RT @emptywheel: Nature recently found that, "exposure to the Russian [internet troll] influence campaign was eclipsed by content from domes…
RT @emptywheel: Nature recently found that, "exposure to the Russian [internet troll] influence campaign was eclipsed by content from domes…
RT @emptywheel: Nature recently found that, "exposure to the Russian [internet troll] influence campaign was eclipsed by content from domes…
Nature recently found that, "exposure to the Russian [internet troll] influence campaign was eclipsed by content from domestic news media and politicians." https://t.co/zZKvbpZPYD
RT @tpaskhalis: Great to see it out. In this @NatureComms paper we show the null effects of exposure to Russian IRA campaign on Twitter on…
“Finally, we find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the Russian foreign influence campaign and changes in attitudes, polarization, or voting behavior.” Via @Nature https://t.co/kbLBP5vHxp
RT @CSMaP_NYU: Yesterday @NatureComms published our paper about Russia’s foreign influence efforts *on Twitter* in the 2016 election. We've…
RT @CSMaP_NYU: Russia's foreign influence campaign in 2016 caused widespread concern. But how effective was it? Our new @NatureComms pape…
RT @CSMaP_NYU: Yesterday @NatureComms published our paper about Russia’s foreign influence efforts *on Twitter* in the 2016 election. We've…
RT @NoahCarl90: New study on the 2016 US election finds that very few individuals were exposed to the Russian influence campaign, and it ha…
RT @CSMaP_NYU: Yesterday @NatureComms published our paper about Russia’s foreign influence efforts *on Twitter* in the 2016 election. We've…
RT @CSMaP_NYU: You can read the full @NatureComms paper here. It's open access and free to read. 8/ https://t.co/coMxO2KoSR
RT @CSMaP_NYU: Yesterday @NatureComms published our paper about Russia’s foreign influence efforts *on Twitter* in the 2016 election. We've…
RT @CSMaP_NYU: Yesterday @NatureComms published our paper about Russia’s foreign influence efforts *on Twitter* in the 2016 election. We've…
Well, maybe, but the actual study, cited below, also says that the primary recipients of Russian disinformation were Republicans, and that domestic media swamped the internet compared to Russian propaganda with similar disinformation. Like ... Breitbart? h
RT @ApocalypseBar_B: Study finds no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the Russian foreign influence campaign and ch…
RT @jordanbpeterson: Imagine that.
RT @jordanbpeterson: Imagine that.
Study finds no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the Russian foreign influence campaign and changes in attitudes, polarization, or voting behavior in the 2016 election https://t.co/X2IdfRmKOt
@schryguy @bee_chives @dvdmtmbn @RepAdamSchiff Doesn't matter if it didn't have any effect on outcome. https://t.co/crS5LESZxp
RT @CSMaP_NYU: Yesterday @NatureComms published our paper about Russia’s foreign influence efforts *on Twitter* in the 2016 election. We've…
RT @Kyukimasa: 大統領選が近づくと国外アカウントから大量の投稿(ロシアが雇ったインターネットトロール、どれだけ仕事したのか) https://t.co/gAUg1kela9 しかし届いたのは主に最初から共和党支持者なので選挙結果そのものにはさほど影響ない (社会の…
RT @Bernstein: “We find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the Russian foreign influence campaign and changes in…
RT @HenryPorters: The *fact* that Russia interfered w/ our election is bad. It’s impact is overhyped because MSM journalists created Trump…
“Accounts labeled as “Russian trolls” on Twitter had no impact on the 2016 US presidential election, A study published in Nature Communications confirmed. Content attributed to the (IRA) didn’t influence attitudes/voting patterns/or political divisions.”
RT @DougHenwood: The alleged Russian disinfo campaign in 2016 had approximately no effect on anything. Despite that the authors want to bel…
RT @DougHenwood: The alleged Russian disinfo campaign in 2016 had approximately no effect on anything. Despite that the authors want to bel…
RT @DougHenwood: The alleged Russian disinfo campaign in 2016 had approximately no effect on anything. Despite that the authors want to bel…
RT @jordanbpeterson: Imagine that.
More evidence the IRA did not impact the 2016 election following on other research (citation 12 is key). Russian IO spoke largely to a small echo chamber with no change in attitude/behavior. IO as a field needs to confront the behavior question head on ht
Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election… https://t.co/2Vq5JVclOh
RT @DougHenwood: The alleged Russian disinfo campaign in 2016 had approximately no effect on anything. Despite that the authors want to bel…
RT @CSMaP_NYU: Yesterday @NatureComms published our paper about Russia’s foreign influence efforts *on Twitter* in the 2016 election. We've…
RT @jordanbpeterson: Imagine that.
