RT @pmddomingos: Russian misinformation on social media had no influence on the 2016 election. https://t.co/6Jc2EuzDdH
RT @mbalter: Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relatio…
RT @CSMaP_NYU: Yesterday @NatureComms published our paper about Russia’s foreign influence efforts *on Twitter* in the 2016 election. We've…
@BAlbertBen @mtaibbi "we find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the Russian foreign influence campaign and changes in attitudes, polarization, or voting behavior. " https://t.co/pPyOwKbspG
RT @mbalter: Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relatio…
'Finally, we find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the Russian foreign influence campaign and changes in attitudes, polarization, or voting behavior' But here we are on the cusp of WW3 regardless!
RT @tpaskhalis: Great to see it out. In this @NatureComms paper we show the null effects of exposure to Russian IRA campaign on Twitter on…
RT @CSMaP_NYU: Russia's foreign influence campaign in 2016 caused widespread concern. But how effective was it? Our new @NatureComms pape…
I'm rather surprised this was allowed to be published. "Finally, we find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the Russian foreign influence campaign and changes in attitudes, polarization, or voting behavior. ... https://t.co/gl
@Avellini7 @krassenstein @mtaibbi @tedlieu What Taibbi exposed is consistent with what others have found including Facebook etc “We find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the Russian foreign influence campaign and changes in att
RT @j_a_tucker: 📢📣 We've got a new paper out from @CSMaP_NYU today in @NatureComms 📢 Russia's foreign influence campaign on Twitter in 2…
@dbongino @mtaibbi @tedlieu “We find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the Russian foreign influence campaign and changes in attitudes, polarization, or voting behavior.” https://t.co/F9f1fPH4my
Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relationship to attitudes and voting behavior. This was always a crock, now proven to have had no impact. https://t.co/pHcaJ9vwog
RT @mbalter: Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relatio…
@tedlieu @somuchmalarkey @mtaibbi “Finally, we find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the Russian foreign influence campaign and changes in attitudes, polarization, or voting behavior.” https://t.co/F9f1fPHCc6
https://t.co/Pv92sw0HbE tl;dr: din't make any difference at all
RT @mbalter: Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relatio…
RT @mbalter: Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relatio…
Studie publikovaná v prestižním vědeckým časopise Nature Communications: "Nakonec jsme nenašli žádný důkaz o významném vztahu mezi působením ruské zahraniční vlivové kampaně a změnami postojů, polarizace nebo volebního chování." https://t.co/cBVBpyuUyJ
Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relationship to attitudes and voting behavior | Nature Communications https://t.co/pGUVy304nw
#conspiracytheory over #Trump die onder NL journaille de ronde deed kan nu ook prullenbak in: "De onderzoekers zien bij degenen die werden blootgesteld aan Russische berichten geen meetbare veranderingen in opvattingen of stemgedrag." via @nieuwscheckers
RT @CSMaP_NYU: You can read the full @NatureComms paper here. It's open access and free to read. 8/ https://t.co/coMxO2KoSR
RT @CSMaP_NYU: And here’s a tweet thread summarizing the findings. 9/9 https://t.co/PXkcPDPHik
RT @CSMaP_NYU: You can read the full @NatureComms paper here. It's open access and free to read. 8/ https://t.co/coMxO2KoSR
RT @pmddomingos: Russian misinformation on social media had no influence on the 2016 election. https://t.co/6Jc2EuzDdH
RT @j_a_tucker: 📢📣 We've got a new paper out from @CSMaP_NYU today in @NatureComms 📢 Russia's foreign influence campaign on Twitter in 2…
RT @CSMaP_NYU: Yesterday @NatureComms published our paper about Russia’s foreign influence efforts *on Twitter* in the 2016 election. We've…
RT @CSMaP_NYU: Yesterday @NatureComms published our paper about Russia’s foreign influence efforts *on Twitter* in the 2016 election. We've…
RT @CSMaP_NYU: Yesterday @NatureComms published our paper about Russia’s foreign influence efforts *on Twitter* in the 2016 election. We've…
RT @jonathanstray: "We find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the [2016] Russian foreign influence campaign and…
