RT @millerjm86: Ok all, this new paper in @NatureComms really has me sad/confused/angry https://t.co/HN2gIV4rTt A Thread 1/
RT @CarolynBertozzi: Garbage alert: this “big authorship data” analysis stumbles on what we already know about gender bias in academia, the…
RT @stephaniehicks: I'm absolutely stunned this article made it past an editor's desk. I'll just RT a comment from the reviews: "Finally,…
"It’s right there in COPE guidelines. Articles should be retracted if the data are no longer reliable, in cases of misconduct or, most importantly, if enough people on Twitter are offended." (I read it here, not in the paper) https://t.co/FJROSWI8Tu
@sandman_gr Κανείς δε ξέρει https://t.co/W6GyQ2GRp5
RT @millerjm86: Ok all, this new paper in @NatureComms really has me sad/confused/angry https://t.co/HN2gIV4rTt A Thread 1/
RT @clairlemon: An extremely non-PC study recently published in @NatureComms suggests that junior women do better with male mentors than fe…
Why do we still have to prove this in the 21st century? I've had a great female mentor in academia who laid the basis for my interest in research
RT @CarolynBertozzi: Garbage alert: this “big authorship data” analysis stumbles on what we already know about gender bias in academia, the…
The association between early career informal mentorship in academic collaborations and junior author performance https://t.co/SXvz1gwdwS via @nuzzel
RT @vtraag: The recent paper on female mentorship in science caused quite some stir. https://t.co/3egSl73UXu In this blog post @LudoWaltman…
RT @CSHL_WISE: (1/2) We are less than 1 week away from our last virtual #journalclub of 2020 - join us 12/17 @ 5pm to discuss the importanc…
RT @NatureComms: We're aware of the concerns raised regarding the publication of this paper https://t.co/TCxHlFThh6. We thank those who've…
A fair amount of discussion regarding the following @nature publication - https://t.co/vx0Dzn6HeQ
(1/2) We are less than 1 week away from our last virtual #journalclub of 2020 - join us 12/17 @ 5pm to discuss the importance of Women Mentors in STEM. Our host Jonathan Werner @JonathanMWerner will host and talk about this recent Nature Comms article: h
The association between early career informal mentorship in academic collaborations and junior author performance https://t.co/5rDZQsb1s6
RT @k_oron: Wait, did I just read a paper in @NatureComms that advises that - in order to be successful in science- it’s best to avoid havi…
RT @k_oron: Wait, did I just read a paper in @NatureComms that advises that - in order to be successful in science- it’s best to avoid havi…
RT @DieterLukas: A great explanation for why it is necessary to think carefully about the way that gender inequalities might arise in acade…
RT @DieterLukas: A great explanation for why it is necessary to think carefully about the way that gender inequalities might arise in acade…
RT @DieterLukas: A great explanation for why it is necessary to think carefully about the way that gender inequalities might arise in acade…
A great explanation for why it is necessary to think carefully about the way that gender inequalities might arise in academia before thinking about suggestions to make changes (and a good introduction to dags & colliders):
RT @vtraag: The recent paper on female mentorship in science caused quite some stir. https://t.co/3egSl73UXu In this blog post @LudoWaltman…
RT @vtraag: The recent paper on female mentorship in science caused quite some stir. https://t.co/3egSl73UXu In this blog post @LudoWaltman…
RT @vtraag: The recent paper on female mentorship in science caused quite some stir. https://t.co/3egSl73UXu In this blog post @LudoWaltman…
RT @vtraag: The recent paper on female mentorship in science caused quite some stir. https://t.co/3egSl73UXu In this blog post @LudoWaltman…
RT @vtraag: The recent paper on female mentorship in science caused quite some stir. https://t.co/3egSl73UXu In this blog post @LudoWaltman…
RT @vtraag: The recent paper on female mentorship in science caused quite some stir. https://t.co/3egSl73UXu In this blog post @LudoWaltman…
RT @vtraag: The recent paper on female mentorship in science caused quite some stir. https://t.co/3egSl73UXu In this blog post @LudoWaltman…
@debsimpson3 @myheroistrane @mededdoc @PDX_Tom @GME_MD Even if names not exposed the reviews themselves and responses would be terribly useful as proved by that recent awful @NatureComms article in women as mentors. https://t.co/5XEbaxI9h6 #MedEdChat
RT @GME_MD: association btw early career informal mentorship ...collaborations & jr author performance | Nature Comm #MEDEDchat #PeerReview…
association btw early career informal mentorship ...collaborations & jr author performance | Nature Comm #MEDEDchat #PeerReview: huge responsibility @debsimpson3 @JournalofGME @GLBDallaghan @mededdoc @PDX_Tom https://t.co/tg42aha3ov
RT @vtraag: The recent paper on female mentorship in science caused quite some stir. https://t.co/3egSl73UXu In this blog post @LudoWaltman…
RT @watermicrobe: Raise your hand if you are a male scientist who had a female mentor who was pivotal to your success. This paper is way of…
RT @vtraag: The recent paper on female mentorship in science caused quite some stir. https://t.co/3egSl73UXu In this blog post @LudoWaltman…
