@ScienceNotDogma @HDMW18 @ClimateDefiance Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists and contrarians https://t.co/xKE3s4uXMe
@somedeepstuff1 @FChecker76 @JonMny @MarcEHJones The paper you have posted has been thoroughly debunked. We've talked about some points and while I agree that some of the debunking is a bit lazy, the paper itself is still garbage. That's why it wasn't pub
RT @mari_lasilva: Interesting how incidents of climate change denialism has also have similarly gone up steeply, especially after 2015 htt…
RT @mari_lasilva: Interesting how incidents of climate change denialism has also have similarly gone up steeply, especially after 2015 htt…
Interesting how incidents of climate change denialism has also have similarly gone up steeply, especially after 2015 https://t.co/1lYTUlOLro https://t.co/Tili4MBxHw
@sidehatchMark @BBCWorld Here's you two articles: Have fun not reading, not understanding, and trying to take facts out of context for your own narrative because you lack the ability to live in reality. https://t.co/rQP8u4L11l https://t.co/h1WkxsPtDn
RT @Scassonius: @carlo_canepa @borghi_claudio Eccone altri. Buona lettura, Carlo. https://t.co/bfWPyOGTuA https://t.co/J7AQEr1EOI https:…
@akickoutofyou @vicevongola2 @borghi_claudio https://t.co/b5QTmuuDHA Una fonte. https://t.co/eVcTJ3FyN1 un'altra fonte. Ulteriori fonti: https://t.co/bfWPyOGTuA https://t.co/J7AQEr1EOI https://t.co/PVnguVJCEH. https://t.co/81oP6xlFdk https://t.co/
@BNerlich @loscharlos @edyong209 @AlokPatelMD Yes, very similar https://t.co/CH1l1M3Gx7 https://t.co/DOPeNPYuoG https://t.co/ikd0lO7QEr https://t.co/Nye9Ao5LvJ https://t.co/QYGqKdLGUP Both: Scientists ignored for political expediency & short ter
RT @FiyyazAhmed_06: @GeraldKutney #CC_Denialism #Opinion_11 Now, these false claims have been thoroughly debunked and the number of outrig…
@GeraldKutney #CC_Denialism #Opinion_11 Now, these false claims have been thoroughly debunked and the number of outright climate deniers is vanishingly small. However, this fringe group possesses an outsized voice on social media. #ClimateBrawl #ClimateCr
RT @FrisoHeidinga: @heleenekker Interessant artikel over de algemene overrepresentatie van climate skeptics in de media tov in de wetenscha…
RT @FrisoHeidinga: @heleenekker Interessant artikel over de algemene overrepresentatie van climate skeptics in de media tov in de wetenscha…
RT @FrisoHeidinga: @heleenekker Interessant artikel over de algemene overrepresentatie van climate skeptics in de media tov in de wetenscha…
@heleenekker Interessant artikel over de algemene overrepresentatie van climate skeptics in de media tov in de wetenschappelijke literatuur. Wellicht kan dit een (onbewuste) oorzaak zijn dat de NOS, kijkend naar andere media, niet de erg uit de pas wil lop
RT @IreMonasterolo: Do media contribute to climate disinformation at scale? Article showing (climate) contrarians featured in 49% more medi…
RT @juliancubero: (Merece la lectura, incluso con lo de ajustar la “desproporcionada” atención a los contrarios al cambio climático) “…pro…
RT @juliancubero: (Merece la lectura, incluso con lo de ajustar la “desproporcionada” atención a los contrarios al cambio climático) “…pro…
(Merece la lectura, incluso con lo de ajustar la “desproporcionada” atención a los contrarios al cambio climático) “…professional journalists and editors should adjust the disproportionate attention given to contrarians…” #CambioClimático https://t.co/m
RT @IreMonasterolo: Do media contribute to climate disinformation at scale? Article showing (climate) contrarians featured in 49% more medi…
RT @UltimaGenerazi1: In questo articolo si analizza la copertura mediatica delle tesi di scienziati negazionisti: questi ricevono una visib…
RT @UltimaGenerazi1: In questo articolo si analizza la copertura mediatica delle tesi di scienziati negazionisti: questi ricevono una visib…
Discrepancy in scientific authority and #media visibility of #climate #change scientists and contrarians https://t.co/4T3VyfuRx0
RT @IreMonasterolo: Do media contribute to climate disinformation at scale? Article showing (climate) contrarians featured in 49% more medi…
Do media contribute to climate disinformation at scale? Article showing (climate) contrarians featured in 49% more media articles than scientists yet in mainstream media sources just 1% excess visibility, demonstrating crowding out of professional sources
