The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2

RT @MJnanostretch: 1/5 Here are the 6 main arguments PO used in Feb'20 to reach the firm conclusion that the pandemic virus originated thro…

RT @MJnanostretch: 1/5 Here are the 6 main arguments PO used in Feb'20 to reach the firm conclusion that the pandemic virus originated thro…

1/5 Here are the 6 main arguments PO used in Feb'20 to reach the firm conclusion that the pandemic virus originated through natural evolution not a lab. *Do they raise any serious issues w you? https://t.co/u4aYsA86LQ

@LucidDr95185723 @FanCooler2 @istat_it @il_pat @PoulardMere @FrancyontheMoon secondo aspetto le famose mail che Jim Jordan non presenta né mostra. Perché ? https://t.co/EC9ET9Jw4l semplice perché nessuno ha fatto pressioni, perché il processo scientifico i

RT @Bryce_Nickels: Polite request for scientists to take a few minutes out of their weekend to read "The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2," pu…

RT @billsonofbill2: @NobodyHadToDie @real_seeking @IraIrleague @IanCopeland5 So why are all cause mortality rates higher in the unvaccinate…

RT @Bryce_Nickels: Polite request for scientists to take a few minutes out of their weekend to read "The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2," pu…

RT @Bryce_Nickels: Polite request for scientists to take a few minutes out of their weekend to read "The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2," pu…

RT @MJnanostretch: A challenge I took when PO came out- I encourage you to take it. I found what the paper cited as "evidence" to be pedant…

RT @Bryce_Nickels: Polite request for scientists to take a few minutes out of their weekend to read "The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2," pu…

RT @Bryce_Nickels: Polite request for scientists to take a few minutes out of their weekend to read "The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2," pu…

RT @Bryce_Nickels: Polite request for scientists to take a few minutes out of their weekend to read "The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2," pu…

RT @Bryce_Nickels: Polite request for scientists to take a few minutes out of their weekend to read "The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2," pu…

RT @MJnanostretch: A challenge I took when PO came out- I encourage you to take it. I found what the paper cited as "evidence" to be pedant…

RT @MJnanostretch: A challenge I took when PO came out- I encourage you to take it. I found what the paper cited as "evidence" to be pedant…

RT @Bryce_Nickels: Polite request for scientists to take a few minutes out of their weekend to read "The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2," pu…

RT @MJnanostretch: A challenge I took when PO came out- I encourage you to take it. I found what the paper cited as "evidence" to be pedant…

A challenge I took when PO came out- I encourage you to take it. I found what the paper cited as "evidence" to be pedantic talking points &prepossessed opinion, too weak &narrow to support its strong &sweeping conclusion that NO "type of labora

RT @Bryce_Nickels: Polite request for scientists to take a few minutes out of their weekend to read "The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2," pu…

RT @Bryce_Nickels: Polite request for scientists to take a few minutes out of their weekend to read "The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2," pu…

RT @Bryce_Nickels: Polite request for scientists to take a few minutes out of their weekend to read "The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2," pu…

"The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2," published in @NatureMedicine on March 17, 2020.

RT @Bryce_Nickels: Polite request for scientists to take a few minutes out of their weekend to read "The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2," pu…

RT @Bryce_Nickels: Polite request for scientists to take a few minutes out of their weekend to read "The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2," pu…

RT @Bryce_Nickels: Polite request for scientists to take a few minutes out of their weekend to read "The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2," pu…

Polite request for scientists to take a few minutes out of their weekend to read "The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2," published in @NatureMedicine on March 17, 2020. Please read carefully and consider if the arguments presented in the paper are peculiar. h

RT @HansMahncke: I would encourage anyone who reads the fraudulent Proximal Origin paper to pay particular attention to footnote 20, which…

@MichelCucchi Et ils ont corrompu le gratin du GoF à double usage : https://t.co/HnY8t4giMi

RT @HansMahncke: I would encourage anyone who reads the fraudulent Proximal Origin paper to pay particular attention to footnote 20, which…

RT @Bryce_Nickels: I encourage academic scientists to read (or reread) "The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2" (aka "Proximal Origins") and car…

