RT @JackMLawrence: I’ve been smiling all day but also at a loss for words. My first published academic article came out today and it’s in N…
RT @madfall1213: Ivermectin Didn’t Save Japan From Covid-19 by @GidMK https://t.co/UQWv248RUR イベルメクチンの教訓 The lesson of ivermectin: meta-an…
@MarkELindsay Is non-expert ivermectin lad spouting nonsense about medicine again? https://t.co/rJtLHFsVeF https://t.co/IlD2CRp4Bd https://t.co/WbbNcQgdUp
@adriennemariet @JaymieGill Ivermectin doesn’t work for Long Covid, ding dong. Continual flaws in studies, most retracted, and papers have never demonstrated that interaction works as a prophylactic or a treatment of Covid. https://t.co/pHUrCqJxWx
"Relying on low-quality or questionable studies in the current global climate presents severe &immediate harms." Listen to the man! You can't accept or discard this obviously true reasoning solely on the basis of how a given claim is politically coded
@hfortiermtl @RobertM72103719 @AlastairMcA30 I don't get my information on medical science from right-wing think tanks, anymore than I would do that for medical science. But I understand why a non-expert contrarian ideologue like you would. The other art
@hfortiermtl @AlastairMcA30 @RobertM72103719 The studies you don't read + understand because you're a disingenuous troll. https://t.co/jxTy0A2fjL https://t.co/rJtLHFsVeF https://t.co/whF40JKgmD
@WiscguyNE @AlastairMcA30 Re: "Get your vax and as many boosters as possible, douchebag!" https://t.co/i5CwPxUuvQ Stay mad, bro. Ivermectin still doesn't work for SARS-CoV-2. 😉 https://t.co/rJtLHFsVeF https://t.co/1TA8sLCkOB https://t.co/V1SRaxTzRz
@FnqSilver @realXinOoi @rt7683 @NSWHealth @GidMK @SwaledaleMutton Always nice when non-expert vaccine denialists + ivermectin promoters bravely run from evidence. 🙂 https://t.co/rJtLHFsVeF https://t.co/YbC2plheoz https://t.co/0oNxQUSxc8
@momentomoriDM @DrSusanOliver1 Let folks know when you're finally on speaking terms with reality, and learn to stop labeling it 'fake news'. "No "second wave" in🇸🇪 likely d/t natural herd immunity." https://t.co/PckAD8fqVm https://t.co/rJtLHFsVeF https:
@KappaFannon @JudyMinkoff @genevievefri @medpagetoday It's clear that it didn't work. If you knew the timeline for funding, performing, + publishing studies, then you'd know it was clear ivermectin didn't work even before this study was published. You're
@momentomoriDM @SolNataMD Re: "Here is the source of the data. https://t.co/6LtVRDkAPU" Peddle that non-peer-reviewed disinformation website somewhere else, troll. https://t.co/rJtLHFsVeF https://t.co/sLyR0qQonV https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/zb4T
@AndyMLinn @_everythingism @smith_john55 @ban_epp_gofroc @past_is_future Anymore than you can support your contrarian position on ivermectin, a position that's rebutted by evidence. https://t.co/R8JzeiWdTq https://t.co/rJtLHFsVeF https://t.co/hbnuEsmies
@AndyMLinn @Stephengm99 @smith_john55 @_everythingism @ban_epp_gofroc @past_is_future That's nice, troll. Let folks know when you finally learn to competently evaluate published evidence and/or rely on informed experts, instead of descending into baseless
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @ban_epp_gofroc @_everythingism @past_is_future If that's your example of a 'good scientist', then you would still erro…
@Stephengm99 @AndyMLinn @_everythingism @smith_john55 @ban_epp_gofroc @past_is_future Do you need a refresher on the published evidence? https://t.co/rJtLHFsVeF https://t.co/15WqLE7XZ8
@smith_john55 @BreezerGalway @cappsie I already read studies, including competent peer-reviewed meta-analyses, instead of the non-peer-reviewed tripe you peddle. Ivermectin doesn't work. When are you going to address your failed claims on veterinary form
@smith_john55 @BreezerGalway @cappsie And people poisoned themselves with veterinary formulations of ivermectin because they falsely believed it worked against SARS-CoV-2. You can stop pretending that wasn't explained to you. https://t.co/rJtLHFsVeF htt
@_everythingism @AndyMLinn @ban_epp_gofroc @past_is_future He's just pulling Kory's asinine tactic of distorting experts' private messages to evade published evidence that shows he's wrong. Unsurprising, since his conspiracism extends from lab leak tripe
RT @madfall1213: 虚実のはざま 読売新聞 https://t.co/WMjQfMOPWY The lesson of ivermectin meta-analyses based on summary data alone are inherently unre…
