@Lallatva @tagesschau Hatte extra eine linke publikation gewählt. Bin bei ihnen versucht haben sie es. Aber hatte keine Wirkung. https://t.co/XpCRQy4VGL
@tomjanmeeus Wellicht (ook) interessant @tomjanmeeus, conclusie onderzoek naar Russische beïnvloeding via #desinformatie op #Twitter in aanloop naar verkiezingen in VS van 2016’: https://t.co/6pVKM5tPJA
RT @j_a_tucker: 📢📣 We've got a new paper out from @CSMaP_NYU today in @NatureComms 📢 Russia's foreign influence campaign on Twitter in 2…
@MelKShow @AWeissmann_ They got debunked really bad not just for their Trump-Russian dossier... https://t.co/ngpC4Wo0Lt https://t.co/iyTpa88rxf
@mohansson @ThomasBartz5 @AWeissmann_ They (serious academics) already are judging the Russiagaters https://t.co/ngpC4Wo0Lt https://t.co/wUvbrIkst2
@AWeissmann_ Russiagate? How long before we stop pretending that the 2016 election was stolen or much less there was significant interference that influenced the result? https://t.co/ngpC4Wo0Lt https://t.co/QQ6mCZjRgQ
@LordCrankyPantz @jvgraz Oh. Propaganda from a military organization that has reaped untold billions from the conflict they've created. I should definitely believe that pabulum. https://t.co/Sy0lkdNufu
RT @OversightPR: @rgoodlaw @RepAdamSchiff Here we go with the "blame Russia" for Hillary's lack of appeal defense. It's her policies and co…
@WalshFreedom @AdamSchiff no, dumbass. https://t.co/qH3B1Q1CEn
@theSkepdik @DynamiteFitz @lourg786 @Acyn RU influence was grossly exaggerated. https://t.co/qH3B1Q2atV
@BaddCompani *Polling of Swing State Voters https://t.co/3eUEpAiU17 Media Research Center **Peer-reviewed publication. https://t.co/Knbo9Ng1sI Nature Communications, 2023
@rgoodlaw @RepAdamSchiff Here we go with the "blame Russia" for Hillary's lack of appeal defense. It's her policies and corruption that were the problem (Clinton is the source of the Russia Hoax) : *Media Research Center https://t.co/3eUEpAiU17 **Nature C
@giverealfacts @Chyn2000 @EdKrassen @GCapital_LLC I've also read this gem, often referred to, albeit not read by those who reference it. "Researchers’ understanding of the influence of the social media side of these campaigns remains unresolved, however, i
https://t.co/XLFIBMf034 Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relationship to attitudes and voting behavior
RT @Raymond_vT: @QueenyRaj @Donerd @steven_braham Rond 'Rusland heeft online geprobeerd om verkiezingen in de VS te beïnvloeden' werd (ook)…
@QueenyRaj @Donerd @steven_braham Rond 'Rusland heeft online geprobeerd om verkiezingen in de VS te beïnvloeden' werd (ook) #desinformatie en #nepnieuws verspreid @QueenyRaj. Zie bijvoorbeeld uitkomst van onderzoek: https://t.co/6pVKM5tPJA
@sailaunderscore lmao I can tell where you get your news just admit you have no idea what's going on, like the rest of the people Taibbi duped https://t.co/KfJcfhXZWO https://t.co/pyRMuJzdJo https://t.co/WbYa8MnaXN
RT @KorosecLena: @jdamijan Mogoče je fajn kot dodatek k temu poročilu omeniti še objavljeno študijo iz januarja 2023, ki ugotavlja, da rusk…
RT @KorosecLena: @jdamijan Mogoče je fajn kot dodatek k temu poročilu omeniti še objavljeno študijo iz januarja 2023, ki ugotavlja, da rusk…
@jdamijan Mogoče je fajn kot dodatek k temu poročilu omeniti še objavljeno študijo iz januarja 2023, ki ugotavlja, da ruske dezinformacije niso bistveno vplivale na način glasovanja volivcev na ameriških predsedniških volitvah leta 2016. https://t.co/83jY0
Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relationship to attitudes and voting behavior https://t.co/EbpWJLmI4a via @Nature
@IllegalCluster @rakityrak @AdamCarollaShow @taraleerodas Russia did help Trump (and Bernie and Jill Stein) https://t.co/qwIl2k1bDA
7/ Ein Beispiel hierfür ist die russische Online-Desinformation während der US-Wahlen 2016. Die Desinformations-Kampagnen des Kreml erreichten damals nur relativ wenige Leute, und es gibt keine Evidenz, dass die Kampagnen den Wahlausgang beeinflussten. htt
RT @FrankLuntz: “We find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the 2016 Russian foreign influence campaign and chang…