RT @HansMahncke: I would encourage anyone who reads the fraudulent Proximal Origin paper to pay particular attention to footnote 20, which…

RT @HansMahncke: I would encourage anyone who reads the fraudulent Proximal Origin paper to pay particular attention to footnote 20, which…

@roadjull @past_is_future @robalpire @mattwridley Not folks' job to persuade non-expert conspiracists like you, anymore than its geoscientists job to persuade flat Earthers. 🤷‍♂️ You can keep ranting in the wind about 'shills' that exist just in your mind

RT @Bryce_Nickels: I encourage academic scientists to read (or reread) "The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2" (aka "Proximal Origins") and car…

RT @Bryce_Nickels: I encourage academic scientists to read (or reread) "The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2" (aka "Proximal Origins") and car…

RT @Bryce_Nickels: I encourage academic scientists to read (or reread) "The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2" (aka "Proximal Origins") and car…

RT @Bryce_Nickels: I encourage academic scientists to read (or reread) "The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2" (aka "Proximal Origins") and car…

RT @HansMahncke: I would encourage anyone who reads the fraudulent Proximal Origin paper to pay particular attention to footnote 20, which…

RT @HansMahncke: I would encourage anyone who reads the fraudulent Proximal Origin paper to pay particular attention to footnote 20, which…

RT @HansMahncke: I would encourage anyone who reads the fraudulent Proximal Origin paper to pay particular attention to footnote 20, which…

RT @Bryce_Nickels: I encourage academic scientists to read (or reread) "The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2" (aka "Proximal Origins") and car…

RT @Bryce_Nickels: I encourage academic scientists to read (or reread) "The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2" (aka "Proximal Origins") and car…

RT @HansMahncke: I would encourage anyone who reads the fraudulent Proximal Origin paper to pay particular attention to footnote 20, which…

Why did scientists tweet like this early in 2020? This was in response to reporting that showed there were safety concerns pre 2019 about the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

RT @Bryce_Nickels: I encourage academic scientists to read (or reread) "The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2" (aka "Proximal Origins") and car…

RT @Bryce_Nickels: I encourage academic scientists to read (or reread) "The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2" (aka "Proximal Origins") and car…

RT @HansMahncke: I would encourage anyone who reads the fraudulent Proximal Origin paper to pay particular attention to footnote 20, which…

RT @HansMahncke: I would encourage anyone who reads the fraudulent Proximal Origin paper to pay particular attention to footnote 20, which…

RT @Bryce_Nickels: I encourage academic scientists to read (or reread) "The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2" (aka "Proximal Origins") and car…

RT @Bryce_Nickels: I encourage academic scientists to read (or reread) "The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2" (aka "Proximal Origins") and car…

RT @HansMahncke: I would encourage anyone who reads the fraudulent Proximal Origin paper to pay particular attention to footnote 20, which…

RT @HansMahncke: I would encourage anyone who reads the fraudulent Proximal Origin paper to pay particular attention to footnote 20, which…

RT @HansMahncke: I would encourage anyone who reads the fraudulent Proximal Origin paper to pay particular attention to footnote 20, which…

RT @HansMahncke: I would encourage anyone who reads the fraudulent Proximal Origin paper to pay particular attention to footnote 20, which…

RT @Bryce_Nickels: I encourage academic scientists to read (or reread) "The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2" (aka "Proximal Origins") and car…

RT @HansMahncke: I would encourage anyone who reads the fraudulent Proximal Origin paper to pay particular attention to footnote 20, which…

RT @HansMahncke: I would encourage anyone who reads the fraudulent Proximal Origin paper to pay particular attention to footnote 20, which…

RT @HansMahncke: I would encourage anyone who reads the fraudulent Proximal Origin paper to pay particular attention to footnote 20, which…

RT @HansMahncke: I would encourage anyone who reads the fraudulent Proximal Origin paper to pay particular attention to footnote 20, which…

I would encourage anyone who reads the fraudulent Proximal Origin paper to pay particular attention to footnote 20, which cites a list of lab virus backbones from 2014 to "irrefutably" show that the 2019 Covid virus was not based on any lab virus backbones