RT @emptywheel: Nature recently found that, "exposure to the Russian [internet troll] influence campaign was eclipsed by content from domes…
RT @emptywheel: Nature recently found that, "exposure to the Russian [internet troll] influence campaign was eclipsed by content from domes…
RT @HelenaVillarRT: - El estudio no encuentra relación significativa entre haber visto tuits o mensajes de cuentas de "influencia rusa" y c…
@chrislhayes New study blows up myth that Russian bots swayed 2016 Election for Trump. https://t.co/YFvATdrUMQ https://t.co/ljjYBE090K
What’s interesting is that this guy writes a whole book on the conspiracy theory w/o showing direct evidence of the “hack-and-dump” by GRU. Maybe I’m a simpleton, but I would’t be able to jerk off across 316 pages unless I could conclusively prove my thesi
RT @emptywheel: Nature recently found that, "exposure to the Russian [internet troll] influence campaign was eclipsed by content from domes…
RT @emptywheel: Nature recently found that, "exposure to the Russian [internet troll] influence campaign was eclipsed by content from domes…
RT @pmddomingos: Russian misinformation on social media had no influence on the 2016 election. https://t.co/6Jc2EuzDdH
RT @HelenaVillarRT: - El estudio no encuentra relación significativa entre haber visto tuits o mensajes de cuentas de "influencia rusa" y c…
RT @HelenaVillarRT: - El estudio no encuentra relación significativa entre haber visto tuits o mensajes de cuentas de "influencia rusa" y c…
Und der Nech Erich ist lebendes Beispiel, dass die Russenpropaganda genau in die Köpfe einschlägt, die Möglichkeiten besitzen, die Falschwahrheiten sehr breit zu streuen und zu legitimieren. Das ist sehr schlimm und dass blinde Journalisten immer wieder d
RT @CSMaP_NYU: You can read the full @NatureComms paper here. It's open access and free to read. 8/ https://t.co/coMxO2KoSR
RT @CSMaP_NYU: Yesterday @NatureComms published our paper about Russia’s foreign influence efforts *on Twitter* in the 2016 election. We've…
RT @CSMaP_NYU: Congrats to @GregoryEady @tpaskhalis @janzilinsky @RichBonneauNYC @Jonathan_Nagler and @j_a_tucker on this (long-awaited) pa…
RT @CSMaP_NYU: Russia's foreign influence campaign in 2016 caused widespread concern. But how effective was it? Our new @NatureComms pape…
RT @CSMaP_NYU: And here’s a tweet thread summarizing the findings. 9/9 https://t.co/PXkcPDPHik
RT @CSMaP_NYU: You can read the full @NatureComms paper here. It's open access and free to read. 8/ https://t.co/coMxO2KoSR
I think deep down inside everyone knew "Buff Bernie" weren't going to make you vote differently than you had already planned. But if you're not questioning those who said it did.... Then I can't help.
RT @DougHenwood: The alleged Russian disinfo campaign in 2016 had approximately no effect on anything. Despite that the authors want to bel…
RT @CSMaP_NYU: Russia's foreign influence campaign in 2016 caused widespread concern. But how effective was it? Our new @NatureComms pape…
RT @CSMaP_NYU: And here’s a tweet thread summarizing the findings. 9/9 https://t.co/PXkcPDPHik
RT @CSMaP_NYU: You can read the full @NatureComms paper here. It's open access and free to read. 8/ https://t.co/coMxO2KoSR
RT @CSMaP_NYU: Yesterday @NatureComms published our paper about Russia’s foreign influence efforts *on Twitter* in the 2016 election. We've…
RT @CSMaP_NYU: Yesterday @NatureComms published our paper about Russia’s foreign influence efforts *on Twitter* in the 2016 election. We've…
But how effective he has been is apparently overblown: "we find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the Russian foreign influence campaign and changes in attitudes, polarization, or voting behavior." 3/5 https://t.co/31xz6hXzZD
RT @pmddomingos: Russian misinformation on social media had no influence on the 2016 election. https://t.co/6Jc2EuzDdH
This is an interesting thread about Russian meddling in U.S. elections. The answer may be more nuanced than we think
Does someone want to tell @thedailybanter that researchers still think it's important to discuss what happened on Twitter and published a study on that very topic? https://t.co/0ktdrtn1qQ People still think it's important, even if Ben wants to dismiss beca
RT @pmddomingos: Russian misinformation on social media had no influence on the 2016 election. https://t.co/6Jc2EuzDdH
Fake stats. Probably a lefty org.
