@77_yanni @TheLongerGame @RealJoelSmalley It's utterly unrelated to HIV then. But he's wrong in any case https://t.co/U7W92DWo9n
@WaltiSiegrist SARS-CoV-2 is a natural and unmanipulated virus derived from animal to human spillover. New World Order is a conspiracy theory. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 | Nature Medicine https://t.co/qsivFgbf5b
@ezequielclavero @AAlbertoliva @gasty1982 https://t.co/oqNXi1wDtQ. Dos clicks de vuelta.
If anyone needs a source for why COVID was NOT made in a lab, here's a thorough analysis published in one of the most prestigious scientific journals. They say it's definitely not manmade but could have originated in loads of other natural ways. https://
@JoaoVit27077226 @RGL4U https://t.co/qmaZt4Rarg aqui nazi, boa leitura (tenta cobrar mais do seu presidente já que vc não tá na China)
@AndresCRC1 @CamiloHead93 @Tweet1A No, es producto de una zoonosis: https://t.co/JrLjjctjde
@Chancine @TiBouc24 @DanielLeblond4 @cdube_sante @francoislegault SARS-CoV-2 is a natural and unmanipulated virus. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 | Nature Medicine https://t.co/caKggQYKQ3
Bio-terrorists have a couple of hours left to start getting down to business, or else @sapinker wins $400. (No, conspiracy buffs, Sars-cov-2 was not "designed in a lab": https://t.co/u7AhY6uxYN).
@paclm @Vigezaro @rafaru2002 https://t.co/V4jRCawpmF Ahi esta lo que busca, el SARS-CoV2 es demostradamente de origen natural.
RT @SpringerNature: Our top-rated article on @altmetric this past year was 'The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2' published #OpenAccess in Mar…
Our top-rated article on @altmetric this past year was 'The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2' published #OpenAccess in March in @NatureMedicine. You can read it here: https://t.co/toBJT4kRdk
SARS-Cov-2の近位起源について この実験室で操作されていないとされてますね https://t.co/R7JGZFhRGy
@OCiarmhaic1 @HuXijin_GT KABOOM!! Science has just blown you out of the water. This from Nature Magazine. Got that? This is New England Journal of Medicine level science. Not some conspiracy freakshow stuff you probably subscribe to. Now GTFOH!! h
@Breakingnieuws1 Er is wetenschappelijk peer-reviewed bewijs dat "Genetic data irrefutably show that SARS-CoV-2 is not derived from any previously used virus backbone". Misschien even googlen "irrefutably". https://t.co/dwCyR4O5kw
RT @XKeyscore1: LOL. It is a smart virus developed in numerous labs, with genetic material from several different deadly viruses, 40 strai…
@NataliMarso https://t.co/oFZpuofKyJ "It is improbable that SARS-CoV-2 emerged through laboratory manipulation of a related SARS-CoV-like coronavirus" = Исключена вероятность, что SARS-CoV-2 возник из-за лабораторной манипуляции над родственным SARS-CoV-по
@Nandaek_19 @lucas_estevam92 @Raphaelgomes71 @Ricardo_Abreu_ Na verdade, em março saiu um estudo falando que as chances dele ser criado em laboratório são muito pequenas. Foi publicado na Nature: https://t.co/dN0vhb3vI3
@Rompapas @javiablitas @SlideAway___ toma, para que te hagas un poco más culto, que te hace falta. El estudio que desmontó el cuento de que fue hecho por laboratorio: https://t.co/gDUFiPGaMs Porque esta hipótesis se barajó entre los científicos y se invest
@climb65 @BarneriasPierre @1968Framboisine Le virus est naturel. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 | Nature Medicine https://t.co/lX9z98Ucud
@Marina75429392 @JRodriguezG26 @okdiario Menos mal yo no creo. Se sabe gracias al descubrimiento del Coronavirus RmYN01: https://t.co/JrLjjctjde
そういえば、初期の頃「SARS-CoV-2が人工生成ではない」理由として、スパイクタンパクの結合効率が最大ではない配列だ、ってNature論文で言ってたろ?w 人工的に作成したなら最大効率にするからだ、的な言い分w それはどうかな?w 自然な変異の方が結合能の高い塩基配列が偶然生じるわけでしょ?
