RETRACTED ARTICLE: The association between early career informal mentorship in academic collaborations and junior author performance

RT @ValidScience: @wildcat_of @ProfNoahGian Nature retracted this peer-reviewed scientific article because it found that female:female ment…

RT @ValidScience: @wildcat_of @ProfNoahGian Nature retracted this peer-reviewed scientific article because it found that female:female ment…

@wildcat_of @ProfNoahGian Nature retracted this peer-reviewed scientific article because it found that female:female mentorship in academia fared worse than other pairings, and this bothered leftists. It wasn't false. It wasn't fraud. Leftist ideology is i

WWでなぜか全体的に引用数が下がる問題（東アジア以外でも）、数年前に議論が紛糾してリトラクトされたNature commのこの論文と似てないか？https://t.co/UWjUuakWlh

@echoprogram_ @MarcH1331 @bvbergeronMD @MarvinMediocre @kevinnbass There's a lot more to the intellectual landscape than left & right, but leftists are the worst, most malicious & dishonest people we have in large number. I don't like these interac

RT @JSchleiderPhD: ...the authors earnestly suggest "women should stop mentoring women" as a solution for misogyny 🙃 "Our findings suggest…

This guy got a study canceled by Nature because it showed that male academics were better mentors than females. Wouldn't this be entirely in line with expectations if we assume the allegation that women were discriminated in academia up until recently?

Re-reading this old catastrophe ahead of a lecture on ethical research for my students tomorrow. Remember how upset we all were? What a poorly conceived piece of research though. https?src=hashtag_click">#change-history">https://t.co/kDtDX2D3k0).#change-history

RT @doughertyorama: @lakens That specific paper was retracted a few years ago. https://t.co/wR6DKTf92x

“Those criticisms were targeted to the authors’ interpretation of their data that gender plays a role in the success of mentoring relationships between junior and senior researchers, in a way that undermines the role of female mentors and mentees.“

RT @doughertyorama: @lakens That specific paper was retracted a few years ago. https://t.co/wR6DKTf92x

RT @doughertyorama: @lakens That specific paper was retracted a few years ago. https://t.co/wR6DKTf92x

@lakens That specific paper was retracted a few years ago. https://t.co/wR6DKTf92x

@PsychRabble @RetractionWatch Do you mean the made-up "reasons" coerced on the authors by the woke mob? Or the real reasons, such as tribal outrage over "problematic" findings? Two entirely different things. See the mentoring study for an illustration: htt

https://t.co/EUHqKoU8I0 "Si, la verdad también es que las mujeres en ciencia no son aún una muestra representativa de las mujeres en la vida real. El machismo femenino, aquel gestado por años de discriminación y selección, ha ocasionado que las que mujere

RT @lookslikechloe: 요 며칠 난리났던 네이쳐 커뮤니케이션 성ㅋ차별ㅠ... 논문... (대충 내용: “여성 트레이니가 여성 멘토에게 교육 받으면 성공하기 힘들다” 😇😇) 저자들이나 리뷰어들도 잘못했지만 솔직히 에디토리얼 보드가 진짜진짜…

RT @lookslikechloe: 요 며칠 난리났던 네이쳐 커뮤니케이션 성ㅋ차별ㅠ... 논문... (대충 내용: “여성 트레이니가 여성 멘토에게 교육 받으면 성공하기 힘들다” 😇😇) 저자들이나 리뷰어들도 잘못했지만 솔직히 에디토리얼 보드가 진짜진짜…

RT @lookslikechloe: 요 며칠 난리났던 네이쳐 커뮤니케이션 성ㅋ차별ㅠ... 논문... (대충 내용: “여성 트레이니가 여성 멘토에게 교육 받으면 성공하기 힘들다” 😇😇) 저자들이나 리뷰어들도 잘못했지만 솔직히 에디토리얼 보드가 진짜진짜…

RT @vtraag: The recent paper on female mentorship in science caused quite some stir. https://t.co/3egSl73UXu In this blog post @LudoWaltman…

RT @KeikoUTorii: @deboisagoodboy 今回議論に用いた論文は https://t.co/2ih2Z7waBZ とこれ https://t.co/910g6YGhpX 2/

@deboisagoodboy 今回議論に用いた論文は https://t.co/2ih2Z7waBZ とこれ https://t.co/910g6YGhpX 2/

RT @mothersinsci: this paper concludes that women should be mentored by men to boost their careers, rather than considering systemic barrie…