RT @vtraag: The recent paper on female mentorship in science caused quite some stir. https://t.co/3egSl73UXu In this blog post @LudoWaltman…
RT @vtraag: The recent paper on female mentorship in science caused quite some stir. https://t.co/3egSl73UXu In this blog post @LudoWaltman…
RT @vtraag: The recent paper on female mentorship in science caused quite some stir. https://t.co/3egSl73UXu In this blog post @LudoWaltman…
RT @vtraag: The recent paper on female mentorship in science caused quite some stir. https://t.co/3egSl73UXu In this blog post @LudoWaltman…
RT @vtraag: The recent paper on female mentorship in science caused quite some stir. https://t.co/3egSl73UXu In this blog post @LudoWaltman…
RT @vtraag: The recent paper on female mentorship in science caused quite some stir. https://t.co/3egSl73UXu In this blog post @LudoWaltman…
RT @vtraag: The recent paper on female mentorship in science caused quite some stir. https://t.co/3egSl73UXu In this blog post @LudoWaltman…
RT @vtraag: The recent paper on female mentorship in science caused quite some stir. https://t.co/3egSl73UXu In this blog post @LudoWaltman…
RT @vtraag: The recent paper on female mentorship in science caused quite some stir. https://t.co/3egSl73UXu In this blog post @LudoWaltman…
The recent paper on female mentorship in science caused quite some stir. https://t.co/3egSl73UXu In this blog post @LudoWaltman and I discuss the causal intricacies of studying gender bias in science.1/10
RT @k_oron: Wait, did I just read a paper in @NatureComms that advises that - in order to be successful in science- it’s best to avoid havi…
RT @k_oron: Wait, did I just read a paper in @NatureComms that advises that - in order to be successful in science- it’s best to avoid havi…
RT @Love_H2O: And in case you wanted more about the Nature Comms paper (https://t.co/Et4olfYkoL) that suggested female mentorship reduced p…
RT @Love_H2O: And in case you wanted more about the Nature Comms paper (https://t.co/Et4olfYkoL) that suggested female mentorship reduced p…
Ridiculous
This is just a reminder that I am waiting for the investigation on this article to end https://t.co/WTKkPRnJnt
RT @ME_Frederickson: Hard not to feel aggrieved. Papers in last 2 weeks: women are caring for kids during COVID because we "evolved stronge…
RT @millerjm86: Ok all, this new paper in @NatureComms really has me sad/confused/angry https://t.co/HN2gIV4rTt A Thread 1/
RT @BaccarelliAA: A call to everyone on Twitter to immediately contact @NatureComms editorial board! Protest the publication of this deep…
RT @waterbarnes: Sigh. Where to begin? In our longitudinal study we showed that w each additional same gender mentor students had 2x great…
RT @HillPharmD: So...I'm pretty excited for a topic discussion today with @PhARMprogram staff & trainees re: controversial research. We wil…
So...I'm pretty excited for a topic discussion today with @PhARMprogram staff & trainees re: controversial research. We will primarily be discussing this paper in @NatureComms, but might also touch on naloxone moral hazard & The Bell Curve... https
If you want to be even more infuriated by this disaster, read the reviewer comments: https://t.co/6oF198b8Fq
RT @CarolynBertozzi: Garbage alert: this “big authorship data” analysis stumbles on what we already know about gender bias in academia, the…
Great response (https://t.co/CkOHCewKo5) to a slightly controversial nature paper #femalescientists #genderequity (https://t.co/Sch24UBMTZ)
RT @Murphy_Lab_OU: Raise your hand if you are a female scientist who had a female mentor who was pivotal to you success. This paper is way…
“While current diversity policies encourage same-gender mentorships to retain women in academia, our findings raise the possibility that opposite-gender mentorship may actually increase the impact of women who pursue a scientific career.” 👀 https://t.co/V
RT @FlyBehaviour: Finding: Female-female mentoring relationships result in lower publication outcomes. Author interpretation: Female-femal…
thanks to all my amazing mentors, who've so far been amazing women!🤚 #WomenInScience
RT @watermicrobe: Raise your hand if you are a male scientist who had a female mentor who was pivotal to your success. This paper is way of…
RT @MHendr1cks: Imagine if there was a study that found evidence of bias against women in grant review and concluded that, based on that, u…
Had lively discussion of controversial paper with negative conclusions about female mentoring. Systemic bias still present in academia! @UCLABrainSPORT #DBGBHH #JC @MlPrinsPhD @talin_babikian @lindz4RandF @SfNtweets @WNGtweets AlShebli @NatureComms 2020: h
RT @rodrigofnarciso: I cannot believe that this paper - after review - could even be considered for publication. An absolutely shameful and…
性別と仕事に関することを軽率に話しづらい風潮ですが、Nature 系の論文に「女性メンター(指導する側)からはメンティー(指導される側)が得られる効果が低くなる」という論文が出て炎上しています。 https://t.co/8H0K6kV9bb
RT @Murphy_Lab_OU: Raise your hand if you are a female scientist who had a female mentor who was pivotal to you success. This paper is way…
RT @MizzzouSleep: Kevin McGovney (Graduate Student) suggests this paper should include data on what resources & advice mentees are given ba…
Kevin McGovney (Graduate Student) suggests this paper should include data on what resources & advice mentees are given based on their gender, given this paper is comparing male and female protégé success.
