@Debunk_the_Funk @AlexBerenson Is non-expert ivermectin lad flapping his gums again? https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/EtTP5bPjWP
@AndyMLinn Now you're just making stuff up in bad faith with no cited evidence, just as you did on ivermectin. No amount of evidence is ever going to get through to a disingenuous conspiracy theorist like you. 🤷♂️ https://t.co/R8JzeiWLIY https://t.co/17
@AndyMLinn @past_is_future Same non-expert conspiracism that misled you on ivermectin also misleads you on lab leak. https://t.co/R8JzeiWLIY https://t.co/173oqole2m https://t.co/WiKh0Kg4uZ
@joesanders33 @001B_Betty @Marco_Piani No one takes you seriously. You're just being used for lulz, and as an object lesson in dishonest denialism. You have no more ability to admit to what the evidence shows than a flat Earther does. https://t.co/FtI0tO
RT @JackMLawrence: I’ve been smiling all day but also at a loss for words. My first published academic article came out today and it’s in N…
@joesanders33 @PoeBrianL @plagueprose Oh, the vaccine denialist was also a non-expert ivermectin fan. How unsurprising. https://t.co/IVG6t95M5b Cochrane dealt with that: https://t.co/vQofadiEi4 https://t.co/FtI0tOZrOD https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.
@GidMK @AlbertUgh @TheSGEM @CaulfieldTim @ScienceUpFirst @SajjadFazel @KrishanaSankar @drkiki @RealDoctorMike @bunsenbernerbmd @StanKutcher @RyanMarino @cochranecollab Again, for posterity: Have the non-expert ivermectin fans been peddling another conferen
@AlastairMcA30 For posterity: Have the non-expert ivermectin fans posted about another conference abstract yet? https://t.co/lCBc22J5W8 https://t.co/173oqole2m https://t.co/NjMPRtgtuD https://t.co/88eW8XiOkG
@JamesMc18758088 @AprilHunter @nowoolovreyz @RachelNotley @elonmusk You're unlikely to get through to the non-expert ivermectin fans. They're a lost cause, deep in their conspiracism + denialism. https://t.co/173oqole2m https://t.co/1TA8sLCkOB https://t
@phillyharper @jsm2334 @dr_jon_l Also, non-expert conspiracists: Ivermectin doesn't work for SARS-CoV-2. https://t.co/pZb82UlTgx https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/kj6j6gHaQd
@Baskerville_13 @Ravarora1 @C_Kavanagh That's nice, non-expert ivermectin fan + conspiracist theorist. Informed non-paranoid adults are talking. 😉 https://t.co/rtTmSrQE0l https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/VCi2m2M3Ls
@Sijwill @Chris__Sage @R_H_Ebright I'm fine citing peer-reviewed published evidence from mainstream experts, instead of pretending I know better than them. Same thing I did on ivermectin, which is why I didn't screw up as utterly as you did. https://t.co
@Sijwill @Chris__Sage @R_H_Ebright Probably exactly how you were behaving when people told you wrong about ivermectin. So confident you knew better than experts on that, yet so wrong... https://t.co/173oqokGcO "currently the zoonosis hypothesis has the
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @Debunk_the_Funk @factbid Again, we're not dealing with sensible people here. They're driven by the same sort of evide…
@stuartjdneil For posterity: Ivermectin didn't work for SARS-CoV-2, despite many lab leak conspiracists + their ilk claiming otherwise. https://t.co/rjAq4sHbQJ https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/PuO8gemChm https://t.co/afwr5liTBE
@Debunk_the_Funk @factbid Again, we're not dealing with sensible people here. They're driven by the same sort of evidence-free denialist paranoia that led them into vaccine denialism, lab leak conspiracism, ivermectin fandom, etc. https://t.co/173oqokGcO
@Debunk_the_Funk @factbid You're not going to get through to him, as you likely know. He's a non-expert contrarian conspiracist with no idea how to evaluate published evidence. He just goes with whatever pre-determined narrative suits his paranoia biases
@APPCPenn Would be telling to see how many of them also accept vaccine denialism on COVID-19 vaccines, that hydroxychloroquine works, that SARS-CoV-2 leaked from a lab, etc. In other words, crank magnetism: https://t.co/cURfACSR3B https://t.co/173oqokGcO
@jamesheathers By the way, is this you? https://t.co/mkcw858Oi9 https://t.co/A7hr0o1ySh https://t.co/3qMso5qcgt Cc: @Jikkyleaks https://t.co/26VgI23bdI
@sasha_latypova @PodcastBill @GidMK Re: "Covid agent is likely a chemical poisoning substance (chemical weapon, possibly including synthetic bio-toxin features, could also have radiological features [...])." https://t.co/a4AhhgPULd 😑 Zelenko-esque https
@Sijwill @Chris__Sage @R_H_Ebright You mean your fellow non-expert contrarian who, as on ivermectin, had to catch up to where the experts were long before he was? Maybe read published papers from experts next time, instead of daft conspiracy theory blogs.
