SjTloS3hgu] https://
RT @madfall1213: The lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses based on summary data alone are inherently unreliable | Nature Medicine https://t.…
RT @madfall1213: Ivermectin Didn’t Save Japan From Covid-19 by @GidMK https://t.co/UQWv248RUR イベルメクチンの教訓 The lesson of ivermectin: meta-an…
RT @suzuki_takaya: イベルメクチン/COVID-19 2 組み入れた試験自体がフェイクだとシステマティックレューがどうなるかという話。このころからぼちぼち論文撤回が始まっていた。 https://t.co/RzRAN5RkNq
イベルメクチン/COVID-19 2 組み入れた試験自体がフェイクだとシステマティックレューがどうなるかという話。このころからぼちぼち論文撤回が始まっていた。 https://t.co/RzRAN5RkNq
@real_seeking @OXHarryH1 @SaltaoVladimir @Dalmane15 @TakethatCt @JohnRee58027351 @ryanbeed @DiegoHAWK6 @ptcjoneses @Purrrr31 @AreYouSure1985 @KStateTurk @Lunatic__Fringe @DrAcula987 @XRadarP Perfectly fine screenshot that shows GidMK is more competent than
@ryanbeed @real_seeking @Dalmane15 @PhillyPharmaBoy @TakethatCt @OXHarryH1 @JohnRee58027351 @SaltaoVladimir @DiegoHAWK6 @ptcjoneses @Purrrr31 @AreYouSure1985 @KStateTurk @Lunatic__Fringe @DrAcula987 @XRadarP Yup. Ivermectin produces results consistent wit
@B3d4zzl3dRe @IvorMectin1 @CuchulainnCu @alangolds "The lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses based on summary data alone are inherently unreliable" (https://t.co/jShEsowZ6P)
@ghforfreedom ...practice and public policy." https://t.co/jShEsowZ6P
@ghforfreedom "Since the above primary studies were published (and now retracted), many hundreds of thousands of patients have been dosed with ivermectin, relying on an evidence base that has substantially evaporated under close scrutiny." https://t.co/jSh
@ghforfreedom ...says a group of 5 scientists in "The lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses based on summary data alone are inherently unreliable" https://t.co/jShEsowZ6P
@CWDandAJD @DeanDeanc3 @William237654 @DebbyWritesJoy @DineshDSouza You weren’t interested in the replies? Do you not understand how peer reviewal works? Here’s one. https://t.co/MmGb6CvADc
@fugginskid @Detrieman @GidMK Re: "do you have same standards with Tess Lawrie's meta analyses?" Why would I be interested in a meta-analysis that contains fraudulent research + work at high risk of bias? You really are a denialist non-expert. https://t
@EricMetcalf13 @Faceplants00 @Samuel_Gregson @TnAlistair @avghyperborean @thebadstats @BretWeinstein Always fun when denialists bravely run away after their disingenuous conspiracy antics fail. 😆 https://t.co/pkgoVnLuDq https://t.co/dw9oJHb0Nf https://t.
@TnAlistair @avghyperborean @Faceplants00 @Samuel_Gregson @thebadstats @BretWeinstein Re: "[The issue w/IVM and COVID is that per the highest quality available evidence, it doesn’t help treat COVID] Per the highest quality evidence, it does actually" As u
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @patobrenner Re: "many studies proving the ineffectiveness of ivermectin" Has results consistent with an intervention…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @patobrenner Re: "many studies proving the ineffectiveness of ivermectin" Has results consistent with an intervention…
@jasnotron @MaxDWolf @LooksEliza @patobrenner Maybe instead of lying to people about ivermectin + defending your fellow ivermectin peddler, you should instead go do your homework? https://t.co/37nQZklgY8 https://t.co/PpcrwLvwSq https://t.co/si0lAzh4Mw
@jasnotron Re: "Merck doesn't own the patent" They still make money off of it, + that's more money than they make off of any mandated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. They got it right in ivermectin for SARS-CoV-2. You got it wrong. Deal with it. 🤷♂️ https://t.co/3
@jasnotron @MaxDWolf @LooksEliza @patobrenner Merck's position is simple: They see ivermectin produces results consistent with a drug that does not work for SARS-CoV-2. So they avoid bad publicity from backing it on that https://t.co/sZtrSokv5k https://t
@Jkaye777 @Pappiness @elonmusk Miss. I will leave this here. Please stop promoting usage of this drug, it won’t help against COVID and it causes shortages of its ACTUAL veterinary usage. https://t.co/2PxaJnJxw0 here’s a cool article I found that has not be
