RT @ProfMarkMaslin: Major Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists compared with contrarians…
Laser precision analysis: thread
Klimaat agit prop (ic lasteren van sceptici) in Nature...
RT @WeatherProf: This gist here is contrarians are featured 49% more in media, but only 1% more in mainstream indicating that new media sou…
RT @ProfTerryHughes: Interesting analysis of the “expertise” of climate change deniers in the (mostly USA) media. https://t.co/HHH7WXt2Zx
This gist here is contrarians are featured 49% more in media, but only 1% more in mainstream indicating that new media sources with goals to sow doubt are crowding out real media. Conclusion: scientists need to be more visible/ vocal. https://t.co/Qz5MoVZ
Note that the authors can't resolve whose scientific findings (Authoritarians vs Contrarians) are defensible or falsifiable. They only argue that "authoritative" viewpoints (i.e. the viewpoints we like) should be boosted in media accounts. This is science?
RT @doug__h: New study shows that the media is giving a handful of unqualified climate deniers as much media attention as the top 200 legit…
RT @tadhgoma: Climate contrarians vs expert scientists -contrarians featured in 49% more media articles with 1% excess in mainstream media.…
@belette_rouge @RTBFinfo Ah, d’accord. Mieux vaut le relire, du coup. L’article complet se trouve ici, pour info : https://t.co/xJnqaauRQ8
Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists and contrarians #ClimateChange #scientists https://t.co/FO85Srhkti https://t.co/Jwp9qbnq6y
@catinsight a thread for you.
RT @ProfMarkMaslin: Major Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists compared with contrarians…
RT @bvanheerwaarden: Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists and contrarians | Nature Communi…
RT @SimonLeeWx: "Here we show via direct comparison that [climate] contrarians are featured in 49% more media articles than scientists... m…
@AndrewSiffert @KellyHereid Or not, as the case may be... https://t.co/yzTvnOnrWw
"Here we show via direct comparison that [climate] contrarians are featured in 49% more media articles than scientists... many of which contribute to the production and consumption of climate change disinformation at scale" https://t.co/QVbJ9XCRLg
A scientific proof that journalists must rediscover their job. https://t.co/BHCgPSmJOw Journalism exists to report truth on difficult/complex subjects. Ergo, failing to report truth will cause its extinction (tech overcame need for journalism as just rep
RT @lbergkamp: An argument that raises more questions than it answers — Why should there be any relation between “scientific authority” a…
RT @tadhgoma: Climate contrarians vs expert scientists -contrarians featured in 49% more media articles with 1% excess in mainstream media.…
RT @FabiusMaximus01: Is this a joke? Oddities abound. Contrarians are not named, but sourced to the Desmog blog (w/ other sources), conside…
RT @ProfMarkMaslin: Major Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists compared with contrarians…
RT @SebastienBaille: "Le résultat peut s’exprimer familièrement ainsi : plus vous n’avez rien publié d’intéressant en climatologie, et plus…
Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists and contrarians https://t.co/GYBTtibtid
@rte @rtenews
Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists and contrarians | Nature Communications https://t.co/oCxE5wNJJv
RT @ProfMarkMaslin: Major Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists compared with contrarians…
RT @ProfMarkMaslin: Major Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists compared with contrarians…
RT @ProfMarkMaslin: Major Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists compared with contrarians…
Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists and contrarians🧐 https://t.co/cqushB3vQO
Scientific paper on climate trolls : having lost ground challenging science they now "challenge assessments of CC impacts in an effort to impede the development of proactive regulations." https://t.co/618Cc68EMJ
My crush💙paper of the week ⤵️ (seen via @ecosdelfuturo) https://t.co/bmpqmm2bam
RT @FabiusMaximus01: Is this a joke? Oddities abound. Contrarians are not named, but sourced to the Desmog blog (w/ other sources), conside…
Negators (1% of climate science related papers) get 15 times more mainstream media coverage than actual climate scientists. In the same time in France, 87% of 25-34yo are convinced nuclear energy production is responsible for climate change. Coincidence ?
