jail
Why oh why did I decide to read this dumpster fire article that was published in Nature? After the first paragraph I threw my phone down and exhaled, audibly.
RT @nisslbodies: WTAF is this and why would Nature publish it? https://t.co/i6TAm4livD
@Nature needs to address its misogyny problem, vol. 11847.
RT @ravenscimaven: “Britney will pump out a lot of good data, but gradually, with her music, her intermittent marriages and pregnancies, no…
RT @bryancmounce: Can we just not. https://t.co/vqF8zDGgYv
How is this real?!!! @Nature what the actual f*&#
For every valid point about media visibility and a diversity of skills being beneficial to science, there are like 2-5 insulting assumptions about Britney’s incompetence and 14-16 extremely unnecessary details about clothing and physical appearance. 🤮
RT @nisslbodies: WTAF is this and why would Nature publish it? https://t.co/i6TAm4livD
RT @camurphy3: What - and I cannot emphasize this enough - the fuck is this? https://t.co/Oz12Mp7om9
RT @steppebioarch: Creepy, offensive, and sexist. At least this prof waves his red flags 🚩so people can avoid working with or for him….. ht…
RT @steppebioarch: Creepy, offensive, and sexist. At least this prof waves his red flags 🚩so people can avoid working with or for him….. ht…
Now what in the fresh hell is this @Nature ???? https://t.co/MIzMoLLLfL
I am shocked and appalled Nature published this! The amount of misogyny in it is disturbing. This is what pushes women away from science.
RT @RebeccaHaacker: How does sexist nonsense like this get published yet so many excellent papers get rejected?? When Britney Spears comes…
"Science is a meritocracy" "Only the best articles are published in top journals" "You have to have a high impact article to get a TT position" At least it's 69th (hehe) percentile among it's peers at nature, but still 98th among all pubs of similar age.
RT @0_minyaaa: 🤢🤮I cannot express how grossed out I was while reading it. I couldn't even finish it. Yeah sure it was "published" in 2008.…
@Nature what the actual fuck?? This isn’t ironic or funny or cute - it’s sexist trash. Why would you publish this? H/t @ravenscimaven https://t.co/yQ5Xcm7Sam
RT @ravenscimaven: “Britney will pump out a lot of good data, but gradually, with her music, her intermittent marriages and pregnancies, no…
RT @ravenscimaven: “Britney will pump out a lot of good data, but gradually, with her music, her intermittent marriages and pregnancies, no…
RT @nisslbodies: WTAF is this and why would Nature publish it? https://t.co/i6TAm4livD
RT @ravenscimaven: “Britney will pump out a lot of good data, but gradually, with her music, her intermittent marriages and pregnancies, no…
RT @ravenscimaven: “Britney will pump out a lot of good data, but gradually, with her music, her intermittent marriages and pregnancies, no…
RT @nisslbodies: WTAF is this and why would Nature publish it? https://t.co/i6TAm4livD
what the fuck? what is this post? why is it in Nature? what is even happening??
So this is horrifying:
Just read the article. This is, pretty much, a old man fantasizing about having Britney comes to his lab. The detail in his narrative is rather disturbing… what a creep!
RT @nisslbodies: WTAF is this and why would Nature publish it? https://t.co/i6TAm4livD
I almost cannot believe what I just read @Nature. Unquestionably unacceptable, today and in 2008. Gross.
RT @ravenscimaven: “Britney will pump out a lot of good data, but gradually, with her music, her intermittent marriages and pregnancies, no…
What is nature even publishing these days!
RT @ravenscimaven: “Britney will pump out a lot of good data, but gradually, with her music, her intermittent marriages and pregnancies, no…
RT @tcarpenter216: So, are nature pubs like…easy to get now or… https://t.co/Q8FXyo2S5L
This article is so gross. Also, as a costume designer I just want to add that "Lycra stretch top" is redundant. It's like saying "stretchy fabric stretch top"
RT @MermaidNiki: Wtf did I just read…. And why is it still up on @Nature over a decade later.
RT @ravenscimaven: “Britney will pump out a lot of good data, but gradually, with her music, her intermittent marriages and pregnancies, no…
RT @MermaidNiki: Wtf did I just read…. And why is it still up on @Nature over a decade later.
Dafuq, Nature. Ugh.
What the hell did I just read?
the misogyny and ableism that @Nature allowed is beyond disgusting. sexist, slut shaming, self-insert fanfiction.
This was published in 2008. But @nature still has it on their site. It wasn’t appropriate then. It’s certainly not now. Separate issue - how would any woman feel working with this guy?!! Being taught by this guy?!! He is still a prof at LSU. I have a lot
Hmm, I didn't know that if a researcher can write a fantasy play in a creepy way, it was/is possible to publish in "reputable" scientific journal: #Nature https://t.co/RnxHiTBepJ
RT @Helena_LB: I have no idea what I just read. https://t.co/8d8E8FOhNX
RT @balon_marie: OnlyFans removes porn Nature finally makes the move from science to incel fanfic WHAT A TIME TO BE ALIVE
Truly a meditation in misogyny in science right here thanks NATURE
2008. It may seem like forever ago. But I was in college. Working in a lab. As a woman. And this was still deemed 'okay' by @Nature. Disgusting and should be retracted.