RT @DougHenwood: The alleged Russian disinfo campaign in 2016 had approximately no effect on anything. Despite that the authors want to bel…
RT @CSMaP_NYU: Yesterday @NatureComms published our paper about Russia’s foreign influence efforts *on Twitter* in the 2016 election. We've…
RT @DougHenwood: The alleged Russian disinfo campaign in 2016 had approximately no effect on anything. Despite that the authors want to bel…
RT @DougHenwood: The alleged Russian disinfo campaign in 2016 had approximately no effect on anything. Despite that the authors want to bel…
RT @DougHenwood: The alleged Russian disinfo campaign in 2016 had approximately no effect on anything. Despite that the authors want to bel…
The alleged Russian disinfo campaign in 2016 had approximately no effect on anything. Despite that the authors want to believe there were second-order effects—from things like their speculation on second-order effects! https://t.co/U1uFe40ISM https://t.co
RT @cphoffmann: This study (by @GregoryEady et al.) has it all: Exposure to Russian disinformation was highly concentrated in a tiny, ideol…
RT @jordanbpeterson: Imagine that.
RT @tpaskhalis: Great to see it out. In this @NatureComms paper we show the null effects of exposure to Russian IRA campaign on Twitter on…
RT @Kyukimasa: 大統領選が近づくと国外アカウントから大量の投稿(ロシアが雇ったインターネットトロール、どれだけ仕事したのか) https://t.co/gAUg1kela9 しかし届いたのは主に最初から共和党支持者なので選挙結果そのものにはさほど影響ない (社会の…
RT @jordanbpeterson: Imagine that.
RT @jordanbpeterson: Imagine that.
RT @NaturePortfolio: Using longitudinal survey and Twitter data, a study in @NatureComms examines the relationship between exposure to Russ…
@ScottAdamsSays "foreign influence campaigns may also succeed through second-order effects: those effects that are achieved by provoking a domestic reaction to the intervention itself." https://t.co/qQ4xVT9GTX
RT @j_a_tucker: 📢📣 We've got a new paper out from @CSMaP_NYU today in @NatureComms 📢 Russia's foreign influence campaign on Twitter in 2…
RT @jordanbpeterson: Imagine that.
Using longitudinal survey and Twitter data, a study in @NatureComms examines the relationship between exposure to Russian Internet Research Agency activities on Twitter and voting behavior and attitudes in the 2016 US election. https://t.co/SY7UHKpmtP http
RT @jordanbpeterson: Imagine that.
RT @Kyukimasa: 大統領選が近づくと国外アカウントから大量の投稿(ロシアが雇ったインターネットトロール、どれだけ仕事したのか) https://t.co/gAUg1kela9 しかし届いたのは主に最初から共和党支持者なので選挙結果そのものにはさほど影響ない (社会の…
RT @Kyukimasa: 大統領選が近づくと国外アカウントから大量の投稿(ロシアが雇ったインターネットトロール、どれだけ仕事したのか) https://t.co/gAUg1kela9 しかし届いたのは主に最初から共和党支持者なので選挙結果そのものにはさほど影響ない (社会の…
RT @Kyukimasa: 大統領選が近づくと国外アカウントから大量の投稿(ロシアが雇ったインターネットトロール、どれだけ仕事したのか) https://t.co/gAUg1kela9 しかし届いたのは主に最初から共和党支持者なので選挙結果そのものにはさほど影響ない (社会の…
RT @CSMaP_NYU: Yesterday @NatureComms published our paper about Russia’s foreign influence efforts *on Twitter* in the 2016 election. We've…
大統領選が近づくと国外アカウントから大量の投稿(ロシアが雇ったインターネットトロール、どれだけ仕事したのか) https://t.co/gAUg1kela9 しかし届いたのは主に最初から共和党支持者なので選挙結果そのものにはさほど影響ない (社会の二極化や共和党支持者がさらに偏向した一因ではあるなと)
RT @jordanbpeterson: Imagine that.
RT @CSMaP_NYU: Russia's foreign influence campaign in 2016 caused widespread concern. But how effective was it? Our new @NatureComms pape…
RT @jordanbpeterson: Imagine that.