@Sijwill @SudarshanChate2 @chrischirp @TravellingTabby Re: "Ivermectin works against it." https://t.co/tbqEIyYOEu For posterity: No it didn't, anymore than lab leak conspiracists were right, as per crank magnetism. https://t.co/ufIywnXLIa https://t.co/xv
RT @tomo_hiko: @kenccha15601944 @alo3677 Niaee論文に対する批判です こんな論文、メタ解析に絶対含めるべきではない https://t.co/4PuKCqg7oP https://t.co/TGrtLO0XZ5
RT @madfall1213: 虚実のはざま 読売新聞 https://t.co/WMjQfMOPWY The lesson of ivermectin meta-analyses based on summary data alone are inherently unre…
虚実のはざま 読売新聞 https://t.co/WMjQfMOPWY The lesson of ivermectin meta-analyses based on summary data alone are inherently unreliable Nature Medicine https://t.co/EiOCjkFJIp Thinking false and slow Implausible beliefs and the Cognitive Reflection Test https://t
@kenccha15601944 @alo3677 Niaee論文に対する批判です こんな論文、メタ解析に絶対含めるべきではない https://t.co/4PuKCqg7oP https://t.co/TGrtLO0XZ5
@filipe_rafaeli @gtuckerkellogg @CureusInc Why are you still peddling that long-debunked disinformation website, instead of competently done meta-analyses? https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/sLyR0qQonV https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/zb4TidfQR1 ht
@trillionofcells @Sijwill @Chris__Sage @R_H_Ebright You + your fellow non-expert ivermectin lad and vaccine denialist can continue mumbling to each another in your paranoid conspiracy theories. https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/3D6Bw4Q7xc
@BarryESharp @shallit43 @gtuckerkellogg @CureusInc You're incapable of honest discussion. All you have is spamming conspiracism to evade published evidence that shows you're wrong (+ which you don't how to evaluate), while you show you don't grasp concept
@Sijwill @valdesignasid @Tigress21 @deNutrients @CensoredThinker Re: "So did they take it ?" https://t.co/ElPmxEAJoS You're hopeless, ivermectin lad. 🙄 https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/GotyBVlFxj https://t.co/cS1FVdYcKI
@Sijwill @Chris__Sage @R_H_Ebright Hello, non-expert conspiracist who peddles COVID-19 disinformation over + over again. "Ivermectin works against it." https://t.co/X2qvS6Ha63 https://t.co/xvyZIYnTP8 https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/4sMqhWlRPz
@marc_g_wathelet @ImmunoGangsta @Debunk_the_Funk @BretWeinstein I'm right about the two of you being wrong on ivermectin, just like so many of your fellow non-expert vaccine denialists were. Y'all just leap onto the bandwagon of whatever contrarian conspi
@ImmunoGangsta @Debunk_the_Funk @DopplerEffect93 @SaltaoVladimir @ENirenberg @weldeiry @DravenS17 @Jikkyleaks @gorskon And further confirmation that the Venn diagram of non-expert ivermectin fans + vaccine denialists is close to a circle. https://t.co/IVG
@JR4_Truth @Debunk_the_Funk @thereal_truther @Standup__Man @katwrappah @USMortality @JeromeAdamsMD @joshg99 You're still just making stuff up in bad faith, with no evidence. You're a disingenuous conspiracy theorist who pretends to know about science topi
@scotub @gtuckerkellogg Knee-jerk contrarianism + conspiracism is tedious, whether on ivermectin, a supposed lab leak, etc. https://t.co/DBd8pJPP2y https://t.co/KD0yIdD1n4 https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/AeY0IcX8dP
@gtuckerkellogg @AesBrah @PierreKory @Johnincarlisle @jordanbpeterson Their ideologically-motivated double standard is quite obvious. They'll cite a conference abstract on an observational study with a weak design, but willfully ignore an abstract of a me
@TxUnmask @Awithonelison @ChuckMastan @Bankersbonus1 @SwaledaleMutton @TheChiefNerd @TakeWeightOffMD Why do you peddle a meta-analysis containing fraudulent data + with an 'expression of concern'? https://t.co/173oqokGcO "Meta-analyses do not establish i
@gorskon @GrumpyOldDoc @tenebra99 @vpknerd @weldeiry @t1pnl So Makis us on the ivermectin grift as well. https://t.co/2lyhbDLaHC How unsurprising. https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/1TA8sLCkOB https://t.co/SeOtEkh0tI
@Debunk_the_Funk @real_seeking @weldeiry @gorskon @md_wallach @ImmunoGangsta @DravenS17 @Jikkyleaks @P_J_Buckhaults You're not going to get through to that troll, as you likely know. They're still pretending ivermectin works, for example. They're just a n
Are you connected? https://t.co/Gzewi08bSc