@AndyMLinn @_everythingism @DreamsOfTaos @Ayjchan Again, you'd move the goalposts no matter what you're given. And if the report was numerous pages you wouldn't read it anyway, anymore than you bothered to read the published evidence on ivermectin. You'r
@PeterJAnderson_ @BillyBostickson @stuartjdneil Yes, you non-expert contrarian conspiracists really are boring + repetitive in how you screw up on topic after topic... https://t.co/2GL08DKDH3 https://t.co/rJtLHFsVeF https://t.co/sLOJwVdDJR
@jennabgreen @coreisma @SapiensWell @dr_jon_l @Doctor_Eric_B @gorskon @CaulfieldTim @medicamentarii @MakisMD @DrCanuckMD @DrJacobsRad @19joho @DrEricDing He's not missing anything of substance from either of you trolls. https://t.co/P124p6LwnB https://t.c
@EqualOpp4All @stkirsch Nope - this has been debunked🌟 https://t.co/OPNpehIvph
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @KappaFannon @JudyMinkoff @genevievefri @medpagetoday Cool story, non-expert contrarian conspiracist. You're still as…
@boianspeaks @gentle_class7 @GidMK That's nice, disingenuous troll. Ivermectin doesn't work. Vaccines work. https://t.co/rJtLHFsVeF https://t.co/1TA8sLCkOB https://t.co/bKFlTrMOK2
@KappaFannon @JudyMinkoff @genevievefri @medpagetoday Cool story, non-expert contrarian conspiracist. You're still as unreliable on ivermectin as you are on pathogen/outbreak origins. You go from topic to topic, peddling whatever paranoid non-mainstream n
@boianspeaks @gentle_class7 @GidMK You're about as an unreliable on vaccines as you were on ivermectin. https://t.co/FeEmgDmc2Z https://t.co/rJtLHFsVeF https://t.co/9q4vaaIZ2o
@ShroedingerBird @GidMK 1) You don't know the study being discussed. https://t.co/HTV0xthDJ7 2) That RoB assessment in Song et al. is just wild. https://t.co/2bz7fBMIoe 3) Is there a sensitivity analysis for studies with lower RoB? 4) Why did you cherry-
RT @sudokuvariante: 😱Look, @GidMK can say something with a great deal of certainty without IPD, which contradicts @GidMK statement: https:/…
RT @sudokuvariante: 😱Look, @GidMK can say something with a great deal of certainty without IPD, which contradicts @GidMK statement: https:/…
😱Look, @GidMK can say something with a great deal of certainty without IPD, which contradicts @GidMK statement: https://t.co/FarvDI6JKR "Any study for which authors are not able or not willing to provide suitably anonymized IPD should be excluded entirely
@jhas5 @dkupiecki @tgof137 @_everythingism @BillyBostickson @CallumJCParr The overlap between lab leak conspiracists vs. hydroxychloroquine/ivermectin fans is quite telling. https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/cURfACSR3B https://t.co/nfY6gPa5YT
@AndyMLinn Your tweets are examples of propaganda. Instead of getting people to evaluate evidence or go to expert sources that competently evaluate evidence, you encourage using baseless paranoia about experts as a heuristic. Yes or no: Did ivermectin wo
@AndyMLinn It's simply a fact that what Kory said was erroneous, as Kory later admitted. That reality isn't propaganda just because you're hopelessly paranoid, just like the reality that ivermectin doesn't work. https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/FPD6a
@AndyMLinn @ASFleischman Also, ivermectin didn't work + your non-expert conspiracism on that failed as badly as your conspiracism on lab leak. Spend more time relying on experts informed on the evidence + less time defending crackpots like Kory. https://
@AndyMLinn @past_is_future @ban_epp_gofroc @_everythingism It's not ideological capture on lab leak, anymore than on ivermectin, evolutionary biology, etc. You're just a paranoid non-expert contrarian conspiracist looking for any excuse to evade evidence
@VonMaunder @shallit43 @SolNataMD @BretWeinstein Enjoy being happy in your non-expert vaccine denialism + hawking of a failed treatment like ivermectin. https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/1TA8sLCkOB https://t.co/g8aH2k5kln
@SchumpeterPan @gorskon @AlastairMcA30 @SolNataMD Saw them just fine. Did you miss the meta-analyses of RCTs showing ivermectin doesn't work (or more precisely: produces results consistent with a drug that does not work)? https://t.co/173oqokGcO
@hardjappaleno @A1an_M @SolNataMD Go troll somewhere else. https://t.co/173oqokGcO
@AndyMLinn @_everythingism @ban_epp_gofroc @past_is_future Sorry, your evidence-free non-expert conspiracism is not a substitute of evidence-based scientific consensus. Now go join the non-expert vaccine denialists in ranting about emails. https://t.co/n
