Russian interference in 2016 is a conspiracy theory. Amounted to little, was easily dwarfed by typical US campaigning funding, Steele dossier? Mueller Report? Mostly Fox News-style lucrative paranoid media. It was researched, too, here a paper in Nature,
Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relationship to attitudes and voting behavior https://t.co/fpKEXoS1yr
RT @Raymond_vT: Onderzoek naar Russische beïnvloeding via #Twitter op Amerikaanse verkiezingen in 2016 wijst uit: ‘er is geen bewijs van be…
@Sandervandam2 Geen bewijs dat trollen meer zijn dan slechte ads. Een recente studie in Nature van 2023 "found no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the Russian foreign influence campaign and changes in attitudes, polarization, or vo
@myrobob @nykyt0sha @krubner Although that disinformation campaign has been proven to be overstated in terms of its share on the overall outcome: https://t.co/wsrETp4qhm The US voter bases' ignorance is still dominantly homegrown.
@Destiny_Chiild those operations were not really effective at all! https://t.co/z9fO8UqD7m
@adamkovac That doesn't strike me as a reason to force a sale of a company or ban an app though—also see compelling evidence that despite Russia's best efforts, its infamous election interference campaign didn't much move the needle. Skeptical China would
@makosloff Yeah, I'm just very skeptical that a social media platform w UGC will have meaningful propaganda effects that are worthy of this level of concern. Some compelling research into Russia's election interference efforts found it barely moved the nee
@MaxwellFrostFL Do X next. Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relationship to attitudes and voting behavior https://t.co/q53pRoo61s
@cspan Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relationship to attitudes and voting behavior https://t.co/q53pRoo61s
@Sander_vdLinden @alexstamos Stamos is referring to a study @Nature (see post below), which @pkafka cites, about ‘the (#misinformation and #disinformation) effect of Russian interference on the 2016 election, specifically on @X/#Twitter, on anyone’s views
@NancyRPearcey Fact checkers do an important job since, notwithstanding Nancy's disinformation campaign, Russia et al pedal disinformation through orgs like the "Internet Research" Agency, as is well documented in peer reviewed literature https://t.co/4iCp
@MarcoSchlaepfer @Dr_Alex_H_B @SRF ich verstehe nicht, was du mit deinen „diffusen„ zeilen mitteilen willst, aber ja, russland nutzt soziale medien, um menschen zu manipulieren. weniger beeinflussbare nutzer merken es, du offensichtlich nicht. die wirkung
RT @1900HO: Diese Studie (Nature Communications) hat den Einfluss von 🇷🇺Trollfarmen auf das Wahlverhalten in 2016 untersucht Ergebnis: We…
RT @1900HO: Diese Studie (Nature Communications) hat den Einfluss von 🇷🇺Trollfarmen auf das Wahlverhalten in 2016 untersucht Ergebnis: We…
RT @1900HO: Diese Studie (Nature Communications) hat den Einfluss von 🇷🇺Trollfarmen auf das Wahlverhalten in 2016 untersucht Ergebnis: We…
RT @1900HO: Diese Studie (Nature Communications) hat den Einfluss von 🇷🇺Trollfarmen auf das Wahlverhalten in 2016 untersucht Ergebnis: We…
RT @1900HO: Diese Studie (Nature Communications) hat den Einfluss von 🇷🇺Trollfarmen auf das Wahlverhalten in 2016 untersucht Ergebnis: We…
RT @1900HO: Diese Studie (Nature Communications) hat den Einfluss von 🇷🇺Trollfarmen auf das Wahlverhalten in 2016 untersucht Ergebnis: We…
RT @1900HO: Diese Studie (Nature Communications) hat den Einfluss von 🇷🇺Trollfarmen auf das Wahlverhalten in 2016 untersucht Ergebnis: We…
RT @1900HO: Diese Studie (Nature Communications) hat den Einfluss von 🇷🇺Trollfarmen auf das Wahlverhalten in 2016 untersucht Ergebnis: We…
RT @1900HO: Diese Studie (Nature Communications) hat den Einfluss von 🇷🇺Trollfarmen auf das Wahlverhalten in 2016 untersucht Ergebnis: We…
RT @1900HO: Diese Studie (Nature Communications) hat den Einfluss von 🇷🇺Trollfarmen auf das Wahlverhalten in 2016 untersucht Ergebnis: We…
RT @1900HO: Diese Studie (Nature Communications) hat den Einfluss von 🇷🇺Trollfarmen auf das Wahlverhalten in 2016 untersucht Ergebnis: We…
