@LionsOmega @im2byteme @BuckSexton @realDonaldTrump SARS-CoV-2 is a natural and unmanipulated virus derived from animal to human transmission. No virologist is capable of adding a spike glycoprotein to the virus. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 | Nature
@junamelu @kikeAlcorcon1 @PoliciaAlcorcon @AytoAlcorcon @natadeandres @Hardcorcon No hay peor virus que el negacionismo, eso está claro, hay miles de estudios científicos, solo tienes que saber leer y tener un poco de sentido común. Aquí te dejo un artícu
RT @hommel_b: @BorgerPieter @pjvanerp Arme Pepijn van Erp... Het valt ook helemaal niet mee als je skepticus wilt zijn, maar niet de nood…
RT @hommel_b: @BorgerPieter @pjvanerp Arme Pepijn van Erp... Het valt ook helemaal niet mee als je skepticus wilt zijn, maar niet de nood…
RT @hommel_b: @BorgerPieter @pjvanerp Arme Pepijn van Erp... Het valt ook helemaal niet mee als je skepticus wilt zijn, maar niet de nood…
RT @hommel_b: @BorgerPieter @pjvanerp Arme Pepijn van Erp... Het valt ook helemaal niet mee als je skepticus wilt zijn, maar niet de nood…
RT @hommel_b: @BorgerPieter @pjvanerp Arme Pepijn van Erp... Het valt ook helemaal niet mee als je skepticus wilt zijn, maar niet de nood…
@sugarmagn01ia Actually, the “weird” things about SARS-CoV-2 provide evidence for the fact that it is not a manmade virus. https://t.co/oXwjj66nvN
@LouRoe331 @2loki4u @JackPosobiec @MollyMcKraken3 Virus naturally occurring. In Nov 2019 Trump adm warned Israel that something was happening. Didn't warn us. USA averages about 30K-50K flue deaths per year. 270,000 kinda blows that outta the water https:
the "science" is in the research papers those have given me "pause" since i first gave wonder to the OLD hiv "epidemic" the dead kennedys' "the government flu" will give you more truth than ANY rag owned by THEM
@Penelope7777777 @latimes SARS-CoV-2 came from nature, possibly bats. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 | Nature Medicine https://t.co/GepOBLHVkt
@Alannah223 @WSJ @WSJopinion lol this is the dumbest crap ever. it's been peer reviewed, and quite frankly I doubt you've read it, or understand how it comes to it's conclusion. everything in it is verifiable by others. stop posting this absolute garbag
@AntonioLeon79 @navedelmisterio https://t.co/TKcZPYJsFT Ahí tienes algunos, mas de fiar que dos charlatanes.
@cbemerine "...We propose two scenarios that can plausibly explain the origin of SARS-CoV-2: (i) natural selection in an animal host before zoonotic transfer; and (ii) natural selection in humans following zoonotic transfer." https://t.co/jUn4HviRYg
RT @AnaBandar: دراسة بحثية جميلة نشرت في مجلة النيتشر ناقشت كل الاحتمالات، وخلصت إلى أن احتمال تصنيع الفيروس أو خروجه بالخطأ من مختبرات ووه…
RT @angoffinet: And nobody except a few morons accuses anyone of murder. What most likely happened is silly, conceptually trivial GOF exper…
RT @angoffinet: You persist in your denial. The truth will surface one day, and my bet is that you will not be proud when it happens. Sad t…
@DavidLWindt @VICE thanks David, I don't disagree that other possibilities should be explored, but that paper doesn't look very convincing to me compared to this for instance https://t.co/77s2Ymylt4
@tcztcz @AdolfoKastillon No se ni pa que me molesto pero aquí tienes.... https://t.co/0ZA9o7MlFI
RT @BillyBostickson: 5. This is an important admission given that Andersen used his "O-Linked Glycan" prediction as evidence of a natural…
5. This is an important admission given that Andersen used his "O-Linked Glycan" prediction as evidence of a natural origin in his Nature Paper in March https://t.co/Kvm2Dw3SOm https://t.co/An7T2wxBHR
52 Failed Prediction - Andersen's "O linked Glycans" The function of the predicted O-linked glycans is unclear, but they could create a 'mucin-like domain' that shields epitopes - Kristian G. Andersen. https://t.co/Kvm2Dw3SOm and N- and O-glycosylation htt
@Wilfrie77917027 @pricklysquash @gonglei89 This paper back in March speculated that the virus might have circulated in humans for a decade or so but was undetected until a final mutation happened that made it deadly. https://t.co/6evu40DGAy
RT @DrDenaGrayson: 🚨BREAKING: Scientists analyzed genomic data to determine the origin of the deadly new #coronavirus: “Our analyses clear…
@johntdowney @charliekirk11 @RandPaul Doubt we have more to say unless you want to challenge "lab-chimera" (IDK the purpose; just know it does not look natural origin, &Fauci snuck around the Congress' moratorium on GoF research) https://t.co/nEyY61zC
@R_H_Ebright @K_G_Andersen @RadCentrism @nytimes This chap is slanderous and censorious... Personally, I don't want people like him to impede critical, objective inquiry. https://t.co/yC1quQUyXA
@Ayjchan Mr, Votre position ne vous permet pas des attaques aussi infâmes et aussi injustifiées. Ce qui vous dérange, c'est que DES scientifiques présentent des arguments scientifiques qui vous fassent dégringoler de votre piédestal. Shame on you.
