RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
What a load of crap in the formerly esteemed journal Nature! It shows that climate science is hopelessly politicized and alarmists are feverishly trying to silence dissenters: https://t.co/PkDkZkUGIE
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
Very neat idea (haven’t read).
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
#climate deniers featured in mainstream media 1% more often than scientists; and a whopping 49% more often in new media outlets new research shows #ClimateBrawl https://t.co/IgDErvkaSH
La vache.
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
RT @stdebove: Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques.…
RT @ucanr: #Climate deniers vs climate scientists thread: “Our paper has excited some controversy and criticism,” says @LeroyWesterling @uc…
Le graphe #nofakescience qui fait mal... En bleu les experts du climat. Taille des bulles = nb de citations scientifiques. Abscisse = nb de publis. Ordonnée = exposition médiatique. En orange, même chose mais pour les "experts climato-sceptiques"... h
RT @Moshe_Hoffman: How can you tell if you are being sold a lie? If everyone who opposes your side has expertise on the issue, while ever…
How can you tell if you are being sold a lie? If everyone who opposes your side has expertise on the issue, while everyone who agrees with you doesn’t. (And whose funding and prominence can be traced to special interest groups w/ an agenda).
Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists and contrarians. https://t.co/xff5haZqb0 #fakenews #ClimateChange #media #Fridays4Future #climatescience
@zeitonline Sehr interessant übrigens für diejenigen, die gleich Fake News wittern, wenn es um Klimawandel geht: https://t.co/xff5haZqb0
RT @Moshe_Hoffman: This 👇 is what it looks like, when one side is selling facts and another is selling disinformation. (And the media is se…
RT @ucanr: #Climate deniers vs climate scientists thread: “Our paper has excited some controversy and criticism,” says @LeroyWesterling @uc…
ICYMI see what #Nature is doing. The periodical is becoming a Cabal rather than a place for discussion. Brings to mind, Sinclair's quote, "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it." https:/
RT @alex_lamb: ICYMI: this should lay to rest whatever is left of the climate denial argument. It is a concise depiction of how the public…
RT @BeersJournalism: Representació gràfica de perquè el periodisme ha d'evitar incórrer en el "many sides": en vermell, les citacions en la…
Interesting use of citation analysis
RT @geofurb: Anti-science contrarians are given a disproportionately large share of media attention, especially outside of the mainstream.…
Esse efeito é devastador na ciência. Quando a mídia e a opinião pública escolhe “um lado” em um debate, e assim somente um dos lados tem visibilidade, dando a a impressão que existe somente uma verdade incontestável. Eu fujo de consensos. Gosto de destrin
RT @Moshe_Hoffman: This 👇 is what it looks like, when one side is selling facts and another is selling disinformation. (And the media is se…
RT @SolomonMg: Academic colleagues if you’ve ever uttered the phrase “shameless self promotion” take a good hard look at this plot https://…
RT @Moshe_Hoffman: This 👇 is what it looks like, when one side is selling facts and another is selling disinformation. (And the media is se…
RT @Moshe_Hoffman: This 👇 is what it looks like, when one side is selling facts and another is selling disinformation. (And the media is se…
For those who say climate denial is just driven by the average republican being poorly informed (and not about being *strategically* ignorant): Is it *that* hard for people to realize this disparity? Is there any (reasonable) way one could rationalize
RT @Moshe_Hoffman: This 👇 is what it looks like, when one side is selling facts and another is selling disinformation. (And the media is se…
This 👇 is what it looks like, when one side is selling facts and another is selling disinformation. (And the media is selling “balance.”)
