RT @millerjm86: Ok all, this new paper in @NatureComms really has me sad/confused/angry https://t.co/HN2gIV4rTt A Thread 1/
@NatureComms what is this ?????? 🤮🤢
YES
RT @ME_Frederickson: Hard not to feel aggrieved. Papers in last 2 weeks: women are caring for kids during COVID because we "evolved stronge…
@erasmomac Para que al final publiquen cosas como esta: https://t.co/0h2O6i5kUI. 🤦🏽♀️
Here's the controversial new paper suggesting that women mentored by women scientists may be at a disadvantage... I would say the the dearth of female "big shots" likely biased the outcome of this study. Vicious circle... https://t.co/N8x0bQqmnB
So apparently, female trainees are best mentored by men. Seriously?!? One of my favorite mentors once told me it sometimes takes "balls" to be a good mentor. Hunh, I didn't realize SHE was being literal... Go figure... Piss off! https://t.co/H3DdvI0Wav
Returning to the controversial Nature Communications paper itself: https://t.co/HJ2bB5QGbB
RT @ME_Frederickson: Hard not to feel aggrieved. Papers in last 2 weeks: women are caring for kids during COVID because we "evolved stronge…
RT @cientificasmx: Esta semana se publicó en @NatureComms un artículo que causó indignación en esta red. Analizan la relación mentora-prot…
RT @millerjm86: Ok all, this new paper in @NatureComms really has me sad/confused/angry https://t.co/HN2gIV4rTt A Thread 1/
RT @argplantwomen: We believe the data shown in AlShebli et al. (2020) do not accurately reflect “mentorship” but just authorship networks.…
RT @luisaviegas: On November 17, 2020, a scientific article was published in @NatureComms where the authors suggest that female scientists…
RT @marcus_phd: This paper perpetuates a dangerous reliance on academic patriarchy. You don't have to encourage women to collaborate with m…
RT @DrJSPotter: Been thinking about this paper. My first reaction was to roll my eyes and move on. Flaws are apparent to most readers. The…
各位女推友,特别是学术圈的女推友。你们怎么看待这篇publication? 我很在乎你们的观点。 https://t.co/1xR82E0QmW
OMG 😱! I always think studying or publishing gender is beyond the academically sexy gender comparisons, it is to understand what is going on! Too sad to see these in 21st-century @NatureComms.
RT @clairlemon: An extremely non-PC study recently published in @NatureComms suggests that junior women do better with male mentors than fe…
RT @NASAdoc: Very helpful thread on a recent Nature Comms paper that suggests that having female mentors or mentees is likely to be deleter…
Makalenin yazarları ateşten gömlek giymiş. Büyük bir veriden elde edilen böyle bir konudaki bilgilerin, çok dikkatli ele alınması gerekir. Bilimde kadını, toplumsal cinsiyet ve cinsiyetçilik bağlamındaki çalışmalara değinmeden tartışmak tehlikeli! https://
What's this malarkey?? A paper about the impact of gender in mentoring outcomes for women does a reasonable job of proving systemic discrimination and then goes face-first into ridiculous bullshit by concluding women should just not mentor other women
RT @SpiritedSparr0w: Thread of comments from scientists who want papers redacted because they don't like the findings. You hate to see it.
RT @tomkimmerer: I am a botanist, broadly speaking. I have the great fortune that my science has its roots in great women scientists, from…
RT @pitiklinov: Por lo visto, están pidiendo retractar este estudio que encuentra que académicas mujeres que son tuteladas por hombres cose…
RT @ME_Frederickson: Hard not to feel aggrieved. Papers in last 2 weeks: women are caring for kids during COVID because we "evolved stronge…
Sometimes, being a ~*~woman in STEM~*~ seems alright, but then I’m reminded not to get too comfortable—the mask always comes off.
@belguzarnilayt for bachelor's as a mentor, and Liv Hoversten & Clara Martin for MSc. as both being a mentor and being a supervisor. if I am where I am now it's thanks to all these amazing women.
#BMS525 Reading this article made me both sad and livid. As a woman in the STEM field who has been mentored by many amazing women, the suggestion that they will hinder my career success and I will hinder theirs because we are women is hurtful and unethical
RT @AmandaEBates: PLS RETWEET: Sign to be a signatory on a response to https://t.co/f9PsMgxwDE & document mentoring experience here: https:…
This paper is SUCH A BULLSHIT! Scientific workplaces already are such a menacing ambient for women, and still there are people trying to make this even worse!!!
RT @Vertumne1: 🔴Alerte rouge: une étude publiée dans Nature révélerait que plus le mentorat d'un étudiant comprend de femmes moins il aura…
RT @watermicrobe: Raise your hand if you are a male scientist who had a female mentor who was pivotal to your success. This paper is way of…
Le rôle du père.