#Cov19 ile ilgili bu makaleyi 19 Martta paylaşmışım bir daha paylaşayım.Bu sayfadan çeşitli uzmanların araştırmalarını ve makalelerini okuyabilirsiniz.https://t.co/jVWmomCMeg
RT @angoffinet: You persist in your denial. The truth will surface one day, and my bet is that you will not be proud when it happens. Sad t…
And nobody except a few morons accuses anyone of murder. What most likely happened is silly, conceptually trivial GOF experiments and then accidental leak from a poorly supervised, overconfident lab with lax biosecurity. Plain simple Hanlon rasor.
You persist in your denial. The truth will surface one day, and my bet is that you will not be proud when it happens. Sad to see smart people so biased.
@Ayjchan It seems to me that it relies mainly on the "scientific consensus" with a systematic reference to Andersen study, "The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2" that killed the debate. https://t.co/HixxbVOvXP
@RealScotWells @risetoflyy @FarDarcy Analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 viral genome shows no evidence of reverse genetic engineering or backbone. SARS-CoV-2 shares only 79% sequence similarity with SARS. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 https://t.co/4lg24a3tvs
@jgarbuz @TheCenterStripe @DineshDSouza Lead author Department of Immunology and Microbiology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA Kristian G. Andersen "Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefull
@RealScotWells @risetoflyy @FarDarcy Gain-of-function research is unrelated to SARS-CoV-2, which is a natural and unmanipulated virus derived from animal to human transmission. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 | Nature Medicine https://t.co/28xlZZbRgQ
@gemimarc @ASoukk @gorkisan98 @polbeiro @NachoAlVi https://t.co/gFYTT973N3 Me olvide de dejar el articulo djska
@ilhanciger @DrGunerSonmez https://t.co/woxQoxqmft Makale linki
@LaVanguardia La generación de los glicanos ligados a O predichos también es poco probable que haya ocurrido durante el pase de cultivo celular, ya que tales características sugieren la participación de un sistema inmunológico" https://t.co/wpE0I4wJNq
Gente che afferma il coinvolgimento della 'ndrangheta nella creazione del virus della #COVID19. Peccato che a Marzo 2020, su Nature: https://t.co/ZnDXeGa1wW "Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manip
@discordoconme Già a marzo, su Nature, non Novella2000, Nature, compariva il seguente studio in cui si dice chiaramente: "Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus." https://t.co/ZnDXeGa1
@narutopolitique @BrunoOrdoni @andrelh87 @filipebarrost Esse é o estudo, de 17/03/2020. Todos que publiquei são de revistas científicas, inclusive de autores com H-INDEX acima 160. Tenho mais, pelo menos, 42 deles, incluindo máscaras, testes, HCQ, mutação,
@diegoagusan @FernandoArancon @elOrdenMundial “al comparar los datos disponibles de la secuencia del genoma para las cepas conocidas de coronavirus, podemos determinar firmemente que el SARS-CoV-2 se originó a través de procesos naturales” https://t.co/On9
@manvssteam @SoyMustang @Lyde15 It is very easy to see if genes have been artificially toyed with because such things leave behind genetic markers. It is not a lab construct. Here's your academic journal article. https://t.co/vu4jUwLX0b
@HeisenbergBleu @bbcmundo Actually, no. https://t.co/aEbDnj0LkU
A good read before Dr. Fehr lecture Monday. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 | Nature Medicine https://t.co/BcUmDRUoHR
@chaosdezign @Gurhal1 @RandyJo26 @rachidowsky13 @Cerisesurlecous Et s'il s'avérait qu'il y eût intervention humaine, il est fort peu probable que celle-ci ait été intentionnelle dans le but de créer 1 arme biologique, puisque la configuration biologique de
@RandyJo26 @Gurhal1 @rachidowsky13 @Cerisesurlecous Le consensus existe déjà sur le fait que le virus n'est pas issu d'une manipulation génétique d'origine humaine : "Genetic data irrefutably show that SARS-CoV-2 is not derived from any previously used vir
