#ivermectin ... mijn paard is weer blij. https://t.co/Rd6UBRQv22
RT @deevybee: See also this! https://t.co/cb3hzHuqZQ
See also this! https://t.co/cb3hzHuqZQ
@JenniG65103034 @miikka_korhonen @jaana_miettinen @jancdu Höpön höpö. Ivermektiinitutkimukset on todettu pitemmän päälle epäluotettaviksi. Jos se toimisi, niin se olisi lottovoitto valmistajalle, joka voisi kymmenkertaistaa hinnan ja tienata miljardeja. Ei
@ArmendarizDis16 @tertbutle You can’t even spell it, let alone realize it doesn’t treat Covid. How sad. https://t.co/Tysn5hCZtx
RT @mackinprof: @HonorUkb Vitamin D - does nothing https://t.co/0mD9aEtWeg https://t.co/wm4TNnkmuk - follow this, living review (continuous…
RT @madfall1213: Ivermectin Didn’t Save Japan From Covid-19 by @GidMK https://t.co/UQWv248RUR イベルメクチンの教訓 The lesson of ivermectin: meta-an…
RT @madfall1213: The lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses based on summary data alone are inherently unreliable | Nature Medicine https://t.…
@HonorUkb Vitamin D - does nothing https://t.co/0mD9aEtWeg https://t.co/wm4TNnkmuk - follow this, living review (continuously updated) Ivermectin - also no evidence https://t.co/51ISCxrQXM https://t.co/B1RFwLwDUK https://t.co/EvMRZa81ZS
RT @TheSecretSarah: “The lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses based on summary data alone are inherently unreliable” Datasets should be ope…
RT @TheSecretSarah: “The lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses based on summary data alone are inherently unreliable” Datasets should be ope…
RT @TheSecretSarah: “The lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses based on summary data alone are inherently unreliable” Datasets should be ope…
RT @TheSecretSarah: “The lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses based on summary data alone are inherently unreliable” Datasets should be ope…
RT @TheSecretSarah: “The lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses based on summary data alone are inherently unreliable” Datasets should be ope…
“The lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses based on summary data alone are inherently unreliable” Datasets should be open to reasonable request for participant level interrogation. Some researchers send data, others ignore. It’s better open & collaborat
@garrr_scallywag @Simonofthe77th @ErnstingMarkus @PierreKory The problem with meta studies is that they rely on studies off which the quality is metaed away ... https://t.co/jO56f1oU51 https://t.co/OxXsBH0oXV
@carolwales @MythinformedMKE @TheRightMelissa This is somebody's blog, LOL https://t.co/4AqaGFRpgG
@IceMonk Ivermectin doesn't work and harmed people The "science" supporting its used is flawed if not dishonest https://t.co/PfVSUUW6d3
@Mereditella @liliaragnar È pieno. Da qui ci sono link https://t.co/HMKmFABehC
RT @JackMLawrence: I’ve been smiling all day but also at a loss for words. My first published academic article came out today and it’s in N…
@PettDanFTW @MilesD71 Ivermectin-studierna ligger inte till grund för WHO eller de flesta länders rekommendationer eftersom det är dåligt utförda. Ivermectin är inte evidensbaserad behandling. https://t.co/pwAngmpVfU
@dfi_playah @FuruKyouka @blackintheempir "...purported timelines that are not consistent with the veracity of the data collection, and substantial methodological weaknesses. We expect further studies supporting ivermectin to be withdrawn over the coming mo
@dfi_playah @FuruKyouka @blackintheempir "The authors of one recently published meta-analysis of ivermectin for COVID-193 have publicly stated that they will now reanalyze and republish their now-retracted meta-analysis and will no longer include either of