@ZaleskiLuke @DanCrenshawTX Academic study showing the effect of foreign interference on the 2016 election. https://t.co/X7AkrBE0Dd
RT @pmddomingos: Russian misinformation on social media had no influence on the 2016 election. https://t.co/6Jc2EuzDdH
RT @HelenaVillarRT: - El estudio no encuentra relación significativa entre haber visto tuits o mensajes de cuentas de "influencia rusa" y c…
RT @HelenaVillarRT: - El estudio no encuentra relación significativa entre haber visto tuits o mensajes de cuentas de "influencia rusa" y c…
Fascinating "Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relationship to attitudes and voting behavior" https://t.co/0zdIfCfVfb
RT @HelenaVillarRT: - El estudio no encuentra relación significativa entre haber visto tuits o mensajes de cuentas de "influencia rusa" y c…
RT @HelenaVillarRT: - El estudio no encuentra relación significativa entre haber visto tuits o mensajes de cuentas de "influencia rusa" y c…
RT @HelenaVillarRT: - El estudio no encuentra relación significativa entre haber visto tuits o mensajes de cuentas de "influencia rusa" y c…
RT @HelenaVillarRT: - El estudio no encuentra relación significativa entre haber visto tuits o mensajes de cuentas de "influencia rusa" y c…
RT @HelenaVillarRT: - El estudio no encuentra relación significativa entre haber visto tuits o mensajes de cuentas de "influencia rusa" y c…
RT @HelenaVillarRT: - El estudio no encuentra relación significativa entre haber visto tuits o mensajes de cuentas de "influencia rusa" y c…
RT @tpaskhalis: Great to see it out. In this @NatureComms paper we show the null effects of exposure to Russian IRA campaign on Twitter on…
RT @emptywheel: Nature recently found that, "exposure to the Russian [internet troll] influence campaign was eclipsed by content from domes…
RT @pmddomingos: Russian misinformation on social media had no influence on the 2016 election. https://t.co/6Jc2EuzDdH
RT @HelenaVillarRT: - El estudio no encuentra relación significativa entre haber visto tuits o mensajes de cuentas de "influencia rusa" y c…
RT @HelenaVillarRT: - El estudio no encuentra relación significativa entre haber visto tuits o mensajes de cuentas de "influencia rusa" y c…
@RVAwonk When your funding is about to run out, because it turns out what you study doesn’t really matter. https://t.co/X5PQtRBLkl https://t.co/To1StLwrKY
Russian misinformation on social media had no influence on the 2016 election. https://t.co/6Jc2EuzDdH
Om jag jobbade med kontraspionage skulle jag lura ryssen att ineffektiva åtgärder var effektiva och att effektiva åtgärder var ineffektiva.
RT @HelenaVillarRT: - El estudio no encuentra relación significativa entre haber visto tuits o mensajes de cuentas de "influencia rusa" y c…
RT @HelenaVillarRT: - El estudio no encuentra relación significativa entre haber visto tuits o mensajes de cuentas de "influencia rusa" y c…
It's official...Americans voted for Trump for no good reason.Very small sample but here is study.
RT @emptywheel: Nature recently found that, "exposure to the Russian [internet troll] influence campaign was eclipsed by content from domes…
RT @emptywheel: Nature recently found that, "exposure to the Russian [internet troll] influence campaign was eclipsed by content from domes…
RT @emptywheel: Nature recently found that, "exposure to the Russian [internet troll] influence campaign was eclipsed by content from domes…
RT @strnnk_: Анализ кремлевской кампании по дезинфекции с целью помощи Трампу в 2016
RT @emptywheel: Nature recently found that, "exposure to the Russian [internet troll] influence campaign was eclipsed by content from domes…
RT @HelenaVillarRT: - El estudio no encuentra relación significativa entre haber visto tuits o mensajes de cuentas de "influencia rusa" y c…
RT @HelenaVillarRT: - El estudio no encuentra relación significativa entre haber visto tuits o mensajes de cuentas de "influencia rusa" y c…