@Cayyyy_Lantz @whoredenfelder @SevenFlaco @DaRealStoneGato @Janana99613936 @wdunlap @realDonaldTrump @GlendaStacy17 The origin theory I’ve accepted and expressed is shared by experts worldwide and backed by DNA research https://t.co/zLgecBW8t6
@alfarrrj @SLASHSLASHDead @konatiboi @Abboud7 @abichristinaa @three_six_mitra You and your consumption of meat and animal products is the reason for this pandemic. Tell yourself lies about the origin in a lab, because you are too weak to reflect your own b
@CrimesMelan SARS-CoV-2 is a natural and unmanipulated virus derived from animal to human transmission, a zoonose. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 | Nature Medicine https://t.co/Ct8zY7kIIj
@_ferdi @mati_lavia @FabBallarini Uno. No es biografía, es bibliografía. Dos. Ahí tienes. https://t.co/TFvZ9qbk2X https://t.co/4UNXqWKpr5 https://t.co/m6Tq9OOKKj
@aaronub4t @SpillerOfTea It's not a fact; it's delusional nonsense. Don't trust me, trust people who will certainly know more than eitehr of us about such things - e.g. https://t.co/gsXxAKve5S
RT @VidShankarAiyar: The full Nature article is here https://t.co/XmKiTOfvob
The full Nature article is here https://t.co/XmKiTOfvob
@johnrhenals @Tweet1A No, fue producto de una zoonosis: https://t.co/JrLjjctjde
@TWenseleers In maart was duidelijk dat dit niet in een keer gesprongen is, zowel gordeldier als vleermuis wijken te ver af qua RBD. Heen en weer springen zoals met fretten lijkt een plausibel scenario maar dan met lokale dieren in Guangdong district. Maar
@Sergeys_son @DLinkbull You can actually find this stuff out without guessing https://t.co/o8CGUoI2PQ
@Eternity_es @FLMIRONES @VaryIngweion 2. Sobre el origen natural del virus. https://t.co/mDIKyBmEQy
@Rottweilerig @maholydiaz no grito. Sigo diciendo que no me parece echar la culpa a los chinos de lo que ha pasado. Me parece que la evidencia indica que no ha habido intervencion humana en el origen de la epidemia y aun no sabemos mas https://t.co/X8P8Im0
@Rottweilerig @maholydiaz Definitivamente... renuncio https://t.co/X8P8Im0ubO https://t.co/2wHvJcpaLF
RT @_lunardreams: And here. Which was published in med journals back in March. But yall believe what you want. https://t.co/TObwA8Yo1J
And here. Which was published in med journals back in March. But yall believe what you want. https://t.co/TObwA8Yo1J
@fer_ruiz2020 @_______A_R_E_s4 Es un virus que muta de manera constante y lo seguirá haciendo. https://t.co/leORSUXuVu
Deeper view of Spike-Protein in Sars-Cov-2 from "The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2" by @NatureMedicine https://t.co/nAEDEHNnyM https://t.co/f4y5bgCKFw
@stanofcovid People that disagree with man-made theory will source this to say it's not. Shit is way too over my head to understand: https://t.co/DEotBGAA28
Tem que desenhar senão os conspiracionistas não entendem (ou fingem não entender)
(síndrome respiratória aguda grave, outra doença causada por coronavírus, mas não pelo SARS-CoV-2). E ainda nesse artigo da Nature (https://t.co/dTyvAPPfd5), podemos ver que os locais de clivagem polibásica do SARS-CoV-2 são bem diferentes de outros corona
Porque já foi feito. Como podemos ver aqui: https://t.co/dTyvAPPfd5, foi feita uma análise no RBD (domínio receptor obrigatório) uma região do genoma do SARS-CoV-2 que permite que o vírus reconheça e se ligue às células humanas.