Diese Studie (Nature Communications) hat den Einfluss von 🇷🇺Trollfarmen auf das Wahlverhalten in 2016 untersucht Ergebnis: We find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the Russian foreign influence campaign and ... voting behavior
@TruthHammer4EVA @catturd2 The psyops comes from here https://t.co/zXNbNa4K8z
@TheSchnertzman @Idaretobefree @The_Trump_Train The first article is how the campaign started. This is how it developed, and how Republicans were infiltrated. https://t.co/zXNbNa4K8z
Also, most ppl have generally made up their minds & seeing misinfo likely won't change that. Our study looking at Russia's 2016 influence campaign on Twitter found exposure to tweets wasn't linked to changes in attitudes or voting behavior. 6/ https://
@nminkmar @j_2ross Die Datenlage sagt etwas anderes. Der Einfluss russischer Trolle war nicht entscheidend und hat keine substanzielle Wählermenge zu Trumpisten gemacht. https://t.co/iGvZt2vB6V
@JacekLanuszny @MSzuldrzynski To nie jest kwestia wygody. Fakt, że Rosja będzie wpływać na wybory w USA jest oczywisty, bo to jest sposób działania KGB. Są nawet badania, które mierzą jaki był ten wpływ (podpowiem od razu, że nie był wielki) https://t.co/
@BPartisans Bien sûr, tout pays important tente d'influencer... Les É-U en premier. Mais les dernières études, du début de 2023, et reprises largement dans les médias, démontrent l'effet insignifiant des efforts des Russes sur les campagnes de 2016. https:
RT @CoyoteGenius2: @Outy5000 You have to love science. Source: https://t.co/Vx8MjWHLAZ https://t.co/34bOXhPBv8
@Outy5000 You have to love science. Source: https://t.co/Vx8MjWHLAZ https://t.co/34bOXhPBv8
Absolutely shocking! (sarcasm) @GregoryEady https://t.co/o5OjJEkImp "we do not detect a meaningful relationship between exposure to posts from Russian foreign influence accounts and changes in attitudes, polarization, or voting behavior". Americans have be
LOOK WHAT THEY'VE DONE TO MY RUSSIAN COLLUSION, MA ! (Guess who helped the Russians think they had helped Trump's election ?) https://t.co/9aVw7vVMfM https://t.co/ehAmZo84ao
@whstancil Would you be considered a functionally lobotomized person if you [had ever] believed in the Russian Collusion story? https://t.co/7Aj1yMUQaU
@SlyDemure @quirkytwerp @gcush1 @BlueTsunami15 Today, the propaganda most of you pay attention to is largely about making $ for its creators Soon, US enemies will infiltrate conservative spaces to weaponize the uneducated. Then you all are really going to
@mrbenwexler Read this buddy. It’s ok to admit you don’t like Trump, but stop spreading misinformation. https://t.co/7Aj1yMUQaU
@Folon15 @GravitasVernam @mrbenwexler This is not an endorsement ot Trump, but conversations with Russians is not a crime. Undoubtedly other campaigns also had conversations with Russians. Neither is Russian government interference a crime that the Trump c
RT @janzilinsky: A great lecture, and thanks Arvind, for citing our paper https://t.co/TE2QV369yZ Plus there’s a fitting Isaiah Berlin ref…
A great lecture, and thanks Arvind, for citing our paper https://t.co/TE2QV369yZ Plus there’s a fitting Isaiah Berlin reference which didn’t make it into the pdf, so the video is worth a look:
@Paul85923258 @JFarmer1983 @BurtMaclin_FBI @JennaEllisEsq @bonchieredstate Please do not do research on the topic especially academic research! Believe what the intelligence community claims while they do not tell you what impact any “interference” (such a
Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relationship to attitudes and voting behavior https://t.co/2fsWC4uTdf https://t.co/uJM7t51p2y
@GaryMarcus @ylecun Further, a comprehensive study of Russian disinformation during the 2016 election supports LeCun's assessment that most disinformation is harmless because "the people who see it don't believe it and/or aren't harmed by it." https://t.c
RT @GorinMoti: no evidence of..relationship between exposure to Russian foreign influence campaign and changes in attitudes, polarization,…
@JohnBogleyDC @MythinformedMKE This in depth study with charts, graphs, and data says you don’t have any idea what you are talking about. Read it and weep for your country. Hoodwinked and still believe it. lol. https://t.co/5JDDjdzcnQ
@MythinformedMKE https://t.co/5JDDjdzcnQ. Article and deep study showing that Russia trolling had very little or no impact on 2016 election. It was all made up.
