RT @ravenscimaven: I was a minor when I started college. 16! I am so disgusted by this article. I would have been so disturbed being an @LS…
TIL a creepy Britney Spears fanfic was published IN NATURE and wow it's upsetting.
RT @nisslbodies: WTAF is this and why would Nature publish it? https://t.co/i6TAm4livD
What..?
Erm, what the crap is this? Why? https://t.co/L1BRbHAccA
Apparently, at some point @Nature decided they wanted to be more like Cosmopolitan, just dumber! https://t.co/5vxzjAwtNN
?_?
I like it when I see my interests converge, but this is not it. https://t.co/EYkicTwriF
So bizarre. What is the point they are trying to get across?
I have no idea what I just read. https://t.co/8d8E8FOhNX
when will Nature stop publishing this kind of trash....and we wonder why women aren't taken seriously
THIS IS UNHINGED
Can we just not. https://t.co/vqF8zDGgYv
#Nature: #dasbild and #telegraph of scientific journals? Or Scientific.coms? (I have very good experience with the scientific editing process). Second controversial "article" this month though. https://t.co/pjW3AIHzWG
RT @nisslbodies: WTAF is this and why would Nature publish it? https://t.co/i6TAm4livD
RT @surt_lab: The aughts were weird, y’all.
RT @claire_chem: If you're still unsure whether or not there's an issue with women in science, look no further than this article. We MUST d…
Who knew @nature publishes creepy misogynistic real person fan fiction? Someone please retract this garbage.
RT @nisslbodies: WTAF is this and why would Nature publish it? https://t.co/i6TAm4livD
The aughts were weird, y’all.
RT @ravenscimaven: “Britney will pump out a lot of good data, but gradually, with her music, her intermittent marriages and pregnancies, no…
RT @nisslbodies: WTAF is this and why would Nature publish it? https://t.co/i6TAm4livD
RT @camurphy3: What - and I cannot emphasize this enough - the fuck is this? https://t.co/Oz12Mp7om9
RT @ravenscimaven: “Britney will pump out a lot of good data, but gradually, with her music, her intermittent marriages and pregnancies, no…
RT @camurphy3: What - and I cannot emphasize this enough - the fuck is this? https://t.co/Oz12Mp7om9
Allow me to add my own ‘The fuck??’ to this
RT @nisslbodies: WTAF is this and why would Nature publish it? https://t.co/i6TAm4livD
what the actual fuck.
What hahahahhah
What - and I cannot emphasize this enough - the fuck is this? https://t.co/Oz12Mp7om9
Added: As noted here, the piece is actually from 2008, which I guess speaks to the lack-of-wokeness issue. https://t.co/Ifk1FPVee5
RT @ravenscimaven: “Britney will pump out a lot of good data, but gradually, with her music, her intermittent marriages and pregnancies, no…
RT @ravenscimaven: “Britney will pump out a lot of good data, but gradually, with her music, her intermittent marriages and pregnancies, no…
RT @Scientific_Bird: Hilariously bizarre essay published in Nature in 2008 Source: https://t.co/apjI0VyoRP https://t.co/rUKU24XTK9
RT @claire_chem: If you're still unsure whether or not there's an issue with women in science, look no further than this article. We MUST d…
RT @Scientific_Bird: Hilariously bizarre essay published in Nature in 2008 Source: https://t.co/apjI0VyoRP https://t.co/rUKU24XTK9
Wow. I wonder if Brian May ever had to deal with this kind of bullshit when he went in to physics????
RT @nisslbodies: WTAF is this and why would Nature publish it? https://t.co/i6TAm4livD
RT @nisslbodies: WTAF is this and why would Nature publish it? https://t.co/i6TAm4livD
Yes, Nature really did publish the piece linked below, written by "an associate professor of biological sciences at LSU, studying protein structure and function." https://t.co/bdthJ5WmNX
Hilariously bizarre essay published in Nature in 2008 Source: https://t.co/apjI0VyoRP https://t.co/rUKU24XTK9
RT @MadS100tist: Let's all agree we men should not write Editorials PERIOD
RT @ravenscimaven: I was a minor when I started college. 16! I am so disgusted by this article. I would have been so disturbed being an @LS…
What the actual fuck, @Nature?
Holy shit... how in the F did something like this get published?
WTH is this, @Nature?😳 This is the creepiest, and weirdest, paper I've read so far from this journal. "When Britney Spears comes to my lab" https://t.co/opoeUbv2eY
Holy hell, @Nature. The fact that this was published at all is terrible, but how is it still up 13 years later?
This is quite an achievement. Every sentence provokes a full-body cringe.
What the hell did I just read?
This is just plain creepy. I think in 2008 she was barely even legal.
This is truly one of the strangest things I've ever read. Why is this in @Nature ??
