If you are not at Stanford, here is the link to that article: https://t.co/XAa2IVC7TP. It's an impressive long list of signatures already -- add yours!
RT @FlyBehaviour: Finding: Female-female mentoring relationships result in lower publication outcomes. Author interpretation: Female-femal…
Studying bias can find another bias. “One potential explanation could be that..male scientists enjoyed more privileges and access to resources than their female counterparts, and thus were able to provide more support to their protégés.” need more “big
@JanaeHeath1 @caitclancy @SKassutto - you better check out this article...I would be a bad mentor not to share it! Discuss...
RT @JOylerMD: Controversial article =“Current diversity policies promoting female–female mentorships, as well-intended as they may be, coul…
This is a surprising piece of literature, I'm actually feeling a bit incredulous at the result that female mentorship had a limiting effect on protégé academic success. There is more to the study than that of course. https://t.co/pzWjUkIS1O
All three of my supervisors are women and I couldn’t be happier about it btw 🙄🙄🙄🙄 https://t.co/Me1RXlyPMl
✋✋✋
Controversial article =“Current diversity policies promoting female–female mentorships, as well-intended as they may be, could hinder the careers of women who remain in academia”. I disagree and have benefited from many female mentors! @FutureDocs https:
RT @miriam_ionica: I found this NatureComm paper that suggests that women mentoring women is associated with a reduction in the post-mentor…
RT @AmandaEBates: PLS RETWEET: Sign to be a signatory on a response to https://t.co/f9PsMgxwDE & document mentoring experience here: https:…
RT @millerjm86: Ok all, this new paper in @NatureComms really has me sad/confused/angry https://t.co/HN2gIV4rTt A Thread 1/
The interpretation of the authors undermines the role of female mentors and mentees. https://t.co/BD2EqqAwhA
I found this NatureComm paper that suggests that women mentoring women is associated with a reduction in the post-mentorship impact of mentorees. #WomenInSTEM https://t.co/ZwxabzWJg4 (1/3)
Early career informal mentorship with "big-shots" benefits scientific impact of junior authors and opposite-gender mentorship may increase the impact of women who pursue a scientific career. https://t.co/JZLKfODUZ2
RT @tamler: I know I'm supposed to get all worked up about this paper but I forget which way https://t.co/eMK9jqMcG4
RT @BaccarelliAA: A call to everyone on Twitter to immediately contact @NatureComms editorial board! Protest the publication of this deep…
RT @ME_Frederickson: Hard not to feel aggrieved. Papers in last 2 weeks: women are caring for kids during COVID because we "evolved stronge…
Interesting read. Mentoring early career scholars is probably the most impactful work I’ve done. https://t.co/qFt8REK4Ta
The article link https://t.co/Qv9f5TPcn9
Pubmed link to article (I'd rather not build their Altmetric score): https://t.co/HaRGRG9olW
If Nature Communications published this to catch attentions, that's pretty lame.
Sigh. https://t.co/8vTWyrMo0Y
as an Early career my self, as member of a group that is lead by a female PI, as a mentee of female scientists, I feel it is rather unacceptable that in 2020 despite all the efforts we make to promote equality and diversity, journals still publish this mes
ICYMI - that paper indicating that women mentoring other women is the problem (not systematic sexism). Breakdown here of how researcher's correlation was wrongly was attributed as causation.
RT @CarolynBertozzi: Garbage alert: this “big authorship data” analysis stumbles on what we already know about gender bias in academia, the…
@Shubawrite @PrajvalShastri @rk_banyal @gsaipsn @nandita_j It's open access you should be able to get it here: https://t.co/WMhPaFs3Af
RT @millerjm86: Ok all, this new paper in @NatureComms really has me sad/confused/angry https://t.co/HN2gIV4rTt A Thread 1/
RT @CarolynBertozzi: Garbage alert: this “big authorship data” analysis stumbles on what we already know about gender bias in academia, the…
Well, here’s a multilevel failure on the part of the publication process. Incredibly disappointing and disturbing.
