RT @DaviesswPhD: This paper disgusts me. All is does is showcase how deep rooted the whole academic system is in the patriarchy and how we…
RT @FlyBehaviour: Finding: Female-female mentoring relationships result in lower publication outcomes. Author interpretation: Female-femal…
RT @millerjm86: Ok all, this new paper in @NatureComms really has me sad/confused/angry https://t.co/HN2gIV4rTt A Thread 1/
RT @FlyBehaviour: Finding: Female-female mentoring relationships result in lower publication outcomes. Author interpretation: Female-femal…
RT @lizzy_t: Spent this morning getting angry about this paper and then laughing about its absurdity with my (female) colleague and our (fe…
RT @FlyBehaviour: Finding: Female-female mentoring relationships result in lower publication outcomes. Author interpretation: Female-femal…
RT @waterbarnes: Sigh. Where to begin? In our longitudinal study we showed that w each additional same gender mentor students had 2x great…
RT @MHendr1cks: Imagine if there was a study that found evidence of bias against women in grant review and concluded that, based on that, u…
RT @DaviesswPhD: This paper disgusts me. All is does is showcase how deep rooted the whole academic system is in the patriarchy and how we…
Spent this morning getting angry about this paper and then laughing about its absurdity with my (female) colleague and our (female) co-advised graduate student. Clearly we're all doomed by the gender dynamics of this relationship 😬
RT @DaviesswPhD: This paper disgusts me. All is does is showcase how deep rooted the whole academic system is in the patriarchy and how we…
RT @ctmurphy1: I think the *real* thing these data suggest needs to be addressed is publishing women's work fairly. My lab & pubs are typic…
RT @ctmurphy1: I think the *real* thing these data suggest needs to be addressed is publishing women's work fairly. My lab & pubs are typic…
RT @ctmurphy1: I think the *real* thing these data suggest needs to be addressed is publishing women's work fairly. My lab & pubs are typic…
RT @stephaniehicks: I'm absolutely stunned this article made it past an editor's desk. I'll just RT a comment from the reviews: "Finally,…
RT @DaviesswPhD: This paper disgusts me. All is does is showcase how deep rooted the whole academic system is in the patriarchy and how we…
RT @MariRSosa: I don’t even know what to say about this. This paper turns an opportunity to examine systemic biases against women in scienc…
As a female mentor with a lab that is 85% female, I ardently disagree with the conclusions drawn. On the contrary, we’re going places and kicking butt along the way!
Well worth reading this thread... The existing system has biases cemented over decades so the best path forward is to play into these biases regardless of other factors...wtf
RT @waterbarnes: Sigh. Where to begin? In our longitudinal study we showed that w each additional same gender mentor students had 2x great…
"We find evidence that female scientists face systemic disadvantages, and conclude that this is their fault and that women scientists should stop womaning" 🧐
I would not be in grad school right now if it wasn’t for the amazing mentorship I had from Dr. Rivah Winter while I was an undergrad in the @CoralReefFuture lab!!!! She taught me to be the scientist I wanted to be, and I owe my success to her — don’t buy t
RT @ctmurphy1: I think the *real* thing these data suggest needs to be addressed is publishing women's work fairly. My lab & pubs are typic…
WTF @NatureComms ????
RT @mbhufford: For those seeking a research mentor, do not take the conclusions of this @NatureComms study seriously. My female colleagues…
RT @millerjm86: Ok all, this new paper in @NatureComms really has me sad/confused/angry https://t.co/HN2gIV4rTt A Thread 1/
RT @millerjm86: Ok all, this new paper in @NatureComms really has me sad/confused/angry https://t.co/HN2gIV4rTt A Thread 1/
RT @MHendr1cks: Imagine if there was a study that found evidence of bias against women in grant review and concluded that, based on that, u…
Reason 349234 why people in STEM also need the humanities. Arguing women should not mentor other women is harmful and backwards. The authors and @NatureComms need to do better.
Read this thread through to the conclusions! According to this paper, I need to stop mentoring young women as it's hurting my career...rather than, you know, working on systemic biases. Spoiler alert: I'm not gonna stop mentoring other women.
RT @CarolynBertozzi: Garbage alert: this “big authorship data” analysis stumbles on what we already know about gender bias in academia, the…
RT @MarchForScience: Concluding that "women are bad mentors for women" is a horrific take. WTF @NatureComms?
............. uh....
