RT @CharlieJGardner: Ever get the feeling that the media give more coverage to climate deniers and contrarians than they do to climate scie…
RT @CharlieJGardner: Ever get the feeling that the media give more coverage to climate deniers and contrarians than they do to climate scie…
RT @CharlieJGardner: Ever get the feeling that the media give more coverage to climate deniers and contrarians than they do to climate scie…
RT @CharlieJGardner: Ever get the feeling that the media give more coverage to climate deniers and contrarians than they do to climate scie…
RT @CharlieJGardner: Ever get the feeling that the media give more coverage to climate deniers and contrarians than they do to climate scie…
RT @CharlieJGardner: Ever get the feeling that the media give more coverage to climate deniers and contrarians than they do to climate scie…
RT @CharlieJGardner: Ever get the feeling that the media give more coverage to climate deniers and contrarians than they do to climate scie…
RT @CharlieJGardner: Ever get the feeling that the media give more coverage to climate deniers and contrarians than they do to climate scie…
RT @CharlieJGardner: Ever get the feeling that the media give more coverage to climate deniers and contrarians than they do to climate scie…
RT @CharlieJGardner: Ever get the feeling that the media give more coverage to climate deniers and contrarians than they do to climate scie…
RT @CharlieJGardner: Ever get the feeling that the media give more coverage to climate deniers and contrarians than they do to climate scie…
RT @CharlieJGardner: Ever get the feeling that the media give more coverage to climate deniers and contrarians than they do to climate scie…
Ever get the feeling that the media give more coverage to climate deniers and contrarians than they do to climate scientists? Well, the data are in and... They do! 49% more, in fact https://t.co/wliUDJGlLn
RT @ProfMarkMaslin: Major Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists compared with contrarians…
@vileluiza @fbcanhoto Esse tweet é muito interessante. Sobre como os negacionistas costumam ter mais mídia, mas quando se trata de publicações e citações.... https://t.co/336Pc1kS5h
@conformoterapia @veramagalhaes Os negaciosnistas costumam ter mais mídia, mas... https://t.co/336Pc1kS5h
RT @FabiusMaximus01: Is this a joke? Oddities abound. Contrarians are not named, but sourced to the Desmog blog (w/ other sources), conside…
@MattMcGrathBBC article showing my point. nature magazine. https://t.co/60hSdFP0pY
RT @serge_morand: Climate change scientists & skeptics: Petersen show that climate skeptics are featured in 49% more media articles than sc…
Interesting
RT @serge_morand: Climate change scientists & skeptics: Petersen show that climate skeptics are featured in 49% more media articles than sc…
RT @serge_morand: Climate change scientists & skeptics: Petersen show that climate skeptics are featured in 49% more media articles than sc…
Climate change scientists & skeptics: Petersen show that climate skeptics are featured in 49% more media articles than scientists, urging climate scientists to be present in public discourse and to professional journalists to adjust their attention htt
@Luegendetektor @Keeper_86 @patfrr @ryhminsimon @CarelMohn25 @Jazzassinator @solarpapst @BernhardGeyer @An_di_Arbeit @FeynmansMethod @OliverHaas19 @KampLkamp @raumzeitwellen @BVBFW @Antiaktivist1 @klimafakten Welche Untersuchung zeigt das? Hier die Studie
@dgardner Avoiding your question, I offer the following as relevant to the discussion. https://t.co/FoJg8mafif
"Here we show via direct comparison that contrarians are featured in 49% more media articles than scientists." /1 https://t.co/yZ3Jb6082I
@MRG1975 @FriendsOScience @OilsandsAction @DannyHozack Because it supports the blindingly obvious. "Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists and contrarians" https://t.co/XrF4qtCR0I
@nixer26 @DavidBCollum Opposite is true. People with poor scientific credentials and non-experts are disproportionately featured in the media as experts. See https://t.co/m8G6RSF6A1
@geschichtenpost Not a bad idea https://t.co/WrPKxODTHn
@ofuhrer I have to correct my gut feeling, reason is probably " the crowding out of professional mainstream sources by the proliferation of new media sources, many of which contribute to the production and consumption of climate change disinformation at sc
@thereseverdun @svt @Aftonbladet @Expressen https://t.co/O8JiZuI8GF Det är illa om de slarvat med källkritiken, men det gör inte klimatförändringarna mindre sanna för det. Jag rekommenderar att läsa dessa artiklar https://t.co/kXun8FFLYk
