RT @angiegomeza: Retractado! Excelentes noticias! @CientificasEC https://t.co/HgAquSUWQd
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @ElAgusdeKomodo: Les autores del artículo ese tan malo sobre cómo era detrimental tener una tutora mujer en una carrera científica, ya s…
This paper has since been retracted by @NatureComms: https://t.co/xgWj53Ljcg
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @DaviesswPhD: Happy to see this paper retracted and it has been exciting to witness the academic community reflecting on mentorship. Hap…
Retracted! https://t.co/m3E9THQzzG
RT @luisaviegas: Great news: Despite the not-so-much-exciting response of the authors, the article was retracted! https://t.co/3ZLxUlFT6g…
@cientificasmx @NatureComms Hola, justo retractaron el artículo. https://t.co/YayHTKc264
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
With regard to the previously described paper on women's mentorship in academia and the poorly reached conclusion that junior academics should seek male mentorship: "...the paper’s conclusions in their current form do not stand, and the authors have retrac
RT @argplantwomen: Finally, retracted💪💪 @NatureComms @argplantwomen @ASPB_WiPB @500womensci @365BotanyWomen @WomenScienceRFS https://t…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
🎉🎉🎉🎉
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @ElAgusdeKomodo: Les autores del artículo ese tan malo sobre cómo era detrimental tener una tutora mujer en una carrera científica, ya s…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
Les autores del artículo ese tan malo sobre cómo era detrimental tener una tutora mujer en una carrera científica, ya se retractaron 🎉🎉🎉🎉https://t.co/HaxI9yFV7B https://t.co/LPG4tGhUZA
RT @NicoleBarbaro: Nature Comms releases updated peer review guidelines for social and behavioral science studies that may cause concern af…
RT @DaviesswPhD: Happy to see this paper retracted and it has been exciting to witness the academic community reflecting on mentorship. Hap…
RT @NicoleBarbaro: Nature Comms releases updated peer review guidelines for social and behavioral science studies that may cause concern af…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
Heavily-criticized mentorship and gender article from @NatureComms gets the death penalty. https://t.co/04wQOD91oq
The authors have retracted their article linking women to less successful mentorship. Due to unaccounted bias undermining their conclusions. Raises a few questions about what happened during initial review when these concerns were first raised.
RT @NicoleBarbaro: Nature Comms releases updated peer review guidelines for social and behavioral science studies that may cause concern af…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @NicoleBarbaro: Nature Comms releases updated peer review guidelines for social and behavioral science studies that may cause concern af…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
The paper from Alshebli et al. on #mentoring has been RETRACTED by @NatureComms 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽
RT @NicoleBarbaro: Nature Comms releases updated peer review guidelines for social and behavioral science studies that may cause concern af…
Good riddance!
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @RocioDeanna: Finally retracted! 💪
RT @RocioDeanna: Finally retracted! 💪 https://t.co/8suKcFriTf
Finally, retracted💪💪 @NatureComms @argplantwomen @ASPB_WiPB @500womensci @365BotanyWomen @WomenScienceRFS
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @DaviesswPhD: Happy to see this paper retracted and it has been exciting to witness the academic community reflecting on mentorship. Hap…
RT @KrishnanYamuna: Ok: That article which said if you have a female mentor you’re screwed? It’s retracted. Thank you those who led from th…
RT @schneiderleonid: .@NatureComms declares British eugenics as solid science, but sexism by Arabs will not be tolerated. https://t.co/BQDS…
@NatureComms retracted the paper about gender differences (poorly measured) in mentoring.
“Simply being uncomfortable with the conclusions of a published paper, would and should not lead to retraction on this basis alone...In this case, the conclusions turned out not to be supported, and we apologise to the research community for any unintended
RT @Ale_Bortolus: El #Género no tiene ningún conflicto con la #Tutoría en #Academia, ... a menos que Ud introduzca el conflicto con una per…
RT @RocioDeanna: Finally retracted! 💪
RT @NicoleBarbaro: Nature Comms releases updated peer review guidelines for social and behavioral science studies that may cause concern af…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
Wow -- so retraction comes from inability to directly associate co-author with mentorship, not gross misinterpretation of the data......
Great news: Despite the not-so-much-exciting response of the authors, the article was retracted! https://t.co/3ZLxUlFT6g https://t.co/YQzQkdCX7T
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @KrishnanYamuna: Ok: That article which said if you have a female mentor you’re screwed? It’s retracted. Thank you those who led from th…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @DaviesswPhD: Happy to see this paper retracted and it has been exciting to witness the academic community reflecting on mentorship. Hap…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
Retracted
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @Ale_Bortolus: El #Género no tiene ningún conflicto con la #Tutoría en #Academia, ... a menos que Ud introduzca el conflicto con una per…
Good to see this flawed and harmful article retracted. Hope both authors and editors will be more thoughtful in the future about avoiding sexist biases and confounds creeping into research.
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
Happy to see this paper retracted and it has been exciting to witness the academic community reflecting on mentorship. Happy Monday y'all!
RT @Ale_Bortolus: El #Género no tiene ningún conflicto con la #Tutoría en #Academia, ... a menos que Ud introduzca el conflicto con una per…
It seems that the last breath of 2020 is putting some things back in their place. This very unfortunate paper is still very illustrative on how "mentorship" or "excellence" is missunderstood and (another) evidence on how gender-biased are publication recor
Nature Comms releases updated peer review guidelines for social and behavioral science studies that may cause concern after the controversial ‘female mentorship’ paper was published in Nov, which the authors have now retracted on Dec 21. https://t.co/PU0o
RT @KrishnanYamuna: Ok: That article which said if you have a female mentor you’re screwed? It’s retracted. Thank you those who led from th…
RT @jenpluznick: The @NatureComms paper which (erroneously) concluded that women in science fare better if they have male mentors has been…
The @NatureComms paper which (erroneously) concluded that women in science fare better if they have male mentors has been retracted.
Ok: That article which said if you have a female mentor you’re screwed? It’s retracted. Thank you those who led from the front. @pollyp1 @HarmitMalik
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
And finally Retracted !!!
RT @luisaviegas: On November 17, 2020, a scientific article was published in @NatureComms where the authors suggest that female scientists…
Retractado! Excelentes noticias! @CientificasEC
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @RocioDeanna: Finally retracted! 💪 https://t.co/8suKcFriTf
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
Finally retracted! 💪
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
The retractation of this paper is an excellent news for those who truely devote time to true mentoring 👏👍
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
Oooh it's been retracted. Good.
Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.co/l1GBwoGmon on mentorship, and explains changes to our editorial processes.
WHY is this up for debate?? This reminds me of the recent Nature Communications (https://t.co/24qNvm4gg2) which was at the receiving end of a lot of criticism FOR GOOD REASON. Stuff like this leads to the undoing of the HARD WORK of every woman in leadersh
RT @Murphy_Lab_OU: Raise your hand if you are a female scientist who had a female mentor who was pivotal to you success. This paper is way…
RT @TaniaArline: Using 222 million scientific papers, this study found female academic advisors who mentored female protégés gained 18% few…
Less than 2 hours away from our last journal club of the year! Join us virtually at 5pm! DM or check slack for Zoom details!
RT @vtraag: The recent paper on female mentorship in science caused quite some stir. https://t.co/3egSl73UXu In this blog post @LudoWaltman…