@Sergeys_son @DLinkbull You can actually find this stuff out without guessing https://t.co/o8CGUoI2PQ
@Eternity_es @FLMIRONES @VaryIngweion 2. Sobre el origen natural del virus. https://t.co/mDIKyBmEQy
@Rottweilerig @maholydiaz no grito. Sigo diciendo que no me parece echar la culpa a los chinos de lo que ha pasado. Me parece que la evidencia indica que no ha habido intervencion humana en el origen de la epidemia y aun no sabemos mas https://t.co/X8P8Im0
@Rottweilerig @maholydiaz Definitivamente... renuncio https://t.co/X8P8Im0ubO https://t.co/2wHvJcpaLF
RT @_lunardreams: And here. Which was published in med journals back in March. But yall believe what you want. https://t.co/TObwA8Yo1J
And here. Which was published in med journals back in March. But yall believe what you want. https://t.co/TObwA8Yo1J
@fer_ruiz2020 @_______A_R_E_s4 Es un virus que muta de manera constante y lo seguirá haciendo. https://t.co/leORSUXuVu
Deeper view of Spike-Protein in Sars-Cov-2 from "The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2" by @NatureMedicine https://t.co/nAEDEHNnyM https://t.co/f4y5bgCKFw
@stanofcovid People that disagree with man-made theory will source this to say it's not. Shit is way too over my head to understand: https://t.co/DEotBGAA28
Tem que desenhar senão os conspiracionistas não entendem (ou fingem não entender)
(síndrome respiratória aguda grave, outra doença causada por coronavírus, mas não pelo SARS-CoV-2). E ainda nesse artigo da Nature (https://t.co/dTyvAPPfd5), podemos ver que os locais de clivagem polibásica do SARS-CoV-2 são bem diferentes de outros corona
Porque já foi feito. Como podemos ver aqui: https://t.co/dTyvAPPfd5, foi feita uma análise no RBD (domínio receptor obrigatório) uma região do genoma do SARS-CoV-2 que permite que o vírus reconheça e se ligue às células humanas.
Porém, como podemos ver aqui: https://t.co/dTyvAPPfd5, não há registros de nada envolvendo elementos do HIV no genoma do SARS-CoV-2, ou seja, essa ideia não se concretiza. E não, não é porque ele ganhou um Nobel da Medicina que ele tem carta branca para fa
@mstkbn @HikmetGeckil @mustafakrblt @ark_610 Güzel bir yayındır : Theories of SARS-CoV-2 origins bölümü.. https://t.co/pvCzng1JHi
RT @aharrasi1: مقالة حديثة في Nature Medicine تدحض الجدل كون #فيروس_كورونا تم هندسته وراثيا والصحيح هو نتيجة للتطور الطبيعي كون هيكله لا ي…
Ayer me encontré esto en facebook, literalmente fue de las primeras investigaciones que se hicieron... ¿No creen que las y los científicos deberíamos preocuparnos de que la información no esté llegando a la población en general? https://t.co/pQyszKp9d3 ht
RT @Ayjchan: And later Kristian Andersen (also on the expert committee) et al. publishing in @NatureMedicine "we do not believe that any ty…
RT @Ayjchan: And later Kristian Andersen (also on the expert committee) et al. publishing in @NatureMedicine "we do not believe that any ty…
@matteosalvinimi Ti ci vanti pure che non ti informi correttamente? Ma cos’è pigrizia? https://t.co/hXN5ZJxuw8
@nonleggerlo Tutto per pigrizia, perché volendo le informazioni ufficiali ci sono https://t.co/hXN5ZJxuw8
@LucaBizzarri Ma perché non legge le pubblicazioni scientifiche https://t.co/hXN5ZJxuw8
This sentence hidden in the text, but clear statements in abstract that the origin is natural zoonotic.
