RT @_johnmcd: Data indicating that climate scientists are crowded out by deniers in new media https://t.co/fSiFwlw1X9 #DanglFest2019
RT @_johnmcd: Data indicating that climate scientists are crowded out by deniers in new media https://t.co/fSiFwlw1X9 #DanglFest2019
RT @_johnmcd: Data indicating that climate scientists are crowded out by deniers in new media https://t.co/fSiFwlw1X9 #DanglFest2019
RT @_johnmcd: Data indicating that climate scientists are crowded out by deniers in new media https://t.co/fSiFwlw1X9 #DanglFest2019
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
RT @_johnmcd: Data indicating that climate scientists are crowded out by deniers in new media https://t.co/fSiFwlw1X9 #DanglFest2019
RT @_johnmcd: Data indicating that climate scientists are crowded out by deniers in new media https://t.co/fSiFwlw1X9 #DanglFest2019
RT @_johnmcd: Data indicating that climate scientists are crowded out by deniers in new media https://t.co/fSiFwlw1X9 #DanglFest2019
RT @_johnmcd: Data indicating that climate scientists are crowded out by deniers in new media https://t.co/fSiFwlw1X9 #DanglFest2019
Data indicating that climate scientists are crowded out by deniers in new media https://t.co/fSiFwlw1X9 #DanglFest2019
RT @AEDerocher: Distortion of climate change by deniers examined in new paper https://t.co/GDGed5eoNu We've known of such antics with #pola…
'Experts', we've had enough of experts. It's about 'beliefs' now.
That is why airtime should not be given to idiots or ‘alternative’ views just to make good tv or radio. https://t.co/qsfZzUEC1P
RT @ABTagenda: Does climate community realize Marc Morano @climatedepot is most prolific voice of skepticism by a looooong way? He has 35%…
RT @BrunoLatourAIME: A telling piece https://t.co/KA4Lya1an4: the less you publish in refereed papers about climate the smaller your media…
@Olivier_Jeannet @SamGontier @sfoucart @stephanehorel @tristanwaleckx Tenez par exemple cet article de Nature très récent qui parle de la sur-médiatisation totalement disproportionnée des travaux contredisant le consensus sur le changement climatique par r
RT @AEDerocher: Distortion of climate change by deniers examined in new paper https://t.co/GDGed5eoNu We've known of such antics with #pola…
RT @temptoetiam: "These results demonstrate why climate scientists should increasingly exert their authority in scientific and public disco…
RT @BrunoLatourAIME: A telling piece https://t.co/KA4Lya1an4: the less you publish in refereed papers about climate the smaller your media…
RT @BrunoLatourAIME: A telling piece https://t.co/KA4Lya1an4: the less you publish in refereed papers about climate the smaller your media…
RT @SveinTDy: "contrarians are featured in 49% more media articles than scientists" on the topic of climate science. The message from the…
"contrarians are featured in 49% more media articles than scientists" on the topic of climate science. The message from the authors is clear: "professional journalists and editors should adjust the disproportionate attention given to contrarians" https://
"These results demonstrate why climate scientists should increasingly exert their authority in scientific and public discourse, and why professional journalists and editors should adjust the disproportionate attention given to contrarians." https://t.co/lo
RT @AEDerocher: Distortion of climate change by deniers examined in new paper https://t.co/GDGed5eoNu We've known of such antics with #pola…
Distortion of climate change by deniers examined in new paper https://t.co/GDGed5eoNu We've known of such antics with #polarbears for years. Paper says scientists must exert their expertise & journalists/editors should stop giving disproportionate acce
RT @BrunoLatourAIME: A telling piece https://t.co/KA4Lya1an4: the less you publish in refereed papers about climate the smaller your media…
@mribeirodantas @meistrephilipos Um dos posts mais recentes dele trata do artigo da Nature que mostra que o discurso dos céticos têm muito mais repercussão do que os que apontam as mudanças climáticas. O que parece estar em linha com as preocupações dele.