RT @yungneocon: @NathanAverage 18. https://t.co/PSKljLYLWH 19. https://t.co/49YThAHtrg 20. a. https://t.co/0CKRkZnHqy b. https://t.co/Qt4Ma…
"climate scientists should increasingly exert their authority in scientific and public discourse, and ... professional journalists and editors should adjust the disproportionate attention given to contrarians" #scienceandenvironmen… target="_blank" href="https://t.co/zHyAev1gNS">https://t.co/zHyAev1gNS
@petrisarvamaa @Psalolainen Itse tutkimus on julkaistu 13.8.2019 ja löytyy täältä https://t.co/bAp5F7m0BT
RT @mustapipa: "Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists and contrarians." "Here we show via…
RT @anttiyr: @JoukoJokinen Tässä tutkimus, joko osoittaa, että ilmastonmuutoksen kieltäjät saavat tutkijoita enemmän kansainvälistä huomiot…
RT @anttiyr: @JoukoJokinen Tässä tutkimus, joko osoittaa, että ilmastonmuutoksen kieltäjät saavat tutkijoita enemmän kansainvälistä huomiot…
RT @MattJacques: Fascinating visualization shows that climate denialism is given an outsized voice & prominence in the media, in pursuit of…
RT @anttiyr: @JoukoJokinen Tässä tutkimus, joko osoittaa, että ilmastonmuutoksen kieltäjät saavat tutkijoita enemmän kansainvälistä huomiot…
RT @anttiyr: @JoukoJokinen Tässä tutkimus, joko osoittaa, että ilmastonmuutoksen kieltäjät saavat tutkijoita enemmän kansainvälistä huomiot…
RT @anttiyr: @JoukoJokinen Tässä tutkimus, joko osoittaa, että ilmastonmuutoksen kieltäjät saavat tutkijoita enemmän kansainvälistä huomiot…
Joo, toisaalta tämä, mutta toisaalta ovatko Greta Thunbergin vanhemmat täysin vilpittömiä?
Fascinating visualization shows that climate denialism is given an outsized voice & prominence in the media, in pursuit of ‘balance’. #ClimateScience #ClimateBrawl
RT @anttiyr: @JoukoJokinen Tässä tutkimus, joko osoittaa, että ilmastonmuutoksen kieltäjät saavat tutkijoita enemmän kansainvälistä huomiot…
RT @anttiyr: @JoukoJokinen Tässä tutkimus, joko osoittaa, että ilmastonmuutoksen kieltäjät saavat tutkijoita enemmän kansainvälistä huomiot…
RT @anttiyr: @JoukoJokinen Tässä tutkimus, joko osoittaa, että ilmastonmuutoksen kieltäjät saavat tutkijoita enemmän kansainvälistä huomiot…
@JoukoJokinen Tässä tutkimus, joko osoittaa, että ilmastonmuutoksen kieltäjät saavat tutkijoita enemmän kansainvälistä huomiota. Miksi Ylen tulisi vahvistaa tasapuolisuusharhaa? #ilmastokriisi https://t.co/dx5cl2wCAL
@HakkarainenJani @yleuutiset @JoukoJokinen Ongelma on myös että ilmastomuutoksen kieltäjät ovat saaneet enemmän tilaa mediassa kuin tutkijat, myös valtamediassa, mutta ei toki samassa määrin. Ks. tutkimus Nature Communications -lehdessä https://t.co/9dGVps
"Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists and contrarians." "Here we show via direct comparison that contrarians are featured in 49% more media articles than scientists." https://t.co/Po98bLYchq
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
@DinaPomeranz @AW_Baker @RodZeidan @dzentlermunro @economeager @ben_d_groom @charlesjkenny Ooh. I can think of one IRB that messed up. https://t.co/WrPKxODTHn
RT @RichardTol: The Resplandy paper may be gone, but the Petersen paper is still there https://t.co/WrPKxODTHn It claims that I and others…
RT @_johnmcd: Data indicating that climate scientists are crowded out by deniers in new media https://t.co/fSiFwlw1X9 #DanglFest2019
Não me lembro quem disse que a esquerda gostava demais de pesquisas científicas
Bem vindo ao Caos
RT @KariLimaX: Dedico esse post a todos aqueles que acreditam em qualquer negacionista que aparece. É impressionante como eles nunca têm ma…
RT @KariLimaX: Dedico esse post a todos aqueles que acreditam em qualquer negacionista que aparece. É impressionante como eles nunca têm ma…
RT @KariLimaX: Dedico esse post a todos aqueles que acreditam em qualquer negacionista que aparece. É impressionante como eles nunca têm ma…
RT @KariLimaX: Dedico esse post a todos aqueles que acreditam em qualquer negacionista que aparece. É impressionante como eles nunca têm ma…
RT @KariLimaX: Dedico esse post a todos aqueles que acreditam em qualquer negacionista que aparece. É impressionante como eles nunca têm ma…
RT @KariLimaX: Dedico esse post a todos aqueles que acreditam em qualquer negacionista que aparece. É impressionante como eles nunca têm ma…
RT @KariLimaX: Dedico esse post a todos aqueles que acreditam em qualquer negacionista que aparece. É impressionante como eles nunca têm ma…
RT @KariLimaX: Dedico esse post a todos aqueles que acreditam em qualquer negacionista que aparece. É impressionante como eles nunca têm ma…
Negacionista climático vai ter que estudar para caralho, pq cientificamente falando eles são irrelevantes. Só esse bando de alucinado da extrema direita se importa com eles.
