RT @jaycaspiankang: Should read ‘convincing the media’ instead of ‘Americans.’ The Russian disinfo bot story was parts of the American medi…
RT @notjessewalker: A new paper finds little sign that Russian Twitter accounts in 2016 did much to change American "attitudes, polarizatio…
RT @j_a_tucker: 📢📣 We've got a new paper out from @CSMaP_NYU today in @NatureComms 📢 Russia's foreign influence campaign on Twitter in 2…
"Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relationship to attitudes and voting behavior" https://t.co/PkWQ3gs5Ys
RT @j_a_tucker: 📢📣 We've got a new paper out from @CSMaP_NYU today in @NatureComms 📢 Russia's foreign influence campaign on Twitter in 2…
RT @notjessewalker: A new paper finds little sign that Russian Twitter accounts in 2016 did much to change American "attitudes, polarizatio…
RT @dov_levin: Interesting new study finds that social media campaign aspect of the 2016 Russian intervention was ineffective. As usual in…
RT @j_a_tucker: 📢📣 We've got a new paper out from @CSMaP_NYU today in @NatureComms 📢 Russia's foreign influence campaign on Twitter in 2…
Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relationship to attitudes and voting behavior (Gregory Eady / Nature) https://t.co/rXDwGqET9R https://t.co/ZLzCPkvg5p
RT @jaycaspiankang: Should read ‘convincing the media’ instead of ‘Americans.’ The Russian disinfo bot story was parts of the American medi…
In terms of the ratio between real-world meaningful effects and research funding for the study of hypotheticals, Russian disinformation is eclipsed only by Soviet first strikes.
RT @GorinMoti: no evidence of..relationship between exposure to Russian foreign influence campaign and changes in attitudes, polarization,…
RT @jaycaspiankang: Should read ‘convincing the media’ instead of ‘Americans.’ The Russian disinfo bot story was parts of the American medi…
RT @notjessewalker: A new paper finds little sign that Russian Twitter accounts in 2016 did much to change American "attitudes, polarizatio…
RT @j_a_tucker: 📢📣 We've got a new paper out from @CSMaP_NYU today in @NatureComms 📢 Russia's foreign influence campaign on Twitter in 2…
RT @CSMaP_NYU: Russia's foreign influence campaign in 2016 caused widespread concern. But how effective was it? Our new @NatureComms pape…
RT @GorinMoti: no evidence of..relationship between exposure to Russian foreign influence campaign and changes in attitudes, polarization,…
RT @notjessewalker: A new paper finds little sign that Russian Twitter accounts in 2016 did much to change American "attitudes, polarizatio…
RT @jaycaspiankang: Should read ‘convincing the media’ instead of ‘Americans.’ The Russian disinfo bot story was parts of the American medi…
"[W]e find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the Russian foreign influence campaign and changes in attitudes, polarization, or voting behavior." @thespybrief https://t.co/fQi0YXHUUA
RT @wrklsshrd: One of the most frustrating things about the last 5 years in "studying uses of the internet" has been the outsized resources…
RT @j_a_tucker: 📢📣 We've got a new paper out from @CSMaP_NYU today in @NatureComms 📢 Russia's foreign influence campaign on Twitter in 2…
RT @GorinMoti: no evidence of..relationship between exposure to Russian foreign influence campaign and changes in attitudes, polarization,…
Hey, some data-driven eggheads just dropped a research paper on their findings after analyzing all that "Russian misinformation" dispersed by the Internet Research Agency. Their conclusion: It was all Bullshit! https://t.co/uICJYI1Mfp
RT @jaycaspiankang: Should read ‘convincing the media’ instead of ‘Americans.’ The Russian disinfo bot story was parts of the American medi…
RT @cphoffmann: This study (by @GregoryEady et al.) has it all: Exposure to Russian disinformation was highly concentrated in a tiny, ideol…
RT @GorinMoti: no evidence of..relationship between exposure to Russian foreign influence campaign and changes in attitudes, polarization,…
Russiagate - the gift that keeps on giving. "[W]e find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the Russian foreign influence campaign and changes in attitudes, polarization, or voting behavior." https://t.co/fxFyiZ9LtS
RT @jaycaspiankang: Should read ‘convincing the media’ instead of ‘Americans.’ The Russian disinfo bot story was parts of the American medi…
never forget that Senate Democrats tried to restrict Americans' First Amendment rights online (with the so-called "Honest Ads Act") in response to this ginned up nonsense.
