@StrohJulian @lexxxilovexo @philoshua @willsommer You're peddling a disinformation website. https://t.co/pQ2sypfMYE https://t.co/sLyR0qQWdt https://t.co/9M8djQuvsa https://t.co/zb4TidgoGz https://t.co/ty49vjZQjd https://t.co/9zrenbXLYC
@groin_hammer @tristanrajaz @PierreKory Amazing anyone still cites ivmmeta like it's a credible source. It's a disinformation website. https://t.co/pQ2sypff96 https://t.co/sLyR0qQonV https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/zb4TidfQR1 https://t.co/ty49vjZitF
RT @AtomsksSanakan: 22/P People like Kory would like an article that presents them as heterodox dissidents suffering censorship, not as co…
@PhillyPharmaBoy @obsurfer84 Because ivermectin doesn't work, and non-expert ivermectin fans fabricate about went on in Uttar Pradesh. https://t.co/1GXu6IDOn2 https://t.co/pQ2sypff96 https://t.co/8JU38UQCVq https://t.co/QrOguj8HLo
@MercyVetsel So, @MercyVetsel, I'm going to ignore any further baseless conspiracism from you that's just meant to help you deflect from what the evidence evidence shows + the evidence-based scientific consensus. https://t.co/pQ2sypff96 https://t.co/1TA8
22/P People like Kory would like an article that presents them as heterodox dissidents suffering censorship, not as contrarians profiting from debunked claims https://t.co/n9sGhzfWCd https://t.co/WVvNpS3cuQ https://t.co/tXXNdSHTOr https://t.co/PIkQ56gK8I
RT @JackMLawrence: I’ve been smiling all day but also at a loss for words. My first published academic article came out today and it’s in N…
RT @JackMLawrence: I’ve been smiling all day but also at a loss for words. My first published academic article came out today and it’s in N…
RT @madfall1213: Ivermectin Didn’t Save Japan From Covid-19 by @GidMK https://t.co/UQWv248RUR イベルメクチンの教訓 The lesson of ivermectin: meta-an…
@marsouin4 @GidMK Let folks know when you've finally decided to apologize for your misinformation. https://t.co/50eDr5YQB3 https://t.co/pQ2sypfMYE
@marsouin4 It's right there in the tweet you responded to, despite you pretending otherwise. Not that a non-expert ivermectin fan like you would ever be honest on topics like this. 😉 https://t.co/qCG4C9O9KY https://t.co/pQ2sypfMYE https://t.co/CzOSLnx5ac
@marsouin4 @msabouri @inden_l @danjcyr @sschinke His track record is poor, spouting whatever contrarian talking points he thought were popular on the right. Not my fault you don't like that being pointed out. 🤷♂️ https://t.co/BbDdeRfVRN https://t.co/pQ2
@stomacoinfuga @Jo_fer7 @GianniOgnibene @AngeloFornaro7 @AgainCarlakak Studio di dicembre 2020 ampiamente superati ( e lo dice pure lo studio "Larger trials will be needed to confirm these preliminary findings"). Poi ne sono arrivati altri https://t.co/h7X
@Bennotbot @TreysonJack @xadexcrypto @Snowden @elonmusk Moreover: https://t.co/pZ8OAZx75C and https://t.co/3e227A8nrs Moreover Ivermectin isn't "safe" - it's prescribed for treating a number of diseases where the risks of the disease is very high, and don
@turpinator929 @FranJac1991 @PhillyPharmaBoy @AlastairMcA30 @jakeshieldsajj It's saying the same thing: the garbage website you cited uses a nonsensical methodology to reach misleading conclusions. Hence why recent peer-reviewed meta-analyses don't agree
@turpinator929 @FranJac1991 @PhillyPharmaBoy @AlastairMcA30 @jakeshieldsajj "Larger trials will be needed to confirm these preliminary findings." https://t.co/HUsLHSV9Zc I wonder what larger trials showed... ...Oh, it doesn't work: https://t.co/jxTy0AjQb
@Manwhosolditall Fraudulent research. I suggest you drop the Whataboutism on that topic. https://t.co/pQ2sypfMYE
@shanecal93 @LaurenPost11 @nateofoez @jaysulk @hodgetwins you’re hilarious. i have a ph.d. in molecular biology, have been on the front line in detecting the sars-cov-2 virus, and you’re over there slinging partisan feces. here is a mea culpa on the topic
RT @madfall1213: Ivermectin Didn’t Save Japan From Covid-19 by @GidMK https://t.co/UQWv248RUR イベルメクチンの教訓 The lesson of ivermectin: meta-an…
RT @usg_ringo: ”以下の論文の著者5人がどうやってイベルメクチン論文のデータ偽造を暴いたかについての紹介。 イベルメクチンの教訓:要約データだけに基づくメタ解析は本質的に信頼できない https://t.co/on6j0Lzs2M (一つだけではなく次々と欠陥…