at en direkte eksponering over troldefabrikkens indhold havde minimal eller ingen effekt på politiske holdinger eller adfærd blandt amerikanerne. Hvilket i øvrigt er i fin tråd med hvad vi ved fra forskning om politisk kommunikation mere bredt... https://t
RT @insveacz: Başlığa bak. “Dikkat sandığa ayı girmesin.” İddialara bak. 😂😂😂 Bunların niyet çok bozuk. Amerikan seçimlerinde Rus müdahe…
@United24media @Ancarnia Yeah wouldn’t that be cool Russia! https://t.co/kVBTdQNijT https://t.co/qwIl2k1bDA
RT @DOGalip: Yalnız ABD seçimlerine Rusya'nın ve Rusların müdahalesinin herhangi gözlemlenebilir bir etkisi olmadığı ortaya çıktı. Hem de N…
RT @DOGalip: Yalnız ABD seçimlerine Rusya'nın ve Rusların müdahalesinin herhangi gözlemlenebilir bir etkisi olmadığı ortaya çıktı. Hem de N…
Başlığa bak. “Dikkat sandığa ayı girmesin.” İddialara bak. 😂😂😂 Bunların niyet çok bozuk. Amerikan seçimlerinde Rus müdahelesinin kent efsanesi olduğundan haberiniz var mı? 👇🏻 https://t.co/oEmYnv9VGQ https://t.co/BjGFPThOXV
@nonfrankfurtian Fransa-Türkiye-İsrail. Bu üçünün kritik bir önemi var. Ayrıca Cambridge Analytica yalanı boşuna dolaşıma çıkartılmadı. 👇🏻 Cepheleşerek gidilmemesi iyi bir şey. https://t.co/SAh0znHAtD
After thousands of stories about “Russian interference” in 2016, @CSMaP_NYU’s work showed its online advertising efforts couldn’t have had a meaningful impact on the election
Yalnız ABD seçimlerine Rusya'nın ve Rusların müdahalesinin herhangi gözlemlenebilir bir etkisi olmadığı ortaya çıktı. Hem de Nature'da yayınlandı. Demokratların Cumhuriyetçilere yüklenmesi için uydurulmuş bir şehir efsanesi. https://t.co/1c0Gox9icd https:/
highly credible
RT @james_a_lewis: For those who worry about influence campaigns: "we find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the…
RT @james_a_lewis: For those who worry about influence campaigns: "we find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the…
For those who worry about influence campaigns: "we find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the Russian foreign influence campaign and changes in attitudes, polarization, or voting behavior." (From a great conference at #CEPA) http
@finn_charlene @NPR Any Russian social media ads that were found have been proven not to have been extensive and did not impact the election in any way. Majority of the posts were to make $. Why people are still trying to use that as a gotcha is ridiculou
..."interference in the 2016 U.S. election was published on January 9, 2023—https://t.co/37IVtF4PK9—in Nature Communications, an adjunct of Nature science magazine. It shows the obvious, that there was never any meat in that sandwich." *The #Russia-#Trump
Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relationship to attitudes and voting behavior https://t.co/WxKQIQ907l Published: 09 January 2023 #MAGA qt-maga-3844 #BorderObserver http
RT @w85785410: @patternologist @Bauchnabelzwerg @nexta_tv The Arab Spring convinced Putin that it was a “Western-backed coup” when in reali…
@patternologist @Bauchnabelzwerg @nexta_tv The Arab Spring convinced Putin that it was a “Western-backed coup” when in reality it was people freely conversing via new media. It convinced him that Russia needed to use this new tool — social media — to its
@GraphicW5 @infrajohnny You misrepresent this. Russia tried to influence the election. It may not have worked well on Twitter. WaPo reported on a solo study of Twitter. That does not mean it reversed its opinion. This study did not look at all social m
RT @GOODINTERNETraw: Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its…
Par exemple :
RT @fermi_project: #Disinformation efforts such as those examined by the @fermi_project have consequences but maybe not so much on the outc…
RT @fermi_project: The @fermi_project commends @GregoryEady, @tpaskhalis, @janzilinsky, Richard Bonneau, @Jonathan_Nagler, and @j_a_tucker…
The @fermi_project commends @GregoryEady, @tpaskhalis, @janzilinsky, Richard Bonneau, @Jonathan_Nagler, and @j_a_tucker for their work on #Russian #disinformation efforts in @NatureComms ⤵️ https://t.co/N57oI2QU7u
#Disinformation efforts such as those examined by the @fermi_project have consequences but maybe not so much on the outcome of the #US #presidentialelection in 2016 as a new piece in @NatureComms argues⤵️ https://t.co/N57oI2QU7u.