RT @DaviesswPhD: This paper disgusts me. All is does is showcase how deep rooted the whole academic system is in the patriarchy and how we…
RT @precatlady: 👀 (of interest to #digiarch) https://t.co/8pbiOvijRh
RT @stephaniehicks: I'm absolutely stunned this article made it past an editor's desk. I'll just RT a comment from the reviews: "Finally,…
RT @CarolynBertozzi: Garbage alert: this “big authorship data” analysis stumbles on what we already know about gender bias in academia, the…
RT @MHendr1cks: Imagine if there was a study that found evidence of bias against women in grant review and concluded that, based on that, u…
RT @MHendr1cks: Imagine if there was a study that found evidence of bias against women in grant review and concluded that, based on that, u…
RT @CarolynBertozzi: Garbage alert: this “big authorship data” analysis stumbles on what we already know about gender bias in academia, the…
RT @burginam: Lots of commentary on this, rightly so. I'll just add that BS like this is what we get when we define "success" too narrowl…
RT @millerjm86: Ok all, this new paper in @NatureComms really has me sad/confused/angry https://t.co/HN2gIV4rTt A Thread 1/
RT @burginam: Lots of commentary on this, rightly so. I'll just add that BS like this is what we get when we define "success" too narrowl…
RT @CarolynBertozzi: Garbage alert: this “big authorship data” analysis stumbles on what we already know about gender bias in academia, the…
RT @CarolynBertozzi: Garbage alert: this “big authorship data” analysis stumbles on what we already know about gender bias in academia, the…
RT @aaberhe: I think this summary accurately captures a lot of people's opinion about this paper and the journal that allowed the paper to…
RT @FlyBehaviour: Finding: Female-female mentoring relationships result in lower publication outcomes. Author interpretation: Female-femal…
RT @FlyBehaviour: Finding: Female-female mentoring relationships result in lower publication outcomes. Author interpretation: Female-femal…
RT @CarolynBertozzi: Garbage alert: this “big authorship data” analysis stumbles on what we already know about gender bias in academia, the…
RT @GreeneScientist: TFW you find evidence of sexism in science ( https://t.co/NVVN4bkjxq ) and instead of having your takeaway be "wow, we…
RT @ZacharyAaro: “...our findings raise the possibility that opposite-gender mentorship may actually increase the impact of women who pursu…
RT @millerjm86: Ok all, this new paper in @NatureComms really has me sad/confused/angry https://t.co/HN2gIV4rTt A Thread 1/
RT @PsychRabble: "We also find that increasing the proportion of female mentors is associated not only with a reduction in post-mentorship…
RT @ctmurphy1: I think the *real* thing these data suggest needs to be addressed is publishing women's work fairly. My lab & pubs are typic…
RT @mbhufford: For those seeking a research mentor, do not take the conclusions of this @NatureComms study seriously. My female colleagues…
RT @stephaniehicks: I'm absolutely stunned this article made it past an editor's desk. I'll just RT a comment from the reviews: "Finally,…
Hold on! Are there enough non-male senior mentors in the science community to do this ‘study’ with any degree of precision? I don’t think so. https://t.co/9BZ2xo7apo
RT @millerjm86: Ok all, this new paper in @NatureComms really has me sad/confused/angry https://t.co/HN2gIV4rTt A Thread 1/
RT @millerjm86: Ok all, this new paper in @NatureComms really has me sad/confused/angry https://t.co/HN2gIV4rTt A Thread 1/
RT @DNLee5: Wow, just wow. Let me say it again...Citation practices are political... Also, commitment to existing inequitable systems must…
RT @millerjm86: Ok all, this new paper in @NatureComms really has me sad/confused/angry https://t.co/HN2gIV4rTt A Thread 1/
RT @millerjm86: Ok all, this new paper in @NatureComms really has me sad/confused/angry https://t.co/HN2gIV4rTt A Thread 1/
RT @CarolynBertozzi: Garbage alert: this “big authorship data” analysis stumbles on what we already know about gender bias in academia, the…
When the altmetrics of your paper sky-rocket but for all the wrong reasons... also, why is @NatureComms giving voice to this study? 🤢 #WomenInSTEM #Sexism #SuchALongWayToGo
@NatureComms: You have explaining to do after recklessly publishing this article, which tarnishes your reputation and is embarrassing for those of us who have trusted you with our science in the past. This is irresponsible and harmful to women in STEM. ht
RT @CarolynBertozzi: Garbage alert: this “big authorship data” analysis stumbles on what we already know about gender bias in academia, the…
“One potential explanation could be that, historically, male scientists had enjoyed more privileges and access to resources than their female counterparts, and thus were able to provide more support to their protégés.” Need to change the system not reinfor
RT @DasLab_Pombe: This is infuriating for so many reasons. It pains me to think that @NatureComms readers all over the world will read this…
RT @GreeneScientist: TFW you find evidence of sexism in science ( https://t.co/NVVN4bkjxq ) and instead of having your takeaway be "wow, we…
RT @millerjm86: Ok all, this new paper in @NatureComms really has me sad/confused/angry https://t.co/HN2gIV4rTt A Thread 1/
Smh
“...our findings raise the possibility that opposite-gender mentorship may actually increase the impact of women who pursue a scientific career” —🤡 ^^ this is where big data fails If you design policy based on a bias system, you’ll get bias solutions.🤷♂
The conclusions in this paper are WILD! I shouldn't mentor women because a man could provide them with better opportunities? #WomenInSTEM deserve better!