RT @watermicrobe: Raise your hand if you are a male scientist who had a female mentor who was pivotal to your success. This paper is way of…
☹️🤦♀️
Unbelievable-this study is flawed and the conclusion that female scientists should not mentor women is absurd
RT @Victorian_Poet: Science is cool because if you set out to do an experiment with a specific result in mind, bypassing the most basic pri…
RT @Victorian_Poet: “If you have a male mentor you’ll get published more and THATS why women shouldn’t be mentors” Congratulations, you u…
RT @clairlemon: An extremely non-PC study recently published in @NatureComms suggests that junior women do better with male mentors than fe…
RT @clairlemon: An extremely non-PC study recently published in @NatureComms suggests that junior women do better with male mentors than fe…
RT @clairlemon: An extremely non-PC study recently published in @NatureComms suggests that junior women do better with male mentors than fe…
RT @AmandaEBates: PLS RETWEET: Sign to be a signatory on a response to https://t.co/f9PsMgxwDE & document mentoring experience here: https:…
RT @arianemsasso: A group of amazing women wrote a reply (in Portuguese and English) to the quite superficial conclusion of a paper publish…
A group of amazing women wrote a reply (in Portuguese and English) to the quite superficial conclusion of a paper published in nature communications: https://t.co/L3EEuXk8Wt The paper says that women should avoid being a mentor/ mentee of other women. If
3. “current diversity policies promoting female–female mentorships, as well-intended as they may be, could hinder the careers of women who remain in academia in unexpected ways” https://t.co/W6GyQ2GRp5
Αυτό το έκτρωμα δημοσιεύτηκε στο Nature. Εν συντομία με βάση το ότι co-authorship=mentorship (γελάμε εδώ πέρα) μας ενημερώνει ότι : 1.“female protégés who remain in academia reap more benefits when mentored by males rather than equally-impactful females”
2.“mentors benefit more when working with male protégés rather than working with comparable female protégés, especially if the mentor is female” https://t.co/W6GyQ2GRp5
RT @HaynosAF: Thanks to @NatureComms, I have realized I’ve been doing mentorship all wrong for my female mentees. I’m so honored for this c…
RT @_emmarosewest: Female mentor/mentee relationships are THE most rewarding professional and personal relationships that I’ve had. I’ll co…
Many of you may be aware of the recent controversial article in Nature Communications (https://t.co/FtVgH12eKN). We would like to express a statement of concern relating to these issues in an open letter ( https://t.co/rVW9mjMZOO)
I’m just a sample n=1 but I disagree w this “study.” Most of my mentors have been #WomenInSTEM as well as most people who‘ve invited me onto projects, committees, given me teaching experience & much more. Thanks @kerrie_a_wilson @AngelaSocSci + many ot
RT @NAChristakis: I've now been told that this superb author group, incl @alshebli, wrote a prior paper in @NatureComms with similar data/m…
The much talked about paper!! “...While current #diversity policies encourage same-gender #mentorships to retain women in academia, our findings raise the possibility that opposite-gender #mentorship may actually increase the impact of women who pursue a
And in case you wanted more about the Nature Comms paper (https://t.co/Et4olfYkoL) that suggested female mentorship reduced post-mentorship paper impact, here are the paper's reviews that are public. https://t.co/EgdCklrqrm The paper is now under editoria
RT @NAChristakis: I've now been told that this superb author group, incl @alshebli, wrote a prior paper in @NatureComms with similar data/m…
RT @NAChristakis: I've now been told that this superb author group, incl @alshebli, wrote a prior paper in @NatureComms with similar data/m…
I've now been told that this superb author group, incl @alshebli, wrote a prior paper in @NatureComms with similar data/methods and found that ethnic diversity enhanced scientific impact. There was no call to retract that paper. https://t.co/YKELa6eZ9u h
RT @d1001: No puede ser que Nature publique esto en contra de las mujeres en ciencia😡Más allá de los errores metodológicos (que los hay!),…
No puede ser que Nature publique esto en contra de las mujeres en ciencia😡Más allá de los errores metodológicos (que los hay!), no pueden publicar esas opiniones y recomendaciones. Todo mal! https://t.co/qLCokQe6GR Yo firmé este pedido https://t.co/SoCw8au
@AcademicBatgirl 😞🙈 Hopping nature communications will retire this article https://t.co/39SWegYUM6
RT @Francrispi: https://t.co/FfRzN4X4RG 1) RESULTADO: Investigadore/as con mentoras mujeres tienen peores resultados académicos. 2) EXPLI…
lol
RT @NatureComms: We're aware of the concerns raised regarding the publication of this paper https://t.co/TCxHlFThh6. We thank those who've…
RT @NatureComms: We have now published an Editor’s Note on this paper https://t.co/TCxHlFThh6 to alert readers of our ongoing investigation…
RT @JulieBrill5: @CyertMartha Re: https://t.co/DmXWv5YT6j To affirm your support for female scientists, scholars and mentors and unbiased r…
