@AndrewW48661354 @JackPosobiec @DrSusanOliver1 @gtuckerkellogg @K_Sheldrick When one controls for confounders like socioeconomic status (ex: in randomized controlled trials), ivermectin fails. Hence why the NIH's panel recommends against ivermectin. You c
@AllinAkhbar @AlastairMcA30 @jakeshieldsajj Re: "There are loads of studies showing ivm works against COVID now." Nope. Meta-analyses of higher-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) show it failed. https://t.co/pQ2sypff96 https://t.co/OZsN0AmIwe
@JackPosobiec @DrSusanOliver1 @gtuckerkellogg @K_Sheldrick So their retrospective cohort study (which they falsely say is prospective) is riddled with confounding, lower-quality, and does not rebut the meta-analyses of higher-quality RCTs. https://t.co/pQ
@DixieWr62945896 @Basilsalty @DrCarolJasper @ianwilson48 Correct about what? https://t.co/pQ2sypff96 "Toxic Effects from Ivermectin Use Associated with Prevention and Treatment of Covid-19" https://t.co/mVWcmX6k9e https://t.co/eLRKw0mULX
RT @EARL_COVID19_tw: イベルメクチンが新型コロナウイルスに有効との結果を示したNiaeeらのRCTに疑義がかかり,生データ提出を求めたが執筆者が拒否.(Nat Med 2021, Sep22) https://t.co/Kx14EXaKRI ポジティブ結果…
@alexandrosM Here it is. https://t.co/jXp55BXj8G
@Essexgooner2 @ScipioShim There have been a whole host of problems with the IVM trials and subsequent claims resulting from them. Research has been retracted, efficacy of IVM for Covid is not proven👇 https://t.co/ZXdxVVZKls https://t.co/KucdgaCgFa http
@dude_relaxed @fasiapeters Again, all of your tone trolling, red herrings, appeals to an unverified personal anecdote, etc. do nothing to change the fact that ivermectin does not work, as confirmed by meta-analyses of higher-quality RCTs. Deal with it. 🤷
@DonaldWelsh16 @BogochIsaac Sample size is not an excuse, given what's been shown in meta-analyses of higher-quality RCTs. Ivermectin failed. Just accept that evidence-based fact, instead of inventing excuses to the contrary. https://t.co/pQ2sypff96
@PierreKory Re: "first S. Africa then Zimbabwe [...]" 🤦♂️ https://t.co/cqpp8lxh9h https://t.co/zSddM7BHDP Ivermectin then failed in meta-analyses of higher-quality randomized controlled trials: https://t.co/YvIsWlHc4b So... Medicines Control Authorit
@rikimiku @7mdphd @BLCTZwGRhMVi38B イベルメクチンの輝かしい歴史 2 イベルメクチンを有効と報告した研究で,『捏造の兆候や研究を無効とする重大な誤り』がないものは一つもない,と報告されてしまう🥹 https://t.co/8Nuhf6fKAe https://t.co/Xy9vpTotkD
@Jbrdm1 @GidMK Yet when *competent* experts stratify RCTs by study quality (i.e. risk of bias assessment, as per PRISMA guidelines), they don't get the results of the non-expert disinformation website ivmmeta. https://t.co/fY2wEyBa0w https://t.co/YvIsWlH
@LisaGlacken @ReesyBird @goodfoodgal And she was right; they don't work. https://t.co/YvIsWlHc4b "We found that treatment with hydroxychloroquine is associated with increased mortality in COVID-19 patients" https://t.co/SAfMyd7Nxi https://t.co/lgDZIyaa7
@ioainpc11 @GidMK @Covid19Critical @PierreKory Your unverified case anecdote is not persuasive. I could claim someone drank water (or took some other placebo) and got well within a few days. Doesn't mean the water worked. https://t.co/YvIsWlHc4b https://
@nickmmark @AviBittMD @BlockedByVinay It's also just a copy-and-paste of the same position he had 11 months ago. Prasad said RCTs are needed, without mentioning that RCTs were done nor what their results were. https://t.co/YvIsWlHc4b https://t.co/RWbJSx
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @BreezerGalway @TheTruthFairy16 @beverleyturner Probably not the best thread to cite on IVM, since it's less on the evi…
@BreezerGalway @TheTruthFairy16 @beverleyturner Probably not the best thread to cite on IVM, since it's less on the evidence of it not working and more about debunking whining about "horse dewormer" language. This tweet would probably be more useful: htt
RT @kaceysharon: The lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses based on summary data alone are inherently unreliable https://t.co/GjibKl0C4j http…
@Chino780 @jason_willz1 @thehowie @notdred @BlockedByVinay Again, aging like spoiled milk: "We have the same for ivermectin with thousands of people treated successfully with it, as well and India using throughout the country & being successful." https
@FinkelsteinsKid U still mad, bro? https://t.co/YvIsWlHc4b "Ivermectin is not approved for use in COVID-19 in Australia or in other developed countries, and its use by the general public for COVID-19 is currently strongly discouraged" https://t.co/NK6JkY
