@mtaibbi And per NYU that interference amounted to fuck all https://t.co/EsLzCrZW2n
@edzsplace @JayTayorJr Wrong. And so on brand for rwq to find a nuanced, serious study, grab some data points out of context and weaponize them to "prove" their so-called point. Nah. Here's what the org that *you are quoting* has to say about that - https:
@GilGamish3 @FrankBilgemail @simonateba @realDonaldTrump The most consequential action that effected the 2016 election by far was Comey’s horrifically ill-advised, last minute public announcement on the HRC email investigation. Comey continued his downwar
@RobbyMillsforKY You’re completely wrong. Russia did influence the election. Several Trump advisors got indicted for working with Russia lmao https://t.co/qwIl2k1bDA
RT @BestStephenD: As there much chatter these days about foreign influence in Canadian elections, discussed recently on @DavidWCochrane's @…
RT @BestStephenD: As there much chatter these days about foreign influence in Canadian elections, discussed recently on @DavidWCochrane's @…
RT @BestStephenD: As there much chatter these days about foreign influence in Canadian elections, discussed recently on @DavidWCochrane's @…
RT @BestStephenD: As there much chatter these days about foreign influence in Canadian elections, discussed recently on @DavidWCochrane's @…
RT @BestStephenD: As there much chatter these days about foreign influence in Canadian elections, discussed recently on @DavidWCochrane's @…
RT @BestStephenD: As there much chatter these days about foreign influence in Canadian elections, discussed recently on @DavidWCochrane's @…
RT @BestStephenD: As there much chatter these days about foreign influence in Canadian elections, discussed recently on @DavidWCochrane's @…
RT @BestStephenD: As there much chatter these days about foreign influence in Canadian elections, discussed recently on @DavidWCochrane's @…
RT @BestStephenD: As there much chatter these days about foreign influence in Canadian elections, discussed recently on @DavidWCochrane's @…
RT @BestStephenD: As there much chatter these days about foreign influence in Canadian elections, discussed recently on @DavidWCochrane's @…
As there much chatter these days about foreign influence in Canadian elections, discussed recently on @DavidWCochrane's @PnPCBC, I thought this research might be of interest. https://t.co/uBoKVITGLW
@BlueNextWaves Typique du troll On commence à demander des arguments et il disparaît. Si vous souhaitez lire un peu : https://t.co/BpWNK1y80V https://t.co/1RCdir0GgS Faut pas rester ensuite..
@acoyne Actually this has been widely disproven by multiple studies, get Caroline Orr continues to pump out propaganda and then Canadian media disseminate it. https://t.co/SvWKsPwAx3
RT @AlejoPedregal: Pero nunca olvidéis los “estándares mínimos” periodísticos de nuestros medios… aunque pasen 7 años para enterarnos de qu…
RT @LarryKi50202971: Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its…
Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relationship to attitudes and voting behavior https://t.co/WxKQIQ9xWT Published: 09 January 2023 #MAGA qt-maga-3844 #BorderObserver http
RT @Bernstein: “We find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the Russian foreign influence campaign and changes in…
RT @AlejoPedregal: Pero nunca olvidéis los “estándares mínimos” periodísticos de nuestros medios… aunque pasen 7 años para enterarnos de qu…
RT @AlejoPedregal: Pero nunca olvidéis los “estándares mínimos” periodísticos de nuestros medios… aunque pasen 7 años para enterarnos de qu…
RT @AlejoPedregal: Pero nunca olvidéis los “estándares mínimos” periodísticos de nuestros medios… aunque pasen 7 años para enterarnos de qu…
Lean, lean...
