@svsTV De werking van ivermectine is een fabel! Lees dit maar eens: https://t.co/m0Ue1vrb4Q (en de wetenschappelijke artikelen onderaan)
@svsTV De werking van ivermectine is een fabel! Lees dit maar eens: https://t.co/m0Ue1vrb4Q (en de wetenschappelijke artikelen onderaan)
@svsTV De werking van ivermectine is een fabel! Lees dit maar eens: https://t.co/m0Ue1vrb4Q (en eronder de wetenschappelijke artikel)
@Pitrapranam @svsTV De werking van ivermectine is een fabel! Lees dit maar eens: https://t.co/m0Ue1vrb4Q
@svsTV @bousjack @fonslambie De werking van ivermectine is een fabel! Lees dit maar eens: https://t.co/m0Ue1vrb4Q
@bousjack @svsTV @fonslambie De werking van ivermectine is een fabel! Lees dit maar eens: https://t.co/m0Ue1vrb4Q
The lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses based on summary data alone are inherently unreliable https://t.co/GjibKl0C4j https://t.co/p96OE7dpnA
RT @DeAnalistAmf: @b4rb4tron @jangajentaan @svsTV Geen probleem: https://t.co/m0Ue1vrb4Q
@svsTV Fabel! Lees dit maar eens: https://t.co/m0Ue1vrb4Q
@svsTV Fabel! Lees dit maar eens: https://t.co/m0Ue1vrb4Q
@svsTV Fabel! Lees dit maar eens: https://t.co/m0Ue1vrb4Q
@b4rb4tron @jangajentaan @svsTV Geen probleem: https://t.co/m0Ue1vrb4Q
イベルメクチン臨床試験 (Nat Med 11) 単独の試験で死亡率低下した2件、1件は撤回、1件は方法に重大な問題。2件を除く総合評価が進行中、効果の検出は期待薄と 質の低い研究を集めて総合評価をしても、結論の質は高まらないという警告です #COVI19 #イベルメクチン https://t.co/Ai5RkWVGTe
@MLaatikainen @MikaelNiku Jaa, sitä on kyllä riepoteltu aika paljonkin. https://t.co/RsCWxCa7B4
@jc_cruzc @PierreKory Why don't you start here: https://t.co/FTeVZBQx5u
@CachetesDeNalga @PierreKory Sure. Here is a decent meta analysis cautioning against IVM: https://t.co/Zlp2yFYQz4 Here is one explaining how 'fraudulent' IVM research was influencing the meta analyses: https://t.co/sz82qPLzpe Here's a more casual one tha
RT @madfall1213: COVID-19に馬用の薬……イベルメクチンをめぐる議論を解説 - BBCニュース https://t.co/XN7Buaa0WY イベルメクチンの教訓 The lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses bas…
RT @madfall1213: @NBCNews Desperation, misinformation how the ivermectin craze spread across the world The Guardian 2021.9.24 https://t.co/…
RT @madfall1213: Ivermectin: How false science created a Covid miracle drug BBC News 2021.10.7 https://t.co/mjKRVYCU4W イベルメクチンの教訓 The lesso…
RT @madfall1213: The lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses based on summary data alone are inherently unreliable | Nature Medicine https://t.…
RT @madfall1213: The Real Scandal About Ivermectin イベルメクチン狂騒曲 Ivermectin Shows That Not All Science Is Worth Following The Atlantic https:/…
RT @carpe_diem0820: イベルメクチンからの教訓 要約データのみに基づくメタ解析は本質的に信頼性が低い 臨床研究は、要約統計の集合体ではなく、問題に対するより包括的データの貢献と見なすべき 匿名化された個々の患者データを提供できない研究はバイアスリスクが高い T…
RT @AnnikaKirstenR: @DrplasticsurgFL @QuizzicalGirl @RapaportJulian @akheriaty Stop munching ivermectin, stick to plastic surgery and get o…
@tekstone @BKopernikus @smenor @katalin_pota Seems relevant, this article shows the meta analysis was flawed but no conclusion beyond that. Seems like Ivermectin's effectiveness is still pending further study which leads back to the original question, what
There is no evidence to support #Ivermectin use for #COVID: https://t.co/3Xa0SIzvt1 Maybe those pushing for its use, like @billmaher, can stop now. @PeterHotez
RT @carpe_diem0820: イベルメクチンからの教訓 要約データのみに基づくメタ解析は本質的に信頼性が低い 臨床研究は、要約統計の集合体ではなく、問題に対するより包括的データの貢献と見なすべき 匿名化された個々の患者データを提供できない研究はバイアスリスクが高い T…
RT @madfall1213: 7 studies ivermectin fans cite to say the drug works against COVID-19, and why they’re flawed 2021.10.15 https://t.co/nP1M…
RT @madfall1213: Ivermectin for Covid Therapy Is Questionable, But Demand Is Soaring - Bloomberg 2021.10.13 https://t.co/IXQmWxMJ1t イベルメクチン…