RT @ictlogist: El despropósito de los medios de reflejar todas las versiones sobre un asunto, de forma "equitativa/neutral/equidistante", a…
RT @SolomonMg: Academic colleagues if you’ve ever uttered the phrase “shameless self promotion” take a good hard look at this plot https://…
RT @ictlogist: El despropósito de los medios de reflejar todas las versiones sobre un asunto, de forma "equitativa/neutral/equidistante", a…
RT @ictlogist: El despropósito de los medios de reflejar todas las versiones sobre un asunto, de forma "equitativa/neutral/equidistante", a…
RT @BeersJournalism: Representació gràfica de perquè el periodisme ha d'evitar incórrer en el "many sides": en vermell, les citacions en la…
RT @schwardmann: This is troubling https://t.co/RouOg0Qo0f
RT @ictlogist: El despropósito de los medios de reflejar todas las versiones sobre un asunto, de forma "equitativa/neutral/equidistante", a…
RT @BeersJournalism: Representació gràfica de perquè el periodisme ha d'evitar incórrer en el "many sides": en vermell, les citacions en la…
Representació gràfica de perquè el periodisme ha d'evitar incórrer en el "many sides": en vermell, les citacions en la literatura científica dels negacionistes, en blau, els que accepten que el canvi climàtic és un fet i les mencions als mitjans dels dos:
RT @ictlogist: El despropósito de los medios de reflejar todas las versiones sobre un asunto, de forma "equitativa/neutral/equidistante", a…
RT @ictlogist: El despropósito de los medios de reflejar todas las versiones sobre un asunto, de forma "equitativa/neutral/equidistante", a…
Who would have expected this, uh?
RT @ictlogist: El despropósito de los medios de reflejar todas las versiones sobre un asunto, de forma "equitativa/neutral/equidistante", a…
RT @ictlogist: El despropósito de los medios de reflejar todas las versiones sobre un asunto, de forma "equitativa/neutral/equidistante", a…
RT @ictlogist: El despropósito de los medios de reflejar todas las versiones sobre un asunto, de forma "equitativa/neutral/equidistante", a…
El despropósito de los medios de reflejar todas las versiones sobre un asunto, de forma "equitativa/neutral/equidistante", aunque una esté bien fundamentada y la otra sea mera superchería. Aquí, cambio climático; pero sirve para fascismo y otros extremos.
RT @Lifeboat_Earth: References: https://t.co/A5gP341YgO https://t.co/TK84EpAudB That second one is particularly alarming as it also highl…
References: https://t.co/A5gP341YgO https://t.co/TK84EpAudB That second one is particularly alarming as it also highlights where the initial misinformation campaign to throw doubt over man-made climate change came from. No prizes for guessing it was the
More like "a lot of the blame" — a recent study makes it clear just how imbalanced reporting on climate change has been, esp in the US, esp on TV. Sometimes driven by ideology, mostly lazy journalism looking for controversy https://t.co/2tw5p4Y4OV
This is epic ! A beautiful graph .
Sure...Because media is never influenced by its advertisers, and the fossil fuel industry has never lavished millions on huge advertising campaigns. Pull the other one, Vivian Krause. Climate breakdown became news very recently when media couldn't ignore t
Excellent work
This is troubling
RT @LeroyWesterling: It doesn’t take much work for a denier to become an “expert”. Comparing most prominent 224 climate deniers (red) to 22…
Does anyone see this changing? Tirelessly reply to climate deniers in print?
RT @alex_lamb: ICYMI: this should lay to rest whatever is left of the climate denial argument. It is a concise depiction of how the public…
ICYMI: this should lay to rest whatever is left of the climate denial argument. It is a concise depiction of how the public was lied to. Next read The Misinformation Age.
This is why the media seeking “equal representation” for “both sides” is so very wrong.
RT @ucanr: #Climate deniers vs climate scientists thread: “Our paper has excited some controversy and criticism,” says @LeroyWesterling @uc…
@LeroyWesterling It doesn’t take much reasoning to know that you are a knave. Making ad hominem attacks on your opponents is not science. Consensus of the mob is not science. Science is based on data and sound reasoning about the data. https://t.co/FQzsUj
#Climate deniers vs climate scientists thread: “Our paper has excited some controversy and criticism,” says @LeroyWesterling @ucmerced 👇
@NadienSchaffra1 @mariokr10 @SvensonZson @f4fbielefeld @OliverJanich Suchen Sie sich hier einen raus mit vielen Publikationen: https://t.co/8rVAtmT13K . Ich kenne nur die, die in den Medien vertreten sind. Aber okay (wobei Lesch kein Klimaforscher ist): Mo
RT @Glen4Climate: This tells you the degree to which the media is involved the promotion of anti science propaganda. https://t.co/JMguhSziKm
RT @Glen4Climate: This tells you the degree to which the media is involved the promotion of anti science propaganda. https://t.co/JMguhSziKm