@simonbchen There seems to already be a wide scientific consensus that Covid-19 was a naturally occurring virus with no artificial indicators, meaning it is not manipulated or a construct. https://t.co/c93kjcyWqE
Veramente lo sappiamo benissimo che è naturale il SARS-COV2 e lo conferma anche uno studio scientifico su Nature. https://t.co/bznumz21Ft #lariachetirala7 #AIFA #lariachetira
RT @pmarsupia: Os dejo aquí el artículo científico en Nature Medicine donde se explican todos estos detalles sobre el origen natural del vi…
RT @pmarsupia: Os dejo aquí el artículo científico en Nature Medicine donde se explican todos estos detalles sobre el origen natural del vi…
And later Kristian Andersen (also on the expert committee) et al. publishing in @NatureMedicine "we do not believe that any type of laboratory-based scenario is plausible" https://t.co/MgggT0uCxV
@spajda02 @SvobodaLab @MasarovicRobert Například tady https://t.co/PURpJWscXR
@TheRealPengod @verge All those articles are heresay. You should, instead, read the actual scientific paper linked in one of the articles: https://t.co/rktA0aKvNz
@AbrahamWeint Se você estudasse um pouquinho antes de falar asneira iria saber que existem evidências científicas de que o vírus não foi criado em laboratório. https://t.co/t4rO9v8LXg
@Curioso_Arg @thisisnothoppa @MapelliEzequiel @gentlemanrojo @jpgareis @femibarbi Amigo, no se deje ver así de pendejo en público. Unas de las primeras cosas que se revisaron al empezar la pandemia fue si el virus tenía evidencia de haber sido de origen ar
La naturaleza también resultó conservadora y neoliberal. Aquí el probable origen del 👑bairos. https://t.co/leORSUFTwU
RT @matsumotoclinic: そして、これは人工的に作られたものであると考える人も多くいますが、ウイルス学者の間では自然界で突然変異で発生したものだという見方が主流です⬇️ https://t.co/2U5uTwXdUH
RT @matsumotoclinic: そして、これは人工的に作られたものであると考える人も多くいますが、ウイルス学者の間では自然界で突然変異で発生したものだという見方が主流です⬇️ https://t.co/2U5uTwXdUH
RT @matsumotoclinic: そして、これは人工的に作られたものであると考える人も多くいますが、ウイルス学者の間では自然界で突然変異で発生したものだという見方が主流です⬇️ https://t.co/2U5uTwXdUH
RT @matsumotoclinic: そして、これは人工的に作られたものであると考える人も多くいますが、ウイルス学者の間では自然界で突然変異で発生したものだという見方が主流です⬇️ https://t.co/2U5uTwXdUH
感染症専門医の方もそう言ってた。
そして、これは人工的に作られたものであると考える人も多くいますが、ウイルス学者の間では自然界で突然変異で発生したものだという見方が主流です⬇️ https://t.co/2U5uTwXdUH
"The acquisition of both the polybasic cleavage site and predicted O-linked glycans also argues against culture-based scenarios. " https://t.co/Xmp20I58AQ One argument after the other falling down.
RT @Ayjchan: The 1st is the widely-read Proximal Origins article - a correspondence published in @NatureMedicine on March 17, 2020. How did…
@mindmixradio @PatPenn2 @RenovaAlejandro @dkdk459 @NoeticCrypto @meowshallah @staggerlee422 @staceyseektruth @WendyJYoung2 @ma_liky_ @TXTrumpette89 @JasonShaw2017 Judy is a discredited scientist with a history of fraud and theft in 2011, not a whistleblowe
3. Also, China provided enough detail and samples for the rest of the world to decipher the full architecture of the virus. This gave scientists drug design targets not only vaccines but even antibody cocktails to help patients. https://t.co/pGsYCtxoCr h
@liaqatwaja @DrTedros It has been definitely shown that the vaccine could not possibly have been created in a laboratory LONG ago: Andersen et al (Nature 2020): https://t.co/bBmJuQDBOk "Strong evidence that SARS-CoV-2 [novel Corona virus/Covid19] is not th
El peor argumento que me han dado para no vacunarse, es porque creen que SARS-CoV-2 "salió" de un laboratorio. ¿Gente, dónde creen que se desarrollan las vacunas? El laboratorio más grande que existe es LA NATURALEZA. Vivimos en un lindo siglo, ÚNANSE. h
@alessan47586283 @lucianocapone Agevolo il link all'articolo https://t.co/Y4Ry2IyQZ4
The 1st is the widely-read Proximal Origins article - a correspondence published in @NatureMedicine on March 17, 2020. How did the authors determine that "SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus"? https://t.co/MgggT0uCx