RT @LudoWaltman: Our analysis of this @NatureComms paper was previously published on @LeidenMadtrics blog, where we argued that papers like…

RT @LudoWaltman: Our analysis of this @NatureComms paper was previously published on @LeidenMadtrics blog, where we argued that papers like…

Our analysis of this @NatureComms paper was previously published on @LeidenMadtrics blog, where we argued that papers like this one should not be retracted; they have flaws, like almost all papers do, but retracting them is not the right way to handle this

Previous, now retracted, research found that protégés with female mentors were less highly cited than protégés with male mentors. The authors suggested pairing female protégés with male mentors to improve the representation of women in science. https://t.c

@MoritzPoll I also saw this at Nature Communications (here is an example of a retracted article that has caused quite some controversy https://t.co/5nKUkeeS9l) - not sure though if it’s a general thing. In any case, highly informative!

@alexadobrien Men are actually very good at helping women. But shhhh dont tell anyone that. The poor woman who published this piece was cancelled, the journal forced to apologise and the article retracted and vowed to fund and be better feminists next time

@LezKatze Great argument: I see your study, and reply with: "Ma feelings" Its shocking these are even allowed to be pubished, as usually these types are censored. E.g. woman who did below study was bullied and journal forced to retract this paper: https://

@JacquiPJourno @whartonswords https://t.co/XMxUbKLsuO

@oldandrewuk And when studies with the narrative you don't want pop up e.g. this one - which was vicously attacked by campaginers and the journal forced to retract paper and apoligse and poor woman who wrote paper bullied intro silence https://t.co/amWnVrw

@OSS117_Helsinki Attention, c'est @NatureComms et non @Nature ! Les premiers se sont illustrés il n'y a pas si longtemps en publiant une étude montrant qu'il valait mieux ne pas avoir une femme comme #mentor. Sous la pression le papier a été retiré mais ç

@HydrePrever C'est clair ! #Nature Communications c'est bien ce journal qui a publié un "article" concluant qu'il valait mieux ne pas avoir une femme comme mentor ? (un article retiré suite aux réactions mais ça en dit long sur le processus de revue) ht

RT @ProfArmani: Since grad student recruitment time is starting, I'd like to tell an entertaining story - that I just found out. Last year,…

RT @ProfArmani: Since grad student recruitment time is starting, I'd like to tell an entertaining story - that I just found out. Last year,…

RT @ProfArmani: Since grad student recruitment time is starting, I'd like to tell an entertaining story - that I just found out. Last year,…

RT @ProfArmani: Since grad student recruitment time is starting, I'd like to tell an entertaining story - that I just found out. Last year,…

RT @ProfArmani: Since grad student recruitment time is starting, I'd like to tell an entertaining story - that I just found out. Last year,…

RT @ProfArmani: Since grad student recruitment time is starting, I'd like to tell an entertaining story - that I just found out. Last year,…

Since grad student recruitment time is starting, I'd like to tell an entertaining story - that I just found out. Last year, around this time, the below paper came out: https://t.co/pOFDCcbAj7 (Not the retraction, the actual article) 🧵

Something I've been meaning on talking about: the recent bouts of hoax papers have led to the defense that most papers are flawed in their methodology. It's interesting in that it's likely right but then seeing which papers get called back could indicate p

@Yi_Zen_Chu @RhiannonDauster Hey, careful with that last question, we might need to retract your tweet https://t.co/JGg0aDknrf

@NeilLewisJr This reminds me of the (now retracted nature) article that showed that female students mentored by male faculty are more successful. Clearly, the solution is not to stop pairing these students with women faculty!! https://t.co/Efa9TKHJrr

@LAIRUBC The only one which comes to mind was the heavily criticized and then retracted article last year: https://t.co/d6ZVJtFG4c

RT @NatureComms: We're aware of the concerns raised regarding the publication of this paper https://t.co/TCxHlFThh6. We thank those who've…

@Delpeu Fa quatre dies els va caure el cel a sobre als autors d'aquest paper https://t.co/S0IkyRv5ow https://t.co/ECB62N1WOi

We get two papers that appear harmless but are promoting #bropenscience. How? Well, one paper undermined the role of female mentors and mentees with regard to scientific impact but was retracted as people rightfully discussed these findings. https://t.co/w

This retracted @Nature article *was* accurate: midcareer women (WOC even more) barely hanging on, harassed, mislabeled NOT the powerful mentors that #WomenInSTEM need in early career Can’t empower others if #WomenInMedicine so embattled ourselves http

