PaperOfTheDay https://t.co/rjAq4sHbQJ https://t.co/JNmXdZDiF4 https://t.co/173oqokGcO "Quality of clinical evidence and political justifications of ivermectin mass distribution of COVID-19 kits in eight Latin American countries" https://t.co/ihf5XLkZ7v h
@Mac_Gann @fusreedah @josepharthur @Timcast Doesn't help your argument any more than the others. Consider these https://t.co/k1mv8Y90l1 https://t.co/o7ygjPHrmF https://t.co/EHX0h0hyw8
@ch_zimmer @PaulBieniasz Published evidence showed ivermectin didn't work for SARS-CoV-2. Conspiracists didn't like that, so they requested scientists' emails + twisted those emails to suit their preferred narrative. Guess what you're doing... https://t.
@Hedzer15 @leigh_loeb @Catsnft2 @djlange @PeterHotez @annamerlan @joerogan Meta analyses generally find it provides no benefit, even prophylactically. Early analyses didn’t stand up to scrutiny. Could be wrong, but it is likely less effective than quercet
@hanassa35 @noskcaj_linds @xstcy95 @djlange @leigh_loeb @PeterHotez @annamerlan @joerogan Sic. No, no, no. There were initial indications that it might work prophylactically, but generally those studies were found to be lacking. https://t.co/CghDuLkDQ9
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @VigilantFox @elonmusk @CommunityNotes @EpochTimes Shown repeatedly in higher-quality studies (ex: randomized controlle…
@VigilantFox @elonmusk @CommunityNotes @EpochTimes Shown repeatedly in higher-quality studies (ex: randomized controlled trials at lower risk of bias), ivermectin has no statistically significant benefit. Non-expert ideologues counting low-quality studies
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @MdBreathe @19joho Stop trolling. "95 studies showing the efficacy of ivermectin" https://t.co/LGZD0DLyNb https://t.c…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @MdBreathe @19joho Stop trolling. "95 studies showing the efficacy of ivermectin" https://t.co/LGZD0DLyNb https://t.c…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @MdBreathe @19joho Stop trolling. "95 studies showing the efficacy of ivermectin" https://t.co/LGZD0DLyNb https://t.c…
@keithccurtis @Iluminator_cz @stkirsch Sorry this is not a publication. Just a promotionary website. Some "studies" contributing to this analysis have been proven fraudulent. Btw, why is c19ivm hiding ownership? Wh Try a proper article on IVM from a high-
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @MdBreathe @19joho Stop trolling. "95 studies showing the efficacy of ivermectin" https://t.co/LGZD0DLyNb https://t.c…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @MdBreathe @19joho Stop trolling. "95 studies showing the efficacy of ivermectin" https://t.co/LGZD0DLyNb https://t.c…
@MdBreathe @19joho Stop trolling. "95 studies showing the efficacy of ivermectin" https://t.co/LGZD0DLyNb https://t.co/JjoLSaFoua https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/Yf7hq6jx7m
@tKT2T2n81J4uCBJ @nhk_news https://t.co/vtA9jXJ84a この論文の筆頭著者であるイランのNiaeeは過去何度もやらかしてて、あまり鵜呑みにはできないです。 そもそもこの論文に信用性があったところで、有意差があるという論文が少なければメタ解析をひっくり返せないです。
RT @JoanieOC: @Jikkyleaks @medpagetoday Kyle Sheldrick received a grant of $1 million from the Australian gov't for his company, around the…
RT @JoanieOC: @Jikkyleaks @medpagetoday Kyle Sheldrick received a grant of $1 million from the Australian gov't for his company, around the…
RT @JoanieOC: @Jikkyleaks @medpagetoday Kyle Sheldrick received a grant of $1 million from the Australian gov't for his company, around the…
RT @JoanieOC: @Jikkyleaks @medpagetoday Kyle Sheldrick received a grant of $1 million from the Australian gov't for his company, around the…
RT @JoanieOC: @Jikkyleaks @medpagetoday Kyle Sheldrick received a grant of $1 million from the Australian gov't for his company, around the…
RT @JoanieOC: @Jikkyleaks @medpagetoday Kyle Sheldrick received a grant of $1 million from the Australian gov't for his company, around the…
A conversion of science to the science™️
RT @JoanieOC: @Jikkyleaks @medpagetoday Kyle Sheldrick received a grant of $1 million from the Australian gov't for his company, around the…
RT @JoanieOC: @Jikkyleaks @medpagetoday Kyle Sheldrick received a grant of $1 million from the Australian gov't for his company, around the…
RT @JoanieOC: @Jikkyleaks @medpagetoday Kyle Sheldrick received a grant of $1 million from the Australian gov't for his company, around the…
@Jikkyleaks @medpagetoday Kyle Sheldrick received a grant of $1 million from the Australian gov't for his company, around the time he was ripping apart Ivermectin etc, with his friends Gideon,(no PhD) Jack (bachelor's then), James, Nicholas (Psychologist).
