In today's #journalclub at the @SalfordHMR I will be presenting & discussing with our members an interesting (!) paper on #EarlyCareerAcademic #Mentorship which was published in the #NatureCommunications but retracted not long after. Wonder why??? See
@AMBarroness The article was retracted on Dec 21 2020. https://t.co/chNBOviHbi
@ItCentrist @JaniceFiamengo Helping women is *not* the objective of those pushing this narrative. Making their narrative universal is the goal and no matter how many women (and men) they hurt is immaterial. Theory over reality regardless of damage. https:
RT @NatureComms: We have now published an Editor’s Note on this paper https://t.co/TCxHlFThh6 to alert readers of our ongoing investigation…
RT @usnehal: @DrvanTilburg @arghavan_salles @LindaNguyenMD @BMoshiree Going back to the crab pot analogy @DrvanTilburg How do you get out…
Genuine q: why is retraction the right solution here?
@DrvanTilburg @arghavan_salles @LindaNguyenMD @BMoshiree Going back to the crab pot analogy @DrvanTilburg How do you get out of that crab pot? Typically somebody pulls you out Who is outside of that pot? That is exactly why this @nature article *was* co
outrageous that this #retracted paper made it to nature.
#retracted: paper saying female mentors hurt the careers of female mentees. https://t.co/zGgb7XdCWx
The Article was retracted 12/21/2020 #WomenInMedicine #WomenInScience https://t.co/zUhs9jlt2H
I still don’t agree with this @nature article being retracted, cuz, frankly, it is from male mentors that I have learned the most about courageous and ethical leadership. Women, too often are precariously perched under a glass ceiling or on a glass cliff.
RT @GarmireGroup: This @NatureComms paper that undermined female mentors is retracted. Power is within the people. Thank you ALL for speak…
RT @JamesLingford: Nature Communications retracts much-criticized paper on mentorship: https://t.co/B5v7yj8si8 retraction note: https://t.…
RT @carmenbeat: #MUYinteresante seguir esta polémica: Una importante revista científica retira un artículo revisado por pares e incluye nue…
RT @carmenbeat: #MUYinteresante seguir esta polémica: Una importante revista científica retira un artículo revisado por pares e incluye nue…
#MUYinteresante seguir esta polémica: Una importante revista científica retira un artículo revisado por pares e incluye nuevas normas editoriales. Y de esta forma, la corrección política puede termina apuntando a una sociedad tribal, en la que la identidad
RT @NAChristakis: I've now been told that this superb author group, incl @alshebli, wrote a prior paper in @NatureComms with similar data/m…
RT @ConceptualJames: Equity isn't the solution. It's the problem. https://t.co/xgqZrOskdz
RT @SarcasticCupcak: You realize the first-author on this journal article (of which Nature does not dispute the data or make any allegation…
You realize the first-author on this journal article (of which Nature does not dispute the data or make any allegations of fraud), is herself a woman, right? Her name is Bedoor AlShebli
RT @peteypopetey: @clairlemon It is here: https://t.co/8zYePSkUdP I love that the reason isn't that the data is wrong but that it shows wo…
Some day the powerful person may not be a patriarch. We aren't there yet. This @nature paper should NOT have been retracted. Is an unfortunate reality that young women who align with male mentors are going to do better because of current power structures h
RT @CientificasAca: - Deme el paper más machirulo que tenga - https://t.co/HwrWHZDY4e - No, no tan machirulo ¿Se acuerdan del estudio que…
RT @julielffman: Voy a brindar porque 2021 nos traiga una comunicación de la ciencia con conciencia de clase, sentido crítico de la realida…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @CientificasAca: - Deme el paper más machirulo que tenga - https://t.co/HwrWHZDY4e - No, no tan machirulo ¿Se acuerdan del estudio que…
RT @CientificasAca: - Deme el paper más machirulo que tenga - https://t.co/HwrWHZDY4e - No, no tan machirulo ¿Se acuerdan del estudio que…
RT @CientificasAca: - Deme el paper más machirulo que tenga - https://t.co/HwrWHZDY4e - No, no tan machirulo ¿Se acuerdan del estudio que…
RT @CientificasAca: - Deme el paper más machirulo que tenga - https://t.co/HwrWHZDY4e - No, no tan machirulo ¿Se acuerdan del estudio que…
Nature retracts science-based article because they didn’t agree with the social implications. It’s all about #science, right? RETRACTED ARTICLE: The association between early career informal mentorship in academic collaborations & junior author perform
RT @DaviesswPhD: Happy to see this paper retracted and it has been exciting to witness the academic community reflecting on mentorship. Hap…
RT @CientificasAca: - Deme el paper más machirulo que tenga - https://t.co/HwrWHZDY4e - No, no tan machirulo ¿Se acuerdan del estudio que…
RT @CientificasAca: - Deme el paper más machirulo que tenga - https://t.co/HwrWHZDY4e - No, no tan machirulo ¿Se acuerdan del estudio que…
RT @CientificasAca: - Deme el paper más machirulo que tenga - https://t.co/HwrWHZDY4e - No, no tan machirulo ¿Se acuerdan del estudio que…
Voy a brindar porque 2021 nos traiga una comunicación de la ciencia con conciencia de clase, sentido crítico de la realidad y perspectiva de género. Si no la trae, tendremos que construirla con gente como @carohadad, @ValeArvejita, @JuliAlcain y la comunid
RT @CientificasAca: - Deme el paper más machirulo que tenga - https://t.co/HwrWHZDY4e - No, no tan machirulo ¿Se acuerdan del estudio que…
I still think this article should NOT have been retracted by @nature as if women (minorities too?) are repeated rejected and make their language more and more narrow, what does that do to how they use language for mentees? Isn't it possible, also narrow?