RT @KariLimaX: Dedico esse post a todos aqueles que acreditam em qualquer negacionista que aparece. É impressionante como eles nunca têm ma…
RT @KariLimaX: Dedico esse post a todos aqueles que acreditam em qualquer negacionista que aparece. É impressionante como eles nunca têm ma…
Leia Merchants of Doubt da Naomi Oreskes Just follow the money
RT @KariLimaX: Dedico esse post a todos aqueles que acreditam em qualquer negacionista que aparece. É impressionante como eles nunca têm ma…
RT @KariLimaX: Dedico esse post a todos aqueles que acreditam em qualquer negacionista que aparece. É impressionante como eles nunca têm ma…
@claysonfelizola Oi Clayson, nesse link tem um artigo da Nature que comprova exatamente isso que vc falou. https://t.co/DBbWwt5fAl
Dedico esse post a todos aqueles que acreditam em qualquer negacionista que aparece. É impressionante como eles nunca têm mais publicações ou sucesso na academia.
@EamonReilly_com @SusanHarris80 @darrengrimes_ @afneil Also, contrarily to your impression, climate skeptics/denialists are far more represented in media than they should be if the ratio was the same as the overwhelming consensus: https://t.co/tyExduxKGa
@Naegleria1 @MikeAHemingway @EcoSenseNow Consider this article, which is an abominable piece of trash, but got past the peer review process: https://t.co/0VFdcMKG6G
@Reporterre combien y a-t-il de publications scientifiques qui existent qui tentent de nuancer l'approche GES pour expliquer le réchauffement climatique. Depuis 1991, il y en a plus de 35000 selon cet article paru dans Nature (figure 1a). https://t.co/Tq
Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists and contrarians | Nature Communications https://t.co/ggyvXGlQWQ
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
@pio421 @OBerruyer Le consensus que les médias et politique ont mis sur le devant de la scène pour arranger leur politique à venir mais certainement pas reconnu par le monde scientifique. https://t.co/1NLVMvf6rH
@Anette33846693 @emts85 @DoortjeDurft @SBergsma @Zwijgende_Stem @groenlinks @D66 @climategateNL De hier opgevoerde “wetenschappelijke bewijzen” zijn allemaal betaald door de olie industrie. De 500 “wetenschappers” van de #Clintel brief, worden door échte #
RT @RichardTol: The Resplandy paper may be gone, but the Petersen paper is still there https://t.co/WrPKxODTHn It claims that I and others…
RT @RichardTol: The Resplandy paper may be gone, but the Petersen paper is still there https://t.co/WrPKxODTHn It claims that I and others…
RT @demo_demo_nl: @curryja 7/ Maar het is nog veel erger: recent verscheen er een stuk in Nature waarin mensen als Judith Curry – die dus d…
RT @demo_demo_nl: @curryja 7/ Maar het is nog veel erger: recent verscheen er een stuk in Nature waarin mensen als Judith Curry – die dus d…
RT @demo_demo_nl: @curryja 7/ Maar het is nog veel erger: recent verscheen er een stuk in Nature waarin mensen als Judith Curry – die dus d…
RT @demo_demo_nl: @curryja 7/ Maar het is nog veel erger: recent verscheen er een stuk in Nature waarin mensen als Judith Curry – die dus d…
RT @RichardTol: The Resplandy paper may be gone, but the Petersen paper is still there https://t.co/WrPKxODTHn It claims that I and others…
RT @RichardTol: The Resplandy paper may be gone, but the Petersen paper is still there https://t.co/WrPKxODTHn It claims that I and others…