RT @ProfTerryHughes: Interesting analysis of the “expertise” of climate change deniers in the (mostly USA) media. https://t.co/HHH7WXt2Zx
I guess if you're rare & noisy you get media attention. Doesn't mean you're right tho @giulio_mattioli
RT @FabiusMaximus01: Is this a joke? Oddities abound. Contrarians are not named, but sourced to the Desmog blog (w/ other sources), conside…
RT @JeanPatrickT: Lecture Obligatoire tirée de @NatureNews. On y démontre objectivement la disproportion de représentativité des scientifiq…
RT @keelingcurve: 'These results demonstrate why climate scientists should increasingly exert their authority in scientific and public disc…
RT @reishiva: メディアも温暖化の進行に加担している(ーー# https://t.co/TwIpARtrj0
RT @nresearchnews: A group of climate change contrarians appeared in 49% more media articles than scientists who support the consensus that…
RT @ProfTerryHughes: Interesting analysis of the “expertise” of climate change deniers in the (mostly USA) media. https://t.co/HHH7WXt2Zx
RT @geoffsimmonz: This study highlights the importance of the work @NZStuff is doing with its climate reporting. @PatrickCrewdson http…
RT @reishiva: メディアも温暖化の進行に加担している(ーー# https://t.co/TwIpARtrj0
RT @JeanPatrickT: Lecture Obligatoire tirée de @NatureNews. On y démontre objectivement la disproportion de représentativité des scientifiq…
RT @Beyond_Climate: 【気候変動】気候変動懐疑論者のメディアにおける可視性の評価 | Nature Communications https://t.co/YpaM6P3Xvq 気候変動懐疑論者を取り上げた記事が、人間の活動を気候変動の一因とする大多数の見解を…
RT @ProfTerryHughes: Interesting analysis of the “expertise” of climate change deniers in the (mostly USA) media. https://t.co/HHH7WXt2Zx
RT @reishiva: メディアも温暖化の進行に加担している(ーー# https://t.co/TwIpARtrj0
This study highlights the importance of the work @NZStuff is doing with its climate reporting. @PatrickCrewdson https://t.co/iXfaPUbWvV
RT @ProfTerryHughes: Interesting analysis of the “expertise” of climate change deniers in the (mostly USA) media. https://t.co/HHH7WXt2Zx
RT @JeanPatrickT: Lecture Obligatoire tirée de @NatureNews. On y démontre objectivement la disproportion de représentativité des scientifiq…
RT @NatureJapan: 【気候変動】気候変動懐疑論者のメディアにおける可視性の評価 | Nature Communications https://t.co/GslcsZamtA #気候変動
New study shows that the media is giving a handful of unqualified climate deniers as much media attention as the top 200 legitimate climate scientists.
RT @ProfTerryHughes: Interesting analysis of the “expertise” of climate change deniers in the (mostly USA) media. https://t.co/HHH7WXt2Zx
This takes the ad hominem to the next level...
RT @Beyond_Climate: 主に北米とヨーロッパに拠点を置くメディアソースの約10万点の記事とブログ記事では、気候変動懐疑論者のメディアにおける可視性が、気候変動科学者よりも49%高かったが、(編集基準が厳格な)30の主要メディアソースを特に調べたところ、両者の可視…
RT @Beyond_Climate: 【気候変動】気候変動懐疑論者のメディアにおける可視性の評価 | Nature Communications https://t.co/YpaM6P3Xvq 気候変動懐疑論者を取り上げた記事が、人間の活動を気候変動の一因とする大多数の見解を…
RT @Beyond_Climate: 【気候変動】気候変動懐疑論者のメディアにおける可視性の評価 | Nature Communications https://t.co/YpaM6P3Xvq 気候変動懐疑論者を取り上げた記事が、人間の活動を気候変動の一因とする大多数の見解を…
RT @reishiva: メディアも温暖化の進行に加担している(ーー# https://t.co/TwIpARtrj0
RT @Beyond_Climate: 【気候変動】気候変動懐疑論者のメディアにおける可視性の評価 | Nature Communications https://t.co/YpaM6P3Xvq 気候変動懐疑論者を取り上げた記事が、人間の活動を気候変動の一因とする大多数の見解を…
RT @reishiva: メディアも温暖化の進行に加担している(ーー# https://t.co/TwIpARtrj0
メディアも温暖化の進行に加担している(ーー#
Check out the redcube/sharedit link at the bottom of retweeted tweet for full paper if you don't have university access.