@JHJ612 @ivanpuopolo Ja https://t.co/XbobGVJc9X

@juusotwiittaa @panuraatikainen @KangasAnni @HakkarainenJani @SamiSyrjamaki @TuomoLap Tuollainen vaikutelma haluttiin tosiaan antaa, mutta artikkelit eivät todellakaan olleet virheettömiä. Lähdeviittauksia kolumnissa ei annettu, mutta esim. Nat Comm -artik

RT @usnehal: @KerryWilkinsMD @DrHarryThomas @tomfolanmd @BrainCoach333 @criley_md @ScottVernaglia @DavidEpsteinMD @Larissaandr08 @thefancys…

RT @usnehal: @KerryWilkinsMD @DrHarryThomas @tomfolanmd @BrainCoach333 @criley_md @ScottVernaglia @DavidEpsteinMD @Larissaandr08 @thefancys…

RT @usnehal: @KerryWilkinsMD @DrHarryThomas @tomfolanmd @BrainCoach333 @criley_md @ScottVernaglia @DavidEpsteinMD @Larissaandr08 @thefancys…

@KerryWilkinsMD @DrHarryThomas @tomfolanmd @BrainCoach333 @criley_md @ScottVernaglia @DavidEpsteinMD @Larissaandr08 @thefancysurgeon @DrPaulaWhiteman @imswimming3 @Driantong @nthibodeaujarry @areinamo21 @physicianswkly @GSalazar_MD @ChanaSacks @peter_masia

@LiquidSoul06 @bardotravelling @ClassFirster @JohnHMcWhorter The examples are endless. You have labs and journal articles retracting articles for stating that there are biological sex differences between males and females. Literally endless examples. http

@ceptional This paper https://t.co/Aj9cHKPuy3 (recovering gender bias in academia and drawing the conclusion that you shouldn't work with female academics) got the same criticism already during peer review. Peer review is openly available.

RT @stephaniehicks: I'm absolutely stunned this article made it past an editor's desk. I'll just RT a comment from the reviews: "Finally,…

I found the link to the retracted 2020 @Nature article discussed in the blog featured in the thread post just above👆 Glad it was retracted at least! https://t.co/ABbPTctuBw

RT @Murphy_Lab_OU: Raise your hand if you are a female scientist who had a female mentor who was pivotal to you success. This paper is way…

#ThinkingThursday: This flawed paper since retracted concluded that women as mentors for other women were less impactful. https://t.co/MMibPXzPLp #MedEd #WomenInMedicine #womeninSTEM https://t.co/6pJqs2DvtN

I wish I had greater female mentorship during my PhD. I would trade publications for safety, validation,& care any day. BUT this conclusion is so biased - female mentorship does NOT mean productivity decline 🧵 #phdchat #AcademicChatter #MentalHealthAwa

RT @elenagomezdiaz: The big power of small wins towards #GenderEquality Retraction of: @NatureComms https://t.co/OiCkuhVkCK that concluded…

RT @usnehal: Need robust, honest conversation on system drivers & gaps. Article retracted but results true: strategic early career #womeni…

Need robust, honest conversation on system drivers & gaps. Article retracted but results true: strategic early career #womeninSTEM align w/ more powerful male leaders/mentors while women can’t even stay in own jobs not that women “tear each other do

I really wish this had been handled better to explore very real issue of being able to offer female-to-female across generation mentorship when everyone is depleted and feeling held back. Further, ethics are "expensive" and it can be hard to maintain them.

RT @shrimai_: I published one of my early works under the mentorship of Prof. Yulia Tsvetkov @LTIatCMU. I learnt a great deal from her whil…

@MediClit Feminists lost their shit over this and forced the female author and journal to retract the paper and apologise https://t.co/qlV6XrMUEb

@bigrockbigriver @nresearchnews Hehe, if only! So I can’t DM you. Check if this link is working? I just checked it was working: https://t.co/i0Mh4LTvD5

A2: The conclusions in this study highlighted systemic bias in scientific publishing - not that women are less effective mentors. Women mentors have taught me to advocate for myself, which has allowed me to move my career forward. #WIMSMentoring

RT @OhioStateMed: Q2: AlShebli et al. published and now retracted an article in Nature Communications that contended men are superior mento…

A2) representation matters— in so many ways. As I became a mother I found having mentors who role-modeled working physician motherhood to me to be key to my success. Seeing a leader embrace her role as a mother as wholly as her roles at work- and admit it