RT @UltimaGenerazi1: In questo articolo si analizza la copertura mediatica delle tesi di scienziati negazionisti: questi ricevono una visib…
RT @UltimaGenerazi1: In questo articolo si analizza la copertura mediatica delle tesi di scienziati negazionisti: questi ricevono una visib…
RT @UltimaGenerazi1: In questo articolo si analizza la copertura mediatica delle tesi di scienziati negazionisti: questi ricevono una visib…
RT @UltimaGenerazi1: In questo articolo si analizza la copertura mediatica delle tesi di scienziati negazionisti: questi ricevono una visib…
@LeonardoPanetta Le offro materiali di approfondimento per evitare pessime figure le prossime volte 1: https://t.co/c3Cwirtj8x 2: https://t.co/pLiRutZn8n
RT @UltimaGenerazi1: In questo articolo si analizza la copertura mediatica delle tesi di scienziati negazionisti: questi ricevono una visib…
RT @UltimaGenerazi1: In questo articolo si analizza la copertura mediatica delle tesi di scienziati negazionisti: questi ricevono una visib…
RT @UltimaGenerazi1: In questo articolo si analizza la copertura mediatica delle tesi di scienziati negazionisti: questi ricevono una visib…
RT @UltimaGenerazi1: In questo articolo si analizza la copertura mediatica delle tesi di scienziati negazionisti: questi ricevono una visib…
RT @UltimaGenerazi1: In questo articolo si analizza la copertura mediatica delle tesi di scienziati negazionisti: questi ricevono una visib…
In questo articolo si analizza la copertura mediatica delle tesi di scienziati negazionisti: questi ricevono una visibilità mediamente doppia rispetto agli altri scienziati. https://t.co/BjAzjWUQSx
@Rafal_Plonsk @tomaawroblewski @Neuropa_ No ale wejdźmy w to badanie naukowe https://t.co/MY8IrjlycG które ma swój dodatek https://t.co/qqjkSQkK07 Polecam abstract w badaniu oryginalnym: "Here we show via direct comparison that contrarians are featured in
@Rafal_Plonsk @tomaawroblewski 2:50 i teraz skacze na film Moore'a. Ja pierdole. Serio myślisz że od tego kolesia coś sensownego się dowiesz? Właśnie widzę że opiera się na blogu denialisty, który wykorzystuje to badanie https://t.co/MY8IrjlycG.
RT @Chetecilla25: La misma turra desde hace décadas. ¿Cuánta gente está viviendo de meternos miedo? En Nature publican que no hay unanimida…
RT @Chetecilla25: @Juanmialmeria2 @rl7624 Revista científica Nature. Los cientificos no están todos de acuerdo. https://t.co/YGIBP6wL0H
La misma turra desde hace décadas. ¿Cuánta gente está viviendo de meternos miedo? En Nature publican que no hay unanimidad entre los científicos. https://t.co/YGIBP6wL0H
@Juanmialmeria2 @rl7624 Revista científica Nature. Los cientificos no están todos de acuerdo. https://t.co/YGIBP6wL0H
@NOconsensus @CCCAlliance @BulfordDaniel @TwitterSupport @elonmusk @ellagirwin @TwitterSafety I’ve likely been shadowbanned since defamatory “Internet Blogs, Polar Bears and Climate Change Denial by Proxy” paper in 2017. @AEDerocher & his #polarbear cr
@Tanguy_Cornec @GerhardKrinner @Fnac @FonfredeMichel @journey6369 @GVilleval @catnatnet @FlayDeni ➡️ pas que des enfants de cœur derrière la désinformation (Les Marchands de doute ou https://t.co/yEeYkwR2Bl) + couverture médiatique disproportionnée par rap
@BBCWorld For Political Expediency, best not issue the warning then. Nov. 28, 2022 417.31 ppm CO2 and still rising fast. #ClimateCrisis #EcologicalCrisis https://t.co/aWakNcQmiW
@Gordosailing @GeraldKutney Banned from Nature for mixing cherries in the Curry Sauce. https://t.co/aWakNcQU8u
@j_freundt More media attention + amplification through social media might be one reason… 🫥 See also this research: https://t.co/Gx6ZKaCOyH
@MRGdeviaje @pcjd3 @cultrun No veo cancelación alguna. Valga como ejemplo que a Judith Curry, una de las más furibundas "contrarians" casi la hacen presidenta de la NOAA. En medios conservadores, cualquier voz negacionista está amplaimente sobrerrepresenta
RT @HaddockAdhoc: Interesante Hilo: "Alarmar a la ciudadanía desde el IPCC con los fenómenos meteorológicos castastróficos, el crecimiento…
RT @HaddockAdhoc: Interesante Hilo: "Alarmar a la ciudadanía desde el IPCC con los fenómenos meteorológicos castastróficos, el crecimiento…
RT @akthivity: Vuelve la inquisición, caza de brujas (S.XXI). Polémica en el mundo científico (Nature): con los 3 mosqueteros (Univ. La Mer…
RT @HaddockAdhoc: Interesante Hilo: "Alarmar a la ciudadanía desde el IPCC con los fenómenos meteorológicos castastróficos, el crecimiento…
RT @akthivity: Vuelve la inquisición, caza de brujas (S.XXI). Polémica en el mundo científico (Nature): con los 3 mosqueteros (Univ. La Mer…