@johnmchanning @PeterHotez This "meta-analysis" incl various fraudulent studies that have been retracted/in the process thereof - eg: Elgazzar paper. You can't incl fraudulent papers in a meta-analysis or you compound bias & fraud. https://t.co/FjHg6rg
@JujuIsBackAgain @Fraslin - Nature Medicine,👇 https://t.co/5JkzAhaIl4 - Nature News,👇 https://t.co/yExsJ9tYbY - Brititish Medical Journal evidence-based medicine,👇 https://t.co/B3U07W5MFx
Flaws in ivermectin data suggest COVID-19 meta-analyses need rethinking https://t.co/s3IvYfvVbv https://t.co/z7KDR1vD04 https://t.co/AaTy57HGeY
@12tonevideos @MattWhitmanTMBH Here is the link to that https://t.co/40M8ZICjVT
@BZBSmith @StevePhillipsMD because they have just about all been retracted so far .. this could have been inferred from my previous statement. Nature even wrote an article about it https://t.co/YiefeHCVsw
@Lcmb777777 @GuidoGKrieger @oatila Vc acredita em tudo q te dizem? Desiste e admite q vc caiu em fake news e nem viu o artigo do cara. Quem sabe vc aprende e não cai mais. https://t.co/mPjqQXmXgu https://t.co/mPjqQXmXgu https://t.co/MCyXiOj4qa
@NecallRewsom @ApostatePod @TimespaceC The lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses based on summary data alone are inherently unreliable “Relying on low-quality or questionable studies in the current global climate presents severe and immediate harms” https:
@voice_hard @BreezerGalway @MdBreathe Re: "Still waiting" You're not waiting. You're just pretending. No matter what you shown you'll just willfully ignore it, because you're a paranoid + dishonest non-expert committed to defending ivermectin no matter wh
@voice_hard @BreezerGalway @MdBreathe Your paranoid ranting does not change the fact that you're relying on a long-debunked article (Bryant et al.) that's known to rely on fraudulent research like Elgazzar, Raad, and Niaee. https://t.co/UMD60APd8R https:
@voice_hard @BreezerGalway @MdBreathe Re: "2 out of all the studies in that paper." And you're still being dishonest. You were told *at least 2,* which you pretend means just 2. For example, Niaee is also fraudulent. What's wrong with you? Why can't you
@ArtsenC @pvdg65 @nhgnieuws De werking van ivermectine is een fabel! Lees dit maar eens: https://t.co/m0Ue1vrb4Q (en de wetenschappelijke artikelen onderaan)
@GCSCS_RuG The "certainty" of the evidence in this website contrasts with other sources: https://t.co/ZOrNzRx0JT and https://t.co/ViNm001orC
@jclavien @DGueissaz @RTSinfo @raoult_didier Quant aux fameuses études sur le sujet qui démontreraient une efficacité de l'Ivermectine, vous devriez lire cet article : https://t.co/vviNS9LubG
@GidMK Re: "A remarkable work of academic integrity - Dr. Andrew Hill and colleagues have redone their meta-analysis" The revised version is now published. https://t.co/UMD60APd8R https://t.co/oZAscfjaU8 https://t.co/XEesDvQ3JH
@MarkDavidsonAfr @RomanCabanac Then you have the "concerned epidemiologists and researchers" paper, which happens to be lead by a "student" Jack Lawrence being relied on as central dogma https://t.co/6dv4qg65ES. You haven't disproved Ivermectin's modality
SGUL等英米豪研究者がNatMedに書簡。#イベルメクチン の #COVID19 効果研究のカオスは、#メタアナリシス 手法の欠陥の証明。でたらめなRCTも入れ込んでしまう。..this situation requires immediate remediation、#IPDベースメタアナリシス だけを許容を、と。 https://t.co/57nTrXy9A2
RT @AtomsksSanakan: Ivermectin's supposed mortality benefit for COVID-19 hinges on 1 likely fraudulent study: Niaee et al. https://t.co/rH…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: Ivermectin's supposed mortality benefit for COVID-19 hinges on 1 likely fraudulent study: Niaee et al. https://t.co/rH…
https://t.co/JumhIkGBRS Recordemos que las revistas científicas han sido absorbidos por los más ricos del mundo y también hay línea. La ciencia es como un cuchillo de dos filos puede ser usado para el bien o para el mal históricamente ha sido así.