RT @carpe_diem0820: イベルメクチンからの教訓 要約データのみに基づくメタ解析は本質的に信頼性が低い 臨床研究は、要約統計の集合体ではなく、問題に対するより包括的データの貢献と見なすべき 匿名化された個々の患者データを提供できない研究はバイアスリスクが高い T…
RT @ymori117: nature medicine「イベルメクチンの教訓:要約データのみに基づいたメタ分析は本質的に信頼できない」 https://t.co/CpMYk9daMr イベルメクチンが有効だったと主張する臨床試験論文の個別データを精査したところ、次々と信頼で…
@Awithonelison Lawrie's co-authored meta-analysis (Bryant et al.) hasn't held up. https://t.co/pQ2syoXDKw "Meta-analyses do not establish improved mortality with ivermectin use in COVID-19" https://t.co/CviHuLcbeb https://t.co/5lhHBw2Xzf https://t.co/Z
@Sijwill I'd never dream of falling to your depths. Your lab leak conspiracism is just another symptom of your crank magnetism, paranoid non-expert. "Ivermectin works against it." https://t.co/X2qvS6YKXB https://t.co/xvyZIY6iqy https://t.co/pQ2syoXDKw h
@iambackagain21 @MonicaGandhi9 Let’s compile a bunch of bad studies published in predatory journals, find a pooled effect size and call it a “meta-analysis.” Meanwhile, high-n RCTs published in good medical journals consistently find no effect.
@JohnBoweActor https://t.co/reJdimjIBN Just embarrassing now.
Medical experts + scientists did better on ivermectin than did Maher. "The Panel recommends against the use of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19, except in clinical trials" https://t.co/1TA8sLCSE9 https://t.co/jxTy0A2N9j https://t.co/pQ2sypfMYE h
@mentju4 @sense_strand @LaymansScience @Debunk_the_Funk @SwaledaleMutton @TomahawkVPhD Re: "Where's your evidence that ~30 RCTs showed ivermectin worked, if your source for that wasn't ivmmeta?" FYI, @mentju4: I'll be disregarding any answer you give tha
@sense_strand @LaymansScience @Debunk_the_Funk @SwaledaleMutton @TomahawkVPhD No hope of getting through to that ivermectin lad. He started flailing about when he was debunked on that. https://t.co/no9HeorXlK https://t.co/9pwYYA1LXb https://t.co/znuTAU7M
@SHIN_Fafnhir3 @BadMedic E questi sono tutti gli studi che dimostrano che l’invermectina non funziona
@TheBlueBishop1 @AlastairMcA30 @EddieWa29872179 @AlexBerenson The problem is that Ivermectin does not work against Covid, as shown repeatedly in RCTs.
@HansMahncke Re: "Wonder what other crank positions you held to..." Ivermectin, of course. "Ivermectin is not approved for use in COVID-19 in Australia or in other developed countries" https://t.co/NK6JkYCqUc https://t.co/MGiOvrLug9 https://t.co/pQ2sypf
@ClimateOfGavin Re: "Criticism of nonsense is silencing dissension" Case in point: "Suppression of the ivermectin debate: https://t.co/Dju6mcIjLr" https://t.co/XRz8oWHrQ7 https://t.co/pQ2syoXDKw https://t.co/1TA8sLCkOB https://t.co/TUYjo39EG9
@curryja Re: "Suppression of the ivermectin debate: https://t.co/Dju6md0sZz" https://t.co/XRz8oWqoO7 Ah, Judith Curry trolling on ivermectin. Crank magnetism strike again among the AGW denialists. 🤣 https://t.co/DtfCOTpLpv Row 7: https://t.co/EyVoE7RFVb
@LionAdvocacy @BogochIsaac Ah, now it makes more sense why you say the same sort of disingenuous tripe as other vaccine denialists. https://t.co/vDCSTnYvaG Telling the sort of predictable excuses + fabrications y'all peddle. https://t.co/lbPn7Z3QE8 htt
RT @tomo_hiko: ソウミヤことチームイベルメクチンや花木秀明が騒ぎ出してるこのNiaeeによる論文(私は未読)ですが、イベルメクチン狂騒曲を追ってきた皆様なら忘れない名前かと思います。 https://t.co/NYS0nX4IqQ https://t.co/QJ…
ソウミヤことチームイベルメクチンや花木秀明が騒ぎ出してるこのNiaeeによる論文(私は未読)ですが、イベルメクチン狂騒曲を追ってきた皆様なら忘れない名前かと思います。 https://t.co/NYS0nX4IqQ https://t.co/QJKSuwwjQI
@FamilyAdvEco @IainMulady @JohnBoweActor It. Doesn't. Work. https://t.co/pQ2syoXDKw "Ivermectin is not approved for use in COVID-19 in Australia or in other developed countries, and its use by the general public for COVID-19 is currently strongly discour
@SP4C3GH0S7 Multiple large studies from the IVM meta-study were found to have significant issues which cast a lot of doubt on the validity of it. https://t.co/3OH5leZpi9
@_WillNotComply 1/3 " many hundreds of thousands of patients7 have been dosed with ivermectin, relying on an evidence base that has substantially evaporated under close scrutiny." The only two studies that showed benefit were retracted. Nature a real pub
