But of course, these efforts are not applied at random. This one is getting looked at because it is 'problematic': It found that male 'mentors' were better for female junior scientists' careers: https://t.co/czz6LxeKY2
RT @millerjm86: Ok all, this new paper in @NatureComms really has me sad/confused/angry https://t.co/HN2gIV4rTt A Thread 1/
RT @jenheemstra: @biyolokum "Our study...suggests that female protégés who remain in academia reap more benefits when mentored by males rat…
Cuando la ciencia no es asexuada...#NoSinMujeres @CienciaFem @CeGeneroRRII @IPSA_RC19
RT @HRobbea: Feminists viciously trying to get yet another paper UNPUBLISHED as they "do not like it." The law of gender in academia: men a…
Interesting paper that shows the value in having multiple mentors, including opposite sex mentors for long term academic success! This is important in helping to alleviate the mentorship burden on #women in academia. https://t.co/r6TTzWmaxO @NatureComms @a
RT @millerjm86: Ok all, this new paper in @NatureComms really has me sad/confused/angry https://t.co/HN2gIV4rTt A Thread 1/
RT @lastpositivist: The general contours of this take is very very familiar - "sure this is bad, but it is bad in a typical way, retraction…
RT @eisenberg13: Glad my female mentor agrees that the terrible paper claiming “female mentors are worse for female trainee’s careers than…
RT @senizu1: Calling for embracing the goal of gender equity in science by the scientific community as a whole, but all the rest is detrime…
RT @WomenInStat: I'm sure by now many of you have seen this article published last week in @NatureComms https://t.co/X2DnDS5eWL
Ver artigo “The association between early career informal mentorship in academic collaborations and junior author performance” em: https://t.co/wSpipdlFwR
Muy buen hilo... Cuando el patriarcado se disfraza de ciencia... hay colegas trabajando para mostrar que el rey está desnudo
@saxon_leslie, Betsy Ritter, Lila Gleitman, and obviously my mom Carolyn Harley. Might have been nice if there had been more women in linguistics at MIT when I did my PhD there.
I'm sure by now many of you have seen this article published last week in @NatureComms https://t.co/X2DnDS5eWL
RT @arabinow: I'm discouraged by this article suggesting that female mentors and mentees benefit more from working with men than other wome…
RT @RedInvestChile: Preocupación por este paper de #Nature, en conclusiones los autores sugieren que las mujeres no deberíamos ser mentoras…
RT @clairlemon: An extremely non-PC study recently published in @NatureComms suggests that junior women do better with male mentors than fe…
RT @CharlieFehl: Quick action by the global community. #DiversityandInclusion works in #STEM.
RT @TaniaArline: Using 222 million scientific papers, this study found female academic advisors who mentored female protégés gained 18% few…
Estão se retratando, mas não indicam que vão tirar o artigo da edição. Dia 17 de novembro saiu na Nature um artigo científico onde os autores concluíram que mulheres cientistas não deveriam orientar mulheres pois isso teria um impacto negativo em suas ca
RT @millerjm86: Ok all, this new paper in @NatureComms really has me sad/confused/angry https://t.co/HN2gIV4rTt A Thread 1/
RT @EricsElectrons: I haven’t read the paper yet so I have no opinion on the results & methods. I do find it odd when research goes agains…
RT @HRobbea: Feminists viciously trying to get yet another paper UNPUBLISHED as they "do not like it." The law of gender in academia: men a…
RT @alcesanna: I would not be where I am today without amazing female mentors 🤚 https://t.co/ADneCY66Vt
My female mentors have been phenomenal. This article really deserves all the negative backlash it has received. Can’t believe Nature really published it. https://t.co/RFRrXyUyvA
As conclusões desse paper são bizarras! Como isso foi passar na @NatureComms? https://t.co/V8NSEwjDco
I haven’t read the paper yet so I have no opinion on the results & methods. I do find it odd when research goes against the systemic racism/sexism narrative it causes outrage & rigorous criticism from academics who don’t use the same analytical me
I'm female PhD candidate who has a great female mentor, this is just a crappy paper but it makes me angry and sad when seeing sexism and racism are still present in STEM field. How can this even get published? Jeezzz... https://t.co/bcJNcXzk02
Important thread to read - misogyny and discrimination in academic institutions of course bleeds into publications
Read the whole thread #WomenMentoringWomen
RT @DaniSBassett: The unfounded claims & discriminatory recommendations published in this paper are detrimental to all notions of equity in…
RT @DrJBacteria: Seems like the right conclusion is not that women shouldn't mentor women but that men should stop devaluing #WomenInSTEM @…
RT @ibroSecretariat: Unsubstantiated claims made in @NatureComms paper https://t.co/0TL7HODvSQ, damages the global scientific community & p…
RT @millerjm86: Ok all, this new paper in @NatureComms really has me sad/confused/angry https://t.co/HN2gIV4rTt A Thread 1/
RT @pitiklinov: Por lo visto, están pidiendo retractar este estudio que encuentra que académicas mujeres que son tuteladas por hombres cose…
RT @NatureComms: We have now published an Editor’s Note on this paper https://t.co/TCxHlFThh6 to alert readers of our ongoing investigation…
My success is small so far but yes, absolutely. Not to mention I had a female mentor before that who was pivotal to my not being harassed and bullied out of academia to begin with.