RT @tadhgoma: Climate contrarians vs expert scientists -contrarians featured in 49% more media articles with 1% excess in mainstream media.…
"Le résultat peut s’exprimer familièrement ainsi : plus vous n’avez rien publié d’intéressant en climatologie, et plus vous serez starisé par la presse, surtout les titres récents n’existant que sur internet. " https://t.co/2oRnScRtQC Lien vers l'étude :
RT @tadhgoma: Climate contrarians vs expert scientists -contrarians featured in 49% more media articles with 1% excess in mainstream media.…
RT @TVPLab: Interesting article in @NatureComms showing media coverage of climate change scientist vs contrarian. This analysis stresses th…
RT @tadhgoma: Climate contrarians vs expert scientists -contrarians featured in 49% more media articles with 1% excess in mainstream media.…
RT @tadhgoma: Climate contrarians vs expert scientists -contrarians featured in 49% more media articles with 1% excess in mainstream media.…
Interesting article in @NatureComms showing media coverage of climate change scientist vs contrarian. This analysis stresses the need of public engagement from the scientists to ensure proper information reaches the public. #Science #ClimateChange https:
Climate contrarians vs expert scientists -contrarians featured in 49% more media articles with 1% excess in mainstream media. A farce. #ClimateEmergency Climate scientists must exert authority in public discourse and journalists and editors must adjust.
RT @ProfMarkMaslin: Major Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists compared with contrarians…
RT @TaraLynC: "Contrarians are featured in 49% more media articles than scientists." We need to do better! https://t.co/4pGKymru6a
"Contrarians are featured in 49% more media articles than scientists." We need to do better!
I won't pretend I'm surprised, #ClimateChange deniers receive way more media attention than scientists. That is insane and deeply concerning for democracy... https://t.co/kbuiKktIvh
@nofake_science @HuetSylvestre Pour qui voudrait lire la source, le papier est en #openaccess : https://t.co/kbuiKktIvh
RT @adelineheitz: 🤩🤯This study demonstrates "why climate scientists should exert their authority in scientific and public discourse, and wh…
RT @lbergkamp: An argument that raises more questions than it answers — Why should there be any relation between “scientific authority” a…
An argument that raises more questions than it answers — Why should there be any relation between “scientific authority” and “media visibility”? How do we know that scientific authority in climate science is necessarily a function of merit? https://t
IS this a joke? Oddities abound… 'contrarians' are not named, but sourced to the Desmog blog (w/ other sources), considered authoritative… says reports by @HeartlandInst have been “debunked”, citing ClimateFeedback… https://t.co/kKZ6GnyonG
Let’s data visualize the media’s culpability in climate change distortion, denial and inaction, shall we ...
Nouvelle étude @NatureComms : ces dernières années, les climato-sceptiques ont bénéficié de beaucoup plus d'attention médiatique que des scientifiques du #climat reconnus. Une asymétrie qui alimente la confusion et ralentit la réponse à l'urgence. https://
En daar is de gewenste ratio in de CO2 discussie..@fvdemocratie @thierrybaudet @GerritHiemstra https://t.co/K9bmStKl4N
RT @NatureJapan: 【気候変動】気候変動懐疑論者のメディアにおける可視性の評価 | Nature Communications https://t.co/GslcsZamtA #気候変動
RT @ProfTerryHughes: Interesting analysis of the “expertise” of climate change deniers in the (mostly USA) media. https://t.co/HHH7WXt2Zx
RT @doug__h: New study shows that the media is giving a handful of unqualified climate deniers as much media attention as the top 200 legit…
reaffirming #science: "..objectively demonstrates the crowding out of professional #mainstream sources by the proliferation of new media sources, many of which contribute to the production and consumption of #climatechange #disinformation at scale.." ht
RT @reishiva: メディアも温暖化の進行に加担している(ーー# https://t.co/TwIpARtrj0
RT @doug__h: New study shows that the media is giving a handful of unqualified climate deniers as much media attention as the top 200 legit…
Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists and contrarians | https://t.co/ZpVHfX6tgw
Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists and contrarians | Nature Communications https://t.co/lwVLFsuvxX
Per quelli che mettono sullo stesso piano i negazionisti del climate change e il 97% degli esperti di clima... https://t.co/PbWFvTqA1o
If you challenge the "consensus" (scientific word for general agreement on something for which there's no proof), you aren't a scientist, you're a "contrarian"? I'm assuming these "contrarians" had to go through the same peer review processes as the "scien
RT @matthewgburgess: THREAD: While I can appreciate the general goal of understanding how misinformation on climate change spreads, this is…
RT @RogerPielkeJr: So @nature has published a paper that includes me on a list of “contrarians” who reject climate science. I’ve contribute…
@curryja Interesting paper : https://t.co/ZHSRZv5Mem From the supps: "We also noted several top-cited researcher profiles belonging to the CCC list: R. Bradley, J. Clark, J. Curry, C. Johnson, R. Pielke, J. Taylor, and R. Tol; these individuals were summar
Build bridges, be counted part of the ghetto as the gates are slammed shut.