@apieck @ockhams @fmeeus1 ik bedoel dit: https://t.co/ivJPT7Fjq5
RT @BrunoLatourAIME: A telling piece https://t.co/KA4Lya1an4: the less you publish in refereed papers about climate the smaller your media…
@Bittersweetctzn Ça existe déjà IRL. https://t.co/a8jnBB6dY5
@Marialisu @zaratrusta1978 @nowthisnews @MarayaSonntag @Pedroamartinez @realDonaldTrump Burda manipulación de la ciencia https://t.co/PxHvzSpctN
RT @beyond_ideology: MUST READ climate change discourse: 49% greater cross media visibility of contrarian arguments & actors misrepresents…
RT @beyond_ideology: MUST READ climate change discourse: 49% greater cross media visibility of contrarian arguments & actors misrepresents…
RT @BrunoLatourAIME: A telling piece https://t.co/KA4Lya1an4: the less you publish in refereed papers about climate the smaller your media…
RT @beyond_ideology: MUST READ climate change discourse: 49% greater cross media visibility of contrarian arguments & actors misrepresents…
@Karmaincorrect @PaulWermer @EricHolthaus @GretaThunberg @AukeHoekstra Contrarians have been published in these. The governance process for selection is pretty good, I believe. Interestingly, the resulting publicity is far higher for contrarian publication
Possible explanation: Media are all emotions not facts. Media are more interested in climate skeptics because Media principal goal is to devalue skeptics.
Nice article in nature communications investigating the media coverage (and impact) of climate experts compared to mostly pseudo-scientists. Part of the problem...and a reminder that scientists need to engage more in popularization of science https://t.co/
RT @BrunoLatourAIME: A telling piece https://t.co/KA4Lya1an4: the less you publish in refereed papers about climate the smaller your media…
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
@_LouisT @Penelopemcquade Car les chercheurs ont aussi analysé les données pour les seuls « mainstream media » (les New York Times, NPR, CBS, Wall Street Journal, Le Monde, Financial Times, The Economist de ce monde)... Et dans ces médias, l’équilibre est
RT @beyond_ideology: MUST READ climate change discourse: 49% greater cross media visibility of contrarian arguments & actors misrepresents…
@naturecomms has amended its blacklist paper, to remove all names. https://t.co/WrPKxODTHn It now simultaneously argues (a) that anonymisation is not needed because only public data were used and (b) that no names can be shown.
RT @beyond_ideology: MUST READ climate change discourse: 49% greater cross media visibility of contrarian arguments & actors misrepresents…
RT @tan123: You had me at "We juxtapose 386 prominent contrarians with 386 expert scientists" #ClimateCult https://t.co/i7jSZi7m6M
RT @tan123: You had me at "We juxtapose 386 prominent contrarians with 386 expert scientists" #ClimateCult https://t.co/i7jSZi7m6M
RT @XR_Freiburg: Die #Klimakatastrophe ist in vollem Gang. Wie konnte es so weit kommen? Ein Problem ist die grottenschlechte Medienberic…
RT @BrendanCarton: #ClimateCrisis: What is wrong with the Media? https://t.co/ntXCWaoLSD
RT @miguelmontejo74: A propósito del artículo de hoy de @FVallespin ... Parece que a los medios no les interesa mucho la evidencia... ¿Pasa…
A propósito del artículo de hoy de @FVallespin ... Parece que a los medios no les interesa mucho la evidencia... ¿Pasará lo mismo con las audiencias?
RT @BrunoLatourAIME: A telling piece https://t.co/KA4Lya1an4: the less you publish in refereed papers about climate the smaller your media…
RT @janine_ok: Tell me you are surprised!! 'direct comparison that contrarians are featured in 49% more media articles than scientists' #T…
9/Of course, the policy advocates will have none of that and continue to vilify the contrarians as unworthy, and elevating some very sketchy scientists: https://t.co/6K5dY6rfhP.
RT @BrunoLatourAIME: A telling piece https://t.co/KA4Lya1an4: the less you publish in refereed papers about climate the smaller your media…
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
RT @BrendanCarton: #ClimateCrisis: What is wrong with the Media? https://t.co/ntXCWaoLSD
RT @BrendanCarton: #ClimateCrisis: What is wrong with the Media? https://t.co/ntXCWaoLSD
#ClimateCrisis: What is wrong with the Media?
RT @_benoux_: One of the most profound pieces of pseudoscience in Nature. A total disgrace. LeRoy Westerling, a co-author, finds that most…
RT @BrunoLatourAIME: A telling piece https://t.co/KA4Lya1an4: the less you publish in refereed papers about climate the smaller your media…
RT @ABhiyant_Tiwari: Climate scientists definitely need better communication skills for non-scientific publications!! https://t.co/Db6X0yrL…
Climate scientists definitely need better communication skills for non-scientific publications!!