aqui o link pro artigo: https://t.co/FqiBx1Yppf
RT @millerjm86: Ok all, this new paper in @NatureComms really has me sad/confused/angry https://t.co/HN2gIV4rTt A Thread 1/
RT @NatureComms: We're aware of the concerns raised regarding the publication of this paper https://t.co/TCxHlFThh6. We thank those who've…
RT @SarahTishkoff: WTF? Shame on you @NatureComms for publishing this article. The problems that women face in science aren't due to havin…
RT @HRobbea: Feminists viciously trying to get yet another paper UNPUBLISHED as they "do not like it." The law of gender in academia: men a…
Pues se lo han pensado dos veces: https://t.co/QQFNdGnfoQ
👀👇👇 Chequense este hilo de @cientificasmx
RT @cientificasmx: Esta semana se publicó en @NatureComms un artículo que causó indignación en esta red. Analizan la relación mentora-prot…
RT @cientificasmx: Esta semana se publicó en @NatureComms un artículo que causó indignación en esta red. Analizan la relación mentora-prot…
RT @clopezcorrea: It is outrageous that @NatureComms accepts to publish such a study 😡
✋✋✋
RT @TaniaArline: Using 222 million scientific papers, this study found female academic advisors who mentored female protégés gained 18% few…
RT @clopezcorrea: It is outrageous that @NatureComms accepts to publish such a study 😡
RT @DmochowskiIvan: There are too few female academic scientists, and as a result far too few female mentors. I've been fortunate to have g…
RT @FRACTAL_Col: Un altavoz como @nature ha desperdiciado la oportunidad de poner el foco y discutir de una manera rigurosa los sesgos de g…
Excellent Yoel Inbar on the Nature Comunication paper on mentors: "At some point we have to decide whether we want to know what's true, or whether we'd rather make progressives comfortable. I would rather know what's true"
It is outrageous that @NatureComms accepts to publish such a study 😡
@itsbrunon aqui o artigo
RT @TaniaArline: Using 222 million scientific papers, this study found female academic advisors who mentored female protégés gained 18% few…
RT @TaniaArline: Using 222 million scientific papers, this study found female academic advisors who mentored female protégés gained 18% few…
RT @cientificasmx: Esta semana se publicó en @NatureComms un artículo que causó indignación en esta red. Analizan la relación mentora-prot…
RT @TaniaArline: Using 222 million scientific papers, this study found female academic advisors who mentored female protégés gained 18% few…
RT @jodimindell: Thank you to my amazing female mentor Dr. Mary Carskadon @sleepyteens and female role models Drs. Carole Marcus, @AncoliS…
RT @millerjm86: Ok all, this new paper in @NatureComms really has me sad/confused/angry https://t.co/HN2gIV4rTt A Thread 1/
Quick action by the global community. #DiversityandInclusion works in #STEM.