Pero nunca olvidéis los “estándares mínimos” periodísticos de nuestros medios… aunque pasen 7 años para enterarnos de que nos tomaban el pelo y, ¡oh, sorpresa!, también responden a sesgos ideológicos. https://t.co/HWhp8hpoDY https://t.co/zlZzWZYt4h http
@EveAdam0 @nytopinion A groundbreaking recent New York University study, however, says there’s no evidence Russian tweets had any meaningful effect at all. https://t.co/6IT7H1OoNg https://t.co/z3cR19QmtT
RT @j_a_tucker: Some further follow up on exactly what the paper does and does not reveal in this 🧵 👇 https://t.co/jmNbol6Jt1 18/17
RT @j_a_tucker: Thanks to @GregoryEady @tpaskhalis, the co-lead authors on this paper, for their amazing work, as well as the rest of my co…
RT @j_a_tucker: 📢📣 We've got a new paper out from @CSMaP_NYU today in @NatureComms 📢 Russia's foreign influence campaign on Twitter in 2…
RT @BestStephenD: This, likely, applies to @CPC_HQ/@PierrePoilievre disinformation, lies, too. "...we find no evidence of a meaningful rela…
RT @BestStephenD: This, likely, applies to @CPC_HQ/@PierrePoilievre disinformation, lies, too. "...we find no evidence of a meaningful rela…
RT @BestStephenD: This, likely, applies to @CPC_HQ/@PierrePoilievre disinformation, lies, too. "...we find no evidence of a meaningful rela…
RT @BestStephenD: This, likely, applies to @CPC_HQ/@PierrePoilievre disinformation, lies, too. "...we find no evidence of a meaningful rela…
RT @BestStephenD: This, likely, applies to @CPC_HQ/@PierrePoilievre disinformation, lies, too. "...we find no evidence of a meaningful rela…
RT @BestStephenD: This, likely, applies to @CPC_HQ/@PierrePoilievre disinformation, lies, too. "...we find no evidence of a meaningful rela…
RT @BestStephenD: This, likely, applies to @CPC_HQ/@PierrePoilievre disinformation, lies, too. "...we find no evidence of a meaningful rela…
RT @BestStephenD: This, likely, applies to @CPC_HQ/@PierrePoilievre disinformation, lies, too. "...we find no evidence of a meaningful rela…
Letošní studie na nových datech z Twitteru se ohlíží zpátky za volbami 2016 a "nenachází žádný důkaz o významném vztahu mezi expozicí Ruskému vlivu a změně v postojích, polarizaci nebo voličském chování". https://t.co/oHjsYKENTN
This, likely, applies to @CPC_HQ/@PierrePoilievre disinformation, lies, too. "...we find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the Russian foreign influence campaign and changes in attitudes, polarization, or voting behavior." https
Bottom line: The whole "Russian Collusion"/"Russia stole 2016 election for Trump" bit is a bunch of hooey. But objective observers already knew that. https://t.co/a9xq2pk0Ko
RT @anarchobonobo: @DavidCornDC @Snowden Physician heal thyself. That the Russians interfered is trivially true. States to do this: Israel'…
RT @anarchobonobo: @DavidCornDC @Snowden Physician heal thyself. That the Russians interfered is trivially true. States to do this: Israel'…
Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relationship to attitudes and voting behavior | Nature Communications https://t.co/0kWXAMqUui
@ZYinzzzz @JamesWi54905250 @RVAwonk That's exactly what Republicans say about voting fraud. This has been answered: https://t.co/4mVHn2dKOk
@JamesWi54905250 @ZYinzzzz @RVAwonk 1. Empirical studies have shown that the interference not have a demonstrable effect. This the democratic equivalent of Republican obsession with voting fraud - it happens but has not demonstrable effect. https://t.co/4
RT @VeveGeorgescu: @TimothyDSnyder Research shows that Russian disinformation had little impact on voting behaviour:“ we find no evidence o…
@RichardKeppler1 @DavidCornDC They grind on it because Russiagate did more damage to the left than 9/11 truth did. Conspiracy theories do real damage. That Russia interfered is trivially true. That Israel interfered is trivially true. This interference h
@DavidCornDC @Snowden Physician heal thyself. That the Russians interfered is trivially true. States to do this: Israel's election inference campaign was even more significant. Do you **deny** that this inference had no impact on the election? https://t.
An interview about our recent @CSMaP_NYU study (in German) https://t.co/TE2QV369yZ A 5-word summary: reach does not imply influence.
Relevant article 2 https://t.co/NYkpsdRXCh
@petteruspanus @AudunBraten @faktisk_no Du har jo f.eks. Nature Communications som sier bl.a. «Finally, we find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the Russian foreign influence campaign and changes in attitudes, polarization, or v
RT @j_a_tucker: To put a concrete example on this, a few weeks ago, we published an important paper where we collected over 1.2 billion twe…
To put a concrete example on this, a few weeks ago, we published an important paper where we collected over 1.2 billion tweets to understand exposure to Russian IRA trolls in the 2016 election. https://t.co/gMU9bPZ42l 4/
@BenjaminACarter @RajChaklashiya People are making such claims. There have been academic studies on this verifying what I am saying. Here's one I posted just about three weeks ago. https://t.co/zYDYJ9QrYR
Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relationship to attitudes and voting behavior https://t.co/WxKQIQ907l Published: 09 January 2023 #MAGA qt-maga-3844 #BorderObserver http
@RealTrabbsBoy @BarryDeCicco @McCartneyWP & on Twitter https://t.co/ZWpeyx74WS
RT @dean_inkster: @TimothyDSnyder “we find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the Russian foreign influence campa…
RT @HackingButLegal: There are major problems with this paper If you were an American voter in 2016 exposed to social media and the news,…
RT @HackingButLegal: There are major problems with this paper If you were an American voter in 2016 exposed to social media and the news,…
RT @HackingButLegal: There are major problems with this paper If you were an American voter in 2016 exposed to social media and the news,…
RT @HackingButLegal: There are major problems with this paper If you were an American voter in 2016 exposed to social media and the news,…
RT @HackingButLegal: There are major problems with this paper If you were an American voter in 2016 exposed to social media and the news,…
RT @HackingButLegal: There are major problems with this paper If you were an American voter in 2016 exposed to social media and the news,…
RT @HackingButLegal: There are major problems with this paper If you were an American voter in 2016 exposed to social media and the news,…
RT @HackingButLegal: There are major problems with this paper If you were an American voter in 2016 exposed to social media and the news,…
RT @HackingButLegal: There are major problems with this paper If you were an American voter in 2016 exposed to social media and the news,…
RT @HackingButLegal: There are major problems with this paper If you were an American voter in 2016 exposed to social media and the news,…
RT @HackingButLegal: There are major problems with this paper If you were an American voter in 2016 exposed to social media and the news,…
RT @HackingButLegal: There are major problems with this paper If you were an American voter in 2016 exposed to social media and the news,…
RT @HackingButLegal: There are major problems with this paper If you were an American voter in 2016 exposed to social media and the news,…
There are major problems with this paper If you were an American voter in 2016 exposed to social media and the news, go read the summary and tell me if it sounds right 🤣 This is fucking gaslighting
@ansgarjohn @rudybouma @MaxJND @wol Wellicht interessant over de beschreven 'In 2016 Russian trolls and bots nearly drowned the truth in a flood of #fakenews and conspiracy theories...' de conclusie van onderzoek naar de invloed van Russische trollen op #T
RT @lukOlejnik: While Russian cyber operation was an interference in domestic US affairs, the foreign 'elections meddling'/disinformation i…
While Russian cyber operation was an interference in domestic US affairs, the foreign 'elections meddling'/disinformation in 2016 had no measurable impact on voters. Median exposure to disinformation content is zero per week in the last week of elections.