Porém, como podemos ver aqui: https://t.co/dTyvAPPfd5, não há registros de nada envolvendo elementos do HIV no genoma do SARS-CoV-2, ou seja, essa ideia não se concretiza. E não, não é porque ele ganhou um Nobel da Medicina que ele tem carta branca para fa
@mstkbn @HikmetGeckil @mustafakrblt @ark_610 Güzel bir yayındır : Theories of SARS-CoV-2 origins bölümü.. https://t.co/pvCzng1JHi
RT @aharrasi1: مقالة حديثة في Nature Medicine تدحض الجدل كون #فيروس_كورونا تم هندسته وراثيا والصحيح هو نتيجة للتطور الطبيعي كون هيكله لا ي…
Ayer me encontré esto en facebook, literalmente fue de las primeras investigaciones que se hicieron... ¿No creen que las y los científicos deberíamos preocuparnos de que la información no esté llegando a la población en general? https://t.co/pQyszKp9d3 ht
RT @Ayjchan: And later Kristian Andersen (also on the expert committee) et al. publishing in @NatureMedicine "we do not believe that any ty…
RT @Ayjchan: And later Kristian Andersen (also on the expert committee) et al. publishing in @NatureMedicine "we do not believe that any ty…
@matteosalvinimi Ti ci vanti pure che non ti informi correttamente? Ma cos’è pigrizia? https://t.co/hXN5ZJxuw8
@nonleggerlo Tutto per pigrizia, perché volendo le informazioni ufficiali ci sono https://t.co/hXN5ZJxuw8
@LucaBizzarri Ma perché non legge le pubblicazioni scientifiche https://t.co/hXN5ZJxuw8
This sentence hidden in the text, but clear statements in abstract that the origin is natural zoonotic.
@simonbchen There seems to already be a wide scientific consensus that Covid-19 was a naturally occurring virus with no artificial indicators, meaning it is not manipulated or a construct. https://t.co/c93kjcyWqE
Veramente lo sappiamo benissimo che è naturale il SARS-COV2 e lo conferma anche uno studio scientifico su Nature. https://t.co/bznumz21Ft #lariachetirala7 #AIFA #lariachetira
RT @pmarsupia: Os dejo aquí el artículo científico en Nature Medicine donde se explican todos estos detalles sobre el origen natural del vi…
RT @pmarsupia: Os dejo aquí el artículo científico en Nature Medicine donde se explican todos estos detalles sobre el origen natural del vi…
And later Kristian Andersen (also on the expert committee) et al. publishing in @NatureMedicine "we do not believe that any type of laboratory-based scenario is plausible" https://t.co/MgggT0uCxV
@spajda02 @SvobodaLab @MasarovicRobert Například tady https://t.co/PURpJWscXR
@TheRealPengod @verge All those articles are heresay. You should, instead, read the actual scientific paper linked in one of the articles: https://t.co/rktA0aKvNz
@AbrahamWeint Se você estudasse um pouquinho antes de falar asneira iria saber que existem evidências científicas de que o vírus não foi criado em laboratório. https://t.co/t4rO9v8LXg
La naturaleza también resultó conservadora y neoliberal. Aquí el probable origen del 👑bairos. https://t.co/leORSUFTwU
RT @matsumotoclinic: そして、これは人工的に作られたものであると考える人も多くいますが、ウイルス学者の間では自然界で突然変異で発生したものだという見方が主流です⬇️ https://t.co/2U5uTwXdUH
RT @matsumotoclinic: そして、これは人工的に作られたものであると考える人も多くいますが、ウイルス学者の間では自然界で突然変異で発生したものだという見方が主流です⬇️ https://t.co/2U5uTwXdUH
RT @matsumotoclinic: そして、これは人工的に作られたものであると考える人も多くいますが、ウイルス学者の間では自然界で突然変異で発生したものだという見方が主流です⬇️ https://t.co/2U5uTwXdUH
RT @matsumotoclinic: そして、これは人工的に作られたものであると考える人も多くいますが、ウイルス学者の間では自然界で突然変異で発生したものだという見方が主流です⬇️ https://t.co/2U5uTwXdUH
感染症専門医の方もそう言ってた。
そして、これは人工的に作られたものであると考える人も多くいますが、ウイルス学者の間では自然界で突然変異で発生したものだという見方が主流です⬇️ https://t.co/2U5uTwXdUH
RT @Ayjchan: The 1st is the widely-read Proximal Origins article - a correspondence published in @NatureMedicine on March 17, 2020. How did…
@mindmixradio @PatPenn2 @RenovaAlejandro @dkdk459 @NoeticCrypto @meowshallah @staggerlee422 @staceyseektruth @WendyJYoung2 @ma_liky_ @TXTrumpette89 @JasonShaw2017 Judy is a discredited scientist with a history of fraud and theft in 2011, not a whistleblowe
3. Also, China provided enough detail and samples for the rest of the world to decipher the full architecture of the virus. This gave scientists drug design targets not only vaccines but even antibody cocktails to help patients. https://t.co/pGsYCtxoCr h