RT @Bryce_Nickels: I encourage academic scientists to read (or reread) "The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2" (aka "Proximal Origins") and car…

RT @Bryce_Nickels: I encourage academic scientists to read (or reread) "The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2" (aka "Proximal Origins") and car…

RT @Bryce_Nickels: I encourage academic scientists to read (or reread) "The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2" (aka "Proximal Origins") and car…

RT @Bryce_Nickels: I encourage academic scientists to read (or reread) "The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2" (aka "Proximal Origins") and car…

RT @Bryce_Nickels: I encourage academic scientists to read (or reread) "The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2" (aka "Proximal Origins") and car…

RT @Bryce_Nickels: I encourage academic scientists to read (or reread) "The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2" (aka "Proximal Origins") and car…

I encourage academic scientists to read (or reread) "The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2" (aka "Proximal Origins") and carefully consider the evidence used to support the claims made by the 5 authors. Links: Nat Med https://t.co/Ly5MUbBhgH PMC (no paywall) h

@ACClaw @WashburneAlex @dasher8090 https://t.co/1Tl0ulzOy7

@NobodyHadToDie @real_seeking @IraIrleague @IanCopeland5 So why are all cause mortality rates higher in the unvaccinated? https://t.co/W2ioapeGfm

RT @jason_willz1: @1stacyphillips -Unvaccinated are dying at higher rates with higher all cause mortality in every country on earth -all ep…

RT @jason_willz1: @1stacyphillips -Unvaccinated are dying at higher rates with higher all cause mortality in every country on earth -all ep…

@1stacyphillips -Unvaccinated are dying at higher rates with higher all cause mortality in every country on earth -all epidemiological studies point to SARS CoV2 natural origins https://t.co/5y5cejh3y8 -97% scientific studies support climate change https:/

@KathyLb82 Read this and tell me what it means. https://t.co/7J8RmG78U6

Nature-medicineへの公開書簡 https://t.co/eNoUzKNyxJ ・SARS-CoV-2のゲノム配列を評価、「自然発生である」とした(https://t.co/2VIlctAsjE) ・論文の著者間の公開されたEメール及びSlackメッセージ は、著者らが論文を信じていなかったことを示している。 ・世界の研究者が論文の撤回を求めている

@VeritasVincit5 @AndyMLinn @past_is_future Your evidence-free claim is noted + rejected. https://t.co/Y2PhtD5f60 https://t.co/e8iO9xEgtA https://t.co/eSeCO6lhjY

@AndyMLinn 🥱 5 out of 9 USA intelligence community entities say natural zoonosis is more likely, 2 say lab leak is more likely, and 2 are non-committal. https://t.co/BPOz7iItsp [https://t.co/G1ffPMpby0] https://t.co/Y2PhtD5f60 https://t.co/e8iO9xEgtA ht

@coronafornia @abwil2 @organicdot @DollyMunoz19 @JimLong36610263 @DarlaShine Scientists largely discredited the "bio-engineered" conspiracy theory early in the pandemic. It's basically a myth. Even if the myth were true, it's no excuse for ignoring public

RT @AtomsksSanakan: @TylerAStepke @ggronvall @KatherineEban @VanityFair @ENERGY @NIH Stop trolling. 5 out of 9 USA intelligence community…

@Jeff23645831 @veryliberalminx @DumaineJaquette @Browns_Fan_Here @ZiggystarZiggy @VinceGottalotta @_Kel_Varnsen_ @WhimsyTX @perinejennifer5 @Karlton111 @KsLiberal @MolaRamLinux @Pis0Mojado @2457klhu @PatrioticKitten @skeeduu @jkoff609 @PhoenixSign1776 @bac

@quisp1965 @JamieOber8590 @ggronvall @KatherineEban @VanityFair @ENERGY @NIH Paranoia about supposed 'coincidences' is the realm of folks like Sandy Hook truthers. I'm interested in evidence. Not baseless paranoia. https://t.co/Y2PhtD5f60 https://t.co/e

@TylerAStepke @ggronvall @KatherineEban @VanityFair @ENERGY @NIH Stop trolling. 5 out of 9 USA intelligence community entities say natural zoonosis is more likely, 2 say lab leak is more likely, and 2 are non-committal. https://t.co/BPOz7iItsp [https://t.