RT @jaycaspiankang: Should read ‘convincing the media’ instead of ‘Americans.’ The Russian disinfo bot story was parts of the American medi…
One of the most frustrating things about the last 5 years in "studying uses of the internet" has been the outsized resources given to the "detect foreign interference" beat. https://t.co/yWRA314KpR https://t.co/SI7u5MlVrA
RT @notjessewalker: A new paper finds little sign that Russian Twitter accounts in 2016 did much to change American "attitudes, polarizatio…
RT @notjessewalker: A new paper finds little sign that Russian Twitter accounts in 2016 did much to change American "attitudes, polarizatio…
RT @j_a_tucker: 📢📣 We've got a new paper out from @CSMaP_NYU today in @NatureComms 📢 Russia's foreign influence campaign on Twitter in 2…
RT @notjessewalker: A new paper finds little sign that Russian Twitter accounts in 2016 did much to change American "attitudes, polarizatio…
RT @jaycaspiankang: Should read ‘convincing the media’ instead of ‘Americans.’ The Russian disinfo bot story was parts of the American medi…
Thanks to @GregoryEady @tpaskhalis, the co-lead authors on this paper, for their amazing work, as well as the rest of my co-authors @janzilinsky @RichBonneauNYC & @Jonathan_Nagler! You can read the full article (#OpenAccess!) here: https://t.co/gMU9b
RT @notjessewalker: A new paper finds little sign that Russian Twitter accounts in 2016 did much to change American "attitudes, polarizatio…
RT @notjessewalker: A new paper finds little sign that Russian Twitter accounts in 2016 did much to change American "attitudes, polarizatio…
I looked at the methodology and the base literature and I have some real questions Especially as study of the RIRA in 2016 was racist and anti Black and included no discussion of the fake Black accounts And strong “Dem”indicators among Internet resear
1/ Six years after the 2016 US presidential election, peer-reviewed academic study finds Twitter content from the Russian foreign influence campaign didn’t meaningfully change US voter behavior https://t.co/4BnNwhFEvh
RT @notjessewalker: A new paper finds little sign that Russian Twitter accounts in 2016 did much to change American "attitudes, polarizatio…
RT @notjessewalker: A new paper finds little sign that Russian Twitter accounts in 2016 did much to change American "attitudes, polarizatio…
RT @notjessewalker: A new paper finds little sign that Russian Twitter accounts in 2016 did much to change American "attitudes, polarizatio…
RT @jaycaspiankang: Should read ‘convincing the media’ instead of ‘Americans.’ The Russian disinfo bot story was parts of the American medi…
RT @notjessewalker: A new paper finds little sign that Russian Twitter accounts in 2016 did much to change American "attitudes, polarizatio…
no evidence of..relationship between exposure to Russian foreign influence campaign and changes in attitudes, polarization, or voting Russia’s..campaign on social..may have had its..effects by convincing Americans that its campaign was successful LOL htt
RT @notjessewalker: A new paper finds little sign that Russian Twitter accounts in 2016 did much to change American "attitudes, polarizatio…
RT @notjessewalker: A new paper finds little sign that Russian Twitter accounts in 2016 did much to change American "attitudes, polarizatio…
RT @notjessewalker: A new paper finds little sign that Russian Twitter accounts in 2016 did much to change American "attitudes, polarizatio…
RT @notjessewalker: A new paper finds little sign that Russian Twitter accounts in 2016 did much to change American "attitudes, polarizatio…
RT @gavinbwilde: 👀 "We find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the Russian foreign influence campaign and changes…
RT @notjessewalker: A new paper finds little sign that Russian Twitter accounts in 2016 did much to change American "attitudes, polarizatio…
RT @notjessewalker: A new paper finds little sign that Russian Twitter accounts in 2016 did much to change American "attitudes, polarizatio…
RT @jaycaspiankang: Should read ‘convincing the media’ instead of ‘Americans.’ The Russian disinfo bot story was parts of the American medi…
RT @notjessewalker: A new paper finds little sign that Russian Twitter accounts in 2016 did much to change American "attitudes, polarizatio…
RT @gavinbwilde: 👀 "We find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the Russian foreign influence campaign and changes…
RT @staillat: Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relati…
RT @jaycaspiankang: Should read ‘convincing the media’ instead of ‘Americans.’ The Russian disinfo bot story was parts of the American medi…
RT @notjessewalker: A new paper finds little sign that Russian Twitter accounts in 2016 did much to change American "attitudes, polarizatio…
RT @j_a_tucker: 📢📣 We've got a new paper out from @CSMaP_NYU today in @NatureComms 📢 Russia's foreign influence campaign on Twitter in 2…
A new study finds that “Russian influence operations on Twitter in the 2016 election reached relatively few users, most of whom were highly partisan GOP and the Russian accounts had no measurable impact in changing minds or influencing voter behavior https
Should read ‘convincing the media’ instead of ‘Americans.’ The Russian disinfo bot story was parts of the American media making up a story out of what amounted to random bits of info and force feeding it to the public for a year. The premise was always lud
this is also the reason brands never liked advertising on Twitter - it had no measurable impact on sales
RT @CSMaP_NYU: Russia's foreign influence campaign in 2016 caused widespread concern. But how effective was it? Our new @NatureComms pape…
Convincing Americans this penny-ante effort was successful was an entirely American accomplishment.