RT @ENirenberg: Its origin is unambiguously natural based on the best evidence available: https://t.co/F372bnzA8F https://t.co/5upLVPChrR…
Em março, foi publicado um artigo mostrando não só sua origem, mas que seu genoma era desconhecido nos bancos de dados, e que, com o conhecimento que tínhamos naquele momento, não saberíamos fazer um vírus assim. Ou seja: uma novidade da natureza. https://
@Leapinglordlevy @Stephen69054196 @YardleyShooting @C53758546Mandy SARS-CoV-2 emerged in Wuhan as a zoonose, from animal to human spillover. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 | Nature Medicine https://t.co/OMdTV2FGRO
@us3r_322 Judy is wrong about nearly everything related to vaccines, face masks, and COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 is a natural virus based on analysis of the full viral genome. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 | Nature Medicine https://t.co/ywvOZQGQE8
@javiihache No sé a que te refieres, pero te recomiendo que te leas este artículo y a ver si encuentro el otro te puedo poner. "Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus." https://t.co/kSnJ
@LiberaMentis80 @strani_placenik Ajde kao mediji i politicari, ali hoces da kazes da su i naucnici sirom sveta deo zavere: https://t.co/YNY3l53hxQ
@LucidAsTheSky @francoisedegois @ZabouF @LEXPRESS parmi les articles montrant le peu de probabilité que l'origine du virus soit synthétique : https://t.co/NaZRs9zaKl https://t.co/SoOeVlKeWS
@F0y42 @_mioux_ @ArizonaAntoine @GG_RMC On a quand même des sources qui coïncident hein... https://t.co/gVloLVQsvb
@F0y42 @ArizonaAntoine @GG_RMC Ça, c'est pas une source, c'est de la rhétorique complotiste... Ça par exemple, c'est une source. https://t.co/vi9RyWKi8H https://t.co/lFGAEBbhkR
به دنبال یه بحث دوستانه، گفتم یه مقاله بذارم. حداقل چکیده اش سخت نیست. اگه شک داریم، از کجا بدونیم که کرونا یه اسلحه طراحی شده یا یه ویروس دستکاری شده نبوده؟ از اینجا: https://t.co/nw0U8rq87G هرچند فلان سیاست مدار خاص گفته باشه بهمان... این علمه.
@AlbertoThomas You are spreading so much medical misinformation. SARS-CoV-2, HIV and rabies are all zoonoses. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 | Nature Medicine https://t.co/wDJM5j9QwN
@boundagebyblue @AtheistsFoxhole @nytimes so if you were truly interested in knowing why that this wasn't the case here maybe go read about how we can determine if a virus has been manipulated by man. sars-cov-2 was not. here is a good place to start.htt
@A_Romero_F Es muy difícil apuntar cual es el reservorio animal con exactitud pues la vigilancia/conocimiento de virus de animales es muy limitado. Tenemos datos que apuntan a que murciélagos y pangolines estan involucrados, uno de esos estudios: https://t
XE.. HUI ENTRA un al fil dels PEBRES (respectem al "pare") i "fa bo" (confirma) el que sempre ha pensat :va elegir be:s'ho pasa un bé.. I aprèn molt @cocademolletes @pepxabiagen @sentovicent @DimoniCent @conlapipol @bisantico @constan_escriva @agossarat @s
Le coronavirus se serait-il échappé d'un laboratoire à Wuhan ? L'idée revient en force https://t.co/MwPEJZIZg7? https://t.co/cpxHlZTTE0 https://t.co/mL288EYncQ
RT @DeBunKerEtoiles: Si vous confondez « fabriqué en labo » et « échappé d’un labo », c’est grave parce que la différence est juste énorme…
RT @DeBunKerEtoiles: Si vous confondez « fabriqué en labo » et « échappé d’un labo », c’est grave parce que la différence est juste énorme…
RT @DeBunKerEtoiles: Si vous confondez « fabriqué en labo » et « échappé d’un labo », c’est grave parce que la différence est juste énorme…
RT @DeBunKerEtoiles: Si vous confondez « fabriqué en labo » et « échappé d’un labo », c’est grave parce que la différence est juste énorme…
Si vous confondez « fabriqué en labo » et « échappé d’un labo », c’est grave parce que la différence est juste énorme dans ce que ça implique derrière. Et surtout, plusieurs études ont montré que le virus n’est PAS artificiel. Ce n’est pas MOI qui le dis.