Dr. Neetu Nair (Postdoctoral Fellow) shares the dangers of this paper's discussion, saying young scientists with less experience may read this article and choose to work with male mentors, as opposed to equally successful female mentors.
Dr. Melanie Stearns (Postdoctoral Fellow) points out resources and grantsmanship play a major role in academic success, where female scientists experience more roadblocks than their male colleagues.
RT @MizzzouSleep: Look out for our live tweets Friday, December 4th during our lab's discussion on an article in Nature Communications. Tun…
RT @ChristinaMccrae: Heads up! Tomorrow Drs Neetu Nair and Melanie Stearns will be leading a discussion in my lab of this highly controvers…
Early career informal mentorship with "big-shots" benefits scientific impact of junior authors and opposite-gender mentorship may increase the impact of women who pursue a scientific career. https://t.co/JZLKfODUZ2
RT @ChristinaMccrae: Heads up! Tomorrow Drs Neetu Nair and Melanie Stearns will be leading a discussion in my lab of this highly controvers…
Heads up! Tomorrow Drs Neetu Nair and Melanie Stearns will be leading a discussion in my lab of this highly controversial paper that suggests female protégés benefit more from male mentors.
RT @millerjm86: Ok all, this new paper in @NatureComms really has me sad/confused/angry https://t.co/HN2gIV4rTt A Thread 1/
There are so many problems with this study and I am glad to see there’s already those sending in criticisms. https://t.co/uyPiQrS50Z
To express very serious concerns, NIH leadership has submitted a commentary https://t.co/SLtL3b9qhG in reply to the same outrageous article published by Al Shebli et. al. in a recent issue of the 'Nature Communications' journal (vol.11: 5855) available at
Flawed interpretation of mentoring by women ignites call for change in science value systems Not a good move by Nature Communications: https://t.co/3wjyC3N19O please sign: https://t.co/2b98Y231BS
RT @ME_Frederickson: Hard not to feel aggrieved. Papers in last 2 weeks: women are caring for kids during COVID because we "evolved stronge…
RT @watermicrobe: Raise your hand if you are a male scientist who had a female mentor who was pivotal to your success. This paper is way of…
I am excited to have strong, inspiring female mentors as I work to become a veterinarian. Decreasing female-female mentorships is a sexist solution to a gender bias that is still present in science.
Sigh...
How did this paper get passed reviewers is beyond me
An article that has gotten a lot of attention recently being discussed by some up and coming young scientists and researchers. You don’t want to miss it! Change starts at the root!
I hate everything about this paper, discuss https://t.co/E5UGmlAYGN
RT @CNIOStopCancer: Informaciones como esta nos demuestran que aún queda mucho camino por recorrer en la eliminación de los sesgos de géner…
The authors had the option of pointing out the huge inequality women in science face, but they chose to just flat out say “females are bad mentors and bad protégés”.
RT @AlspachLab: This paper lays bare the inequalities that women in science face. But instead of framing it that way, the authors conclude…
RT @maradierssen: Nature Communications paper (https://t.co/eTP0jT0fqM) suggests females are worse mentors. Although being reviewed for pos…
Look out for our live tweets Friday, December 4th during our lab's discussion on an article in Nature Communications. Tune in Friday from 10-11 a.m. CST and let us know your thoughts! https://t.co/svHv4N03qx
RT @maradierssen: Nature Communications paper (https://t.co/eTP0jT0fqM) suggests females are worse mentors. Although being reviewed for pos…
Nature Communications paper (https://t.co/eTP0jT0fqM) suggests females are worse mentors. Although being reviewed for possible flaws, papers like this increase concern about the underrepresentation of women in science, that will require change societal pe
RT @millerjm86: Ok all, this new paper in @NatureComms really has me sad/confused/angry https://t.co/HN2gIV4rTt A Thread 1/