@nuisancefilter People make up their own minds and are pretty smart about it. https://t.co/OEwtQ6anUr
@roulinski @PierrePoilievre Russian bot farms ? You sound just as bad as when people say they found microchips in their arms. https://t.co/SvWKsPwAx3
@TobiasRothmund @hugoreasoning I think the quote refers specifically to this study finding no effects of Russian trolling on attitudes or behavior. Which is very much in line with previous studies on the Russian influence campaign. https://t.co/KWIKexsen
@chaserchapman You really think Cambridge analytica impacted the election? Couldn’t anyone use Facebook ads for political speech? What do you think of reports that counter the vast claims of influence: https://t.co/dn6Nl1BWnQ
Exposure to Russian foreign influence accounts during the 2016 election campaign https://t.co/2NBYvx3JfH
RT @cstewartiii: Really important paper on exposure to Russian influence efforts in 2016. Here's the link and two graphs I will likely use…
@danielsgoldman Total nonsense Goldman. Your claim falls apart on the fact that the social media posts in question were a microscopic $50k in vague right wing cultural attitudes ads, most of which weren't even election specific. None had any measurable imp
**Estimated percent change published in Nature Communications, 2023 https://t.co/vtMvsVUzL0
@birdgirl8888 @DavidAFrench @gtconway3d 2. “attitudes, polarization, or voting behavior.” https://t.co/REKDcJzTUj
Do you know what is the scariest thing? What surprised me the most from you a Canadian veteran? Everything that is happening in this noble country. 1. It is how the CCP interferes with our electoral system while the most important thing is to cover up the
RT @Alessacanada: Are you ok? I noticed serious reading comprehension issues with you. Can you explain to me how running away from a dicta…
The only reaction is possible for this. https://t.co/24Trx2u04M
Are you ok? I noticed serious reading comprehension issues with you. Can you explain to me how running away from a dictatorship like Venezuela endorsed by Russia makes me far right-wing? My country was destroyed by communism and socialist left-wing ideol
Here's the scariest thing.. The more you publicly positioned yourself to be a "strong" supporter on the right, the greater the likelihood that you were previously targetted by foreign #misinformation without you knowing it. See: https://t.co/2jkGO1NECf
RT @BestStephenD: @bruceanderson Anytime any of our brilliant pollsters, strategists, and pundits wants to quantify how Chinese interferenc…
@bruceanderson Anytime any of our brilliant pollsters, strategists, and pundits wants to quantify how Chinese interference influenced voting behavior or turn out it would be OK with me. Meanwhile, some might find this interesting. https://t.co/uBoKVITGLW
@DanielMazahreh @MaxBlumenthal @JuliaDavisNews If you read the actual NYU study, you'll see that the authors admit its limitations. “It would be a mistake to conclude... that other aspects of the campaign did not have any impact on the election, or on fait
2/ Subito i dati. Ci sono studi sull'influenza dei troll russi in Occidente? Certo! Nel più recente e poderoso, pubblicato su @NatureComms a gennaio, sono state per la PRIMA VOLTA analizzate le opinioni di chi è stato esposto ad account di propaganda russa
(Here’s a link to the study cited in the previous article). “We find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the Russian foreign influence campaign and changes in attitudes, polarization, or voting behavior.” https://t.co/GgGTvMGLB5