- Deme el paper más machirulo que tenga - https://t.co/HwrWHZDY4e - No, no tan machirulo ¿Se acuerdan del estudio que sugería que las mujeres científicas deberían buscar mentores varones para ser más exitosas?🤦♀️ Finalmente, @NatureComms decidió retract
RT @garethjsullivan: Well about time https://t.co/9z1BCeHPGh
I strongly believe in equal opportunity of access, not forced results. Which gets proven again and again.
RT @clairlemon: An extremely non-PC study recently published in @NatureComms suggests that junior women do better with male mentors than fe…
RT @clairlemon: An extremely non-PC study recently published in @NatureComms suggests that junior women do better with male mentors than fe…
RT @cientificasmx: Esta semana se publicó en @NatureComms un artículo que causó indignación en esta red. Analizan la relación mentora-prot…
Glad to see that Nature communications has retracted this article!
RT @Danonnina: Retractaron el artículo de “no tengas mujeres mentoras”. Argumentan fallos en la metodología: no justificar la métrica de “…
RT @MegaFaunaMe: https://t.co/a3MpoPiT6I 1/7 The gender-based conclusions/recommendations of this paper are not supported by the study res…
RT @ImHardcory: 1. The paper 'The association between early career informal mentorship in academic collaborations and junior author perform…
RT @siminevazire: Props to Nature Comms for publishing the peer review history of that dumpster fire paper, so we can see how it failed. A…
RT @martingil_: Ok so it seems they're retracted it due to unfounded conclusions given the available data. That's OK. As much as I'm agains…
Ok so it seems they're retracted it due to unfounded conclusions given the available data. That's OK. As much as I'm against PC and cancel culture, science comes first, and it seems this paper was not up to the standards it should've been. https://t.co/IA
Conjecture: Perception of reality has a liberal bias because the Left will bury evidence to the contrary.
"Readers criticised the use of co-authorship as a measure of mentorship, and citations as a measure of success of the mentoring relationship." Did it need retracting due to unvalidated #bibliometrics? I don't know, but after post-publication #peerreview th
RT @KrishnanYamuna: Ok: That article which said if you have a female mentor you’re screwed? It’s retracted. Thank you those who led from th…
RT @NatureComms: We're aware of the concerns raised regarding the publication of this paper https://t.co/TCxHlFThh6. We thank those who've…
I am happy to see this action https://t.co/405sneKvtF Well done @NatureComms!
Hmm who will try to replicate it?