I'm still in shock: The association between early career informal mentorship in academic collaborations and junior author performance https://t.co/zh9f055ffG
Please, @NatureComms retract it asap!!!!! And explain to us why???? Why this article was accepted??? A lot of good science rejected and this bullshit published in @NatureComms! Unbelievable! Disgusting!!!!!!!
RT @rachelawiselure: how is this in Nature!??! My advisors have always been women for the most part; @blillehaugen , @rmqueen , & so many m…
RT @AmandaEBates: PLS RETWEET: Sign to be a signatory on a response to https://t.co/f9PsMgxwDE & document mentoring experience here: https:…
Really in 2020 ? https://t.co/QKL9kxob7k From when shared authorship is a measure for mentoring?
RT @ME_Frederickson: Hard not to feel aggrieved. Papers in last 2 weeks: women are caring for kids during COVID because we "evolved stronge…
@feminisciencia Me gustaría saber tu opinión acerca del más reciente articulo publicado en Nature, acerca del impacto que tienen mentores/as sobre la carrera científica de sus orientados https://t.co/OR0WCGJTJR
RT @ME_Frederickson: Hard not to feel aggrieved. Papers in last 2 weeks: women are caring for kids during COVID because we "evolved stronge…
RT @NatureComms: We're aware of the concerns raised regarding the publication of this paper https://t.co/TCxHlFThh6. We thank those who've…
Quietly wondering how much it cost to publish this: https://t.co/V34PoYnjqu
RT @eisenberg13: Glad my female mentor agrees that the terrible paper claiming “female mentors are worse for female trainee’s careers than…
RT @ME_Frederickson: Hard not to feel aggrieved. Papers in last 2 weeks: women are caring for kids during COVID because we "evolved stronge…
Some important points for future research: What is the trend in last decade or last two decade Have the trends changed from 1970s to 2010s Comparison in Physics and Engineering, Chemistry and Biomedical Sciences.
RT @ME_Frederickson: Hard not to feel aggrieved. Papers in last 2 weeks: women are caring for kids during COVID because we "evolved stronge…
RT @olpetita: 👇👇👇Great thread from my colleague @MegaFaunaMe clearly and concisely explaining the methodological flaws and misleading inter…
RT @NatureComms: We're aware of the concerns raised regarding the publication of this paper https://t.co/TCxHlFThh6. We thank those who've…
Can someone please explain to me why I should strive to publish in Nature??? Sort it out @NatureComms (4/n) https://t.co/727DNma3bn
Another good couple of weeks...
RT @Murphy_Lab_OU: Raise your hand if you are a female scientist who had a female mentor who was pivotal to you success. This paper is way…
RT @ERC_RESOLUTION: As a female Professor, PI of an #StGERC, and supervisor of female students, I am shocked that such biased paper could b…
RT @ME_Frederickson: Hard not to feel aggrieved. Papers in last 2 weeks: women are caring for kids during COVID because we "evolved stronge…
RT @ME_Frederickson: Hard not to feel aggrieved. Papers in last 2 weeks: women are caring for kids during COVID because we "evolved stronge…
RT @pitiklinov: Por lo visto, están pidiendo retractar este estudio que encuentra que académicas mujeres que son tuteladas por hombres cose…
🙌🏾
RT @ME_Frederickson: Hard not to feel aggrieved. Papers in last 2 weeks: women are caring for kids during COVID because we "evolved stronge…
RT @millerjm86: Ok all, this new paper in @NatureComms really has me sad/confused/angry https://t.co/HN2gIV4rTt A Thread 1/
Well i can imagine why it'd get large opposing voices. No one wants to hear or see that type of stuff online, even if it might be part of reality outside.
RT @ERC_RESOLUTION: As a female Professor, PI of an #StGERC, and supervisor of female students, I am shocked that such biased paper could b…
RT @millerjm86: Ok all, this new paper in @NatureComms really has me sad/confused/angry https://t.co/HN2gIV4rTt A Thread 1/
Still no response?
RT @Alejandra_ReCa: Un nuevo y controvertido artículo en #Nature habla de que mujeres mentoreando mujeres no es buena idea 🤔 han tenido en…
RT @yorl: Having now read the Nature Communications paper that is causing all the uproar, I have two reactions. First, the causal language…
RT @Alejandra_ReCa: Un nuevo y controvertido artículo en #Nature habla de que mujeres mentoreando mujeres no es buena idea 🤔 han tenido en…
RT @ME_Frederickson: Hard not to feel aggrieved. Papers in last 2 weeks: women are caring for kids during COVID because we "evolved stronge…
A reasonable take!