RT @madfall1213: The lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses based on summary data alone are inherently unreliable | Nature Medicine https://t.…
RT @madfall1213: Ivermectin Didn’t Save Japan From Covid-19 by @GidMK https://t.co/UQWv248RUR イベルメクチンの教訓 The lesson of ivermectin: meta-an…
RT @madfall1213: イベルメクチン、 誤った科学が生んだ新型ウイルス「特効薬」 BBCニュース 2021.10.9 https://t.co/nmm37MaerZ イベルメクチンの教訓 The lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses…
@JFunziez @TerryTheDude73 Your meta-analysis was retracted because of the results were less than honest. You haven't been right once with me. A year ago "they" were telling us we won't catch or spread? Who's they & catch what? You're lost...too many li
@RhetoricalGirl0 @Lil_Bill_1 @SteveDeaceShow 🙄 "Ivermectin is not approved for use in COVID-19 in Australia or in other developed countries, and its use by the general public for COVID-19 is currently strongly discouraged" https://t.co/NK6JkYBT4E https:/
@mentju4 @WendyOrent Really telling, though, the lengths some non-expert contrarians will go to avoid admitting they were wrong about ivermectin, that RCTs didn't actually give evidence it worked, etc. 🤷♂️ https://t.co/pQ2sypff96 https://t.co/znuTAU7MeE
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @past_is_future @gorskon Telling how non-expert contrarian ideologues fell for nonsense on ivermectin, just as they fel…
@past_is_future @gorskon Telling how non-expert contrarian ideologues fell for nonsense on ivermectin, just as they fell for nonsense in their lab leak conspiracism. Some folks never learn. https://t.co/pQ2sypff96 https://t.co/znuTAU7MeE https://t.co/q4
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @mentju4 @TheEthanIverson @gorskon @Baric_Lab @PeterDaszak Correcting non-expert lab leak conspiracists is like trying…
@Dr_Bry_So_Fly Your cited source (Bryant et al.) was nonsense that contained fraudulent research. Hence why the journal added an 'expression of concern' to it. Ivermectin's benefit was illusory. https://t.co/pQ2sypff96 https://t.co/CviHuKUAmD https://t.
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @jeffreyatucker Tucker, stop peddling tripe on ivermectin. @19joho @gorskon @AlastairMcA30 @nickmmark "Ivermectin is…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @jeffreyatucker Tucker, stop peddling tripe on ivermectin. @19joho @gorskon @AlastairMcA30 @nickmmark "Ivermectin is…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @jeffreyatucker Tucker, stop peddling tripe on ivermectin. @19joho @gorskon @AlastairMcA30 @nickmmark "Ivermectin is…
@jeffreyatucker Tucker, stop peddling tripe on ivermectin. @19joho @gorskon @AlastairMcA30 @nickmmark "Ivermectin is not approved for use in COVID-19 in Australia or in other developed countries" https://t.co/NK6JkYBT4E https://t.co/AhqvHzQonE https://
@Nemeses667 @real_seeking @k_b_lvi @PhillyPharmaBoy @stevereed84 @DyfrigH @DrSusanOliver1 The troll you're responding to blocked me after they were repeatedly shown to be wrong. "Ivermectin is not approved for use in COVID-19 in Australia or in other deve
@TopAlliedAceWW1 @auscandoc @GidMK Re: "there were reports it was effective" Reports where? You can get random reports that all sorts of things work when they actually don't, such as astrology, homeopathy, drinking bleach (MMS), etc. Published evidence s
@FlyClimbEvolv @L_Scott10 @AlastairMcA30 @jakeshieldsajj …not consistent with the veracity of the data collection, and substantial methodological weaknesses. We expect further studies supporting ivermectin to be withdrawn over the coming months." https://t
@mentju4 @TheEthanIverson @gorskon @Baric_Lab @PeterDaszak Telling who peddled a garbage source like ivmmeta as if it was credible, especially as a defense of a failed treatment that doesn't work. https://t.co/pQ2sypfMYE "Time to Stop Using Ineffective C
@mentju4 @TheEthanIverson @gorskon @Baric_Lab @PeterDaszak Correcting non-expert lab leak conspiracists is like trying to correct non-expert lab leak fans: No amount of evidence will ever get through to them, due to their paranoid mindset, denialism, etc.