Study. Problem with #ClimateChange is the diminishing demand for expertise in scientific discourse aimed at the public. Exacerbated by proliferation of new media, which democratize information, making it hard to identify trustworthy information https://t.
先ほどの記事の元ネタ論文(Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists and contrarians https://t.co/9k69Ld7UEF)をツイートしようとすると拒否される。なぜだ。
RT @ProfMarkMaslin: Major Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists compared with contrarians…
RT @Beyond_Climate: 主に北米とヨーロッパに拠点を置くメディアソースの約10万点の記事とブログ記事では、気候変動懐疑論者のメディアにおける可視性が、気候変動科学者よりも49%高かったが、(編集基準が厳格な)30の主要メディアソースを特に調べたところ、両者の可視…
RT @Beyond_Climate: 【気候変動】気候変動懐疑論者のメディアにおける可視性の評価 | Nature Communications https://t.co/YpaM6P3Xvq 気候変動懐疑論者を取り上げた記事が、人間の活動を気候変動の一因とする大多数の見解を…
RT @Beyond_Climate: 【気候変動】気候変動懐疑論者のメディアにおける可視性の評価 | Nature Communications https://t.co/YpaM6P3Xvq 気候変動懐疑論者を取り上げた記事が、人間の活動を気候変動の一因とする大多数の見解を…
RT @ProfMarkMaslin: Major Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists compared with contrarians…
RT @FabiusMaximus01: Is this a joke? Oddities abound. Contrarians are not named, but sourced to the Desmog blog (w/ other sources), conside…
RT @adelineheitz: 🤩🤯This study demonstrates "why climate scientists should exert their authority in scientific and public discourse, and wh…
RT @ProfMarkMaslin: Major Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists compared with contrarians…
RT @FabiusMaximus01: Is this a joke? Oddities abound. Contrarians are not named, but sourced to the Desmog blog (w/ other sources), conside…
Major Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists compared with contrarians Direct comparison of individuals shows #Climatechange deniers were featured in 49% more media publications than Scientists. https://t.co
🤩🤯This study demonstrates "why climate scientists should exert their authority in scientific and public discourse, and why professional journalists should adjust the disproportionate attention given to contrariant". Also an interesting use of #Bigdata htt
RT @doug__h: New study shows that the media is giving a handful of unqualified climate deniers as much media attention as the top 200 legit…
RT @FabiusMaximus01: Is this a joke? Oddities abound. Contrarians are not named, but sourced to the Desmog blog (w/ other sources), conside…
Interesting study comparing media coverage of climate change scientists against contrarians. Contrarians featured in 49% more media articles... but only 1% when it came to mainstream media. So journalists are doing a good job, but could be doing better
Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists and contrarians | Nature Communications https://t.co/Me1AI0zbEt
Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists and contrarians https://t.co/4w4YKkHs9b FYI and ...
RT @doug__h: New study shows that the media is giving a handful of unqualified climate deniers as much media attention as the top 200 legit…
RT @doug__h: New study shows that the media is giving a handful of unqualified climate deniers as much media attention as the top 200 legit…
RT @doug__h: New study shows that the media is giving a handful of unqualified climate deniers as much media attention as the top 200 legit…
RT @ProfTerryHughes: Interesting analysis of the “expertise” of climate change deniers in the (mostly USA) media. https://t.co/HHH7WXt2Zx
Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists and contrarians | Nature Communications https://t.co/rBVgkpPevy
RT @doug__h: New study shows that the media is giving a handful of unqualified climate deniers as much media attention as the top 200 legit…
RT @doug__h: New study shows that the media is giving a handful of unqualified climate deniers as much media attention as the top 200 legit…
RT @doug__h: New study shows that the media is giving a handful of unqualified climate deniers as much media attention as the top 200 legit…
RT @Beyond_Climate: 【気候変動】気候変動懐疑論者のメディアにおける可視性の評価 | Nature Communications https://t.co/YpaM6P3Xvq 気候変動懐疑論者を取り上げた記事が、人間の活動を気候変動の一因とする大多数の見解を…
RT @ProfTerryHughes: Interesting analysis of the “expertise” of climate change deniers in the (mostly USA) media. https://t.co/HHH7WXt2Zx
RT @FabiusMaximus01: Is this a joke? Oddities abound. Contrarians are not named, but sourced to the Desmog blog (w/ other sources), conside…
RT @nresearchnews: A group of climate change contrarians appeared in 49% more media articles than scientists who support the consensus that…
THREAD: While I can appreciate the general goal of understanding how misinformation on climate change spreads, this is a bad take that shouldn't have made it through peer review. Now that it's out, I hope to see a response published. https://t.co/c7QaJDIsR