@PavlosPavlova @quay_dr @R_H_Ebright "we do not believe that any type of laboratory-based scenario is plausible." https://t.co/hPD72Lz3qU

@acesoth @zaqrider @justinbaragona @mehdirhasan This is what scientific evidence actually looks like. Not some YouTube video titled TRUTH BOMB. Keep in mind this is a topic you volunteered to debate, answers to simple questions shouldn't be this hard. http

@michaelzlin You just described the proximal origins paper without knowing it https://t.co/aLVT38UDv5

@Nature @RetractionWatch This paper is a lie. Do your job and retract this🚮🚮🚮🚮

The hoax of the century

This paper is fraudulent.

@Sijwill @Chris__Sage @R_H_Ebright I'm on subject: You're using the same daft + deceptive reasoning on pandemic/origins as used by conspiracists on ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, vaccines, etc. You just don't like that deception of your's being pointed

@Sijwill @Chris__Sage @R_H_Ebright Still no published evidence from you, just as on ivermectin. 5 out of 9 USA intelligence community entities say natural zoonosis is more likely, 2 say lab leak is more likely, and 2 are non-committal. https://t.co/BPOz7i

@Sijwill @Chris__Sage @R_H_Ebright Re: "Currently LL hypothesis has way more evidence than zoonosis." As vacuous as saying there way way more evidence that ivermectin worked for SARS-CoV-2. You don't cite published on this, anymore than you did on iverme

@Sijwill @Chris__Sage @R_H_Ebright Re: "You clearly have no argument whatsoever to debate LL." 🥱 5 out of 9 USA intelligence community entities say natural zoonosis is more likely, 2 say lab leak is more likely, and 2 are non-committal. https://t.co/BPOz

@Mydit2222 @MagaisLife @EdKrassen Indeed.

@Sijwill @Chris__Sage @R_H_Ebright Re: "nobody’s listening" 🥱 https://t.co/P8ypGXj4Kg https://t.co/KmkU2DE2uf https://t.co/DO3tXxtzHE https://t.co/VDnbbbWVHh https://t.co/PhQYajUiHC https://t.co/BWOc1I6DBa https://t.co/0hcaJG8SKG https://t.co/mgMae8DwcK

"not only do we know there were WIV scientists who had developed COVID-19-like illnesses in November 2019, but also that they were working with the closest relatives of SARS-CoV-2, and inserting gain-of-function features unique to it" https://t.co/jgPaIGfu

@user19211934330 J'attends de voir ses études. En attendant, on a des études phylogénétique des Divers souches du SRAS-CoV-2 qui montre que c'est une zoonoses de chauve-souris. https://t.co/EFIUB3b5xL https://t.co/Dms2fnxnIP https://t.co/6OaXFNgFru

@corona_realism Da liegen doch ca. 3 Wo zwischen Mail und Versicherung an Eides statt, oder? Versteh ich das falsch? Trotzdem nat. maximal unglaubwürdig - ist erkennb., wann die proximal origins correspondence tatsächlich eingereicht wurde? Hab kein “subm

@The_Trump_Train Moron still listening to the QAnon whackos. However, the genetic data irrefutably show that SARS-CoV-2 i.. two scenarios that can plausibly explain the origin of SARS-CoV-2: (i) natural selection in an animal host before zoonotic transfer;

@CaulfieldTim @RyanMarino @jonathanstea @DocMCohen @AntibioticDoc @DrShazmaMithani @StanKutcher @doritmi @DrKatEpi @GidMK Still waiting for that extremely flawed and criminally intentional deceptive paper known as "The Proximal Origins of SARS-COV-2" to be

@tb_nature @eneldiluvio @jsm2334 @RogerSeheult A letter to the editor… hmmm…. Sounds like another paper I read recently… https://t.co/aAe22Jvoir

@dennis_crork @RobinBroadway4 a.) No evidence that it's a bioweapon. b.) The genome line you've been fed is false. MANY papers and articles are available to you that explain in detail why this is so. This is the widely held viewpoint by most experts. htt