RT @nresearchnews: A group of climate change contrarians appeared in 49% more media articles than scientists who support the consensus that…
RT @ProfTerryHughes: Interesting analysis of the “expertise” of climate change deniers in the (mostly USA) media. https://t.co/HHH7WXt2Zx
RT @NatureJapan: 【気候変動】気候変動懐疑論者のメディアにおける可視性の評価 | Nature Communications https://t.co/GslcsZamtA #気候変動
RT @Beyond_Climate: 主に北米とヨーロッパに拠点を置くメディアソースの約10万点の記事とブログ記事では、気候変動懐疑論者のメディアにおける可視性が、気候変動科学者よりも49%高かったが、(編集基準が厳格な)30の主要メディアソースを特に調べたところ、両者の可視…
RT @NatureJapan: 【気候変動】気候変動懐疑論者のメディアにおける可視性の評価 | Nature Communications https://t.co/GslcsZamtA #気候変動
【気候変動】気候変動懐疑論者のメディアにおける可視性の評価 | Nature Communications https://t.co/GslcsZamtA #気候変動
Is this a joke? Oddities abound. Contrarians are not named, but sourced to the Desmog blog (w/ other sources), considered authoritative. Says reports by @HeartlandInst have been “debunked”, citing ClimateFeedback. @RogerAPielkeSr @RogerPielkeJr @curryja
RT @ProfTerryHughes: Interesting analysis of the “expertise” of climate change deniers in the (mostly USA) media. https://t.co/HHH7WXt2Zx
RT @LeroyWesterling: We also ranked climate scientists by their media coverage and looked at who covers them. The most covered? @MichaelEM…
You had me at "We juxtapose 386 prominent contrarians with 386 expert scientists" #ClimateCult
RT @ProfTerryHughes: Interesting analysis of the “expertise” of climate change deniers in the (mostly USA) media. https://t.co/HHH7WXt2Zx
RT @ProfTerryHughes: Interesting analysis of the “expertise” of climate change deniers in the (mostly USA) media. https://t.co/HHH7WXt2Zx
RT @ProfTerryHughes: Interesting analysis of the “expertise” of climate change deniers in the (mostly USA) media. https://t.co/HHH7WXt2Zx
This is alarming. Media and journalists should adjust the disproportionate attention given to climate science skeptics, and climate scientists should increasingly exert their authority in scientific and public discourse. By Anthony LeRoy Westerling et al.
RT @ProfTerryHughes: Interesting analysis of the “expertise” of climate change deniers in the (mostly USA) media. https://t.co/HHH7WXt2Zx
RT @uchida_kawasaki: 【気候変動】気候変動懐疑論者のメディアにおける可視性の評価 | Nature Communications | Nature Research https://t.co/1vCOA7C7hx
RT @Beyond_Climate: 【気候変動】気候変動懐疑論者のメディアにおける可視性の評価 | Nature Communications https://t.co/YpaM6P3Xvq 気候変動懐疑論者を取り上げた記事が、人間の活動を気候変動の一因とする大多数の見解を…
RT @Beyond_Climate: 【気候変動】気候変動懐疑論者のメディアにおける可視性の評価 | Nature Communications https://t.co/YpaM6P3Xvq 気候変動懐疑論者を取り上げた記事が、人間の活動を気候変動の一因とする大多数の見解を…
RT @Beyond_Climate: 【気候変動】気候変動懐疑論者のメディアにおける可視性の評価 | Nature Communications https://t.co/YpaM6P3Xvq 気候変動懐疑論者を取り上げた記事が、人間の活動を気候変動の一因とする大多数の見解を…
RT @ProfTerryHughes: Interesting analysis of the “expertise” of climate change deniers in the (mostly USA) media. https://t.co/HHH7WXt2Zx
Scientist denying climate change have 15 more exposition in media than the best scientists explaining climate change... It is like bringing at the same level people thinking that the earth is rond or flat... original paper : https://t.co/YH9SZdKgna
Interesting analysis of the “expertise” of climate change deniers in the (mostly USA) media.
【気候変動】気候変動懐疑論者のメディアにおける可視性の評価 | Nature Communications | Nature Research https://t.co/1vCOA7C7hx
RT @Beyond_Climate: 【気候変動】気候変動懐疑論者のメディアにおける可視性の評価 | Nature Communications https://t.co/YpaM6P3Xvq 気候変動懐疑論者を取り上げた記事が、人間の活動を気候変動の一因とする大多数の見解を…
RT @Beyond_Climate: 【気候変動】気候変動懐疑論者のメディアにおける可視性の評価 | Nature Communications https://t.co/YpaM6P3Xvq 気候変動懐疑論者を取り上げた記事が、人間の活動を気候変動の一因とする大多数の見解を…
RT @davidhik: Interesting: 386 contrarians juxtaposed with 386 expert scientists by tracking digital footprints of 200K research papers & 1…
Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists and contrarians | Nature Communications https://t.co/wfURsqai8z
Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists and contrarians https://t.co/XiNjIOojPA @nature
Très intéressant effectivement mais que faire face à ce phénomène ?