@AleMagno88 @juansmithalvar1 @GiacoDiego La ivermectina es humo. https://t.co/I2RhtZT5Ge
@ccdeman @mirjambikker @keesvdstaaij @2eKamertweets De werking van ivermectine is een fabel! Lees dit maar eens: https://t.co/m0Ue1vrb4Q (en de wetenschappelijke artikelen onderaan)
@jaaprog1 @DissidentNl De werking van ivermectine is een fabel! Lees dit maar eens: https://t.co/m0Ue1vrb4Q (en de wetenschappelijke artikelen onderaan)
@sineadggleeson @BebopPrime @w_merriman here’s a link to Nature, which talks about not only the Bryant Meta Analysis but other Meta Analyses and how they are fraught becuase they are dependent upon porrly conducted or fraudulent studies: https://t.co/RBsuk
@svsTV De werking van ivermectine is een fabel! Lees dit maar eens: https://t.co/m0Ue1vrb4Q (en de wetenschappelijke artikelen onderaan)
@svsTV De werking van ivermectine is een fabel! Lees dit maar eens: https://t.co/m0Ue1vrb4Q (en de wetenschappelijke artikelen onderaan)
@gmeeus2 Already said you don't get to rely on fraudulent work like Elgazzar + Niaee. And you willfully ignoring confidence intervals is noted. https://t.co/rHugBC8ySG https://t.co/hagRbf4yed https://t.co/SjTloS3hgu https://t.co/XIUXTnAUid https://t.co
RT @cowblue_z4: @replys17 @makkoukuzira @ises56 @hanakihideaki それです。いくつかの不正な論文、データにより、引き起こされた問題が私の先ほどから上げているnatureの論文の主旨であり、タイトルにもなっています。 こ…
RT @cowblue_z4: @replys17 @makkoukuzira @ises56 @hanakihideaki それです。いくつかの不正な論文、データにより、引き起こされた問題が私の先ほどから上げているnatureの論文の主旨であり、タイトルにもなっています。 こ…
RT @cowblue_z4: @replys17 @makkoukuzira @ises56 @hanakihideaki 捏造論文が1つとは言っていません。誤読しないでくださいね。 上記でも挙げましたが、指摘いただいた問題についてはこちらを一読されれば良いかと思います。…
RT @cowblue_z4: @replys17 @makkoukuzira @ises56 @hanakihideaki 捏造があったのです。その結果 >Since the above primary studies were published, many hundre…
@replys17 @makkoukuzira @ises56 @hanakihideaki それです。いくつかの不正な論文、データにより、引き起こされた問題が私の先ほどから上げているnatureの論文の主旨であり、タイトルにもなっています。 これは別にイベルメクチンに限った話では無く、今後の薬剤臨床研究において知っておくべきことでしょう。 https://t.co/CsNKFylXAy
@replys17 @makkoukuzira @ises56 @hanakihideaki 捏造論文が1つとは言っていません。誤読しないでくださいね。 上記でも挙げましたが、指摘いただいた問題についてはこちらを一読されれば良いかと思います。 https://t.co/CsNKFylXAy
@replys17 @makkoukuzira @ises56 @hanakihideaki 捏造があったのです。その結果 >Since the above primary studies were published, many hundreds of thousands of patients7 have been dosed with ivermectin, relying on an evidence base that has substantially evaporated under
@gmeeus2 @GidMK Good job, Twitter. 🙂 https://t.co/UMD60APd8R https://t.co/YJB14mPVFX
@svsTV De werking van ivermectine is een fabel! Lees dit maar eens: https://t.co/m0Ue1vrb4Q (en de wetenschappelijke artikelen onderaan)
@boulware_dr To be clear: *I'm* claiming it's likely fraudulent based on evidence provided by other people. I don't want to put my words into their mouths. https://t.co/hagRbf4yed https://t.co/SjTloS3hgu https://t.co/b6CYktLnvI https://t.co/rHugBC8ySG
RT @AtomsksSanakan: Ivermectin's supposed mortality benefit for COVID-19 hinges on 1 likely fraudulent study: Niaee et al. https://t.co/rH…