RT @BrunoLatourAIME: A telling piece https://t.co/KA4Lya1an4: the less you publish in refereed papers about climate the smaller your media…
RT @BrunoLatourAIME: A telling piece https://t.co/KA4Lya1an4: the less you publish in refereed papers about climate the smaller your media…
RT @Jarmo_Salmela: Noteworthy media bias. YLE & rest: do something to your editors. https://t.co/1eAvSw6LiV
RT @BrunoLatourAIME: A telling piece https://t.co/KA4Lya1an4: the less you publish in refereed papers about climate the smaller your media…
RT @beyond_ideology: MUST READ climate change discourse: 49% greater cross media visibility of contrarian arguments & actors misrepresents…
Noteworthy media bias. YLE & rest: do something to your editors. https://t.co/1eAvSw6LiV
Dies kommt vielen Politikern zu Gute. Sie müssen nicht handeln, wenn die wissenschaftlichen Fakten von den Medien verharmlost werden.. 🙄
RT @beyond_ideology: MUST READ climate change discourse: 49% greater cross media visibility of contrarian arguments & actors misrepresents…
It seems that climate "contrarians are featured in 49% more media articles than scientists" https://t.co/yCyKltFisj
RT @BrunoLatourAIME: A telling piece https://t.co/KA4Lya1an4: the less you publish in refereed papers about climate the smaller your media…
RT @BrunoLatourAIME: A telling piece https://t.co/KA4Lya1an4: the less you publish in refereed papers about climate the smaller your media…
RT @BrunoLatourAIME: A telling piece https://t.co/KA4Lya1an4: the less you publish in refereed papers about climate the smaller your media…
RT @HeloiseDufour: Les difficiles relations entre #medias et #recherche: étude montrant que les «experts» climato-sceptiques mis en lumière…
RT @BrunoLatourAIME: A telling piece https://t.co/KA4Lya1an4: the less you publish in refereed papers about climate the smaller your media…
RT @kaoryu: 「新しいメディア、特に厳格な情報品質評価基準を適用していない可能性のある情報源やブログによるコンテンツ配信の拡張性が、気候変動懐疑論者の人目を引く発言に対して有利に働いている可能性がある」 【気候変動】気候変動懐疑論者のメディアにおける可視性の評価(Na…
RT @BrunoLatourAIME: A telling piece https://t.co/KA4Lya1an4: the less you publish in refereed papers about climate the smaller your media…
RT @BrunoLatourAIME: A telling piece https://t.co/KA4Lya1an4: the less you publish in refereed papers about climate the smaller your media…
RT @haltaq: "特に厳格な情報品質評価基準を適用していない可能性のある情報源"=武田邦彦とかを取り上げる日本のメディアあらかたと出版社な。 https://t.co/28fbO2W5yW
RT @kaoryu: 「新しいメディア、特に厳格な情報品質評価基準を適用していない可能性のある情報源やブログによるコンテンツ配信の拡張性が、気候変動懐疑論者の人目を引く発言に対して有利に働いている可能性がある」 【気候変動】気候変動懐疑論者のメディアにおける可視性の評価(Na…
"特に厳格な情報品質評価基準を適用していない可能性のある情報源"=武田邦彦とかを取り上げる日本のメディアあらかたと出版社な。
RT @BrunoLatourAIME: A telling piece https://t.co/KA4Lya1an4: the less you publish in refereed papers about climate the smaller your media…
RT @BrunoLatourAIME: A telling piece https://t.co/KA4Lya1an4: the less you publish in refereed papers about climate the smaller your media…
RT @BrunoLatourAIME: A telling piece https://t.co/KA4Lya1an4: the less you publish in refereed papers about climate the smaller your media…
RT @BrunoLatourAIME: A telling piece https://t.co/KA4Lya1an4: the less you publish in refereed papers about climate the smaller your media…
RT @BrunoLatourAIME: A telling piece https://t.co/KA4Lya1an4: the less you publish in refereed papers about climate the smaller your media…
RT @BrunoLatourAIME: A telling piece https://t.co/KA4Lya1an4: the less you publish in refereed papers about climate the smaller your media…
RT @BrunoLatourAIME: A telling piece https://t.co/KA4Lya1an4: the less you publish in refereed papers about climate the smaller your media…
RT @BrunoLatourAIME: A telling piece https://t.co/KA4Lya1an4: the less you publish in refereed papers about climate the smaller your media…
@BrunoLatourAIME reforçando o texto que já havia feito referência aqui. Aquela história dos negacionistas terem mais espaço do que sua produção acadêmica sinaliza.
RT @BrunoLatourAIME: A telling piece https://t.co/KA4Lya1an4: the less you publish in refereed papers about climate the smaller your media…
RT @BrunoLatourAIME: A telling piece https://t.co/KA4Lya1an4: the less you publish in refereed papers about climate the smaller your media…