@liaqatwaja @DrTedros It has been definitely shown that the vaccine could not possibly have been created in a laboratory LONG ago: Andersen et al (Nature 2020): https://t.co/bBmJuQDBOk "Strong evidence that SARS-CoV-2 [novel Corona virus/Covid19] is not th
El peor argumento que me han dado para no vacunarse, es porque creen que SARS-CoV-2 "salió" de un laboratorio. ¿Gente, dónde creen que se desarrollan las vacunas? El laboratorio más grande que existe es LA NATURALEZA. Vivimos en un lindo siglo, ÚNANSE. h
@alessan47586283 @lucianocapone Agevolo il link all'articolo https://t.co/Y4Ry2IyQZ4
The 1st is the widely-read Proximal Origins article - a correspondence published in @NatureMedicine on March 17, 2020. How did the authors determine that "SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus"? https://t.co/MgggT0uCx
@Subterfugitive کاملا درسته ویروس SARS-CoV-2 به هیچ وجه نمیتونه آزمایشگاهی و ساخته دست بشر باشه.. طبق مطالعات. بیوانفورماتیکی و مقالات ژورنال های معتبر از جمله نیچر https://t.co/06a3FlEWsf
@TheSeeker268 And... The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 https://t.co/woWVYF7cxN
@hereonceortwice i mean theres studies where they are sure its natural. i think its sketch cause we think we are invinceable and are shook that we arent https://t.co/RKOx9u0aeT
@JCPEREZCODEX @DrLiMengYAN1 SARS-CoV-2 is a natural and unmanipulated virus derived from animal to human transmission. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 | Nature Medicine https://t.co/8vwZ1NosvB https://t.co/YR5bnVfFfV
@sunlorrie Thank you. Sad to admit I read Nature papers with caution these days. Recall the paper which argued virus cannot be from lab? https://t.co/gp9z0atf8f Here is some interesting conflict: https://t.co/KjgeaVXcT1
@LLinWood SARS-CoV-2 is a natural and unmanipulated virus derived from animal to human transmission. The CCP did not release this virus. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 | Nature Medicine https://t.co/kDx3uv8SzR
@Ferrucc66935382 @dawac72 @FabioP81287858 "Sfuggito ad un laboratorio al nord"... e niente, volevo commentare nel merito, ma sinceramente non ce la faccio proprio. Prova a dare una letta qui: https://t.co/rUhEJiZIag
@exaltified @emartinez78987 @GordonJGM20 @kc_k89 SARS-CoV-2 is a natural and unmanipulated virus, not man-made. Analysis of the genome showed no evidence of a prior viral backbone. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 | Nature Medicine https://t.co/NhlnnFdhiK
@JSmarlos @Anonymo12869076 Here is a good scientific synopsis of the natural occurrence from back in March: https://t.co/SGlkDBxPmm
@mellziland Esse trabalho científico (17/03) trata da origem "aproximada" do vírus, descartando - não de todo - a impossibilidade de ter sido feito em laboratório e que o vírus saltou espécie numa mesma classe. O 7º a infectar humanos. https://t.co/k5kjAD
@ComitatoCentra1 Il Nord-Italia famosissimo per i suoi pipistrelli "Rhinolophus affinis" e dei pangolini malesiani "Manis javanica". https://t.co/XPYZsbZhnq
@FromageAlpage @flavinkins no o linked glycans have ever been found in those predicted locations so this invalidates his argument that an immune system must be involved as sars-cov-2 developed (in animals or humans) also @flavinkins can explain "mucin like
Simples assim
@RafaelFontana Nessa artigo - que uma parte foi recortada para os propósitos do tamarindo - cientistas tentam determinar a origem. Em certo momento, na conclusão, dizem da "quase impossibilidade" de ter sido fabricado, mas fazem o alerta. https://t.co/i4p
@sommerfeldkitty @Mareq16 SARS-CoV-2 was not man made, since it is a zoonose derived from animal to human spillover. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 | Nature Medicine https://t.co/DAd9MIuMzr
RT @docramiro: El análisis del origen del #COVID19. Spoiler alert: no fue creado en un laboratorio. https://t.co/bvlZXidiNu https://t.co/zR…
@LionsOmega @im2byteme @BuckSexton @realDonaldTrump SARS-CoV-2 is a natural and unmanipulated virus derived from animal to human transmission. No virologist is capable of adding a spike glycoprotein to the virus. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 | Nature