RT @Alejandra_ReCa: Un nuevo y controvertido artículo en #Nature habla de que mujeres mentoreando mujeres no es buena idea 🤔 han tenido en…
Wow. That seems like some very bad analysis by a bunch of men overlooking bad behavior and systemic biases of men.
how is this in Nature!??! My advisors have always been women for the most part; @blillehaugen , @rmqueen , & so many more mentors and guides
Reading this paper did my head in. Follow the scientific method, fine, but at least discuss results properly: why our academic system is holding back success for female mentor-mentee relationships. Also the variables analyzed aren't the best representation
RT @pinda_25: The association between early career informal mentorship in academic collaborations and junior author performance Who dare t…
The association between early career informal mentorship in academic collaborations and junior author performance Who dare to say science needs men's dominance? Did the editor read this before publication?. No way https://t.co/XAXMSPlX63
RT @ME_Frederickson: Hard not to feel aggrieved. Papers in last 2 weeks: women are caring for kids during COVID because we "evolved stronge…
Women - too busy trying to fight the thought that we don't belong to be confident enough to deserve equal pay. 🙃
RT @ME_Frederickson: Hard not to feel aggrieved. Papers in last 2 weeks: women are caring for kids during COVID because we "evolved stronge…
RT @ME_Frederickson: Hard not to feel aggrieved. Papers in last 2 weeks: women are caring for kids during COVID because we "evolved stronge…
RT @ME_Frederickson: Hard not to feel aggrieved. Papers in last 2 weeks: women are caring for kids during COVID because we "evolved stronge…
RT @ME_Frederickson: Hard not to feel aggrieved. Papers in last 2 weeks: women are caring for kids during COVID because we "evolved stronge…
RT @ME_Frederickson: Hard not to feel aggrieved. Papers in last 2 weeks: women are caring for kids during COVID because we "evolved stronge…
Hard not to feel aggrieved. Papers in last 2 weeks: women are caring for kids during COVID because we "evolved stronger motivation" for childcare (https://t.co/jIYtz28I7f), we're bad mentors (https://t.co/bB1SZwJ6L1), and too timid for equal pay (https://t
RT @cientificasmx: Esta semana se publicó en @NatureComms un artículo que causó indignación en esta red. Analizan la relación mentora-prot…
RT @NickieNewton: @NatureComms - Is this seriously this is the message you want to portray in 2020?! In my experience, this is completely…
RT @MTeesson: It’s diabolical that this was published. In the words of @CCriadoPerez “for the women who persist: keep on being bloody diffi…
@NatureComms makes false claims about supporting #diversity and #BlackLivesMatter. Wake up call, if you amplify incomplete work riddled with systemic bias that negatively impacts 50% of the human population; your claims to support #diversity are empty and
RT @AcademicCoven: The last thing we need is a top tier journal perpetuating sexism in academia. Female mentorship is important, valuable a…
@NatureComms Yet in the same week you tweet this, you published an article about systemic bias against women in STEM research that made faulty inference about causation from incomplete correlations. https://t.co/oU3Rn0HMU2
I predominately mentor women. It is a privilege & honor. #Mentorship is a special bond that is personal & this study’s many confounding variables & study design flaws cannot assess @WomenSurgeons @4womeninscience @nature https://t.co/7
The last thing we need is a top tier journal perpetuating sexism in academia. Female mentorship is important, valuable and many of us wouldn’t be who we are without it.
Is this for real? Did Nature Communications really publish this nonsense?! https://t.co/NNMVSMxtlR
Love seeing my feed filled with protest of the @NatureComms article discouraging female mentees from seeking female mentorship. Opportunity to sign on to a response to #Nature below.
RT @Lotus_STEMM: Research has shown the importance of #mentorship, with culture and representation at the forefront. However, the paper fro…
Luisa M. Diele-Viegas, PhD. of the U. Maryland Biology department, invites your signature at https://t.co/lRJQzULkf2 on this response to the Nature Communications paper at https://t.co/d3tKNr8J5S:
RT @WomenInStat: I'm sure by now many of you have seen this article published last week in @NatureComms https://t.co/X2DnDS5eWL
RT @lastpositivist: The general contours of this take is very very familiar - "sure this is bad, but it is bad in a typical way, retraction…
RT @pitiklinov: Por lo visto, están pidiendo retractar este estudio que encuentra que académicas mujeres que son tuteladas por hombres cose…
So what to do if you've done some data work and found an inconvenient result like this? You can try to put the right spin on it: https://t.co/zrQGzhIZFe