RT @KrishnanYamuna: Ok: That article which said if you have a female mentor you’re screwed? It’s retracted. Thank you those who led from th…
RT @KrishnanYamuna: Ok: That article which said if you have a female mentor you’re screwed? It’s retracted. Thank you those who led from th…
RT @KrishnanYamuna: Ok: That article which said if you have a female mentor you’re screwed? It’s retracted. Thank you those who led from th…
RT @KrishnanYamuna: Ok: That article which said if you have a female mentor you’re screwed? It’s retracted. Thank you those who led from th…
RT @cientificasmx: Baia baia 👀 ¿se acuerdan de este artículo? Al final l@s autor@s decidieron retractarlo con base en la crítica de la comu…
RT @elenagomezdiaz: Y hoy podemos decir que se ha ganado una pequeña batalla hacia la #igualdad Editorial: https://t.co/0VYhR6c1Xg y nota…
RT @PsychRabble: Nature's retraction of the alShebli article on mentoring is bullshit. Here is the original article: https://t.co/RY7PL8vY…
RT @squazzoni: These authors could have dispensed more "would" and "could" in their text instead of causal claims, if any, but this controv…
RT @squazzoni: These authors could have dispensed more "would" and "could" in their text instead of causal claims, if any, but this controv…
🎉🎉🎉💪🏻💪🏻💪🏻
RT @squazzoni: These authors could have dispensed more "would" and "could" in their text instead of causal claims, if any, but this controv…
RT @PsychRabble: Nature's retraction of the alShebli article on mentoring is bullshit. Here is the original article: https://t.co/RY7PL8vY…
These authors could have dispensed more "would" and "could" in their text instead of causal claims, if any, but this controversy has gone too far. This was not a paper to be retracted. We have replications for alternative measurements and to assess alterna
RT @sNeuroble: The authors have retracted their article linking women to less successful mentorship. Due to unaccounted bias undermining th…
Linking to my thoughts on this earlier this a.m. prior to seeing @docmartin22's tweet that I retweeted with comment. https://t.co/0zFZtEfh4n
RT @PsychRabble: Nature's retraction of the alShebli article on mentoring is bullshit. Here is the original article: https://t.co/RY7PL8vY…
Nature's retraction of the alShebli article on mentoring is bullshit. Here is the original article: https://t.co/RY7PL8vYd0
@SexyIsntSexist @JacquesDerrida7 @TaniaArline @RetractionWatch @NatureComms @daniela_witten Yes, because the conclusions are drawn from results obtained through flawed methodology. Thus the conclusions are useless to the scientific community *and* have sev
RT @poWOMENer: The terrible Nature Communications paper about mentorship has been officially retracted due to data concerns. More detail ab…
RT @thegeekgineer: Amigos de @pcoffeebreak , hablaréis sobre este cambio editorial? alrededor hay mucho ruido y como siempre... poca señal…
https://t.co/VvgqqdBpYL… hmmmmmmm so is the other paper gonna be removed as well that used same other and same methodology? Or is that OK since you liked the outcome? Lol "science"... astrology more like it. Read my palm?
The terrible Nature Communications paper about mentorship has been officially retracted due to data concerns. More detail about the retraction here https://t.co/Qbt9ESZOTb
RT @elenagomezdiaz: The big power of small wins towards #GenderEquality Retraction of: @NatureComms https://t.co/OiCkuhVkCK that concluded…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @elenagomezdiaz: Y hoy podemos decir que se ha ganado una pequeña batalla hacia la #igualdad Editorial: https://t.co/0VYhR6c1Xg y nota…
Amigos de @pcoffeebreak , hablaréis sobre este cambio editorial? alrededor hay mucho ruido y como siempre... poca señal :) sería de gran ayuda entenderlo!
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @valeasche: This new paper in @NatureComms really made me sigh🙄: https://t.co/6wbkEsqbPi In response to AlShelby et al. (2020) In my op…
RT @KrishnanYamuna: Ok: That article which said if you have a female mentor you’re screwed? It’s retracted. Thank you those who led from th…
RT @elenagomezdiaz: Y hoy podemos decir que se ha ganado una pequeña batalla hacia la #igualdad Editorial: https://t.co/0VYhR6c1Xg y nota…
RT @FaizahAlotaibi_: تم سحب الدراسة من نيتشر اليوم! يبدو ان النساء الاكاديميات لهم فرص افضل في المجال اذا اخذوا توجيهات من المشرف المتعاو…
RT @elenagomezdiaz: The big power of small wins towards #GenderEquality Retraction of: @NatureComms https://t.co/OiCkuhVkCK that concluded…
RT @elenagomezdiaz: The big power of small wins towards #GenderEquality Retraction of: @NatureComms https://t.co/OiCkuhVkCK that concluded…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @elenagomezdiaz: Y hoy podemos decir que se ha ganado una pequeña batalla hacia la #igualdad Editorial: https://t.co/0VYhR6c1Xg y nota…
The @NatureComms article has now been retracted - right thing to do but too little too late?
No se si estaban al tanto de un trabajo que publico Nature sobre mujeres como mentorship que fue muy repudiado por la comunidad científica https://t.co/VaMLlbWyUl
RT @triziagos: after investigation and three independent reviewers the biased paper https://t.co/oIyQBFrkwa has been retracted! at least!
RT @elenagomezdiaz: Y hoy podemos decir que se ha ganado una pequeña batalla hacia la #igualdad Editorial: https://t.co/0VYhR6c1Xg y nota…