@Subterfugitive کاملا درسته ویروس SARS-CoV-2 به هیچ وجه نمیتونه آزمایشگاهی و ساخته دست بشر باشه.. طبق مطالعات. بیوانفورماتیکی و مقالات ژورنال های معتبر از جمله نیچر https://t.co/06a3FlEWsf
@TheSeeker268 And... The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 https://t.co/woWVYF7cxN
@hereonceortwice i mean theres studies where they are sure its natural. i think its sketch cause we think we are invinceable and are shook that we arent https://t.co/RKOx9u0aeT
@JCPEREZCODEX @DrLiMengYAN1 SARS-CoV-2 is a natural and unmanipulated virus derived from animal to human transmission. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 | Nature Medicine https://t.co/8vwZ1NosvB https://t.co/YR5bnVfFfV
@sunlorrie Thank you. Sad to admit I read Nature papers with caution these days. Recall the paper which argued virus cannot be from lab? https://t.co/gp9z0atf8f Here is some interesting conflict: https://t.co/KjgeaVXcT1
@LLinWood SARS-CoV-2 is a natural and unmanipulated virus derived from animal to human transmission. The CCP did not release this virus. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 | Nature Medicine https://t.co/kDx3uv8SzR
@Ferrucc66935382 @dawac72 @FabioP81287858 "Sfuggito ad un laboratorio al nord"... e niente, volevo commentare nel merito, ma sinceramente non ce la faccio proprio. Prova a dare una letta qui: https://t.co/rUhEJiZIag
@exaltified @emartinez78987 @GordonJGM20 @kc_k89 SARS-CoV-2 is a natural and unmanipulated virus, not man-made. Analysis of the genome showed no evidence of a prior viral backbone. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 | Nature Medicine https://t.co/NhlnnFdhiK
@JSmarlos @Anonymo12869076 Here is a good scientific synopsis of the natural occurrence from back in March: https://t.co/SGlkDBxPmm
@mellziland Esse trabalho científico (17/03) trata da origem "aproximada" do vírus, descartando - não de todo - a impossibilidade de ter sido feito em laboratório e que o vírus saltou espécie numa mesma classe. O 7º a infectar humanos. https://t.co/k5kjAD
@ComitatoCentra1 Il Nord-Italia famosissimo per i suoi pipistrelli "Rhinolophus affinis" e dei pangolini malesiani "Manis javanica". https://t.co/XPYZsbZhnq
@FromageAlpage @flavinkins no o linked glycans have ever been found in those predicted locations so this invalidates his argument that an immune system must be involved as sars-cov-2 developed (in animals or humans) also @flavinkins can explain "mucin like
Simples assim
@RafaelFontana Nessa artigo - que uma parte foi recortada para os propósitos do tamarindo - cientistas tentam determinar a origem. Em certo momento, na conclusão, dizem da "quase impossibilidade" de ter sido fabricado, mas fazem o alerta. https://t.co/i4p
@sommerfeldkitty @Mareq16 SARS-CoV-2 was not man made, since it is a zoonose derived from animal to human spillover. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 | Nature Medicine https://t.co/DAd9MIuMzr
RT @docramiro: El análisis del origen del #COVID19. Spoiler alert: no fue creado en un laboratorio. https://t.co/bvlZXidiNu https://t.co/zR…
@LionsOmega @im2byteme @BuckSexton @realDonaldTrump SARS-CoV-2 is a natural and unmanipulated virus derived from animal to human transmission. No virologist is capable of adding a spike glycoprotein to the virus. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 | Nature
@junamelu @kikeAlcorcon1 @PoliciaAlcorcon @AytoAlcorcon @natadeandres @Hardcorcon No hay peor virus que el negacionismo, eso está claro, hay miles de estudios científicos, solo tienes que saber leer y tener un poco de sentido común. Aquí te dejo un artícu
RT @hommel_b: @BorgerPieter @pjvanerp Arme Pepijn van Erp... Het valt ook helemaal niet mee als je skepticus wilt zijn, maar niet de nood…
RT @hommel_b: @BorgerPieter @pjvanerp Arme Pepijn van Erp... Het valt ook helemaal niet mee als je skepticus wilt zijn, maar niet de nood…