@88flyersfan88 @WokeStreetJ @ChrisDJackson Russia and China are both guilty of spreading misinformation through bot accounts all over the internet. https://t.co/bd1Z8YAT02
Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relationship to attitudes and voting behavior https://t.co/e7k5rDCDTI via @Nature
@SmachTheresa @rick_prewitt @usapoliticsguy1 @WalshFreedom Of MSNBC. It is from a study done by NYU. I mean New York University could be a garbage school 🤷♂️. https://t.co/bCPTxrRjYg
@mvanblom Conclusie onderzoek naar beïnvloeding verkiezingen VS in 2016: https://t.co/6pVKM5tPJA
@enithka @geertjanhahn Goede aanvulling Enith. Zie ook over hetgeen @geertjanhahn schrijft over beïnvloeding verkiezingen VS 2016 en wat onderzoek uitwijst: https://t.co/6pVKM5tPJA
RT @Raymond_vT: @geertjanhahn Ben je @geertjanhahn bekend met dit onderzoek (december 2022) naar Russische beïnvloeding via #desinformatie…
@fuckroeper @geertjanhahn Onderzoek uit 2022, laat iets anders zien dat @geertjanhahn stelt: https://t.co/6pVKM5tPJA
@geertjanhahn Ben je @geertjanhahn bekend met dit onderzoek (december 2022) naar Russische beïnvloeding via #desinformatie op #socialmedia op de Amerikaanse verkiezingen in 2016 en de conclusie ervan? https://t.co/6pVKM5tPJA
@grizwald87 @EmmMacfarlane @acoyne Yeah, because China needs Canada. 😂 It’s embarrassing how delusional Canadians are about our global stage presence. We are a vassal state and the only foreign interference we should be worried about is the United States.
@BachmannRudi Ad3) ich kenne zumindest keine Studie, die einen wesentlichen Einfluss nachweisen konnte (falls jemand eine hat: gern her damit!), dafür aber einige, die eben das nicht konnten. z.B. relativ aktuell: 3/ https://t.co/QBLUMw9nC3
@AnikaBedson @MBrooks81301844 @nytimes Goals are not evidence that this interference effort had any effect on the election outcome. Serious peered reviewed research says otherwise. https://t.co/H4DJmOaNp0
@MBrooks81301844 @nytimes The Russian interference claims are greatly exaggerated and independent research found no effect on the outcome of the election https://t.co/ngpC4Wo0Lt https://t.co/XA5C2YhbRI
RT @CSMaP_NYU: Yesterday @NatureComms published our paper about Russia’s foreign influence efforts *on Twitter* in the 2016 election. We've…
@LaurensVHG @marcoderksen Wellicht interessant @LaurensVHG over de passage in je artikel op Volkskrant en verwijzing naar 'Russische beïnvloeding via #desinformatie campagne van de Amerikaanse presidentsverkiezingen van 2016 via elk groot #socialmedia plat
@KAMA52 @tribelaw You are deep down the rabbit hole and must return to reality. https://t.co/qH3B1Q1CEn
Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relationship to attitudes and voting behavior | Nature Communications https://t.co/hLgrjQjH2m
@PaulStrobel @winkelsdorf Ich denke, dass wir hier wenig signifikantes sehen werden. Während ja die Colombia University nen Paper für den Impact verfasst hat (eher dürftig argumentiert) gehen andere Veröffentlichungen ja von geringer Wirkung aus. https://t
@TruthFreedom_ @GuntherEagleman Recent study finds there was no “meaningful relationship between exposure to the Russian foreign influence campaign [including alleged armies of social media bots] and changes in attitudes, polarization, or voting behavior.”