If you haven't seen the paper that launched 1000 outrages: https://t.co/MVpgyuxIFx #equity #stem
RT @tamler: I know I'm supposed to get all worked up about this paper but I forget which way https://t.co/eMK9jqMcG4
RT @EWhitteck: Will definitely add this to new faculty orientation and our new mentoring program (NOT) "female protégés who remain in acade…
Link para o artigo: https://t.co/fY5kOs9NAx
The article can be found here to convince you (if needed) to sign and that we as a scientific community have still a long way to go regarding equity https://t.co/LTQqla1QRJ
RT @gmboland: @RogersLabUCD This is driven by the same garbage that allows things like this to be published: https://t.co/uXwskUbQBD. One w…
RT @argplantwomen: Las @argplantwomen pensamos que este artículo no expresa la realidad de las mujeres científicas. Si compartís nuestra mi…
RT @millerjm86: Ok all, this new paper in @NatureComms really has me sad/confused/angry https://t.co/HN2gIV4rTt A Thread 1/
A deeply frustrating thread 😓
RT @millerjm86: Ok all, this new paper in @NatureComms really has me sad/confused/angry https://t.co/HN2gIV4rTt A Thread 1/
Very nice thread on what exactly has been going on: https://t.co/bRD7zFyBl1
So in conclusion, we suggest the further perpetuating gender inequality in STEM by avoiding female mentorship 🙄😤🤯 https://t.co/8ULZRQfEzg
@RogersLabUCD This is driven by the same garbage that allows things like this to be published: https://t.co/uXwskUbQBD. One word, bias. So sorry! You should not have to justify your worth. You sound amazing and mentees would be lucky to work with you! @Aca
Totally agree. Thanks @wendy_bickmore. And I would add one other reason: this article (https://t.co/mmn7MZdbNh), for which editors "are investigating the concerns raised"..but in the meantime they decided to publish it.
RT @storylandcomm: #GenderInAg Open access link to the paper in question: https://t.co/iCK8iv7maY
#GenderInAg Open access link to the paper in question: https://t.co/iCK8iv7maY
https://t.co/y9Uct3CVC9 Thanks @VIBLifeSciences for the clear message in your statement!
This ... I have no words, it's 2020 #naturecommunications https://t.co/M3z8EGwH5x
We all know this is true from our various office experiences, no one wants to zoom in on it. Women prefer male bosses, and male bosses are better mentors and bosses to women in lower levels.
RT @waterbarnes: Sigh. Where to begin? In our longitudinal study we showed that w each additional same gender mentor students had 2x great…
Will definitely add this to new faculty orientation and our new mentoring program (NOT) "female protégés who remain in academia reap more benefits when mentored by males rather than equally-impactful females." Seriously?!? https://t.co/Wyj0YOKemb
I was always mentored by female PIs. I'm sure they are not even a bit worse than male PIs and in fact they are much more productive than any others (lol) The stats told us that we need a change and should all strive for the genuine equality in the scientif
@CyertMartha Re: https://t.co/DmXWv5YT6j To affirm your support for female scientists, scholars and mentors and unbiased rigorous science, sign this open letter. RT and share with colleagues. #WomenInSTEM @CDNwomenSTEM https://t.co/AdlZwUQ1S6
RT @ErinMGibson: Female mentors are the reason I stayed in academia for a postdoc, survived my postdoc while parenting, was confident enoug…
«Our gender-related findings suggest that current diversity policies promoting female–female mentorships, as well-intended as they may be, could hinder the careers of women who remain in academia in unexpected ways.» https://t.co/CgNxhzaQen
RT @millerjm86: Ok all, this new paper in @NatureComms really has me sad/confused/angry https://t.co/HN2gIV4rTt A Thread 1/
RT @AmandaEBates: PLS RETWEET: Sign to be a signatory on a response to https://t.co/f9PsMgxwDE & document mentoring experience here: https:…
A @nature paper with major methodological flaws highlighting the gender bias and disparity in STEM, and the conclusion is that women should continue to work around the biased system? How the heck did this get published? 😠
RT @yorl: Having now read the Nature Communications paper that is causing all the uproar, I have two reactions. First, the causal language…
RT @luisaviegas: On November 17, 2020, a scientific article was published in @NatureComms where the authors suggest that female scientists…
…comunidade científica (https://t.co/xIsbTGm8xc).
RT @NatureComms: We have now published an Editor’s Note on this paper https://t.co/TCxHlFThh6 to alert readers of our ongoing investigation…
@_lrendell @NatureNews Another good reason not to review for @NatureNews right now: https://t.co/EP28BLxSPA
Link to the questionable paper (which now has an editor’s note): https://t.co/3dUextwCJs #retract #STEM #WomenInSTEM
RT @FlyBehaviour: Finding: Female-female mentoring relationships result in lower publication outcomes. Author interpretation: Female-femal…
Nem preciso citar teorias como o darwinismo social que foram aceitas no meio científico né ? A ciência não é inquestionável. Publicar artigo científico não os faz melhores. Mas questiono @NatureComms , como assim vocês aprovam esse tipo de artigo ?