RT @ravenscimaven: “Britney will pump out a lot of good data, but gradually, with her music, her intermittent marriages and pregnancies, no…
RT @RebeccaHaacker: How does sexist nonsense like this get published yet so many excellent papers get rejected?? When Britney Spears comes…
RT @nisslbodies: WTAF is this and why would Nature publish it? https://t.co/i6TAm4livD
RT @ravenscimaven: I was a minor when I started college. 16! I am so disgusted by this article. I would have been so disturbed being an @LS…
WTAF? I realize this was published in 2008, but how was this OK to publish then?..."I'll teach Britney not to chew gum over the experiments, how to untangle her hair from the pH meter." https://t.co/s7MpjNBbka
What is Nature's editorial board ON? Because I don't want any. https://t.co/tA9k532E8z
Is it weirder that this got published or the fact that there are citations? 😅
RT @claire_chem: If you're still unsure whether or not there's an issue with women in science, look no further than this article. We MUST d…
RT @ravenscimaven: “Britney will pump out a lot of good data, but gradually, with her music, her intermittent marriages and pregnancies, no…
RT @nisslbodies: WTAF is this and why would Nature publish it? https://t.co/i6TAm4livD
🤢🤮I cannot express how grossed out I was while reading it. I couldn't even finish it. Yeah sure it was "published" in 2008. So? It was ok back then? It has changed much now? ha ha ha
RT @LTF_01: Lmao this guy basically wrote a Tumblr-level fan fiction of Britney Spears becoming his student at LSU and Nature published it…
RT @SimonJGreenhill: Time for a new Nature journal: nature: creepy old guys
RT @500womensci: There is nothing ok with this piece published in @Nature (in 2008) including that it remains available on their website b…
I mean, obviously *checks notes* ... 2008 ... was a different era, but what could possibly have led anyone to believe that this should be published by Nature?!
RT @_Josh_Currie: What the hell did I just read?!? Reminder that @nature rejects like 90% of the research articles they receive, citing spa…
Wtf is this?! It’s like a mix of a science career vignette and Britney Fanfic. Extraordinarily bizarre.
🤮🤮🤮🤮
RT @GameBiologist: If you're ever feeling like "nobody knows misogyny like women in gaming", let me assure you that women in science can fu…
What the hell did I just read?!? Reminder that @nature rejects like 90% of the research articles they receive, citing space limitations, yet somehow manage to find space for this stuff...
RT @ravenscimaven: “Britney will pump out a lot of good data, but gradually, with her music, her intermittent marriages and pregnancies, no…
RT @ravenscimaven: I was a minor when I started college. 16! I am so disgusted by this article. I would have been so disturbed being an @LS…
RT @ravenscimaven: “Britney will pump out a lot of good data, but gradually, with her music, her intermittent marriages and pregnancies, no…
RT @ravenscimaven: I was a minor when I started college. 16! I am so disgusted by this article. I would have been so disturbed being an @LS…
nature just straight up published bad rpf fanfic in 2008??? what even is this!!!!! i can’t breathe omfg
Who ok’d this one @Nature?? There is so much wrong here...
🤢
@Nature really needs to consider firing the editors who thought this garbage was a good idea to publish. We are beyond the point where this can be put off as just a small error in judgement.
RT @nisslbodies: WTAF is this and why would Nature publish it? https://t.co/i6TAm4livD
This was the oddest, most patronizing, out-of-touch thing I've read in quite a while..
"Hit me Nature one more time" https://t.co/orIrLBDvqC Can anybody help me understand this? I am genuinely confuse... #leavebritneyalone #itsbritneyPhD @ariana_gatt: I sense you will love this.
RT @claire_chem: If you're still unsure whether or not there's an issue with women in science, look no further than this article. We MUST d…
RT @LTF_01: Lmao this guy basically wrote a Tumblr-level fan fiction of Britney Spears becoming his student at LSU and Nature published it…
Parece que en 2008 cualquiera podía escribir chorradas en Nature.
My supervisor was of the opinion that Nature is a magazine, not a proper journal.
I hope this professor doesn't have any women in his lab, this fan fic is disturbing. Who decided this was a good idea? https://t.co/aaBElbv2GS
RT @ravenscimaven: “Britney will pump out a lot of good data, but gradually, with her music, her intermittent marriages and pregnancies, no…
Let's all agree we men should not write Editorials PERIOD
RT @ravenscimaven: I was a minor when I started college. 16! I am so disgusted by this article. I would have been so disturbed being an @LS…
If you're ever feeling like "nobody knows misogyny like women in gaming", let me assure you that women in science can fully empathize. With the added benefit of the jerks claiming scientific objectivity for their ick. https://t.co/zr9Urr0Bxy
RT @ravenscimaven: I was a minor when I started college. 16! I am so disgusted by this article. I would have been so disturbed being an @LS…
🗑 gross, creepy, condescending, sexist, I could go on….of all the words to describe this article, absolutely none are good. Eek.
nobody: absolutely no one:
Why? How?
RT @ravenscimaven: “Britney will pump out a lot of good data, but gradually, with her music, her intermittent marriages and pregnancies, no…
RT @ravenscimaven: I was a minor when I started college. 16! I am so disgusted by this article. I would have been so disturbed being an @LS…
What is the point of this incredibly creepy article, and how did it get published?!
RT @claire_chem: If you're still unsure whether or not there's an issue with women in science, look no further than this article. We MUST d…