@ban_epp_gofroc @_everythingism @past_is_future If that's your example of a 'good scientist', then you would still erroneously think it's an open question whether ivermectin works for SARS-CoV-2. That's just a contrarian conspiracist. https://t.co/XveT9k
@AndyMLinn @_everythingism @LeviTD @Biorealism @kellywind @VaughnMises @gadboit No, you fell for it, motivated in part by the same non-expert conspiracism that motivates you on lab leak. You can try learning from that to change how you reason, but you sim
@AndyMLinn @LeviTD @Biorealism @kellywind @_everythingism @VaughnMises @gadboit It's amazing how the accounts complaining turn out to be non-expert conspiracists + denialists who were wrong. Must be doing something right when those are the folks complaini
RT @madfall1213: 虚実のはざま 読売新聞 https://t.co/WMjQfMOPWY The lesson of ivermectin meta-analyses based on summary data alone are inherently unre…
@daniel_corcos @kellywind @_everythingism @VaughnMises @LeviTD @gadboit Go back to your asinine conspiracism on other topics, like ivermectin. It's not needed here + your baseless paranoia is not credible. https://t.co/3FWQtX9No0 https://t.co/173oqokGcO
36/J https://t.co/V5RelP4Spr https://t.co/MAjiDYuK0k https://t.co/3qKD0og9Vv https://t.co/owmVdKcsTT https://t.co/173oqokGcO Experts were right about ivermectin + Taibbi fell for crackpots. Curry conveniently deleted her promotion of that, though. 🧐 ht
@DrJBhattacharya @GidMK He co-authored a paper asking for IPD for meta-analysis authors about ivermectin https://t.co/FarvDI6JKR but I'm quite sure he shared a lot of meta-analysis whose authors didn't have access to IPD since this article was published. 2
RT @madfall1213: 虚実のはざま 読売新聞 https://t.co/WMjQfMOPWY The lesson of ivermectin meta-analyses based on summary data alone are inherently unre…
@OU_TURK @Fisherlady111 Did you miss this?
@kellywind @_everythingism @hypoautonomic @emilyakopp @flodebarre @MoNscience You realize on that thread you illustrated my point about distrust of noted experts/authorities, right? You can drop the conspiracism now. The FDA was correct; ivermectin isn't
@kellywind @hypoautonomic @emilyakopp @flodebarre @_everythingism @MoNscience There is a lot of interesting overlap, though, between non-expert conspiracist proponents of ivermectin (or hydroxychloroquine) vs. non-expert lab leak conspiracists. Crank magn
@Chart_School @Fisherlady111 Do I need to tap the sign again?
@Wrong_way_down @AlBowers1 @Fisherlady111 You mean link these?
@RonOlander @DocDeezWhat @Playbeyblades @Batt1eDave @JesperKitos I think there are still some questions https://t.co/7D9mlAhDZl
RT @madfall1213: 虚実のはざま 読売新聞 https://t.co/WMjQfMOPWY The lesson of ivermectin meta-analyses based on summary data alone are inherently unre…
RT @madfall1213: The lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses based on summary data alone are inherently unreliable | Nature Medicine https://t.…
RT @madfall1213: 虚実のはざま 読売新聞 https://t.co/WMjQfMOPWY The lesson of ivermectin meta-analyses based on summary data alone are inherently unre…
@Theo_TJ_Jordan @past_is_future You're not credible, non-expert conspiracist. And science is not about live discussions with disingenuous denialists like you. It's about published evidence evaluated by competent people (so not you). https://t.co/ds8yBJ3s
@AndyMLinn @past_is_future ...says the non-expert lab leak conspiracist + ideologically-motivated contrarian whose almost the perfect embodiment of what Jacobs aptly complains about. https://t.co/BbzXoiXLHV https://t.co/R8JzeiWdTq https://t.co/173oqokGcO
@AndyMLinn @_everythingism @bluejonn @stuartjdneil @sshole Nothing is owed to a lazy conspiracist who'd rather make up excuses to pretend ivermectin works, rather than defer to the evidence-based consensus of informed experts or read the published evidence
@TheDesignFlaw You need to learn to vet your sources https://t.co/buLJYgdhIy
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @AndyMLinn @_everythingism @bluejonn @stuartjdneil @sshole You can't honestly + competently addressed published evidenc…
@AndyMLinn @_everythingism @bluejonn @stuartjdneil @sshole You can't honestly + competently addressed published evidence, leading you to be misled on lab leak in the same way you were misled on ivermectin. You're simply a non-expert troll + conspiracist,