Ivermectin's supposed mortality benefit for COVID-19 hinges on 1 likely fraudulent study: Niaee et al. https://t.co/rHugBC8ySG https://t.co/wbFX4257Fi https://t.co/hagRbf4yed https://t.co/SjTloS3hgu https://t.co/Xp4O6XqRPH https://t.co/a2nQq60n0v https
@svsTV De werking van ivermectine is een fabel! Lees dit maar eens: https://t.co/m0Ue1vrb4Q (en de wetenschappelijke artikelen onderaan)
>This research has created undue confidence in the use of ivermectin as a prophylactic or treatment for COVID-19, has usurped other research agendas, and probably resulted in inappropriate treatment or substandard care of patients. https://t.co/CsNKFy3
RT @cowblue_z4: Natureからです。 題名は和訳すれば イベルメクチンが教えてくれたこと になりますでしょうか。 https://t.co/CsNKFy3Omq https://t.co/cm06ZFzPnG
Natureからです。 題名は和訳すれば イベルメクチンが教えてくれたこと になりますでしょうか。 https://t.co/CsNKFy3Omq
@svsTV De werking van ivermectine is een fabel! Lees dit maar eens: https://t.co/m0Ue1vrb4Q (en de wetenschappelijke artikelen onderaan)
RT @madfall1213: Ivermectin Didn’t Save Japan From Covid-19 by @GidMK https://t.co/UQWv248RUR イベルメクチンの教訓 The lesson of ivermectin: meta-an…
RT @madfall1213: イベルメクチン、 誤った科学が生んだ新型ウイルス「特効薬」 BBCニュース 2021.10.9 https://t.co/nmm37MaerZ イベルメクチンの教訓 The lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses…
RT @madfall1213: The lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses based on summary data alone are inherently unreliable | Nature Medicine https://t.…
Ivermectin Didn’t Save Japan From Covid-19 by @GidMK https://t.co/UQWv248RUR イベルメクチンの教訓 The lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses based on summary data alone are inherently unreliable | Nature Medicine https://t.co/EiOCjkGhxX
@jordimartifont_ @CGTCatalunya @CGTReus @Deixadeserilla @CUPTarragona @casalcarrasclet @AteneuA @embatOLC @CasalDPF @la_Sageta La lliçó de la ivermectina: les metanàlisis basades únicament en dades resumides són intrínsecament poc fiables: https://t.co/8
@svsTV De werking van ivermectine is een fabel! Lees dit maar eens: https://t.co/m0Ue1vrb4Q (en de wetenschappelijke artikelen onderaan)
@amcelha3 @EadmundHodgson @MoonshineDlight @Leavitt180 @bigskycowboy1 @mtgreenee PMC, is where you posted from. PMC is pubmed. 🙄Notice the website I highlighted in the screenshot. Same as yours. Also, here's a peer review on meta analysis from your articl
@svsTV De werking van ivermectine is een fabel! Lees dit maar eens: https://t.co/m0Ue1vrb4Q (en de wetenschappelijke artikelen onderaan)
@svsTV De werking van ivermectine is een fabel! Lees dit maar eens: https://t.co/m0Ue1vrb4Q (en de wetenschappelijke artikelen onderaan)
@svsTV De werking van ivermectine is een fabel! Lees dit maar eens: https://t.co/m0Ue1vrb4Q (en de wetenschappelijke artikelen onderaan)
>We expect further studies supporting ivermectin to be withdrawn over the coming months. イベルメクチンをサポートする研究は今後数ヶ月で撤回されると予想します。 https://t.co/CsNKFy3Omq