@zerlumpterdokto @AfD https://t.co/JxMA1alysO ... dafür bräuchts jetzt aber ein Gehirn. Querdenker ... Russland? 🤣Ging nur um Covid Terror der sich bewahrheitet hat. Was nicht gefällt wird verunglimpft. Träumt einfach weiter auf der GEZ Wolke 7. Musks Twi
@Theoctopushouse @Texas4Progress @mtaibbi No evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the Russian foreign influence campaign and changes in attitudes, polarization, or voting behavior. Implications for understanding the limits of election
@Theoctopushouse @Texas4Progress @mtaibbi exposure to Russian disinformation accounts was heavily concentrated: only 1% of users accounted for 70% of exposures. Exposure was concentrated among users who strongly identified as Republicans. https://t.co/RbM
RT @dstreisman: No evidence the Russian trolls swung anything. Important paper.
RT @dean_inkster: @TimothyDSnyder “we find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the Russian foreign influence campa…
RT @dean_inkster: @TimothyDSnyder “we find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the Russian foreign influence campa…
@elonmusk Disengenuois response by the current owner of Twitter. https://t.co/vtSNwSfavS
@TimothyDSnyder Research shows that Russian disinformation had little impact on voting behaviour:“ we find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the Russian foreign influence campaign and changes in attitudes, polarization, or voting
@TimothyDSnyder Evidence strongly suggests that it is unlike that Russian interference played a significant role in the 2016 elections. https://t.co/b8QdURBuN0
@TimothyDSnyder According to an international study piloted at NYU & released this month: “we find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the Russian foreign influence campaign & changes in attitudes, polarization, or voting b
@TimothyDSnyder “we find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the Russian foreign influence campaign & changes in attitudes, polarization, or voting behavior.” https://t.co/tagRp1hYkx
Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relationship to attitudes and voting behavior https://t.co/WxKQIQ907l Published: 09 January 2023 #MAGA qt-maga-3844 #BorderObserver http
RT @CSMaP_NYU: Yesterday @NatureComms published our paper about Russia’s foreign influence efforts *on Twitter* in the 2016 election. We've…
@AnthonyDeWitt7 @GugliuzzaSal @KariLake It’s called disinformation. It is still being spread on multiple platforms. Which is why ‘what people believe’ is false. This is a report regarding only Twitter: https://t.co/lEmEEnDytL
"We find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the Russian foreign influence campaign and changes in attitudes, polarization, or voting behavior." #ElectionTwitter #socialmedia https://t.co/XkgeS8h1en
@thecasamarron Man lived in Russia, worked for The Moscow times and a gonzo mag the eXile, open and shut case. Clearly man is paid by Putin personally. Lets ignore more and more stories/research which showed Russian bot/influence campaign was mostly B.S. h
@DwayneTuck Yeah? Almost certainly. Almost. Except not really. #Canadians https://t.co/SvWKsPx8mB backing Ukraine would have included ATACMs, air defence, long range sniper systems, coms systems, night kit. We are profiting. #puppet #cantrollfarms https://
RT @CSMaP_NYU: Yesterday @NatureComms published our paper about Russia’s foreign influence efforts *on Twitter* in the 2016 election. We've…
RT @CSMaP_NYU: And here’s a tweet thread summarizing the findings. 9/9 https://t.co/PXkcPDPHik
RT @CSMaP_NYU: You can read the full @NatureComms paper here. It's open access and free to read. 8/ https://t.co/coMxO2KoSR
RT @CSMaP_NYU: Yesterday @NatureComms published our paper about Russia’s foreign influence efforts *on Twitter* in the 2016 election. We've…
@MarioNawfal A study has been done on Russia impact in 2016. https://t.co/616dmmZltZ