RT @Raymond_vT: @tomjanmeeus Wellicht (ook) interessant @tomjanmeeus, conclusie onderzoek naar Russische beïnvloeding via #desinformatie op…
@Lallatva @tagesschau Hatte extra eine linke publikation gewählt. Bin bei ihnen versucht haben sie es. Aber hatte keine Wirkung. https://t.co/XpCRQy4VGL
@tomjanmeeus Wellicht (ook) interessant @tomjanmeeus, conclusie onderzoek naar Russische beïnvloeding via #desinformatie op #Twitter in aanloop naar verkiezingen in VS van 2016’: https://t.co/6pVKM5tPJA
RT @j_a_tucker: 📢📣 We've got a new paper out from @CSMaP_NYU today in @NatureComms 📢 Russia's foreign influence campaign on Twitter in 2…
@MelKShow @AWeissmann_ They got debunked really bad not just for their Trump-Russian dossier... https://t.co/ngpC4Wo0Lt https://t.co/iyTpa88rxf
@mohansson @ThomasBartz5 @AWeissmann_ They (serious academics) already are judging the Russiagaters https://t.co/ngpC4Wo0Lt https://t.co/wUvbrIkst2
@AWeissmann_ Russiagate? How long before we stop pretending that the 2016 election was stolen or much less there was significant interference that influenced the result? https://t.co/ngpC4Wo0Lt https://t.co/QQ6mCZjRgQ
@LordCrankyPantz @jvgraz Oh. Propaganda from a military organization that has reaped untold billions from the conflict they've created. I should definitely believe that pabulum. https://t.co/Sy0lkdNufu
RT @OversightPR: @rgoodlaw @RepAdamSchiff Here we go with the "blame Russia" for Hillary's lack of appeal defense. It's her policies and co…
@WalshFreedom @AdamSchiff no, dumbass. https://t.co/qH3B1Q1CEn
@theSkepdik @DynamiteFitz @lourg786 @Acyn RU influence was grossly exaggerated. https://t.co/qH3B1Q2atV
@BaddCompani *Polling of Swing State Voters https://t.co/3eUEpAiU17 Media Research Center **Peer-reviewed publication. https://t.co/Knbo9Ng1sI Nature Communications, 2023
@rgoodlaw @RepAdamSchiff Here we go with the "blame Russia" for Hillary's lack of appeal defense. It's her policies and corruption that were the problem (Clinton is the source of the Russia Hoax) : *Media Research Center https://t.co/3eUEpAiU17 **Nature C
@giverealfacts @Chyn2000 @EdKrassen @GCapital_LLC I've also read this gem, often referred to, albeit not read by those who reference it. "Researchers’ understanding of the influence of the social media side of these campaigns remains unresolved, however, i
https://t.co/XLFIBMf034 Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relationship to attitudes and voting behavior
RT @Raymond_vT: @QueenyRaj @Donerd @steven_braham Rond 'Rusland heeft online geprobeerd om verkiezingen in de VS te beïnvloeden' werd (ook)…
@QueenyRaj @Donerd @steven_braham Rond 'Rusland heeft online geprobeerd om verkiezingen in de VS te beïnvloeden' werd (ook) #desinformatie en #nepnieuws verspreid @QueenyRaj. Zie bijvoorbeeld uitkomst van onderzoek: https://t.co/6pVKM5tPJA
@sailaunderscore lmao I can tell where you get your news just admit you have no idea what's going on, like the rest of the people Taibbi duped https://t.co/KfJcfhXZWO https://t.co/pyRMuJzdJo https://t.co/WbYa8MnaXN
RT @KorosecLena: @jdamijan Mogoče je fajn kot dodatek k temu poročilu omeniti še objavljeno študijo iz januarja 2023, ki ugotavlja, da rusk…
RT @KorosecLena: @jdamijan Mogoče je fajn kot dodatek k temu poročilu omeniti še objavljeno študijo iz januarja 2023, ki ugotavlja, da rusk…
@jdamijan Mogoče je fajn kot dodatek k temu poročilu omeniti še objavljeno študijo iz januarja 2023, ki ugotavlja, da ruske dezinformacije niso bistveno vplivale na način glasovanja volivcev na ameriških predsedniških volitvah leta 2016. https://t.co/83jY0
Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relationship to attitudes and voting behavior https://t.co/EbpWJLmI4a via @Nature
@IllegalCluster @rakityrak @AdamCarollaShow @taraleerodas Russia did help Trump (and Bernie and Jill Stein) https://t.co/qwIl2k1bDA
7/ Ein Beispiel hierfür ist die russische Online-Desinformation während der US-Wahlen 2016. Die Desinformations-Kampagnen des Kreml erreichten damals nur relativ wenige Leute, und es gibt keine Evidenz, dass die Kampagnen den Wahlausgang beeinflussten. htt