RT @APPCPenn: Join our director, Kathleen Hall Jamieson for what promises to be a great panel Wednesday on foreign interference and propaga…
RT @jimmylives306: While there was Russian activity, it wasn’t enough to impact the 2016 election. Note: Wikipedia is not a credible rebutt…
RT @jimmylives306: While there was Russian activity, it wasn’t enough to impact the 2016 election. Note: Wikipedia is not a credible rebutt…
RT @bdomackenna: @JoignantAlfredo @mavargasa No es el mismo caso, pero el peso de la prueba cae en los que defienden esa tesis. "... no en…
RT @j_a_tucker: Incredibly excited to welcome @noUpside @jenjpan and Kathleen Hall Jamieson (@AnnenbergPenn) to this virtual @CSMaP_NYU eve…
While there was Russian activity, it wasn’t enough to impact the 2016 election. Note: Wikipedia is not a credible rebuttal to a 65 page data analysis, or anything really. https://t.co/SvWKsPwAx3 #canpoli #russiagateisahoax @mtaibbi @elonmusk @caitoz
@JoignantAlfredo @mavargasa No es el mismo caso, pero el peso de la prueba cae en los que defienden esa tesis. "... no encontramos evidencia de relacion sustantiva entre exposicion a la campania de manipulacion y cambios en actitudes, polarizacion, o pref
RT @j_a_tucker: Incredibly excited to welcome @noUpside @jenjpan and Kathleen Hall Jamieson (@AnnenbergPenn) to this virtual @CSMaP_NYU eve…
RT @APPCPenn: Join our director, Kathleen Hall Jamieson for what promises to be a great panel Wednesday on foreign interference and propaga…
RT @j_a_tucker: Incredibly excited to welcome @noUpside @jenjpan and Kathleen Hall Jamieson (@AnnenbergPenn) to this virtual @CSMaP_NYU eve…
Join our director, Kathleen Hall Jamieson for what promises to be a great panel Wednesday on foreign interference and propaganda. With @j_a_tucker, @noUpside, and @jenpan. Noon ET.
RT @j_a_tucker: Incredibly excited to welcome @noUpside @jenjpan and Kathleen Hall Jamieson (@AnnenbergPenn) to this virtual @CSMaP_NYU eve…
RT @j_a_tucker: Incredibly excited to welcome @noUpside @jenjpan and Kathleen Hall Jamieson (@AnnenbergPenn) to this virtual @CSMaP_NYU eve…
RT @j_a_tucker: Incredibly excited to welcome @noUpside @jenjpan and Kathleen Hall Jamieson (@AnnenbergPenn) to this virtual @CSMaP_NYU eve…
RT @j_a_tucker: Incredibly excited to welcome @noUpside @jenjpan and Kathleen Hall Jamieson (@AnnenbergPenn) to this virtual @CSMaP_NYU eve…
RT @j_a_tucker: Incredibly excited to welcome @noUpside @jenjpan and Kathleen Hall Jamieson (@AnnenbergPenn) to this virtual @CSMaP_NYU eve…
Incredibly excited to welcome @noUpside @jenjpan and Kathleen Hall Jamieson (@AnnenbergPenn) to this virtual @CSMaP_NYU event to discuss foreign interference and propaganda. I'll be kicking the event off with a brief recap of our recent @NatureComms paper:
RT @Golovchenko_Yev: "..., or voting behavior" .https://t.co/9L0Akq1zwV
"..., or voting behavior" .https://t.co/9L0Akq1zwV
RT @jasnoen: Russerne forsøkte å påvirke det amerikanske valget i 2016 via sosiale medier. Men som jeg skrev i Trump-sjokket, er det lite s…
RT @jasnoen: Russerne forsøkte å påvirke det amerikanske valget i 2016 via sosiale medier. Men som jeg skrev i Trump-sjokket, er det lite s…
Russerne forsøkte å påvirke det amerikanske valget i 2016 via sosiale medier. Men som jeg skrev i Trump-sjokket, er det lite som tyder på at de faktisk lyktes. Denne ferske studien bekrefter det. https://t.co/I1C1Zacun4
En gruppe forskere har for nyligt undersøgt eksponering for disinformationskampagner fra det russiske Internet Research Agency (IRA) på twitter i forbindelse det amerikanske præsidentvalg i 2016. Deres undersøgelse peger på en række forhold: 7/11 https://t