A2) This paper was infuriating and flawed in many ways, especially the conclusion that was over-reaching and nonsensical. For me, having a woman mentor in my field was completely transformative for many reasons. #WIMSMentoring

Q2: AlShebli et al. published and now retracted an article in Nature Communications that contended men are superior mentors to women. (https://t.co/a7e2mrRqRy) There are so many reasons we disagree. Tell us, why is it important to have women mentors? #WI

@AlexanderRKlotz For one, the whole issue around this article (https://t.co/zmzmf7zaJE), but there are many more

The conversation around career mentorship is often centred around male mentors & the space has suffered sexist tropes for years - I note this (redacted) article from just last December: https://t.co/VvFIof3ozL

This @nature article should not have been retracted. Women DO need male mentors. Women at midcareer/senior positions too embattled/compromised to support in the same way. Women also need a mom like mine to have an inner confidence, not #impostersyndrome

@MissAmilahS @RaufMiss I wonder if this has something to do with it. For the record, all three of my mentors were female and two were great. https://t.co/ip7j9ysKEr

المصادر https://t.co/ajaynKX6hI https://t.co/KxdYmPVZCS https://t.co/YzN2EvV3sV https://t.co/moK4QPylOo

@gokulrajan_ @anu_evobio Nature Communications has a history of publishing such "strange" articles. I remember this article https://t.co/RWFJiAevFj which was later retracted. I will not be surprised if something similar happens in this case as well.

RT @SCantera1: What!😣How!😬 The mentorship quality of my female supervisors is excellent! Thanks for all your support, hardwork and help @Sa…

RT @z_Betxu_z: Es nuestra responsabilidad el romper esa brecha de estereotipos de género. Entre todos podemos denunciar para no permitir qu…

RT @z_Betxu_z: Es nuestra responsabilidad el romper esa brecha de estereotipos de género. Entre todos podemos denunciar para no permitir qu…

Es nuestra responsabilidad el romper esa brecha de estereotipos de género. Entre todos podemos denunciar para no permitir que artículos como al que me he referido en #11FcientíficasUPM no influyan a la hora de elegir mentores. Afortunadamente retractado h

@tazonchicharos 1. Nature communications publicó un artículo de investigación que ha sido bastante controversial, porque concluye que a las estudiantes les va mejor con asesores masculinos, que con asesores femeninos. Aquí está el paper por si quieres darl

RT @millerjm86: Ok all, this new paper in @NatureComms really has me sad/confused/angry https://t.co/HN2gIV4rTt A Thread 1/

아 리트랙 됐군여 참 다행입니다

@txeagleeagle @turkeyfiend https://t.co/MRTKzs9aDB 리트랙 됐는데요. 제가 모르는 다른 sex/gender differences 관련해서 nature communications에 출판된 이슈 된 논문이 있습니까?

RT @NicoleBarbaro: Nature Comms releases updated peer review guidelines for social and behavioral science studies that may cause concern af…

How did I miss this? That Nature Communications article on how having female mentors is bad for trainees - the one that blew up #academic Twitter - was retracted in December. https://t.co/pjPYRE5C48

Interesante discusión entorno a este paper publicado en Nature y que fue RETRACTED: sobre la asociación entre las mentorias de senior a investigadores jóvenes https://t.co/56GNcae74i

RT @CarolynBertozzi: Garbage alert: this “big authorship data” analysis stumbles on what we already know about gender bias in academia, the…

Alhamdulillah Dr. Sintho Bismillah Dr. Daszkowska-Golec

RT @stephaniehicks: I'm absolutely stunned this article made it past an editor's desk. I'll just RT a comment from the reviews: "Finally,…

RT @NicoleBarbaro: Nature Comms releases updated peer review guidelines for social and behavioral science studies that may cause concern af…

RT @JBozler: Just wondering why concerns weren’t raised (or addressed) during the review process ... https://t.co/L45xQh2tuC

RT @millerjm86: Ok all, this new paper in @NatureComms really has me sad/confused/angry https://t.co/HN2gIV4rTt A Thread 1/

RT @YelizPrior: In today's #journalclub at the @SalfordHMR I will be presenting & discussing with our members an interesting (!) paper on #…

All @CDTPandO students are invited :-)

RT @YelizPrior: In today's #journalclub at the @SalfordHMR I will be presenting & discussing with our members an interesting (!) paper on #…

RT @YelizPrior: In today's #journalclub at the @SalfordHMR I will be presenting & discussing with our members an interesting (!) paper on #…