And people wonder why there aren’t enough women in stem. @Nature
RT @camurphy3: What - and I cannot emphasize this enough - the fuck is this? https://t.co/Oz12Mp7om9
W.T.F. is this?! 😟 https://t.co/17O2AXWnXi
RT @nisslbodies: WTAF is this and why would Nature publish it? https://t.co/i6TAm4livD
Fanfic de un profe de ciencias acerca de como su clase haría de Britney una "mujer de valor", disfrazada de artículo a favor de la integración femenil en las ciencias. Puta ira.
RT @ravenscimaven: I was a minor when I started college. 16! I am so disgusted by this article. I would have been so disturbed being an @LS…
RT @ravenscimaven: “Britney will pump out a lot of good data, but gradually, with her music, her intermittent marriages and pregnancies, no…
This article is disgusting, and has been available for 13 years… time to finally take it down @Nature?
This 2009 article in @Nature ‘When Britney Spears comes to my lab’ is NAUSEATED! So SEXISTS in so many levels! This is a great example of how even sci journals have helped maintain academia toxic for women!
RT @ravenscimaven: I was a minor when I started college. 16! I am so disgusted by this article. I would have been so disturbed being an @LS…
So, are nature pubs like…easy to get now or… https://t.co/Q8FXyo2S5L
RT @chrstn_e: from the "high impact" echelon of academia. gross. i'm going back to bed. way too early for this nonsense
RT @ravenscimaven: “Britney will pump out a lot of good data, but gradually, with her music, her intermittent marriages and pregnancies, no…
When Britney Spears comes to my lab | Nature https://t.co/yRTUHbR72G
RT @camurphy3: What - and I cannot emphasize this enough - the fuck is this? https://t.co/Oz12Mp7om9
RT @nisslbodies: WTAF is this and why would Nature publish it? https://t.co/i6TAm4livD
RT @MermaidNiki: Wtf did I just read…. And why is it still up on @Nature over a decade later.
What in the world did I just read
RT @ravenscimaven: “Britney will pump out a lot of good data, but gradually, with her music, her intermittent marriages and pregnancies, no…
RT @ravenscimaven: “Britney will pump out a lot of good data, but gradually, with her music, her intermittent marriages and pregnancies, no…
RT @ravenscimaven: “Britney will pump out a lot of good data, but gradually, with her music, her intermittent marriages and pregnancies, no…
RT @MermaidNiki: Wtf did I just read…. And why is it still up on @Nature over a decade later.
Nature journal is bullshit now and was in 2008 and was before that too. It’s always been bullshit.
RT @0_minyaaa: 🤢🤮I cannot express how grossed out I was while reading it. I couldn't even finish it. Yeah sure it was "published" in 2008.…
RT @ravenscimaven: “Britney will pump out a lot of good data, but gradually, with her music, her intermittent marriages and pregnancies, no…
RT @nisslbodies: WTAF is this and why would Nature publish it? https://t.co/i6TAm4livD
RT @ravenscimaven: “Britney will pump out a lot of good data, but gradually, with her music, her intermittent marriages and pregnancies, no…
RT @AlyssaJGriffin: Who knew @nature publishes creepy misogynistic real person fan fiction? Someone please retract this garbage.
RT @nanopharmNC: when will Nature stop publishing this kind of trash....and we wonder why women aren't taken seriously https://t.co/w39WV3K…
This is bizarre https://t.co/0KsI26NgJr
RT @nisslbodies: WTAF is this and why would Nature publish it? https://t.co/i6TAm4livD
RT @nisslbodies: WTAF is this and why would Nature publish it? https://t.co/i6TAm4livD
RT @camurphy3: What - and I cannot emphasize this enough - the fuck is this? https://t.co/Oz12Mp7om9
RT @Helena_LB: I have no idea what I just read. https://t.co/8d8E8FOhNX
When I feel down I remember that articles like this are published in Nature
OnlyFans removes porn Nature finally makes the move from science to incel fanfic WHAT A TIME TO BE ALIVE
RT @ravenscimaven: “Britney will pump out a lot of good data, but gradually, with her music, her intermittent marriages and pregnancies, no…
RT @The_Gilp: Significance: 9 Innovation: 9 Approach: 9
from the "high impact" echelon of academia. gross. i'm going back to bed. way too early for this nonsense
Significance: 9 Innovation: 9 Approach: 9
RT @ravenscimaven: “Britney will pump out a lot of good data, but gradually, with her music, her intermittent marriages and pregnancies, no…
I’m glad it’s not just history journals which publish tosh. Also, which cities? https://t.co/oTVpD7WTUQ
When Vince LiCata shows us how gross he is. https://t.co/I7O4Xzf1Al
More humour in academia please!
RT @Helena_LB: I have no idea what I just read. https://t.co/8d8E8FOhNX
RT @xygalatas: Apparently, at some point @Nature decided they wanted to be more like Cosmopolitan, just dumber! https://t.co/5vxzjAwtNN
RT @ravenscimaven: “Britney will pump out a lot of good data, but gradually, with her music, her intermittent marriages and pregnancies, no…
RT @koen_hufkens: Want to get published by Nature? Don't do science, do creepy fiction! https://t.co/KL6rNmNcaT
RT @Helena_LB: I have no idea what I just read. https://t.co/8d8E8FOhNX