@JohnRee58027351 @Katty_Kissem @John17003195 @eliowa Again, your source contained fraudulent / retracted work, resulting in its journal placing an 'expression of concern' on it. You messed up badly on this one. https://t.co/YvIsWlHc4b https://t.co/CviHu
@turpinator929 @ClevMan3 @leonxchibi @Eskareon @BarstoolZ @joerogan @YouTube Re: "that's a big oof for the anti-science/anti-ivermectin crowd" Time for you to reflect on why you were so wrong on this topic. https://t.co/YvIsWlHc4b https://t.co/1TA8sLCkO
@ptcjoneses @Mrtraveler02 @badvaers Re: "If the information was readily available you’d know IVM is effective when used early onset." You've been deceiving people on this for quite some time, like you still do on COVID-19 vaccines. https://t.co/YvIsWlHc4
RT @RayTaylorUK: @khoonseok No - to high attack rate and restrictions: Latest on ivermectin efficacy: https://t.co/1nZkbIQkp7 https://t.co…
@Maestermagoo @WestsydeServer @janeqiuchina @ScienceMagazine @NatGeo Given how poorly you've done when you dispute what informed experts say on a subject, no sensible person should take what you say seriously. https://t.co/8xVP6ZF07F https://t.co/LBSsVAj
@PhillyPharmaBoy @real_seeking @JLangWood @drsimonegold Ivermectin has been an abject failure for COVID-19, no matter what's claimed by the cult that grifters like Kory surrounded themselves with. https://t.co/IY8YDYw8qM https://t.co/YvIsWlHc4b https://t.
@RyanAarons24 @Dave_Calls_BS @kentskinner @DanTheBum @hansel21_ @HiimMe27 @Mattmatti5 @AlBowers1 @arad510 @IslayOfMonroe @DrJamesOlsson @GVDBossche Oh no, the non-expert ivermectin fans are trolling again. Are they still citing fraudulent + retracted data
RT @Love_Kindness_2: @KathleenMFoley2 Hmm you mean this paper that was pulled for misinformation https://t.co/B3HtzGtQQf
@GeorgeSteer13 Hmmm and what about this: https://t.co/B3HtzGtQQf
@KathleenMFoley2 Hmm you mean this paper that was pulled for misinformation https://t.co/B3HtzGtQQf
@slabbb77 @ukcatstripey @nicolas62574020 Nope, not good enough at all. https://t.co/gknqe29gtN
@ParentiSoundSys @littlequackling @AusThinkingGirl @PhillyPharmaBoy @ComradeDoom1 @AlexBerenson @alexandrosM Don't you have some evidence to bravely run from like a vampire fleeing garlic, deceitful denialist? 🙂 https://t.co/YvIsWlHc4b
@12MamaBear17 @TypeACommentary @rf121rf @KrazyCanuckEh @NPR There is no “overwhelming” evidence ivermectin works again Covid and the hospital has taken the right position against a harmful treatment https://t.co/B3HtzGtQQf
@ParentiSoundSys @PhillyPharmaBoy @littlequackling @ComradeDoom1 @martgarrison @AlexBerenson @alexandrosM Re: "ultimately these kinds of questions have to be answered in clinical trials" It failed already in higher-quality clinical trials. You've been sh
@ParentiSoundSys @littlequackling @ComradeDoom1 @martgarrison @AlexBerenson @alexandrosM Your dishonesty is noted, and expected of non-expert ivermectin fans who are also conspiracy theorists. What I actually said was ivermectin doesn't work due o publish
@ParentiSoundSys @littlequackling @ComradeDoom1 @martgarrison @AlexBerenson @alexandrosM Not concerning since plenty of other studies showed HCQ didn't work, jus like plenty of studies showed ivermectin doesn't work. Your paranoia about mainstream institu
@Dave_Calls_BS @LibertarianRep3 You may have been trying to link this: https://t.co/YvIsWlHc4b
RT @GidMK: @dr4liberty @gorskon @GYamey @reason Or our review of the ivermectin fraud and malfeasance, published recently in Nature Medicin…
RT @GidMK: @dr4liberty @gorskon @GYamey @reason Or our review of the ivermectin fraud and malfeasance, published recently in Nature Medicin…
@Silje_Schevig @rn_abrahamsen @CiViX Dette finner du også i kommentaren om uetisk forskning. Når en stor egyptisk preprint ble trukket pga. plagiat, interessekonflikt og fusk med data, viser altså Bryant et al ingen effekt. Artig gjennongang av artikkel
@exalteduterus @nickmmark @jimmy_dore Re: "Don't bother with Nick" Why? He's rebutting the false claim that ivermectin is effective. In contrast, Dore peddled that false claim + then lied about having done so when he was corrected on said claim. from 11:
@SadWithoutGuilt @nickmmark @BillyCarruther3 @mark_melbin @SkyNewsAust @Leo_Puglisi6 @jimmy_dore @mtaibbi @ggreenwald @joerogan @maddow You then said: "the evidence for efectiveness and drug repurpose - which there is some" https://t.co/wHRXTujscW I point
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @jimmy_dore @sonoftom2 @EyesOnTheEmpire @nickmmark Your fabrications on this topic are well-known. For example, from 1…
@molsjames @JReinerMD @PeterHotez @EricTopol @JonathanSarfat1 @TigerlillySusan In this conversation the data shows ivermectin produces results consistent with a drug that does not work for SARS-CoV-2, unlike vaccines, etc. https://t.co/bQjXVirVUm https:/
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @jimmy_dore @sonoftom2 @EyesOnTheEmpire @nickmmark Your fabrications on this topic are well-known. For example, from 1…
@jimmy_dore @sonoftom2 @EyesOnTheEmpire @nickmmark Your fabrications on this topic are well-known. For example, from 11:39 - 15:15 : https://t.co/PBaikJGZw9 https://t.co/xTNcdvr0Ca https://t.co/EqLU536TZs
@nickmmark @BillyCarruther3 @mark_melbin @SkyNewsAust @Leo_Puglisi6 @jimmy_dore @mtaibbi @ggreenwald @joerogan @maddow For Dore's gullible fans: Ivermectin produces results consistent with a drug that does not work for SARS-CoV-2, unlike vaccines, dexamet
@ConstantRebel55 @molsjames @JReinerMD @PeterHotez @EricTopol Yup. Ivermectin produces results consistent with a drug that does not work for SARS-CoV-2, unlike vaccines, dexamethasone, etc. https://t.co/bQjXVirVUm https://t.co/cBbvpvnGGO [https://t.co/S
@RobertFritzenk1 @TaoOfCats @real_seeking @NPR Try a credible source. Ivermectin produces results consistent with a drug that does not work for SARS-CoV-2, unlike vaccines, dexamethasone, etc. https://t.co/bQjXVirVUm https://t.co/cBbvpvnGGO [https://t.c
@Ludwig54561193 @sebast_ivan @jstone1029 @brianstelter @Neilyoung Re: "3) ivermectin and monoclonal antibodies help. Lie?" Ivermectin doesn't help. And Rogan deleted his tweet that insinuated otherwise. https://t.co/bpIwPZi0fb https://t.co/WZjoWUl8pL ht
@Ludwig54561193 @mrudolph22 @ImplicitNorm @RpsAgainstTrump You realize ivermectin doesn't help with COVID-19 while vaccines do, right? https://t.co/5SxWfiCdfr https://t.co/P3VCeKma9n https://t.co/syg5ED3Z0h
@ImplicitNorm @real_seeking @mrudolph22 @RpsAgainstTrump Re: "You won’t say why you are wrong that it is dangerous." What I actually said is in the tweet below. So I suggest you stop making stuff up, @ImplicitNorm. Try actually being honest. https://t.c
@CulinaryOasis79 @real_seeking @SJ_18757 @SEH20203 @MollyBoHa @juliastmi Not interested in the unreliable tripe you posted. https://t.co/Cfd9QpUipg https://t.co/sLyR0qQonV https://t.co/lbWbz3MnWQ
@CulinaryOasis79 @real_seeking @SJ_18757 @SEH20203 @MollyBoHa @juliastmi Dumb memes aren't evidence either, denialist. 🙂 https://t.co/Cfd9QpUipg
@CulinaryOasis79 @real_seeking @SJ_18757 @SEH20203 @MollyBoHa @juliastmi Press pieces aren't evidence, troll. 🙂 Ivermectin produces results consistent with a drug that does not work for SARS-CoV-2, unlike vaccines, etc. https://t.co/bQjXVirVUm https://t
@real_seeking @mrudolph22 @ImplicitNorm @RpsAgainstTrump False. The data shows ivermectin produces results consistent with a drug that does not work for SARS-CoV-2, unlike vaccines, dexamethasone, etc. https://t.co/bQjXVirVUm https://t.co/cBbvpvnGGO [ht
@real_seeking @Gabeperkins9 @Grip75001 @ChrisPBacon470 @MNSKOLMAMA @chantz_y Re: "provided doctors observe a benefit" They don't observe a benefit, so it's recommended against. Off-label use is not about using a medication for an indication we know it doe
@mtntallpaul @JoshW65280673 @BingoMontoya @BlueLinePhilly @MurrayChadwick2 @Briansa79884138 @lukebroadwater @alanfeuer Scabies, head lice, etc. are not SARS-CoV-2. Ivermectin produces results consistent with a drug that does not work for SARS-CoV-2, unlik
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @real_seeking @FillmoreWhite @opedaily @plenalibertad2 @Coyotl2021 @more_unicorns_g The burden of evidence is on you si…
@real_seeking @FillmoreWhite @opedaily @plenalibertad2 @Coyotl2021 @more_unicorns_g The burden of evidence is on you since ivermectin produces results consistent with a drug that does not work for SARS-CoV-2, unlike vaccines, etc. https://t.co/bQjXViJwLU
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @thebadstats @PhilippMarkolin Re: "I'll tell you what, have me on the podcast and we can talk about some of the Covid a…