RT @HaddockAdhoc: Interesante Hilo: "Alarmar a la ciudadanía desde el IPCC con los fenómenos meteorológicos castastróficos, el crecimiento…
RT @HaddockAdhoc: Interesante Hilo: "Alarmar a la ciudadanía desde el IPCC con los fenómenos meteorológicos castastróficos, el crecimiento…
RT @HaddockAdhoc: Interesante Hilo: "Alarmar a la ciudadanía desde el IPCC con los fenómenos meteorológicos castastróficos, el crecimiento…
RT @HaddockAdhoc: Interesante Hilo: "Alarmar a la ciudadanía desde el IPCC con los fenómenos meteorológicos castastróficos, el crecimiento…
Interesante Hilo: "Alarmar a la ciudadanía desde el IPCC con los fenómenos meteorológicos castastróficos, el crecimiento del nivel del mar, el descontrol de los GEI, el peligro del consumo de carne... todo partiendo de simulaciones de modelos climáticos n
@velardedaoiz2 @TheObjective_es Hace tiempo que Torquemada campa a sus anchas https://t.co/Y2ya4o0lxI
The discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists and contrarians. Cognitive bias is one salient human factor contributing to the public’s susceptibility to information manipulation. https://t.co/8k10jo68n7 https:/
Since the early 2000s there has been little disagreement among scientific experts over the fundamental evidence supporting the existence, origin, and societal significance of anthropogenic climate change. https://t.co/6EyhH5WqYT https://t.co/jdLQT38TIv
@LanceForman @nscscience @LBC @AndrewMarr9 He is on this list of the top 100 climate contrarians in this paper. What's notable about them is how little original scientific work they publish (YouTube videos don't count Lance). Also that the amount of media
@OsirisRage @Lutzoid @GaryLineker I didn’t know that scientists with alternative views had been excluded or deplatformed, so I did a quick search. “Scientists excluded from climate debate” It appears to be the other way round. You might find this interest
Marc Morano podle analýzy Nature je mediálně nejúspěšnější klimatický popírač vůbec. Během svojí kariéry Morano založil celou řadu projektů financovaných fosilním průmyslem. Projekty se zpravidla maskují jako nezávislé občanské organizace. 4/n https://t.c
@drchrisnewton @RobinHa31517993 another logical fallacy: attack the source not the content. here is an article from a https://t.co/GUWRaW19fI a leading scientific journal: "Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scien
@rwang0 Which I think is the source of our fundamental disagreement. I’m in agreement with the vast, vast majority of science and indeed the findings of the oil industry themselves. At this stage it’s like disagreeing with evolution. https://t.co/CboFFjg
Prominent climate change denialists received almost 50 percent more media coverage than top-tier climate scientists. Check out “Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists and contrarians” https://t.co/fyhRQdA8us
@rideyourcity @BDliveSA Indeed, we need more people to be educated on the critical need to end the use of fossil fuels ASAP. Many lives and so much of the earth depends on it. Unfortunately journalists too often present the science as unclear or divided
@wildland_zko @NateoftheNorth @MichaelWWara @greenwoodae @CulturalFire Interestingly when it comes to media, people with minority views sometimes are disproportionately represented vs experts with more/more credible scientific publications. For example, cl
Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists and contrarians https://t.co/vdnqYrjqfT
"..proliferation of new media sources, many of which contribute to the production and consumption of climate change disinformation at scale."
RT @TheDisproof: @kbo1978 @theresphysics @RogerPielkeJr @jritch Glad you brought up the media. It seem that climate contrarians/deniers/ske…
@schotalot @MermanKris https://t.co/0qsYOFTVmB Peer reviewed study. All you have shown me is an opinion article in a news paper. Don't try and tell someone they don't know something when obviously you yourself do not. I can find plenty more. But if hearin
@kbo1978 @theresphysics @RogerPielkeJr @jritch Glad you brought up the media. It seem that climate contrarians/deniers/skeptics get more media air time than better qualified, more published and more experienced scientists who accept human induced climate c
RT @TheDisproof: This paper is interesting, it shows that climate deniers/contrarians get a lot more media time than they should as they ar…