RT @usg_ringo: ”以下の論文の著者5人がどうやってイベルメクチン論文のデータ偽造を暴いたかについての紹介。 イベルメクチンの教訓:要約データだけに基づくメタ解析は本質的に信頼できない https://t.co/on6j0Lzs2M (一つだけではなく次々と欠陥…
RT @carpe_diem0820: イベルメクチンからの教訓 要約データのみに基づくメタ解析は本質的に信頼性が低い 臨床研究は、要約統計の集合体ではなく、問題に対するより包括的データの貢献と見なすべき 匿名化された個々の患者データを提供できない研究はバイアスリスクが高い T…
RT @ymori117: nature medicine「イベルメクチンの教訓:要約データのみに基づいたメタ分析は本質的に信頼できない」 https://t.co/CpMYk9daMr イベルメクチンが有効だったと主張する臨床試験論文の個別データを精査したところ、次々と信頼で…
@LostInTheNet1 @ernluccar @FmMosca @Lantidiplomatic E visto che le piace citare Nature, si legga anche questo. https://t.co/JxptOVDB5X
RT @TheBakeman: What always seems to be missing in these trials is the zinc. Hydroxychloroquine (or ivermectin) is the gun (zinc ionophore…
What always seems to be missing in these trials is the zinc. Hydroxychloroquine (or ivermectin) is the gun (zinc ionophore). Zinc is the bullet. Vladimir Zelenko, MD It is the zinc that prevents viral entry. And if virus is present, it is the zinc that
@florianaigner Vor allem Studien, die eine ganz starke Wirkung von Ivermectin fanden wurden schlichtweg erfunden. Ein unverzeihlicher ethischer Verstoß, begangen von Ärzten die daran glauben wollten; und amplifiziert bei Impfgegnern auf social media. /23
@CharlotWa @JwJansen001 @Bartdesmet1985 @vanranstmarc Zie hier het artikel in Nature. https://t.co/I3Rnu0UHOW
@Hollenfeuer88 The studies showing benefits were retracted. "As these two papers were the only studies included in that meta-analysis to demonstrate an independently significant reduction in mortality, the revision will probably show no mortality benefit f
@derfunktionaer Ein paar andere Links von einer Deiner Quellen: https://t.co/BoYoACgQp0 Kurzfassung: Die Studien sind Bullshit: https://t.co/XwKOnfcHeF Zurückgezogen: https://t.co/g17ZjStviW #Entwurmungsmittel #Ivermectin https://t.co/h4WoWpUHjH
@Georgetzoura @_Imogenius @OK2crankynow @spectat0r404 @jasonandrade @DrKGregorevic To date the ivermectin studies hv not proven its efficacy against Covid. Altho there are anecdotal reports, a placebo effect can’t be discounted either https://t.co/UPHJYYfK
@hypolaristic @HunterOfTheRich @BAG_OFSP_UFSP Lesen Sie mal selbst die Studien (es reichen die ersten paar der ~30 vorgeblichen RCT Studien) und mal Berichte über die Studien selbst lesen, z.B. den hier in Nature: https://t.co/ZkhjTdqzVM
@pjanik_otm @lordxxl @Kronos272 @gebirgsziege Sind zwei Studien, die sich mit der Gesamtkatastrophe "Ivermectin gegen CoViD" auseinandersetzen: https://t.co/Yg6xRMOLNS https://t.co/Q9JyHsxASD Meine Aussage ist, neben den entlarvten Fälschungen und Betrug,
@JackSlaterPT @aferraz74 @Makiavel8 @mblopes1966 https://t.co/486zGoMX1E não vou tomar cenas que fazem nada contra o COVID ... Bem melhor
@axhelix @firewall76 @gred_vet @_tommyemme_ @GIORGIOMALAVOL1 Qui https://t.co/N89dli80uY trovi altre interessanti considerazioni. Come hai detto tu sono "l'incongruenza e i modi che pongono seri dubbi"
RT @Elitiker: Patientendaten waren manipuliert, Ergebnisse einfach aus anderen Studien abgeschrieben worden. Manche der als Studienteilnehm…
Patientendaten waren manipuliert, Ergebnisse einfach aus anderen Studien abgeschrieben worden. Manche der als Studienteilnehmer aufgeführten Patienten waren sogar schon vor dem Studienbeginn verstorben. Andere haben grobe Mängel. 7/9 https://t.co/4LgrbBvyz
で、ネイチャーのこの論文で論破と。 https://t.co/eUOvpb7ZUb
RT @madfall1213: COVID-19に馬用の薬……イベルメクチンをめぐる議論を解説 - BBCニュース https://t.co/XN7Buaa0WY イベルメクチンの教訓 The lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses bas…
RT @madfall1213: 'Vigilante treatments': Anti-vaccine groups push people to leave ICUs https://t.co/gTdEhkeCG3 @nbcnewsから 2021.9.24 イベルメク…