RT @hommel_b: @BorgerPieter @pjvanerp Arme Pepijn van Erp... Het valt ook helemaal niet mee als je skepticus wilt zijn, maar niet de nood…
RT @hommel_b: @BorgerPieter @pjvanerp Arme Pepijn van Erp... Het valt ook helemaal niet mee als je skepticus wilt zijn, maar niet de nood…
RT @hommel_b: @BorgerPieter @pjvanerp Arme Pepijn van Erp... Het valt ook helemaal niet mee als je skepticus wilt zijn, maar niet de nood…
@sugarmagn01ia Actually, the “weird” things about SARS-CoV-2 provide evidence for the fact that it is not a manmade virus. https://t.co/oXwjj66nvN
@LouRoe331 @2loki4u @JackPosobiec @MollyMcKraken3 Virus naturally occurring. In Nov 2019 Trump adm warned Israel that something was happening. Didn't warn us. USA averages about 30K-50K flue deaths per year. 270,000 kinda blows that outta the water https:
the "science" is in the research papers those have given me "pause" since i first gave wonder to the OLD hiv "epidemic" the dead kennedys' "the government flu" will give you more truth than ANY rag owned by THEM
@Penelope7777777 @latimes SARS-CoV-2 came from nature, possibly bats. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 | Nature Medicine https://t.co/GepOBLHVkt
@Alannah223 @WSJ @WSJopinion lol this is the dumbest crap ever. it's been peer reviewed, and quite frankly I doubt you've read it, or understand how it comes to it's conclusion. everything in it is verifiable by others. stop posting this absolute garbag
@AntonioLeon79 @navedelmisterio https://t.co/TKcZPYJsFT Ahí tienes algunos, mas de fiar que dos charlatanes.
@cbemerine "...We propose two scenarios that can plausibly explain the origin of SARS-CoV-2: (i) natural selection in an animal host before zoonotic transfer; and (ii) natural selection in humans following zoonotic transfer." https://t.co/jUn4HviRYg
RT @AnaBandar: دراسة بحثية جميلة نشرت في مجلة النيتشر ناقشت كل الاحتمالات، وخلصت إلى أن احتمال تصنيع الفيروس أو خروجه بالخطأ من مختبرات ووه…
RT @angoffinet: And nobody except a few morons accuses anyone of murder. What most likely happened is silly, conceptually trivial GOF exper…
RT @angoffinet: You persist in your denial. The truth will surface one day, and my bet is that you will not be proud when it happens. Sad t…
@DavidLWindt @VICE thanks David, I don't disagree that other possibilities should be explored, but that paper doesn't look very convincing to me compared to this for instance https://t.co/77s2Ymylt4
@tcztcz @AdolfoKastillon No se ni pa que me molesto pero aquí tienes.... https://t.co/0ZA9o7MlFI
RT @BillyBostickson: 5. This is an important admission given that Andersen used his "O-Linked Glycan" prediction as evidence of a natural…
5. This is an important admission given that Andersen used his "O-Linked Glycan" prediction as evidence of a natural origin in his Nature Paper in March https://t.co/Kvm2Dw3SOm https://t.co/An7T2wxBHR
52 Failed Prediction - Andersen's "O linked Glycans" The function of the predicted O-linked glycans is unclear, but they could create a 'mucin-like domain' that shields epitopes - Kristian G. Andersen. https://t.co/Kvm2Dw3SOm and N- and O-glycosylation htt
@Wilfrie77917027 @pricklysquash @gonglei89 This paper back in March speculated that the virus might have circulated in humans for a decade or so but was undetected until a final mutation happened that made it deadly. https://t.co/6evu40DGAy
RT @DrDenaGrayson: 🚨BREAKING: Scientists analyzed genomic data to determine the origin of the deadly new #coronavirus: “Our analyses clear…
@johntdowney @charliekirk11 @RandPaul Doubt we have more to say unless you want to challenge "lab-chimera" (IDK the purpose; just know it does not look natural origin, &Fauci snuck around the Congress' moratorium on GoF research) https://t.co/nEyY61zC
@R_H_Ebright @K_G_Andersen @RadCentrism @nytimes This chap is slanderous and censorious... Personally, I don't want people like him to impede critical, objective inquiry. https://t.co/yC1quQUyXA