Media distortion of reality ... Den Deutschen ÖRR und Privaten Sendern herzlich anempfohlen... https://t.co/4Cxlu5Iu2q
RT @TheDisproof: This paper is interesting, it shows that climate deniers/contrarians get a lot more media time than they should as they ar…
This paper is interesting, it shows that climate deniers/contrarians get a lot more media time than they should as they are less published and have less papers/expertise than proponents of human induced climate change. #climatemedia #COP26 @BBCJustinR htt
RT @wblau: @teresabuecker Indeed! Good entry point into the effects of climate disinformation on journalism: https://t.co/YZVQubpCRr
RT @wblau: @teresabuecker Indeed! Good entry point into the effects of climate disinformation on journalism: https://t.co/YZVQubpCRr
RT @wblau: @teresabuecker Indeed! Good entry point into the effects of climate disinformation on journalism: https://t.co/YZVQubpCRr
RT @wblau: @teresabuecker Indeed! Good entry point into the effects of climate disinformation on journalism: https://t.co/YZVQubpCRr
RT @wblau: @teresabuecker Indeed! Good entry point into the effects of climate disinformation on journalism: https://t.co/YZVQubpCRr
RT @wblau: @teresabuecker Indeed! Good entry point into the effects of climate disinformation on journalism: https://t.co/YZVQubpCRr
RT @wblau: @teresabuecker Indeed! Good entry point into the effects of climate disinformation on journalism: https://t.co/YZVQubpCRr
RT @wblau: @teresabuecker Indeed! Good entry point into the effects of climate disinformation on journalism: https://t.co/YZVQubpCRr
RT @wblau: @teresabuecker Indeed! Good entry point into the effects of climate disinformation on journalism: https://t.co/YZVQubpCRr
@teresabuecker Indeed! Good entry point into the effects of climate disinformation on journalism: https://t.co/YZVQubpCRr
@ASChakos @POTUS Please take your time and read these two articles with an open mind and all the intellect you can muster. Then begin anew your research away from main stream media articles: https://t.co/pbTsUPGPem https://t.co/AFIPqc6Hv0
@scherbenstein GroupThink widerspricht in keiner Weise false-balancing. Das Ergebnis von medialem False-Balancing sehen wir am gut erforschten Klimawandel-Skeptizismus. https://t.co/4tK7A0xp5z
@scherbenstein @schnellenbachj Verzerrungen als Folge uA. von medialem False-Balancing bzw. entlang eigener Wertevortellungen am Beispiel des Klimawandel-Skeptizismus: https://t.co/4tK7A0xp5z
@CP24 Now talk about the same number that disagree. https://t.co/3lKNtjK2DR
@jannibal_ Vielleicht erstmal informieren was "false balance" überhaupt ist. Das ist kein Instrument zur Verteidigung einer Mehrheitsmeinung, sondern bezeichnet das Verzerren von wissenschaftlichen Konsens, also beruht auf objektiven Kriterien. https://t
@amandaleggert @mtpublicradio @PhilipHiguera @MatthewHurteau This is why this is important: creating confusion about scientific consensus is precisely the goal of climate deniers. This pattern is exactly the same in fire science where these extreme views a
@Josean94 @Rub_dc No hay prueba. Por eso dicen consenso de los miembros del panel del IPCC. Si eres científico y opinas de forma distinta no cobras del lobby. Caza de brujas... https://t.co/jTzHOshpPB
@VinnMedOss @vgnett @NRKno Studien den referer til: https://t.co/Hjd9pCLyED
@jlehtira Ja propaganda leviää yhä tehokkaasti https://t.co/kQOIK0qtr8
@GeoffreyLean Yes. I am sure you know this study here on that very issue: https://t.co/YZVQubpCRr
@rahmstorf I am sure you know this Nature article by which journalism can even create a perception by which established climate science can come across as less certain than it already is: https://t.co/YZVQubpCRr
@lkwarzecha Nie powtarzam żadnej liczby. Jednak zamiast kolejnej dyskusji o GO, jakości źródeł i "spiskach" zostawię artykuł (badawczy i udokumentowany dla odmiany) o zjawisku, które sam Pan przedstawia. aczkolwiek cytowania prac na kwesie j/w też tam Pa
Impact of undeniable climate change will be exponentially higher than unexpected COVID-19. Non-multidimentional unwholistic solutions so far won't make small dent on solving magnitude of problems yet to arise. #Stewardship https://t.co/tmw5vNzKbh | https:/
@CupoJoeBlow "There's considerable debate within the scientific community" https://t.co/nVisnFSXJ3 https://t.co/gvxuqt1fXo
@ardesangres @BernaldoDQuiros @aariastorres No es personal. Es su forma de argumentar. Hay muchisimos articulos serios refutando las conclusiones del IPCC (https://t.co/U2V9bQ3W8T). Lo mismo con la eficacia de las vacunas, et al...es en base a eso q me int
For anyone wondering why climate denialism is still a thing... https://t.co/6pWh2mOIDb
True Science unveils works of the Omniscient Creator. Climate change denail is unscientific and unbiblical as it is denail of Centrality of the Kingdom, its Intelligent Multifaceted Multidimentional Design. Climate Change and Kingdom are interconnected. ht
RT @seanmholman: And it states the voices of those questioning the necessity of an energy transition are “rarely heard,” even though a rece…
Leugner haben 50% mehr Medienpräsenz als Wissenschaftler. In Mainstream-Medien haben sie nur 1% mehr Präsenz. Wer das jetzt für ein Qualitätssiegel hält, sollte nochmal ernsthaft nachdenken. https://t.co/iTEFSowaWn
RT @seanmholman: And it states the voices of those questioning the necessity of an energy transition are “rarely heard,” even though a rece…
RT @seanmholman: And it states the voices of those questioning the necessity of an energy transition are “rarely heard,” even though a rece…
And it states the voices of those questioning the necessity of an energy transition are “rarely heard,” even though a recent study found climate contrarians were actually featured in "49 percent more media articles than scientists" between 2000 and 2016.