RT @tomo_hiko: ソウミヤことチームイベルメクチンや花木秀明が騒ぎ出してるこのNiaeeによる論文(私は未読)ですが、イベルメクチン狂騒曲を追ってきた皆様なら忘れない名前かと思います。 https://t.co/NYS0nX4IqQ https://t.co/QJ…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @GidMK Been over for awhile; it doesn't work https://t.co/w9sqhnLT8b https://t.co/rUvqCGeoVZ https://t.co/bQjXVirVUm h…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @filipe_rafaeli @sudokuvariante @gtuckerkellogg @CureusInc Still wasting people's time with a disinformation site like…
@BSCrusher1 @jason_willz1 @lawrie_dr Meta-analyses of higher-quality RCTs already established ivermectin failed for SARS-CoV-2. It's over. Stop making excuses to avoid that evidence-based reality. https://t.co/173oqole2m https://t.co/1TA8sLCkOB https://
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @vanstone_r71419 @BreezerGalway Poorly done ecological analysis that's trumped by higher-quality RCTs. If + when you'r…
@IsZomg @Nomoretrust8 @jonathanstea Here's a critique of IVM research generally. One of the authors has debunked many fraudulent studies. That website still lists some of them though. https://t.co/BYoj4RHRKC
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @vanstone_r71419 @BreezerGalway Poorly done ecological analysis that's trumped by higher-quality RCTs. If + when you'r…
@vanstone_r71419 @BreezerGalway Poorly done ecological analysis that's trumped by higher-quality RCTs. If + when you're further along in evaluating medical studies, they'll explain the evidence pyramid to you. https://t.co/OETAvWKmYD https://t.co/s0HefHH
@MattBro17643363 @Holy_Helicity @HitmanActual_ @jimiuorio @jimmyfallon This is an opinion piece. Why are you posting this and ignoring a double blind study published in the New England journal of Medicine? Have you considered meta analysis is largely bulls
@LiegerMarc48801 @rubritwitt @Dr_Steph_GAYET Et ça tombe bien car si on regarde ce que dit la littérature scientifique ça confirme bien que Gayet est à l’opposé. https://t.co/myXP8GkInx https://t.co/S3J6heM6Zn https://t.co/h7Z1hXtuxZ https://t.co/1Bmm5
@BobbyMiller202 @Dr_Francisco_ @GidMK 🫢 What are this week's lottery numbers? https://t.co/Jf8ngs6GpJ https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/RLOP8EZxnE
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @gtuckerkellogg Let Bryce Nickels do that. It helps illustrate the non-expert contrarian conspiracist mindset that und…
@gtuckerkellogg Let Bryce Nickels do that. It helps illustrate the non-expert contrarian conspiracist mindset that underlies much of both the lab leak nonsense + ivermectin fandom. Hence crank magnetism leading to many holding both positions. https://t.
@RobertM72103719 @Katie_Spence_ @TigerlillySusan @handmadekathy @NicoleSirotek Learn to cite credible scientific sources, contrarian, not whatever crackpot website feeds you the paranoid narratives you want to hear. https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/1
@filipe_rafaeli @sudokuvariante @gtuckerkellogg @CureusInc Still wasting people's time with a disinformation site like ivmmeta. 🙄 https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/sLyR0qQonV https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/zb4TidfQR1 https://t.co/ty49vjZitF http
@jason_willz1 @epimeme @dr_jon_l My goodness, non-expert ivermectin fans are still peddling myths about Peru. 🤦♂️ https://t.co/ihf5XLkZ7v https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/cvtgCJBLQs https://t.co/awlv7lbZSW
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @thereal_truther @Ravarora1 @19joho @JosephFraiman You might want to consider asking him about his claims on ivermectin…
@thereal_truther @Ravarora1 @19joho @JosephFraiman You might want to consider asking him about his claims on ivermectin + the grifters who peddled it. https://t.co/65IHDC28H1 https://t.co/wF3Ba3jyxk https://t.co/IKoitWqk8d https://t.co/173oqokGcO https:/
@XSuperNatural1 @alexandrosM This isn't at all reliable and contradicts every other meta-analysis of ivermectin for covid. 🙄 https://t.co/seR5FhvE3p
@thebadstats @BretWeinstein And ivermectin didn't work, of course. https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/1TA8sLCkOB https://t.co/XIE273C6m3
@Goldspiracy @WaitingForPerot @DrSusanOliver1 Nope, and no amount JAQing off will make it so. https://t.co/173oqokGcO
RT @sudokuvariante: This article by Lawrence et al. published in @NatureMedicine is a total non-sense and should be retracted ASAP. https:/…
RT @sudokuvariante: This article by Lawrence et al. published in @NatureMedicine is a total non-sense and should be retracted ASAP. https:/…