RT @Beyond_Climate: 【気候変動】気候変動懐疑論者のメディアにおける可視性の評価 | Nature Communications https://t.co/YpaM6P3Xvq 気候変動懐疑論者を取り上げた記事が、人間の活動を気候変動の一因とする大多数の見解を…
Lecture Obligatoire tirée de @NatureNews. On y démontre objectivement la disproportion de représentativité des scientifiques du #climat par rapport aux "négateurs de la science du climat" dans les grands médias @clicjf @paslap @QuebecScience @Lactu_Borde
Interesting: 386 contrarians juxtaposed with 386 expert scientists by tracking digital footprints of 200K research papers & 100K English-language media articles on #climatechange. Guess what? Contrarians are featured in 49% more media articles than sci
Dear BBC... https://t.co/OKQBunIluz
RT @stuartpalley: Climate change deniers (non-scientists) are using sketchy media sources to outsize their voices in spreading disinformati…
This article is worth a read. The graphs show that the amount of media attention to climate change contrarians really hasn’t changed much- which is scary with the increasing scientific consensus. I am surprised, but I guess I am in my own little media bubb
RT @keelingcurve: 'These results demonstrate why climate scientists should increasingly exert their authority in scientific and public disc…
RT @keelingcurve: 'These results demonstrate why climate scientists should increasingly exert their authority in scientific and public disc…
@SISeneviratne @Knutti_ETH
Anti science media bias. They can't even understand a logarithmic scale in all probability. They understand $$$.
RT @LeroyWesterling: It doesn’t take much work for a denier to become an “expert”. Comparing most prominent 224 climate deniers (red) to 22…
RT @Beyond_Climate: 主に北米とヨーロッパに拠点を置くメディアソースの約10万点の記事とブログ記事では、気候変動懐疑論者のメディアにおける可視性が、気候変動科学者よりも49%高かったが、(編集基準が厳格な)30の主要メディアソースを特に調べたところ、両者の可視…
RT @Beyond_Climate: 【気候変動】気候変動懐疑論者のメディアにおける可視性の評価 | Nature Communications https://t.co/YpaM6P3Xvq 気候変動懐疑論者を取り上げた記事が、人間の活動を気候変動の一因とする大多数の見解を…
主に北米とヨーロッパに拠点を置くメディアソースの約10万点の記事とブログ記事では、気候変動懐疑論者のメディアにおける可視性が、気候変動科学者よりも49%高かったが、(編集基準が厳格な)30の主要メディアソースを特に調べたところ、両者の可視性は、ほぼ同じ。 https://t.co/YpaM6P3Xvq
【気候変動】気候変動懐疑論者のメディアにおける可視性の評価 | Nature Communications https://t.co/YpaM6P3Xvq 気候変動懐疑論者を取り上げた記事が、人間の活動を気候変動の一因とする大多数の見解を支持する科学者を取り上げた記事よりも49%多かったことが明らかになった。#気候危機 #気候正義
This is a pretty good representation of false balance in reporting. Looks like # of appearances of a climate scientist in news sources is correlated with academic output. For climate contrarians, # of appearances is unrelated to academic work.
I like graphs!
On the denialist side, this is a fatal failure of the journalistic profession
RT @LeroyWesterling: We also ranked climate scientists by their media coverage and looked at who covers them. The most covered? @MichaelEM…
There might be something wrong with the media...
【気候変動】気候変動懐疑論者のメディアにおける可視性の評価 | Nature Communications | Nature Research https://t.co/BWeSt4TFZd
Essential article by Nature on ""Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of #ClimateChange scientists and contrarians": only a few media give enough space to real experts! More on https://t.co/lynb28bB5Y
NPG: Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists and contrarians https://t.co/4Bbu8euOhq https://t.co/ewfp5PkJ0a
Climate change deniers (non-scientists) are using sketchy media sources to outsize their voices in spreading disinformation about climate change. False equivalency in climate reporting is not beneficial to the future well-being of humankind on this planet.
#Climate NPG: Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists and contrarians https://t.co/rOdmOHIQqA