RT @madfall1213: @NBCNews Desperation, misinformation how the ivermectin craze spread across the world The Guardian 2021.9.24 https://t.co/…
RT @madfall1213: Ivermectin: How false science created a Covid miracle drug BBC News 2021.10.7 https://t.co/mjKRVYCU4W イベルメクチンの教訓 The lesso…
RT @madfall1213: イベルメクチン、 誤った科学が生んだ新型ウイルス「特効薬」 BBCニュース 2021.10.9 https://t.co/nmm37MaerZ イベルメクチンの教訓 The lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses…
RT @madfall1213: イベルメクチン、 誤った科学が生んだ新型ウイルス「特効薬」 BBC 2021.10.9 https://t.co/nmm37MaerZ https://t.co/VXmEnf2hCy イベルメクチンの教訓 The lesson of iver…
RT @carpe_diem0820: イベルメクチンからの教訓 要約データのみに基づくメタ解析は本質的に信頼性が低い 臨床研究は、要約統計の集合体ではなく、問題に対するより包括的データの貢献と見なすべき 匿名化された個々の患者データを提供できない研究はバイアスリスクが高い T…
@LKNlifeliberty @604Smiling @sarahbbsunny @LadyBug43840492 Aye keep taking the worming tablets hen. I’ll wager you know absolutely naff all about ‘real’ science. https://t.co/v30BbbDAKO
RT @madfall1213: イベルメクチンの教訓 The lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses based on summary data alone are inherently unreliable | Nature Medicine…
RT @madfall1213: The lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses based on summary data alone are inherently unreliable | Nature Medicine https://t.…
RT @madfall1213: The Real Scandal About Ivermectin イベルメクチン狂騒曲 Ivermectin Shows That Not All Science Is Worth Following The Atlantic https:/…
RT @madfall1213: 7 studies ivermectin fans cite to say the drug works against COVID-19, and why they’re flawed 2021.10.15 https://t.co/nP1M…
RT @madfall1213: Ivermectin for Covid Therapy Is Questionable, But Demand Is Soaring - Bloomberg 2021.10.13 https://t.co/IXQmWxMJ1t イベルメクチン…
RT @usg_ringo: ”以下の論文の著者5人がどうやってイベルメクチン論文のデータ偽造を暴いたかについての紹介。 イベルメクチンの教訓:要約データだけに基づくメタ解析は本質的に信頼できない https://t.co/on6j0Lzs2M (一つだけではなく次々と欠陥…
RT @ymori117: nature medicine「イベルメクチンの教訓:要約データのみに基づいたメタ分析は本質的に信頼できない」 https://t.co/CpMYk9daMr イベルメクチンが有効だったと主張する臨床試験論文の個別データを精査したところ、次々と信頼で…
@C9vidRealist @Jaxie_B8 @drsimonegold The disinformation is the cherry picked meta analysis. Analysis that stratifies studies by rigor shows zero effect. The much touted effects are entirely from poorly conducted studies or studies that have been retract
@gwennw @ggmts_mat @RepThomasMassie @joerogan Where do u have data on remdesivir? Please, let me know. https://t.co/pO9nnejNfp
@socratesccost @LawyersCity @TheBatman1961 It is too easy to only look at the ivermectin pill https://t.co/pO9nnejNfp
@Aaron_Aarons @danceiskeyyaho1 @PatM08901 @kalaeveryday @AaronParnas https://t.co/pO9nnejNfp please read more
I adore this and thank those statisticians who are doing such amazing work. https://t.co/UbpbmZ985k
RT @KindrachukJason: @KStateTurk @MriPhoneCanada @J_EmpyreanGoals @ScienceUpFirst and a Nature article…that wasn’t retracted due to data fl…
@KStateTurk @MriPhoneCanada @J_EmpyreanGoals @ScienceUpFirst and a Nature article…that wasn’t retracted due to data flaws https://t.co/pTRqJDUsv2
RT @susila55: 222 studies 102, 000 patients Ivermectin ⬇️deaths (reduced) 62% #IVERMECTIN ☆needs to be studied as was. vaccine.. https…
222 studies 102, 000 patients Ivermectin ⬇️deaths (reduced) 62% #IVERMECTIN ☆needs to be studied as was. vaccine.. https://t.co/CJYyCKGmmI
List of retracted ivermectic COVID papers continued: Jul 14: https://t.co/meGlNMEfLT (preprint; see also, https://t.co/qEpa0s13JV) Aug 9: https://t.co/rc0bRKzPm7 Oct 26: https://t.co/aA0CpQLMUn Nov 9: https://t.co/CGCZFPpgwr 2/2
@PureDemocracyNZ @ScienceUpFirst Two things: I) I think the series of retracted papers and flawed analyses of ivermectin studies speaks for itself (you can read the 5-part series here: https://t.co/db1ToTRnBn and here https://t.co/pTRqJDUsv2); II) if you t