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @GidMK For example... molnupiravir: https://t.co/ipPtTUUqFG lab leak conspiracism: https://t.co/MpcvR8rxJd ivermecti…
@GidMK For example... molnupiravir: https://t.co/ipPtTUUqFG lab leak conspiracism: https://t.co/MpcvR8rxJd ivermectin: https://t.co/no9HeorXlK https://t.co/pQ2sypfMYE hydroxychloroquine: https://t.co/lgDZIyaHX7 https://t.co/SAfMyd8lmQ https://t.co/5Q
@thebadstats @mentju4 @su3su2u1 @PierreKory Ended badly for the non-expert ivermectin fans, as it did for the non-expert lab leak conspiracists. Again shows that paranoid distrust of informed experts isn't a substitute for expertise + knowledge. https://
5/ Re: "who abuses experts' private messages / emails from *before* they examine much evidence, to evade + be paranoid about what experts say in their research *after* they examine more evidence + cite [evidence]?" Ivermectin fans https://t.co/ODpQvsXIEs
@RockSteady074 @MorganTawnee @Dreambu49405472 @SonofColin1 Indian Bar Association? Those are lawyers, not medical or research experts who'd be informed on evidence for whether a treatment works. https://t.co/pQ2sypff96 https://t.co/uDbFuhtKY7 https://t.c
@Elisaabby1 @alexandrosM No need to rely on paranoid non-expert conspiracists who don't know how to read studies. The published evidence shows what it shows, as confirmed in meta-analysis after meta-analysis. https://t.co/R0EWalec4L https://t.co/pQ2sypff
@TigerlillySusan @Jay64020436 @theblaze @catturd2 There's a reason better-designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) don't get the same results as that study. https://t.co/pQ2sypff96
@PierreKory Re: "dismissal of scientific data perceived to have a political orientation by major media in regards to the Wuhan lab leak… has stunning parallels to the Ivermectin story. DRASTIC reminds me of the FLCCC" Both crank ideas then? https://t.co/
@Maestermagoo @gorskon Non-expert ivermectin fans shouldn't be talking about vaccination, especially pretending that vaccination is being oversold. You oversold ivermectin. https://t.co/8xVP6ZF07F https://t.co/pQ2sypff96 https://t.co/zOltSRxIcI
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @BogochIsaac Yup. Ivm failed for SARS-CoV-2. https://t.co/w9sqhnLT8b https://t.co/rUvqCGeoVZ https://t.co/bQjXVirVUm h…
@adkappraiser @esisney @AdamKinzinger Sorry was thinking of another paper. The critiques of this and related papers is the meta analysis was based on summary data alone and some studies were in vitro. https://t.co/04U9MjPkTX https://t.co/UxL1OTuDOg
RT @ScienceYSK: Ma ancora dobbiamo parlare di COVID e ivermectina? seriamente? STOP THIS BULLSHIT, ivermectina non funziona e non serve per…
Ma ancora dobbiamo parlare di COVID e ivermectina? seriamente? STOP THIS BULLSHIT, ivermectina non funziona e non serve per la COVID-19! https://t.co/g3DciuRLfe https://t.co/VzK3F6MxoZ https://t.co/mJ5326a8Cy https://t.co/az48VDqqcQ https://t.co/PE3KAfa8vP
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @larsceny @PhilippMarkolin @stgoldst @mattwridley @MichaelWorobey When you pretend IVM works based on the Substack of a…
@larsceny @PhilippMarkolin @stgoldst @mattwridley @MichaelWorobey When you pretend IVM works based on the Substack of a non-expert conspiracist who doesn't know how to read papers, you can stop pretending you care about evidence. Bye, low-follower troll a