An interesting study in Nature Comms, b/c of a key question: Does ONLINE EXPOSURE to mis/disinformation impact BEHAVIOR? In this case of Russian influence campaigns on Twitter & voting behavior, they did not find a meaningful relationship. https://t.c
RT @OlifaNT: Vanavond in #Nieuwsuur toch @rudybouma? https://t.co/cQMSSwM8PF
Vanavond in #Nieuwsuur toch @rudybouma?
RT @jordanbpeterson: Imagine that.
Eso sí, las portadas eran espectaculares. Cabe destacar que el mayor peligro para cualquier democracia se encuentra en su propio parlamento, a veces incluso con mayoría.
RT @jordanbpeterson: Imagine that.
RT @NoahCarl90: New study on the 2016 US election finds that very few individuals were exposed to the Russian influence campaign, and it ha…
RT @CSMaP_NYU: Yesterday @NatureComms published our paper about Russia’s foreign influence efforts *on Twitter* in the 2016 election. We've…
RT @jordanbpeterson: Imagine that.
RT @Assassins1258: @ggreenwald Read the actual article. It is not paywalled. https://t.co/hAoDYotMbt The results were limited innpart to…
RT @CSMaP_NYU: Yesterday @NatureComms published our paper about Russia’s foreign influence efforts *on Twitter* in the 2016 election. We've…
RT @j_a_tucker: 📢📣 We've got a new paper out from @CSMaP_NYU today in @NatureComms 📢 Russia's foreign influence campaign on Twitter in 2…
@dalibor_posta @TomasKoblizek Možná jste zaznamenal pár dní starou studii, která ukazuje, že ruské aktivity na Tw neměli v podstatě žádný dopad na US volby 2016. Bylo to tedy samo o sobě dezinfo. https://t.co/OwTc1fDw6F
RT @mattsheffield: Examined from the supply side, Russian social media trolling never seemed all that influential on the 2016 election, in…
RT @jordanbpeterson: Imagine that.
RT @NoahCarl90: New study on the 2016 US election finds that very few individuals were exposed to the Russian influence campaign, and it ha…
A nothingburger if there was ever one. https://t.co/QP3j7cdPBw https://t.co/rVLOWRcrBx
RT @jordanbpeterson: Imagine that.
RT @Denachtzuster1: 9/1/23 - no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the Russian foreign influence campaign and change…
RT @jordanbpeterson: Imagine that.
RT @jordanbpeterson: Imagine that.
RT @tariqkrim: A New York University study finds Russian troll Twitter accounts had a minimal impact on 2016 US election voters; 1% of user…
RT @jordanbpeterson: Imagine that.
מחקר אמפירי על ההתערבות הרוסית בבחירות ארה״ב 2016. החוקרים מצאו ש-1% מהמשתמשים אחראים ל 70% מהחשיפה, ושהחשיפה התמקדה במשתמשים שמזוהים בצורה חזקה כרפובליקנים (הבייס). לא הצליחו למצוא הוכחות לקשר משמעותי בין חשיפה להתערבות הרוסית לבין שינויים בעמדות, בקיטוב
RT @mattsheffield: Examined from the supply side, Russian social media trolling never seemed all that influential on the 2016 election, in…
RT @NoahCarl90: New study on the 2016 US election finds that very few individuals were exposed to the Russian influence campaign, and it ha…
RT @jordanbpeterson: Imagine that.
Highly interesting work by @tpaskhalsi and co-authors highlighting the impact and limits of the news media‘s influence. Fits well to our work: https://t.co/W3V3nFhhqW
RT @jordanbpeterson: Imagine that.
#toread Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relationship to attitudes and voting behavior - Nature Communications https://t.co/gel0idpFer
RT @jordanbpeterson: Imagine that.
RT @jordanbpeterson: Imagine that.
RT @jordanbpeterson: Imagine that.
RT @jordanbpeterson: Imagine that.
RT @jordanbpeterson: Imagine that.
RT @NoahCarl90: New study on the 2016 US election finds that very few individuals were exposed to the Russian influence campaign, and it ha…
RT @jordanbpeterson: Imagine that.
RT @SisyphusUnleas: @realTuckFrumper This study is deeply flawed. First of all it is based on data from 1,496 "Social Media" media follow…
Examined from the supply side, Russian social media trolling never seemed all that influential on the 2016 election, in my view. There wasn't much content & most was obvious trash. Now there's a study looking at the demand side which found similar res