RT @KariLimaX: Dedico esse post a todos aqueles que acreditam em qualquer negacionista que aparece. É impressionante como eles nunca têm ma…
RT @KariLimaX: Dedico esse post a todos aqueles que acreditam em qualquer negacionista que aparece. É impressionante como eles nunca têm ma…
@Hamburg397 @HalleVerkehrt @tazgezwitscher Deren Quelle ist Open Access :) https://t.co/NVybdbRk2Q
Hier das Original: https://t.co/phiY4TZvTX
RT @mss7676: @JGemassmer @Katapultmagazin @KlimaVorAcht @SaraSchurmann Die Studie (https://t.co/ybkR7OKWRB) untersucht nur englischsprachig…
@JGemassmer @Katapultmagazin @KlimaVorAcht @SaraSchurmann Die Studie (https://t.co/ybkR7OKWRB) untersucht nur englischsprachige #Medien/#Blogs, mit einer durchaus umstrittenen Methode. & Länderunterschiede in Medien-Repräsentanz von "SkeptikerInnen" si
Looking forward to Bill Gates' point of view [ with experts from fields of physics, chemistry, biology, engineering, political science, finance ] on how to avoid a climate disaster: https://t.co/USv23g7s1G | Disinformation: https://t.co/zpWoJPG8dL | Enoch
And just to highlight a scientific test in another area (than e.g. face cover) where dichotomized views are present, see this illustrative comparison of social vs. "traditional" media!: https://t.co/jHW4O1fwQH
@SRosa_YUL @VezoVezir «Here we show via direct comparison that contrarians are featured in 49% more media articles than scientists.» 🤷♂️ https://t.co/qaMmViiDYI
Since the early 2000s there has been little disagreement among scientific experts over the fundamental evidence supporting the existence, origin, and societal significance of anthropogenic climate change https://t.co/8xTYbw4r72
Este es un artículo muy interesante que muestra cómo los negadores del cambio climático utilizan los medios de comunicación y redes sociales para amplificar su influencia y cómo tratan de hacer de los dominantes sus modelos https://t.co/I1Nh0e9K6o
This is a very interesting article that shows how climate deniers use social media to amplify their influence and how they try to make dominants their models https://t.co/I1Nh0e9K6o
Wusste ich gar nicht Genauso hier: https://t.co/Uef7IAqzOZ Klimawandel-Leugner, also Anhänger antiwissenschaftlicher Gegenwirklichkeiten, werden in Medien häufiger zitiert und gefeatured als Meinungen zum menschengemachten #Klimawandel. Irgendwoher muss d
RT @Flo_Rian: @AnnikaJoeres @sixtus @Katapultmagazin Wichtig zu erwähnen: Es wurden zwei gleich große(!) Gruppen verglichen, es gibt aber w…
RT @Flo_Rian: @SilvaAtTwitta @AnnikaJoeres @LarsHochmann @Katapultmagazin Petersen et al 2019: “... by contrarians we refer to individuals…
@Werktaetiger_ @AnnikaJoeres @Katapultmagazin Es wurde auch nicht danach differenziert, sondern nach [climate change] “consensus scientists (CCS) and contrarians (CCC)”. https://t.co/8EGgwxPNbh
@SilvaAtTwitta @AnnikaJoeres @LarsHochmann @Katapultmagazin Petersen et al 2019: “... by contrarians we refer to individuals frequently sourced by institutions denying the documented realities of CC and its consequences and/or individuals who have personal
@AnnikaJoeres @sixtus @Katapultmagazin Wichtig zu erwähnen: Es wurden zwei gleich große(!) Gruppen verglichen, es gibt aber wesentlich mehr Wissenschaftler, die den Klimawandel nicht leugnen als „Querdenker“. Diese tauchen also relativ gesehen öfter in Med
@gwup @digitalwerber @AnnikaJoeres @sixtus @Katapultmagazin Die zugrundeliegende Studie nennt sie auch „Contrarians“. https://t.co/8EGgwxPNbh
@lingenhoehl Die Quelle ist diese Publikation hier: https://t.co/4ww1RLZgxe
Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists and contrarians https://t.co/7CfzfEURlT
Scientists versus contrarians in media visibility on the climate crisis https://t.co/m8KYoRRxdA
RT @martoiu: Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists and contrarians https://t.co/pggCbbfq4m
Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists and contrarians https://t.co/pggCbbfq4m
RT @tan123: This claim sounds like complete BS, and doesn't even make sense: "contrarians are featured in 49% more media articles than scie…
RT @tan123: This claim sounds like complete BS, and doesn't even make sense: "contrarians are featured in 49% more media articles than scie…