@angelcollia78 @MariolySosaP Lea esto para que deje de compartir sobre la ivermectina. https://t.co/UFLBe3Gp25
@jason_willz1 @BarryESharp @TheLancet Neither hydroxychloroquine nor ivermectin worked. Whining about Surgisphere does nothing to change that since the conclusion is the same even when all of Surgisphere's work is excluded. That's how replication + consi
@chezpasdur @GidMK @TogetherTrial Because @GidMK published a piece arguing all ivm data are potentially fraudulent and recommended IPD review before including in meta-analyses (what nobody never does), but when @TogetherTrial was published, he kind of fo
@Szymon49366484 @WolnoscTV @GrzegorzBraun_ @KoronyPolskiej @KONFEDERACJA_ Sam nie zwracasz uwagę na te rzeczy. Badania, na których się opierasz, na przykład te z meta-analizy, są jeszcze gorszej jakości. Czytam tam o błędach i fałszerestwie. O konflikcie i
RT @sudokuvariante: In contrast, you can publish that you suspect every positive trial to be fraudulent WITHOUT ANY DATA SUPPORTING YOUR CL…
In contrast, you can publish that you suspect every positive trial to be fraudulent WITHOUT ANY DATA SUPPORTING YOUR CLAIM, https://t.co/FarvDI6JKR even if you're a controversial author who don't understand statistics 101. https://t.co/PA0hBb8IZy It's aca
@Col14412171 @ForbiddenLunch @davidicke Not actual studies, and no data. https://t.co/m9gEQvFWSI
@henri_mourant @scotub He's probably off still prattling on about how the 'medical establishment' was wrong about ivermectin, while he willfully ignores evidence. Lot of overlap between the paranoid mindset of the ivermectin + lab leak crowds. https://t.
RT @QuackDetector: Many of the studies demonstrating benefit of ivermectin for COVID-19 were faulty, misleading, or fraudulent https://t.c…
RT @QuackDetector: Many of the studies demonstrating benefit of ivermectin for COVID-19 were faulty, misleading, or fraudulent https://t.c…
Many of the studies demonstrating benefit of ivermectin for COVID-19 were faulty, misleading, or fraudulent https://t.co/sQwtqmTTaT
@DianeMountz @RobSchneider That one was packed with questionable studies. Look at subsequent meta analysis. Here's a breakdown of may of the flawed studies used in that meta analysis. https://t.co/lbkKw6FYq5
RT @madfall1213: イベルメクチン、 誤った科学が生んだ新型ウイルス「特効薬」 BBC 2021.10.9 https://t.co/nmm37MaerZ https://t.co/VXmEnf2hCy イベルメクチンの教訓 The lesson of iver…
RT @madfall1213: Ivermectin for Covid Therapy Is Questionable, But Demand Is Soaring - Bloomberg 2021.10.13 https://t.co/IXQmWxMJ1t イベルメクチン…
@MarkHubbard33 @nzlabour There are better questions about ivermectin and covid, but your bored. BTW, here's the paper if you want to critique it, https://t.co/bQu4ndAa3u Good luck.
