Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relationship to attitudes and voting behavior #edtechSR #edtech #LikeWar #ConCW #Russia #SocialMedia https://t.co/hpVYhJu43B
RT @CSMaP_NYU: Yesterday @NatureComms published our paper about Russia’s foreign influence efforts *on Twitter* in the 2016 election. We've…
RT @NoahCarl90: New study on the 2016 US election finds that very few individuals were exposed to the Russian influence campaign, and it ha…
More on the study here: https://t.co/PXkcPDQf7S
@BustosWill @AndrewYang Here you go... https://t.co/8d9JhFWwoO
2016年大統領選でのロシアによるTwitter上の影響力工作は、ほとんど効果がなかったことを支持する研究。
RT @m_datasci_: 露のTwitter米国選挙影響工作は、全体でごく一部、しかもその多くは本来のターゲットではない共和党支持者にしか届いていないし、曝露量も主流メディアと比して小さすぎだし、なんなら影響工作受けた人が意見を変えるかどうかを追跡検証したけど効果は殆ど確…
RT @m_datasci_: 露のTwitter米国選挙影響工作は、全体でごく一部、しかもその多くは本来のターゲットではない共和党支持者にしか届いていないし、曝露量も主流メディアと比して小さすぎだし、なんなら影響工作受けた人が意見を変えるかどうかを追跡検証したけど効果は殆ど確…
露のTwitter米国選挙影響工作は、全体でごく一部、しかもその多くは本来のターゲットではない共和党支持者にしか届いていないし、曝露量も主流メディアと比して小さすぎだし、なんなら影響工作受けた人が意見を変えるかどうかを追跡検証したけど効果は殆ど確認できなかった話 https://t.co/rtkYwQoVBG
New study just released that concludes the Russian disinformation campaigns on @facebook and @Twitter had little effect on the #2016election that resulted in @realDonaldTrump winning the presidency- @elonmusk https://t.co/yKn1O2f4Qa
【Search News】 Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence ... - https://t.co/VbDmz0OTy2 https://t.co/5zzLMDIU2w
@JNumbers1297820 @jpyoung1922 @RobertJ07695072 @MSNBC Scientific study, peer reviewed, much more htan you have. https://t.co/JMYCEIgC6x
@JNumbers1297820 @jpyoung1922 @RobertJ07695072 @MSNBC Scientific study. https://t.co/JMYCEIgC6x
"Taking our analyses together, it would appear unlikely that the Russian foreign influence campaign on Twitter could have had much more than a relatively minor influence on individual-level attitudes and voting behavior... Russia’s…https://t.co/fq2PKX6d3v
Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relationship to attitudes and voting behavior https://t.co/LTj05MbTbe https://t.co/sa8zWoLHC5
Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relationship to attitudes and voting behavior https://t.co/WxKQIQ907l Published: 09 January 2023 #MAGA qt-maga-3844 #BorderObserver http
More evidence suggesting that social media is not significantly changing our political preferences. Rather, we are probably selecting into echo chambers based on what we log on already believing. This study is based on Russia's election influence campaign
"Finally, we find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the Russian foreign influence campaign and changes in attitudes, polarization, or voting behavior." https://t.co/xdAkLQ4t7X
@RVAwonk Research mentioned: ‘We find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the Russian foreign influence campaign (on #Twitter) and changes in attitudes, polarization, or voting behavior in the 2016 US election.’ https://t.co/aYGNo
@harryjsisson Harry, Harry, Harry: You are a typical Democrat—you can’t read: https://t.co/Yq2EGSFaSp https://t.co/faKDJqxxYf
The holes in this study are large enough to drive a truck through them. The first obvious problem is that it only looks at Twitter when we know Russia exploited Facebook and other social media platforms. https://t.co/s4RjiIcREb
Then again, i don't really care if a flood of disinformation is produced by an army of IRA-trolls or AI, and their impact is negligible: https://t.co/dZLHHGGrNK
Conclusie betreffend onderzoek naar Russische beïnvloeding via #desinformatie op #Twitter in aanloop naar de Amerikaanse presidentsverkiezingen van 2016’: https://t.co/6pVKM5tPJA
https://t.co/KSRlWRwJOO Like most of the things coming from 'the West', the four-year long, relentless propaganda of American MSM on how Russia 'elected' D. Tramp-was based on 'fake' arguments. And this study, published in 'Nature', proves what was to many
https://t.co/5h7HU5fDyY "Abstract There is widespread concern that foreign actors are using social media to interfere in elections worldwide. Yet data have been unavailable to investigate links between exposure to foreign influence campaigns and political
RT @mkeulemans: Weet u nog? Trump zou mede zijn verkozen door invloed Russische trollenlegers... 🧌🇷🇺 Maar nee hoor. Invloed trollen was mi…
RT @jackholmes0: why would you build the study around Twitter when Facebook was the focus for these influence campaigns in 2016? https://t.…
Even Nature magazine is getting in on kneecapping the #Russiagate myth. .@MarkAmesExiled https://t.co/qfO2LoXQD3