But touting a drug that has been the focal point of retractions and flawed analyses (as beautifully extracted by @GidMK) is not only disingenuous but dangerous https://t.co/pTRqJDUsv2
@hinz_tamara Seriously. There are multiple highly efficacious vaccines and 2 therapeutics that will likely be authorized soon w/ have stood up to scientific rigour. Yet here we are still propping up a drug that has become the poster child for questionable
@_NewsView @Dadabase2 @drsimonegold @ezralevant @wolfblitzer IVM is used primarily for veterinary purposes. I’m not a fan of painting it in that light. However, the “moderate” significance is only found in meta analyses that include the plethora of low q
As I saw some posts about Ivermectin, quoting studies about its efficacy against COVID-19, I recommend this article published in “Nature”, demystifying this fake: https://t.co/MFaCioMcSS
対応 公開: 2021年9月22日 イベルメクチンの教訓:要約データのみに基づくメタアナリシスは本質的に信頼性が低い ジャック・M・ローレンス、ギデオンマエロウィッツ-カッツ、ジェームスAJヘザーズ、ニコラスJLブラウン&カイルA.シェルドリック https://t.co/RLE9kPoqAq
And here is the explanation of how uncritical meta-analises with now-retracted papers falsely supported the use of ivermectin for the treatment and/or prophylaxis of #COVID19. https://t.co/FCF1YaPJlz
RT @madfall1213: The Real Scandal About Ivermectin イベルメクチン狂騒曲 Ivermectin Shows That Not All Science Is Worth Following The Atlantic https:/…
RT @madfall1213: 7 studies ivermectin fans cite to say the drug works against COVID-19, and why they’re flawed 2021.10.15 https://t.co/nP1M…
RT @madfall1213: Ivermectin for Covid Therapy Is Questionable, But Demand Is Soaring - Bloomberg 2021.10.13 https://t.co/IXQmWxMJ1t イベルメクチン…
RT @madfall1213: イベルメクチン、 誤った科学が生んだ新型ウイルス「特効薬」 BBCニュース 2021.10.9 https://t.co/nmm37MaerZ イベルメクチンの教訓 The lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses…
RT @madfall1213: Ivermectin: How false science created a Covid miracle drug BBC News 2021.10.7 https://t.co/mjKRVYCU4W イベルメクチンの教訓 The lesso…
RT @madfall1213: @NBCNews Desperation, misinformation how the ivermectin craze spread across the world The Guardian 2021.9.24 https://t.co/…
RT @madfall1213: The lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses based on summary data alone are inherently unreliable | Nature Medicine https://t.…
@ComradeGough @YouTube Sadly, the question is really over how valid the research papers really are. A computer simulation isn't a peer reviewed clinical trial. These studies aren't producing repeatable results. :( https://t.co/xlJkBH3xvx https://t.co/rmx
@PeaceLily420 @abhi_knight00 @angrysoba @Maqiyn1 @CeeEmCee3 @PopeProduces @clairlemon Correct, it's the science, not the lack of FDA approval, that suggests ivermectin probably doesn't work. See: https://t.co/UdOsLqR1Jh
@PeaceLily420 @CeeEmCee3 @angrysoba @Maqiyn1 @PopeProduces @clairlemon Thank you for acknowledging that. Yes, it does not mean ivermectin doesn't work, but given the current state of the evidence it's quite unlikely that ivermectin is beneficial. If you'd
@aucklandir OK. 1. The biggest paper (producing most of the effect size) in your meta-analysis has been retracted because it was fraudulent. Most of the others are probably fraudulent too (https://t.co/4YGS0BcUTE)
@strfry @pauelll @shelly_pond https://t.co/Whsd33er7N nicht jede Studie ist auch von Wert. Man ist sich ziemlich einig, dass weitaus größere Tests notwendig sind und eine Wirksamkeit derzeit nicht nachweisbar ist.
北里大学のイベルメクチン治験、匿名化された被験者データの共有無しなんですね 海外のイベルメクチン治験で捏造が続発した結果、IPDの共有を必須としようという機運(https://t.co/4PuKCqxaqP)が高まっているのに…(´・ω・`) 万が一、捏造があっても検証困難だしメタアナリシスには含められませんね https://t.co/2dPqbzX3K0
@ZelfzorgCovid19 Ivermectine effectief of toch niet? https://t.co/nR6hGlQsiK