RT @Murphy_Lab_OU: Raise your hand if you are a female scientist who had a female mentor who was pivotal to you success. This paper is way…
RT @yorl: Having now read the Nature Communications paper that is causing all the uproar, I have two reactions. First, the causal language…
Maybe at #NatureCommunications in line with https?src=hashtag_click">#KULeuven">https://t.co/m0nqF5puFA…..#KULeuven
RT @ME_Frederickson: After a long day of online teaching, I thought "I'll just check what's happening on Twitter." Big mistake. I discover…
Feminists viciously trying to get yet another paper UNPUBLISHED as they "do not like it." The law of gender in academia: men and women are exactly the same, except where women are better, lets publish this heavily even if we used false data (e.g. COVID and
Oh dear....Nat. comm. joins angewandte with a very questionable paper making it to publication. Will be very interested to see where this goes...
RT @senizu1: Calling for embracing the goal of gender equity in science by the scientific community as a whole, but all the rest is detrime…
RT @AmandaEBates: PLS RETWEET: Sign to be a signatory on a response to https://t.co/f9PsMgxwDE & document mentoring experience here: https:…
RT @Lotus_STEMM: Research has shown the importance of #mentorship, with culture and representation at the forefront. However, the paper fro…
RT @patankar_lab: @100rabhTak @NatureComms For when you run out of toilet paper during our inevitable next lockdown: https://t.co/MzdIDySvS…
RT @luisaviegas: Na terça feira, 17 de Novembro de 2020, foi publicado um artigo científico na @NatureComms onde os autores sugerem que mul…
RT @NatureComms: We have now published an Editor’s Note on this paper https://t.co/TCxHlFThh6 to alert readers of our ongoing investigation…
RT @CarolynBertozzi: Garbage alert: this “big authorship data” analysis stumbles on what we already know about gender bias in academia, the…
RT @lastpositivist: The general contours of this take is very very familiar - "sure this is bad, but it is bad in a typical way, retraction…
Woah - I missed this. Anyone who cares about encouraging our best scientists should read this thread about a study of the scientific mentoring relationship just published in @NatureComms and why the "conclusion" drawn by the authors is really not the right
RT @yorl: Having now read the Nature Communications paper that is causing all the uproar, I have two reactions. First, the causal language…
RT @asadhanif193: This recently published paper in @NatureComms suggests scientific impact / success of women increases when they're mentor…
RT @AlinaMWieczorek: Oh WTF? @NatureComms https://t.co/Q2hVxR3vEp "Female protégés who remain in academia reap more benefits when mentored…
@kzkedzierska @a_succurro @RuneLinding @schneiderleonid @NatureComms It's linked below the article. https://t.co/q7FpGepGPF
RT @lastpositivist: The general contours of this take is very very familiar - "sure this is bad, but it is bad in a typical way, retraction…
RT @lastpositivist: The general contours of this take is very very familiar - "sure this is bad, but it is bad in a typical way, retraction…
RT @Marti_Ccc: "...female protégés who remain in academia reap more benefits when mentored by males rather than equally-impactful females."…
unbelievable
RT @yorl: Having now read the Nature Communications paper that is causing all the uproar, I have two reactions. First, the causal language…
"Mujeres con tutores hombres son más exitosas que mujeres con tutores mujeres" "El artículo es de #nature" #DiaInternacionalDelHombre https://t.co/yC9a4RMVVi
En resumen, los autores de este artículo concluyen que la calidad de los mentores está determinada por su género, sugiriendo que las mujeres que permanecen en la academia tienen más beneficios y posibilidades de éxito en sus carreras cuando son guiadas por
RT @yorl: Having now read the Nature Communications paper that is causing all the uproar, I have two reactions. First, the causal language…
RT @drjanetnye: a vs b clearly shows the bias many of us women feel, so thanks for mansplaining that for us. The fact that the more number…
RT @MegaFaunaMe: https://t.co/a3MpoPiT6I 1/7 The gender-based conclusions/recommendations of this paper are not supported by the study res…
RT @yorl: Having now read the Nature Communications paper that is causing all the uproar, I have two reactions. First, the causal language…
RT @jackiecassell: Yup. Mine was Prof Anne Johnson of @ucl & @acmedsci. Also as a medic two practitioners- Angela Robinson of @MMC_cnwl & A…
A very sensible position, seriously
RT @FemalesInMS: Another disappointing article has made it past peer review... one which grossly disregards the systemic issues that female…
#AcademicTwitter as a form of peer review
RT @AdamEnglerUCSD: Raise your hand if you are a male scientist who had a female mentor who was pivotal to your success. This paper is way…