RT @gparkin: The study ignored Facebook, platform of choice for influencing the attitudes, opinions and behavior of the masses. Twitter is…
The study ignored Facebook, platform of choice for influencing the attitudes, opinions and behavior of the masses. Twitter is a reinforcement bubble for the political elite. That only 1% of twitterati were targeted is how you'd do it, if you know anything
Academics find (not for the first time) that it wasn't the Russians wot done it. ("It" being Trump's 2016 election, but it would surely apply to Brexit too.) No. It was always more Tucker than Zucker. https://t.co/yLDNbtr0SM
RT @ESoConflict: How influential was Russia’s twitter campaign with the 2016 election? This new paper by @j_a_tucker and co-authors found t…
Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relationship to attitudes and voting behavior - Nature Communications https://t.co/9HJSx1nRme
How influential was Russia’s twitter campaign with the 2016 election? This new paper by @j_a_tucker and co-authors found that Russia’s IO had a relatively minor influence on individual-level attitudes and voting behaviors...
Thank you, Brian https://t.co/s8URWIQ5Te
I checked the original paper and the process looks robust https://t.co/SeWLSQJSRa confirmed my belief that social media is not a strong enough force to change anyone’s beliefs
Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relationship to attitudes and voting behavior https://t.co/ZlOfVxYctk
New study confirms that Russian Twitter propaganda didn't have a meaningful effect on the 2016 US election https://t.co/yDzn3YphRX
@chrislhayes I believe you're referring to our recent studying finding the limited impact of Russia's influence campaign on Twitter in 2016. Happy to chat about the study and the reaction to it if you're interested! https://t.co/PXkcPDPHik
E mo? https://t.co/Vka2E5RYiR
RT @FrankLuntz: “We find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the 2016 Russian foreign influence campaign and chang…
RT @FrankLuntz: “We find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the 2016 Russian foreign influence campaign and chang…
RT @RalphJanik: “Finally, we find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the Russian foreign influence campaign and c…
RT @FrankLuntz: “We find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the 2016 Russian foreign influence campaign and chang…
@45Traitor @mike10010100 @mtaibbi It also did not analyze the content of the posts, the time period looked at only started in Apr 2016 (after primaries were effectively over & after the start of the influence campaign), among other flaws. Here is a di
@mtaibbi "... it would be a mistake to conclude that simply because the Russian foreign influence campaign on Twitter was not meaningfully related to individual-level attitudes that other aspects of the campaign did not have any impact on the election," h
RT @FrankLuntz: “We find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the 2016 Russian foreign influence campaign and chang…
@PJ671 @nichpic @Victorshi2020 Studies also proved that all the bot farms information had ZERO effect on voters in 2016!! https://t.co/8wzmBFNbsr
Interesting new published paper by @janzilinsky and co-authors
RT @Global_Occupant: For those following the faux Russian Collusion, this data analysis is interesting. "we find no evidence of a meaningf…
For those following the faux Russian Collusion, this data analysis is interesting. "we find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the Russian foreign influence campaign and changes in attitudes, polarization, or voting behavior." h
@DavidAFrench Any comments?https://t.co/vzDXWXze1D
RT @j_a_tucker: 📢📣 We've got a new paper out from @CSMaP_NYU today in @NatureComms 📢 Russia's foreign influence campaign on Twitter in 2…
RT @FrankLuntz: “We find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the 2016 Russian foreign influence campaign and chang…
2/2 Russia didn't impact the 2016 election. It turns out even if there was massive exposure to Russians, it simply made no difference. #RussiaGate #Trump #HillaryClinton #Russia #putinspuppet https://t.co/N3vOJSXYo8
RT @FrankLuntz: “We find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the 2016 Russian foreign influence campaign and chang…
RT @FrankLuntz: “We find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the 2016 Russian foreign influence campaign and chang…
If it were about exposure we'd all be fascists. The efforts were broad, deep, and invasive into social networks and media, bringing extremists together on a network of social media, behind one candidate, which is very rarely successful.