RT @stephaniehicks: I'm absolutely stunned this article made it past an editor's desk. I'll just RT a comment from the reviews: "Finally,…
RT @DasLab_Pombe: This is infuriating for so many reasons. It pains me to think that @NatureComms readers all over the world will read this…
Quite thought provoking ... and hopefully action inciting.
RT @GreeneScientist: TFW Nature Patriarchy rejects your paper and invites you to be considered at @NatureComms instead. https://t.co/z2ymJQ…
RT @millerjm86: Ok all, this new paper in @NatureComms really has me sad/confused/angry https://t.co/HN2gIV4rTt A Thread 1/
RT @millerjm86: Ok all, this new paper in @NatureComms really has me sad/confused/angry https://t.co/HN2gIV4rTt A Thread 1/
RT @DNLee5: Wow, just wow. Let me say it again...Citation practices are political... Also, commitment to existing inequitable systems must…
RT @FlyBehaviour: Finding: Female-female mentoring relationships result in lower publication outcomes. Author interpretation: Female-femal…
I don’t even know what to say about this. This paper turns an opportunity to examine systemic biases against women in science into... an argument for fewer women in science? And argument that only men should mentor women? What??! #WomenInSTEM
RT @CarolynBertozzi: Garbage alert: this “big authorship data” analysis stumbles on what we already know about gender bias in academia, the…
RT @MicaPhD_BeKind: Evidence that once again that individuals rather than the existing system of oppression and prejudice is blamed. The co…
RT @millerjm86: Ok all, this new paper in @NatureComms really has me sad/confused/angry https://t.co/HN2gIV4rTt A Thread 1/
This paper manages to be both total BS in terms of "methods" and analysis, sexist and damaging to science. Way to go @NatureComms What editor was reaponsible for this monstrosity?? @elisader @nat_lebot @drfionarita https://t.co/KZ5wC8d6RF
RT @Sheril_: When a scientific journal ignores deeply ingrained institutional barriers + implicit bias against women in academia to promote…
RT @GreeneScientist: TFW you find evidence of sexism in science ( https://t.co/NVVN4bkjxq ) and instead of having your takeaway be "wow, we…
RT @sbarolo: This is a must-read thread. The @NatureComms paper is ridiculous for a few reasons. Using productivity metrics (which reveal s…
This is fucking bullshit. https://t.co/L69RbDmVRC
The association between early career informal mentorship in academic collaborations and junior author performance | Nature Communications https://t.co/lyz3lnyPXj
RT @stephaniehicks: I'm absolutely stunned this article made it past an editor's desk. I'll just RT a comment from the reviews: "Finally,…
THIS
RT @CarolynBertozzi: Garbage alert: this “big authorship data” analysis stumbles on what we already know about gender bias in academia, the…
RT @Jente_O: "As for the impact of each scientist in any given year, it was derived from the citation network." https://t.co/K0Xuy9yTPX Sc…
Evidence that once again that individuals rather than the existing system of oppression and prejudice is blamed. The conclusions of this article perpetuate inequity rather than recognize how it contributed to their findings. https://t.co/TYgq4UQlUk .@natur
RT @markbothwell: This is the journalistic equivalent of a click-bait paper. There is a reason that many refer to the Nature cluster of jou…
"Depressing, but NOT surprising..."
RT @stephaniehicks: I'm absolutely stunned this article made it past an editor's desk. I'll just RT a comment from the reviews: "Finally,…