RT @CSMaP_NYU: Russia's foreign influence campaign in 2016 caused widespread concern. But how effective was it? Our new @NatureComms pape…
📢📣 We've got a new paper out from @CSMaP_NYU today in @NatureComms 📢 Russia's foreign influence campaign on Twitter in 2016 caused widespread concern. But who was exposed? How effective was it? 🧵👇 1/ https://t.co/gMU9bPZ42l
shocker
wow truly shocking that "russian bots" were not responsible for the least likeable politician in world history losing a presidential race
RT @cphoffmann: This study (by @GregoryEady et al.) has it all: Exposure to Russian disinformation was highly concentrated in a tiny, ideol…
As with the claims Russia did Brexit, it is absolutely farcical that NeoLibs convinced themselves that Russia forced British and American people to be our usual vicious and xenophobic selves.
A new paper finds little sign that Russian Twitter accounts in 2016 did much to change American "attitudes, polarization, or voting." The effort's biggest impact may lie in "convincing Americans that its campaign was successful." https://t.co/GIgt0aL7Ig
RT @CSMaP_NYU: Russia's foreign influence campaign in 2016 caused widespread concern. But how effective was it? Our new @NatureComms pape…
RT @staillat: Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relati…
RT @CSMaP_NYU: Russia's foreign influence campaign in 2016 caused widespread concern. But how effective was it? Our new @NatureComms pape…
RT @Bernstein: “We find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the Russian foreign influence campaign and changes in…
RT @CSMaP_NYU: Russia's foreign influence campaign in 2016 caused widespread concern. But how effective was it? Our new @NatureComms pape…
サーベイとTwitterをリンクできるといろいろわかる。この結果は大事。 「ロシアの影響力キャンペーンへの露出と、態度、偏向、投票行動の変化との間に意味のある関係を示す証拠は見いだせなかった。」 https://t.co/4r4bdll5bB
RT @Bernstein: “We find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the Russian foreign influence campaign and changes in…
Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relationship to attitudes and voting #behavior https://t.co/x5va3XbxOD @NatureComms https://t.co/3DoR6NpzRW
RT @cphoffmann: This study (by @GregoryEady et al.) has it all: Exposure to Russian disinformation was highly concentrated in a tiny, ideol…
RT @CSMaP_NYU: Russia's foreign influence campaign in 2016 caused widespread concern. But how effective was it? Our new @NatureComms pape…
RT @CSMaP_NYU: Russia's foreign influence campaign in 2016 caused widespread concern. But how effective was it? Our new @NatureComms pape…
RT @kevincollier: Another data point out today that the IRA's direct engagement with susceptible Americans was less effective, and that mor…
RT @CSMaP_NYU: Russia's foreign influence campaign in 2016 caused widespread concern. But how effective was it? Our new @NatureComms pape…
RT @CSMaP_NYU: Russia's foreign influence campaign in 2016 caused widespread concern. But how effective was it? Our new @NatureComms pape…
RT @Bernstein: “We find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the Russian foreign influence campaign and changes in…
RT @CSMaP_NYU: Russia's foreign influence campaign in 2016 caused widespread concern. But how effective was it? Our new @NatureComms pape…
RT @JimHansonDC: But I was reliably informed by Media/Dems/DeepState Trump won cuz Russia
RT @cphoffmann: This study (by @GregoryEady et al.) has it all: Exposure to Russian disinformation was highly concentrated in a tiny, ideol…
RT @JimHansonDC: But I was reliably informed by Media/Dems/DeepState Trump won cuz Russia
La desinformación -y Rusa 😱- pierde efecto 👇 #RussianDisinformation
RT @cphoffmann: This study (by @GregoryEady et al.) has it all: Exposure to Russian disinformation was highly concentrated in a tiny, ideol…
RT @CSMaP_NYU: Russia's foreign influence campaign in 2016 caused widespread concern. But how effective was it? Our new @NatureComms pape…
Another data point out today that the IRA's direct engagement with susceptible Americans was less effective, and that more pickup came from media outlets quoting the accounts as authentic partisans.
RT @gavinbwilde: 👀 "We find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the Russian foreign influence campaign and changes…
RT @cphoffmann: This study (by @GregoryEady et al.) has it all: Exposure to Russian disinformation was highly concentrated in a tiny, ideol…
RT @JimHansonDC: But I was reliably informed by Media/Dems/DeepState Trump won cuz Russia