RT @madfall1213: イベルメクチン、 誤った科学が生んだ新型ウイルス「特効薬」 BBCニュース 2021.10.9 https://t.co/nmm37MaerZ イベルメクチンの教訓 The lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses…
@BMancunia @BHudsonWrites @DrSusanOliver1 @helenlewis @TeamYouTube @BretWeinstein Bret einstein has been peddling disinformation throughout the pandemic, on topics ranging from ivermectin to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and pandemic origins. It's ridiculous to cit
@jason_willz1 @CKellyUAP Still peddling ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine is ridiculous. https://t.co/Nxy3AwRzr2 https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/FkqNks2omb
@IainMulady @my_own_RESEARCH @BreezerGalway @thisisnothappen @thatsnotmine125 @Project4210 @jo_regular @SwaledaleMutton @JohnBri74065189 @FunTimeFred1 @ArielKarlinsky Did msabouri, the ivermectin lad + vaccine denialist, ever honestly admit he was wrong in
RT @madfall1213: The lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses based on summary data alone are inherently unreliable | Nature Medicine https://t.…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @backtolife_2023 No, they didn't know something that's false. https://t.co/0cXEbGBIlb [https://t.co/0nS3Mch9gb] https:…
@stu_chua @backtolife_2023 For any non-conspiracists who come along later: The meta-analyses include plenty of studies performed before 2022. https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/rUvqCGeWLx https://t.co/EF7zLLr0vt
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @backtolife_2023 No, they didn't know something that's false. https://t.co/0cXEbGBIlb [https://t.co/0nS3Mch9gb] https:…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @backtolife_2023 No, they didn't know something that's false. https://t.co/0cXEbGBIlb [https://t.co/0nS3Mch9gb] https:…
@Maestermagoo @Debunk_the_Funk Your actual comment was on peer-reviewed vs. non-peer-reviewed results. Meta-analysis of peer-reviewed results shows it doesn't work. And the excuses you would make were predictable 3 years ago. https://t.co/QiYCZ11Y9C http
@backtolife_2023 No, they didn't know something that's false. https://t.co/0cXEbGBIlb [https://t.co/0nS3Mch9gb] https://t.co/CckfB86csn [https://t.co/9TFTxBl6YJ] https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/vsVuUQJUBo https://t.co/2DvEvnVHWT
@pmcdunnough @btysonmd @jason_willz1 @GeorgeFareed2 @EduEngineer @FLSurgeonGen @P_McCulloughMD Always nice when the self-professed 'free' thinkers who supposedly 'question everything', bravely run away the moment published evidence shows they're wrong + wh
@pmcdunnough @jason_willz1 That's not how science works, especially with respect to consilience of evidence. It doesn't work by simply saying that because 2 studies were retracted you get to evade numerous studies from numerous other research groups suppo
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @jason_willz1 @Ba_____aa @GeorgeFareed2 @btysonmd @EduEngineer @FLSurgeonGen @P_McCulloughMD Amazing non-expert contrar…
@jason_willz1 @Ba_____aa @GeorgeFareed2 @btysonmd @EduEngineer @FLSurgeonGen @P_McCulloughMD Amazing non-expert contrarians + conspiracists still pretend ivermectin works for SARS-CoV-2. https://t.co/xA6ka0zhgC [https://t.co/0nS3Mch9gb] https://t.co/CckfB
@AlastairMcA30 @Ravarora1 @mtaibbi Maybe Arora + Taibbi should reflect on why they fell for an obvious charlatan like Pierre Kory, and whether whatever biased them for Kory similarly biases them against experts on vaccination? https://t.co/5WpaeduGBu http
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @AminSharaf @WahnSager @NachdenkerOB Ivermectin does not work. It's time to let it go. https://t.co/xA6ka0zhgC https:/…
@PierreKory It is a shame that the trials that were quoted were so easily dismissed due to some apparently being fraudulent Were you unwilling or unable to do other trials to prove the issue? https://t.co/Qvnmc4wxs9
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @AminSharaf @WahnSager @NachdenkerOB Ivermectin does not work. It's time to let it go. https://t.co/xA6ka0zhgC https:/…