RT @tan123: This claim sounds like complete BS, and doesn't even make sense: "contrarians are featured in 49% more media articles than scie…
RT @tan123: This claim sounds like complete BS, and doesn't even make sense: "contrarians are featured in 49% more media articles than scie…
RT @alan_poirier: Don't bother reading this one, folks. Here's the long and short of it. Thanks to the Internet and online resources, skept…
RT @alan_poirier: Don't bother reading this one, folks. Here's the long and short of it. Thanks to the Internet and online resources, skept…
RT @alan_poirier: Don't bother reading this one, folks. Here's the long and short of it. Thanks to the Internet and online resources, skept…
RT @alan_poirier: Don't bother reading this one, folks. Here's the long and short of it. Thanks to the Internet and online resources, skept…
Don't bother reading this one, folks. Here's the long and short of it. Thanks to the Internet and online resources, skeptics are getting their message across. This upsets Karen. Too funny. #ClimateChange
RT @tan123: This claim sounds like complete BS, and doesn't even make sense: "contrarians are featured in 49% more media articles than scie…
This claim sounds like complete BS, and doesn't even make sense: "contrarians are featured in 49% more media articles than scientists". Are we supposed to believe that climate skeptics are never scientists?
RT @KariLimaX: Dedico esse post a todos aqueles que acreditam em qualquer negacionista que aparece. É impressionante como eles nunca têm ma…
самые высокие уровни Climate Change-консенсуса среди самых опытных климатологов Doran, P. T. & Zimmerman, M. K. изучение научного консенсуса по изменению климата. Eos 90, 22-23 (2009) https://t.co/RScnGOOi8o отрицают антропогенное потепление фрики в о
RT @KariLimaX: Dedico esse post a todos aqueles que acreditam em qualquer negacionista que aparece. É impressionante como eles nunca têm ma…
RT @KariLimaX: Dedico esse post a todos aqueles que acreditam em qualquer negacionista que aparece. É impressionante como eles nunca têm ma…
Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists and contrarians | Nature Communications https://t.co/X06yiWve32 Did you know that #ClimateChange contrarians have 49% higher media visibility than climate change scienti
@Paulthatistall @JohnTAlcock1 @Therapod1 @BorisJohnson 200,000 peer reviewed publications Vs 50 old, sometimes local, newspapers. Seriously you throw you lot on which side? https://t.co/sdV1JgtvX8
@Robin_Hagues @COP26 @AlokSharma_RDG Exactly what is bullshit in these articles and why? https://t.co/S9e4ekdYnf https://t.co/OueV1wcCBF Isn't it ironic that it is you who are lying? Anthropogenic climate change is a scientific fact. You can read about it
Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists and contrarians https://t.co/878Hv4gmiI
RT @SuperFoxyLoxy: @ClimateOfGavin @ChrisMartzWX And then, of course, there's this... can we assume that you'll ask @ametsoc to do somethin…
@ClimateOfGavin @ChrisMartzWX And then, of course, there's this... can we assume that you'll ask @ametsoc to do something? Yeah right. https://t.co/FBn583hbOY.
@ProfSteveKeen @smh 2. publications and ∼100,000 English-language digital and print media articles on climate change. https://t.co/878Hv4gmiI
@ed_hawkins @EGU_ESD @ClimateFlavors @Nicola__Maher @Knutti_ETH 2. publications and ∼100,000 English-language digital and print media articles on climate change. https://t.co/878Hv4gmiI
@BassHeavy3 @Co2Green @freethinker967 @BarristersHorse 2. publications and ∼100,000 English-language digital and print media articles on climate change. https://t.co/878Hv4gmiI
@ellymelly @JohnRuddick2 @simonahac The general public is also exposed to more biased media reporting than science in any case. https://t.co/smCuDVjoN7
@kristeligt i giver spalteplads til en kronik som stiller spørgsmålstegn ved den menneskeskabte globale opvarmning, https://t.co/OdbL6KU90h. Overvej om I bidrager til overrepræsentationen af klimaskeptikere vs. klimaeksperter i medierne, https://t.co/ncpJO
@TjekDet Hey TjekDet! Kunne I ikke også tjekke om danske medier også bidrager til problemet med at klimaskeptikere får mere taletid end klimaeksperter? https://t.co/5qy7vYZXqM #dkpol #dkgreen
RT @RhinRhines: need to read later, never enough time https://t.co/bEVw9LcDv4