@gorskon Quick reminder that Arora either has no idea how to recognize credible sources on COVID-19-related topics, or he's actively disinforming / JAQing off. https://t.co/IKoitWqk8d https://t.co/65IHDC28H1 https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/JKRYeYsNr
@Maestermagoo @CCSDMaskUp ...says the non-expert ivermectin fan + contrarian conspiracist who disagrees with informed experts whenever it suits their baseless paranoia. https://t.co/1DYfd2nI39 https://t.co/8ny9jl2hRo https://t.co/8xVP6ZF07F https://t.co/
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @Jeff_mc2 @Startell3 @TigerlillySusan @ArrestFauxi @Data_logical0 @MonicaGandhi9 @AWokeZombie That's nice, non-expert c…
@Jeff_mc2 @Startell3 @TigerlillySusan @ArrestFauxi @Data_logical0 @MonicaGandhi9 @AWokeZombie That's nice, non-expert conspiracist. https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/1TA8sLCkOB https://t.co/olT2Nj2z7R
@ghost_magoo @stuartjdneil @natashaloder @emilyakopp Like the public knew ivermectin worked, non-expert ivermectin lad? I think it's time to let it go and just admit that you have no idea how to evaluate evidence + simply fall for whatever contrarian cons
RT @madfall1213: 虚実のはざま 読売新聞 https://t.co/WMjQfMOPWY The lesson of ivermectin meta-analyses based on summary data alone are inherently unre…
@WePatriot15 Being awarded a Nobel prize for working on *parasites* doesn't mean it worked for *SARS-CoV-2*. Stop trolling. https://t.co/173oqokGcO "Why you should not use ivermectin to treat or prevent COVID-19" https://t.co/Re6mi6thGd https://t.co/w5
@mentju4 @yoshkapundrick @MarionKoopmans Because they got bored with your evidence-free conspiracist antics? I would have blocked your obscenity-hurling denialist trolling long ago, if I didn't have a policy of blocking no one. https://t.co/egKj9WPnfx ht
@Jeff_mc2 @unhealthytruth Ah, so you fall for that sort of garbage source. Ivermectin does not work for SARS-CoV-2. https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/sLyR0qQonV https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/zb4TidfQR1 https://t.co/ty49vjZitF https://t.co/u6Hz
@mentju4 @yoshkapundrick @MarionKoopmans You're the one who drew the link between credibility on HCQ/IVM + credibility on pandemic/outbreak origins. Not my fault it's now working against you. 🤷♂️ Your evidence-free paranoid reasoning is manifest in all
@yoshkapundrick @MarionKoopmans The same background that caused him to be wrong on ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, COVID-19 vaccines, etc. He's just an angry, non-expert conspiracy theorist. https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/OtzeJDDVWj https://t.co/n
@scotub @past_is_future @PEHJackson @bell00david @WashburneAlex As baselessly paranoid on pandemic/pathogen origins as you were on ivermectin. https://t.co/DBd8pJPP2y https://t.co/KD0yIdD1n4 https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/noqIYSHsow
RT @madfall1213: 虚実のはざま 読売新聞 https://t.co/WMjQfMOPWY The lesson of ivermectin meta-analyses based on summary data alone are inherently unre…
@CKellyUAP Ivermectin doesn't work, regardless of whether Oxford's Principle trial posts results. And it's like you're completely unaware of a decades-long history of many clinical trials not reporting results. It's not a conspiracy. https://t.co/173oqo
@NeAnOrScared @JR4_Truth @GeraldKutney Same account that was wrong on ivermectin. https://t.co/nX6Clq4fak https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/R7uBQWseSF
@TnAlistair @Samuel_Gregson @avghyperborean @Faceplants00 @thebadstats @BretWeinstein Re: "There are more meta-analyses published on ivrm that found stat sign effect than not" https://t.co/TgP9QCVeOi For posterity: Non-expert ivermectin lad was making stu
@TnAlistair @villagerssn @Debunk_the_Funk @SlangeVarDave @AlexBerenson ...says the non-expert ivermectin lad. https://t.co/t3UT2yRJrp https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/cZdDc2Tc4V
@Debunk_the_Funk @AlexBerenson Is non-expert ivermectin lad flapping his gums again? https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/EtTP5bPjWP
@AndyMLinn Now you're just making stuff up in bad faith with no cited evidence, just as you did on ivermectin. No amount of evidence is ever going to get through to a disingenuous conspiracy theorist like you. 🤷♂️ https://t.co/R8JzeiWLIY https://t.co/17
@AndyMLinn @past_is_future Same non-expert conspiracism that misled you on ivermectin also misleads you on lab leak. https://t.co/R8JzeiWLIY https://t.co/173oqole2m https://t.co/WiKh0Kg4uZ