@AminSharaf @WahnSager @NachdenkerOB Ivermectin does not work. It's time to let it go. https://t.co/xA6ka0zhgC https://t.co/CckfB86csn https://t.co/jxTy0A2fjL https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/1TA8sLCkOB https://t.co/Vx9fGEmjT2
RT @ymori117: nature medicine「イベルメクチンの教訓:要約データのみに基づいたメタ分析は本質的に信頼できない」 https://t.co/CpMYk9daMr イベルメクチンが有効だったと主張する臨床試験論文の個別データを精査したところ、次々と信頼で…
RT @carpe_diem0820: イベルメクチンからの教訓 要約データのみに基づくメタ解析は本質的に信頼性が低い 臨床研究は、要約統計の集合体ではなく、問題に対するより包括的データの貢献と見なすべき 匿名化された個々の患者データを提供できない研究はバイアスリスクが高い T…
RT @madfall1213: The lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses based on summary data alone are inherently unreliable | Nature Medicine https://t.…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @VigilantFox @RobertKennedyJr The failures of HCQ + ivermectin are not some pro-vaccine conspiracy cooked up by Fauci.…
@VigilantFox @RobertKennedyJr The failures of HCQ + ivermectin are not some pro-vaccine conspiracy cooked up by Fauci. It's a conclusion supported by published evidence from numerous researchers across the world. So feel free to drop the asinine conspira
@CrammGillian @LaurieFare1 @CitizenFreePres Your using a meta analysis that included very flawed studies that were retracted. This garbage is more than 18 months old! C’mon! https://t.co/h53A5cIu3H
Are you more qualified than this doctor?? https://t.co/g0U1BP4xJV
@thecoastguy Ollie, lots of people have asked losts of questions all over the world over the last three years and found that Ivermectin efficacy is near 100%! Unfortunately that's as a horse dewormer. As as Covid prophylactic, not so much. https://t.co/t7X
@PValkirie @GidMK Haha, contrast with " meta-analysts who study interventions for COVID-19 should request and personally review IPD in all cases". https://t.co/FarvDI6JKR It seems to be: "Only my own biases will be accepted in the future" https://t.co/YDww
RT @sudokuvariante: Dear @GidMK . In september 2021, you published a paper in @NatureMedicine arguing that "meta-analysts who study interve…
RT @sudokuvariante: Dear @GidMK . In september 2021, you published a paper in @NatureMedicine arguing that "meta-analysts who study interve…
Dear @GidMK . In september 2021, you published a paper in @NatureMedicine arguing that "meta-analysts who study interventions for COVID-19 should request and personally review IPD in all cases" https://t.co/FarvDI6JKR, qualifying others as inherently unrel
Hello @GidMK . According to your own publication: https://t.co/FarvDI6JKR your own meta-analysis is inherently unreliable, several trials haven't published IPD. Please stop publishing your inherently unreliable meta-analyses. Thanks !
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @r_y_a_n__t @jere7my @sailorrooscout @TerraChained Re: "Like I said before - time will tell. Perhaps we wager ? How abo…
@r_y_a_n__t @jere7my @sailorrooscout @TerraChained Re: "Like I said before - time will tell. Perhaps we wager ? How about - loser deletes account?" Delete your account. https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/1TA8sLCkOB https://t.co/3k1OBIcdQV
@AndyMLinn And you're right back to your fascination with "females penises". Let me know when you're not so willfully ignorant on evidence regarding the topics you fabricate about. Because your paranoia is not a substitute for knowledge 😉 https://t.co/fy
RT @EARL_COVID19_tw: イベルメクチンが新型コロナウイルスに有効との結果を示したNiaeeらのRCTに疑義がかかり,生データ提出を求めたが執筆者が拒否.(Nat Med 2021, Sep22) https://t.co/Kx14EXaKRI ポジティブ結果…
@TechTuber1 @Bradybits @boulware_dr Feel free to look up what a "meta-analysis" is https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/OZsN0AmIwe https://t.co/ukWQRzZe2j https://t.co/bliHYWD0Xv https://t.co/rsqn9ldAWe
RT @EARL_COVID19_tw: イベルメクチンが新型コロナウイルスに有効との結果を示したNiaeeらのRCTに疑義がかかり,生データ提出を求めたが執筆者が拒否.(Nat Med 2021, Sep22) https://t.co/Kx14EXaKRI ポジティブ結果…
Hey @GidMK , please explain how a study which "should be considered at high risk of bias for incomplete reporting and/or excluded entirely from meta-syntheses" can be an "incredible well-done trial"? https://t.co/FarvDI7hAp https://t.co/rbhOrYHMpa