@Samuel_Gregson @C_Kavanagh @GidMK @K_Sheldrick @AviBittMD They start their video with what amounts to a post hoc power analysis, which has well-known problems: https://t.co/0pO3WkxSlv https://t.co/GnTjx2zxKd https://t.co/VsuvBRxfUI And it conflicts with
@patobrenner Re: "many studies proving the ineffectiveness of ivermectin" Has results consistent with an intervention that does not work, unlike dexamethasone, SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, etc. https://t.co/sZtrSokv5k https://t.co/cBbvpvnGGO [https://t.co/SjTl
@ApeGilded I don’t think we’re going to agree about much, based on your pinned tweet, which conflicts with both clinical experience and robust data. https://t.co/C9jVVrlE2I
RT @AtomsksSanakan: 10/P What about the Babalola et al. study Harper cited? https://t.co/X39lXG6noU @GidMK excluded it when performing a…
RT @JackMLawrence: I’ve been smiling all day but also at a loss for words. My first published academic article came out today and it’s in N…
20/P It's also telling that Harper's source Ivmmeta peddled fraudulent + retracted research, much of which was exposed by the sort of competent people that Harper whines about (@GidMK, @JackMLawrence, @jamesheathers, @sTeamTraen) https://t.co/SnOYRMr4qP
10/P What about the Babalola et al. study Harper cited? https://t.co/X39lXG6noU @GidMK excluded it when performing a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on ivermectin's impact on deaths. https://t.co/o5zGc9up84 [https://t.co/SjTloS3hgu] https
@frankdevocht @YvanDutil @SylvainL_Cote @GidMK @isa_picard @clicjf @Wal_Trudeau He does not grasp, and has no honest interest in learning about, the evidence pyramid, even though it's a basic point all experts learn. Sad. 🙄 https://t.co/vMfdD0pG5u https
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @SylvainL_Cote @GidMK @YvanDutil @isa_picard @clicjf @Wal_Trudeau @frankdevocht But sure, keep pretending a crackpot so…
@SylvainL_Cote @GidMK @YvanDutil @isa_picard @clicjf @Wal_Trudeau @frankdevocht But sure, keep pretending a crackpot source like ivmmeta is reliable, while published papers from experts that do competent risk-of-bias assessments aren't. 🙄 https://t.co/sZt
@DrFluffyPants3 @Strange_G @GeorgeFareed2 More real science. Strange how that ivermectin doesn't appear in reputable peer reviewed journals. Hmm I wonder why that might be? 🤔 https://t.co/BAgfbAQ40i
@Existence2100 @Covid19Critical @phillyharper @alexandrosM They're the ones publishing meta-analyses you don't read. 😉 https://t.co/ytWNnaBBLg https://t.co/cBbvpvnGGO https://t.co/SjTloS3hgu https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/ltoz8FH8XK https://t.co/C
@WeareTheCypher @Ruud_Brouwer @Jon___F @bmj_latest @GYamey @GidMK @SarahWieten @mariamedina_A No amount of evidence will every get through to paranoid + dishonest deniers like you. Topic of the thread was ivermectin. Address the published evidence on that
@ulloque_ja @EricTopol But ivermectin has not been shown to be effective. The studies supporting ivermectin are fraught with errors and retractions. Clipped from: https://t.co/PSQRw9opYn
@Jon___F @bmj_latest @GYamey @GidMK @SarahWieten @mariamedina_A Re: "evidence suggests it has benefitted" Nope. Ivermectin produces results consistent with a drug that does not work for SARS-CoV-2, unlike vaccines, dexamethasone, etc. https://t.co/sZtrS
@JJ19jeffjohnson @hitter_lama @BretWeinstein Got anything better than https://t.co/seNSnHKPYJ? Lol... you are kind of giving away your hand here by relying on such obviously biased sources. Lots of issues with ivermectin sources---there's a massive number
@bobmarkel @BethGoldens @thebradfordfile There are plenty of other studies showing ivermectin is completely worthless for COVID-19 treatment. Just quit being a pussy and go get the vaccine, for christsakes. https://t.co/jAXX9Ac0Zn
@mikearos124 Topic of the thread is ivermectin. I'm not interested in the other topics you clearly have non-expert baseless paranoia about. Stop peddling non-expert crackpots to get around what's said by competent experts who exposed fraud you folks would
RT @AtomsksSanakan: Re: "What do you think about ivermectin in COVID-19?" Forgot to give my answer from the choices in the poll: Unsafe &…