RT @FrankLuntz: “We find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the 2016 Russian foreign influence campaign and chang…
RT @FrankLuntz: “We find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the 2016 Russian foreign influence campaign and chang…
It doesn’t mean that they didn’t try. They will keep doing it
@tedlieu Russians tweeted, less than 1% US users interacted with their content #russiangate is pure hysteria. "[W]e find no evidence of a ... relationship between exposure to the Russian foreign influence campaign and changes in attitudes, polarization,
RT @FrankLuntz: “We find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the 2016 Russian foreign influence campaign and chang…
RT @FrankLuntz: “We find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the 2016 Russian foreign influence campaign and chang…
it takes real cognitive dissonance to not connect the media lies about russia, covid origins, and hunters laptops to 1/6 the media are culpable right @DavidAFrench ?
RT @FrankLuntz: “We find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the 2016 Russian foreign influence campaign and chang…
RT @FrankLuntz: “We find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the 2016 Russian foreign influence campaign and chang…
RT @FrankLuntz: “We find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the 2016 Russian foreign influence campaign and chang…
Nobody cares.
RT @FrankLuntz: “We find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the 2016 Russian foreign influence campaign and chang…
RT @FrankLuntz: “We find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the 2016 Russian foreign influence campaign and chang…
RT @FrankLuntz: “We find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the 2016 Russian foreign influence campaign and chang…
RT @FrankLuntz: “We find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the 2016 Russian foreign influence campaign and chang…
“We find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the 2016 Russian foreign influence campaign and changes in attitudes, polarization, or voting behavior.” https://t.co/h0mlOE1WFA
Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relationship to attitudes and voting behavior | Nature Communications https://t.co/6LYpBR1DQN
RT @janzilinsky: Thank you, @mattyglesias, for reading and discussing our paper https://t.co/RsfIlfQipG https://t.co/TE2QV369yZ
A po fazi ocekavani nastava nevyhnutelne faze zklamani. https://t.co/UmnhuaiDX4
RT @NSC: This article refocuses the discussion on the effects of political influence operations on the aspects that really matter: promotin…
Tucker is one of the authors of a new paper, "Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relationship to attitudes and voting behavior," in Nature Communications. https://t.co/jFqb
This article refocuses the discussion on the effects of political influence operations on the aspects that really matter: promoting mistrust in the electoral system and reinforcing the beliefs of those who already have highly partisan views. https://t.co/M
The graphics are from the article "Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election..." https://t.co/Rpo1rWDmPt
@_Allen_Reihman_ @Quaerens_veniam @KelFitton @BowesChay "we find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the Russian foreign influence campaign and changes in attitudes, polarization, or voting behavior. " https://t.co/pPyOwKbspG
Not surprised to read this at all, specially if you think about who were the ppl promoting this narrative the hardest...
RT @TheRealDougLane: @ZaleskiLuke @DanCrenshawTX Academic study showing the effect of foreign interference on the 2016 election. https://…
RT @CraigRApplegate: In a study which should be shocking to no one. Analysis has shown that "Russian information warfare" on Twitter had no…
RT @j_a_tucker: 📢📣 We've got a new paper out from @CSMaP_NYU today in @NatureComms 📢 Russia's foreign influence campaign on Twitter in 2…
Betreffend onderzoek: https://t.co/6pVKM5unz8
RT @pmddomingos: Russian misinformation on social media had no influence on the 2016 election. https://t.co/6Jc2EuzDdH
This article https://t.co/hUGo6n0DAS about exposure to certain Twitter accounts finds the same conclusions as our 2020 article on vaccination: exposure is limited, concentrated among a small group, and tiny compared to other topic-relevant information http
Get Rekt Trollocs
In a study which should be shocking to no one. Analysis has shown that "Russian information warfare" on Twitter had no decernable impact on the political actions or beliefs of those who interacted with it. https://t.co/oSIRNEcn43
RT @LukePUFP: never forget that Senate Democrats tried to restrict Americans' First Amendment rights online (with the so-called "Honest Ads…