@254_2022 Coronaviruses are not dormant. Face masks do not trigger coronaviruses. What Judy Mikovits Gets Wrong: https://t.co/mxO61IoMUe COVID-19 was not manufactured in a lab. It is a natural and unmanipulated virus, a zoonose. The proximal origin of SARS
@lucianofcrespo Toda afirmação deve ser feita com base em alguma evidência. Eis a minha: https://t.co/ciLQk4EyQP
@biggnames @MarkBax77839427 My former boss is wrong. The evolutionary "distance" between SARS-CoV-2 and SARS is about 40 to 70 years based on phylogenetic analysis. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 is natural | Nature Medicine https://t.co/JUA2VOdzGr
@sullivan_larry @DanCady @EDavidAn @fagandr1 @EdWellham @Damo__73_ @SimonMonk @simonahac @mattjcan @EcoSenseNow Natural viruses r very different to lab engineered viruses. Scientists studying the SARS-CoV-2 said: 'Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2
فقط اوپس !!!
RT @Amirbio2: بر اساس مطالعات ساختاری و آزمایش های بیوشیمیایی، به نظر می رسد SARS-CoV-2 دارای RBD است این توانایی رو دارد که با میل زیاد به…
RT @Amirbio2: بر اساس مطالعات ساختاری و آزمایش های بیوشیمیایی، به نظر می رسد SARS-CoV-2 دارای RBD است این توانایی رو دارد که با میل زیاد به…
RT @Amirbio2: بر اساس مطالعات ساختاری و آزمایش های بیوشیمیایی، به نظر می رسد SARS-CoV-2 دارای RBD است این توانایی رو دارد که با میل زیاد به…
RT @Amirbio2: بر اساس مطالعات ساختاری و آزمایش های بیوشیمیایی، به نظر می رسد SARS-CoV-2 دارای RBD است این توانایی رو دارد که با میل زیاد به…
@COCOINTELPRO @TruthFourU HIV-1 did not contribute to the COVID-19 genome. https://t.co/ulVmq5BREZ, The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 is natural | Nature Medicine https://t.co/RDJXmDpduZ https://t.co/Y7cxfkXcFc
RT @Amirbio2: بر اساس مطالعات ساختاری و آزمایش های بیوشیمیایی، به نظر می رسد SARS-CoV-2 دارای RBD است این توانایی رو دارد که با میل زیاد به…
@Observe01324674 @lalibrebe Cela montre que vous n’avez pas cliqué dans le twt jont à mon 1er commentaire. Qq’un a fait une liste d’article de presse. Remontez et suivez les liens.🙂 Sinon, articles scientifiques se basant sur la génétique ici en dessous.
@DamienERNST1 Cela prouve qu’on ne sait pas encore. Quelle serait votre théorie la plus plausible ? (Oublions le pangolin🥴) Voici 2 articles qui ont investigué sous la perspective génétique: https://t.co/fVtrCW1SU1 https://t.co/oQdPY9nu9k
بر اساس مطالعات ساختاری و آزمایش های بیوشیمیایی، به نظر می رسد SARS-CoV-2 دارای RBD است این توانایی رو دارد که با میل زیاد به گیرنده ACE2 از انسان، موش خرما، گربه و سایر گونه های دارای همسانی گیرنده بالا متصل میشود. پ.ن؛ این رو قبلاً می دونستیم حالا ولی
@perifasio0 @JoderMg @USDtin Deja amigo. No se paras que seguís hablando. No presentaste ningún argumento, solo suposiciones. Si, yo si tengo pruebas. Va otro paper. https://t.co/L2miEj8iQ4
@mmateva Март месец излезе изследване в сп. Nature, според което вирусът е с естествен произход: https://t.co/UkOL5FgO7i Не знам обаче след това имало ли е опровержения или нови открития по темата.
RT @Ignis87736341: Si un labo avait créé le virus, on retrouverait des traces d'autres coronavirus combinés dans le génome. Ce qui n'est…
@TLWirkuty @realDonaldTrump The genome is brand new. Never seen before. Definition of Novel. (2/2) https://t.co/V2cQef542U
@joshrogin @beyerstein @RachelAlter007 Here you go, Josh. Do try to understand this:https://t.co/DusVdNIyVa
RT @RatioScientiae: "Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus." #COVID19…
"Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus." #COVID19 #SARSCoV2 https://t.co/uHR9FnNUQv
@joshrogin Andersen et al's March Nature article on the actual most likely scenarios now has 1745 citations. Are you a virologist? https://t.co/aRowgTbelr
@roohe_avareh اطالاعات دقیقتر تئوریهای مطرحشده در این مقاله معتبر نشریه نیچر مطرح و بررسی شده: ««قسمت انتهایی مقاله، بخش Theories of SARS-CoV-2 origins»» https://t.co/W5JZjCzbLc
@DrLiMengYAN1 some useful info in this thread. https://t.co/G18Mtu8Krq