This article by Lawrence et al. published in @NatureMedicine is a total non-sense and should be retracted ASAP. https://t.co/FarvDI6JKR 1/n
@TUFF_Movie @MyMindFull BTW, the word is germane. https://t.co/Q51jY9DlIO
@RoxanneHoge @eekymom @19joho @brownstoneinst @MartinKulldorff @CDCgov "We all used a variety of treatments including HcQ, Ivermectin & Z pack." https://t.co/vBjaXYMnsL Telling that non-expert vaccine denialists often instead opt for failed treatments
@alexandrosM @AlexBerenson Not A Hill https://t.co/iWBGU5EdUv
@LarryBoorstein @GYamey @DavidQuammen In response, more baseless conspiracism from the same non-expert contrarians that got other topics like ivermectin wrong. "Sorry incorrect Ivermectin has protective preventative properties also." https://t.co/2GL08DKD
RT @AtomsksSanakan: 5/ Re: "who abuses experts' private messages / emails from *before* they examine much evidence, to evade + be paranoid…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @RisingTheHill Good illustration of what's said about Hill Rising: Credulous non-expert reporting with no fact-checkin…
@joshlbrooks @Samuel_Gregson It's because they don't do their homework on published evidence, and have no honest interest in doing so because that's not what their target audience (contrarians/conspiracists). Same pattern occurred on lab leak + other topi
@RisingTheHill Good illustration of what's said about Hill Rising: Credulous non-expert reporting with no fact-checking, meant to make money off a gullible contrarian/conspiracist audience. Example: weak pushback on RFK Jr.'s ivermectin tripe https://t.
@smilodonbhz @RoniKurono @filipe_rafaeli Aqui, espertão: https://t.co/0KU9t9JIrO
@filipe_rafaeli @RoniKurono @smilodonbhz Fingiu que não viu ou não entendeu? https://t.co/0KU9t9JIrO
@filipe_rafaeli @camilo_aggio @smilodonbhz Cara, isso aí já foi desmontado desde 2021. Meta-análises baseadas em dados resumidos. Já foi demonstrado que isso não é confiável: https://t.co/06vSZFmYqC
RT @BreezerGalway: Missed this: 'Since the above primary studies were published, many hundreds of thousands of patients7 have been dosed w…
@filipe_rafaeli @camilo_aggio @smilodonbhz Cara, isso aí já foi desmontado desde 2021. Meta-análises baseadas em dados resumidos. Já foi demonstrado que isso não é confiável: https://t.co/HP01isRJYQ
RT @BreezerGalway: Missed this: 'Since the above primary studies were published, many hundreds of thousands of patients7 have been dosed w…
RT @BreezerGalway: Missed this: 'Since the above primary studies were published, many hundreds of thousands of patients7 have been dosed w…
Missed this: 'Since the above primary studies were published, many hundreds of thousands of patients7 have been dosed with ivermectin, relying on an evidence base that has substantially evaporated under close scrutiny' https://t.co/0aVCmlaCrV
@marc_g_wathelet @K_G_Andersen Cool story, bro. Published evidence shows what it shows, no matter how much you pretend otherwise by citing a garbage blog like ivmmeta. Same point for when a flat Earther cites an anonymous, non-peer-reviewed flat Earther b
@berniescoffer @jonathanstea Subsequent research failed to confirm the utility of ivermectin for COVID-19, and in 2021 it emerged that many of the studies demonstrating benefit were faulty, misleading, or fraudulent. https://t.co/WhpGJXo4pa
@Medical_Nemesis @AngryCardio If I wanted an echo chamber, I wouldn't be on Twitter dealing with willfully uninformed folks like you 🙂 Your problem is you deal in vague ideological platitudes, not evidence. Dealing in evidence reflects in one's audience.
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @TigerlillySusan @__anoop__ @ChrisJohnsonMD @RobertKennedyJr Exactly. Changing one's mind in response to evidence, whic…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @TigerlillySusan @__anoop__ @ChrisJohnsonMD @RobertKennedyJr Exactly. Changing one's mind in response to evidence, whic…
@TigerlillySusan @__anoop__ @ChrisJohnsonMD @RobertKennedyJr Exactly. Changing one's mind in response to evidence, which is what they're refusing to do. It's why Pierre Kory's claims of being an "expert" on ivermectin mean nothing in the face of the abund
RT @AtomsksSanakan: PaperOfTheDay https://t.co/rjAq4sHbQJ https://t.co/JNmXdZDiF4 https://t.co/173oqokGcO "Quality of clinical evidence a…