How this got to be published is astounding.
RT @susan_heavey: I've never managed to get a paper into Nature. But then again, I've never tried submitting a misogynistic daydream. 🙄 #ho…
RT @profstruggs: How in the holy fuck did this get published? https://t.co/f5QjBg78tS
RT @jesscaperson: In Nature https://t.co/F0UOhIhdFa
RT @AChillGhost: what on earth is this and why did Nature(!) publish it https://t.co/qyNqs97MdK https://t.co/yXAr4p6aWH
RT @susan_heavey: I've never managed to get a paper into Nature. But then again, I've never tried submitting a misogynistic daydream. 🙄 #ho…
RT @AChillGhost: what on earth is this and why did Nature(!) publish it https://t.co/qyNqs97MdK https://t.co/yXAr4p6aWH
RT @susan_heavey: I've never managed to get a paper into Nature. But then again, I've never tried submitting a misogynistic daydream. 🙄 #ho…
Someone posted this on reddit and what the actual FUCK is this... https://t.co/KBmlb669Nl
I clicked on this thinking, "it can't be THAT bad, can it?" It was worse 🤢
File under: capital-A academy H/t @FarnoshMaz
RT @NinaStrohminger: This article ("When Britney Spears comes to my lab") published in NATURE (!) is so absurdly creepy and sexist I can't…
RT @CathSuter: Dear @Nature please remove this offensive article https://t.co/DMq5kNrULZ And do better.
RT @nisslbodies: WTAF is this and why would Nature publish it? https://t.co/i6TAm4livD
RT @CathSuter: Dear @Nature please remove this offensive article https://t.co/DMq5kNrULZ And do better.
What the hell is that? When Britney Spears comes to my lab | Nature https://t.co/1GX4wgFxnE
cursed Nature paper https://t.co/XmEHEludRE
repulsive
Y'all why am I bothering spending so much time in the lab the perfect Nature article has already been written
RT @Fischblog: OK, bis vor 20 Sekunden dachte ich, das wär ein Witz. 😳 Was zum Henker?
How in the holy fuck did this get published? https://t.co/f5QjBg78tS
RT @Fischblog: OK, bis vor 20 Sekunden dachte ich, das wär ein Witz. 😳 Was zum Henker?
The everliving shit
RT @ravenscimaven: “Britney will pump out a lot of good data, but gradually, with her music, her intermittent marriages and pregnancies, no…
RT @camurphy3: What - and I cannot emphasize this enough - the fuck is this? https://t.co/Oz12Mp7om9
RT @Scilabus: Absolument détestable. @Nature, it's time to take it down. https://t.co/iaWeeGOQ2h
RT @nisslbodies: WTAF is this and why would Nature publish it? https://t.co/i6TAm4livD
In Nature
Yeah this is beyond gross
RT @susan_heavey: I've never managed to get a paper into Nature. But then again, I've never tried submitting a misogynistic daydream. 🙄 #ho…
Please select the type of paper: ⚪️ original research ⚪️ review article 🔘 fanfiction
RT @leslie_bern: What—and I cannot emphasize this part enough—the fuck is this https://t.co/O2noWKsPYk
RT @Scilabus: Absolument détestable. @Nature, it's time to take it down. https://t.co/iaWeeGOQ2h
RT @ravenscimaven: “Britney will pump out a lot of good data, but gradually, with her music, her intermittent marriages and pregnancies, no…
Absolument détestable. @Nature, it's time to take it down.
Who knew that what #BritneySpears really needed to be leading a life of value was to learn to pronounce words ‘correctly’ and start dressing modestly out of fear for her safety 🤢🤢🤢 Even for ‘08 this is bad
Published in Nature. I mean is this for real? What’s the point of this article except perpetuating #sexism ?!?! I am speechless 😶 https://t.co/Cxzi0WDlHg
RT @nisslbodies: WTAF is this and why would Nature publish it? https://t.co/i6TAm4livD
RT @ravenscimaven: “Britney will pump out a lot of good data, but gradually, with her music, her intermittent marriages and pregnancies, no…
RT @CathSuter: Dear @Nature please remove this offensive article https://t.co/DMq5kNrULZ And do better.
Anytime I have a commentary article rejected by @nature from this point on (which so far as been 100%) - I will remember that an editor thought publishing this was a great idea and then I feel better bc the bar literally couldn’t be any lower on this: htt
What the...?? (It's from 2008, but why was it published even then?)
Oops, she's probably been too busy sciencing while the guys have all that spare time to ship off fantasy pieces.
RT @AgTech_Monitor: . So much good content can be published in Nature... But this! https://t.co/4FqzAxnWGq
How in the name of god did this get published in Nature?! https://t.co/rhX6rnfiB1
RT @PaperWhispers: Article from 2008 and is as unhinged now as it was then. It is published by @Nature about Britney Spears potentially tak…
More generally, what's the point of this article? H/T @Fischblog
RT @ravenscimaven: “Britney will pump out a lot of good data, but gradually, with her music, her intermittent marriages and pregnancies, no…
RT @nisslbodies: WTAF is this and why would Nature publish it? https://t.co/i6TAm4livD
RT @itatiVCS: Man I cannot believe that Nature published this. Why am I an academic where my research will likely never have value bc in th…
RT @susan_heavey: I've never managed to get a paper into Nature. But then again, I've never tried submitting a misogynistic daydream. 🙄 #ho…
RT @camurphy3: What - and I cannot emphasize this enough - the fuck is this? https://t.co/Oz12Mp7om9
"Why, yes, I did publish in Nature".
Sometimes I write to these people with ideas for op-eds, they don't come back to me and I'm left thinking my thoughts are not that interesting. But then @Nature goes and publishes this. Just... WHY?! How does this go through editorial criteria? What does
I have so many questions about this https://t.co/gFO6rkStJv
And then Britney Spears breasted boobily towards the stairs, and titted downwards.
What on earth is this sexist trash? I feel like I just read a TMZ post masquerading as a Nature piece. When Britney Spears comes to my lab | Nature https://t.co/E7sjohle65
Hey @Nature, please take this down. Comedy really isn't your strong suit, particularly when it takes advantage of installed mysogyny. Thank you, Everyone.
RT @Fischblog: OK, bis vor 20 Sekunden dachte ich, das wär ein Witz. 😳 Was zum Henker?
This is problematic.. and not just because it has a pop star's name in it.. if I'm missing the humor that's supposed to be there in some form, someone let me know.. If this is supposed to be some form of insult comedy, nuh uh.. find another way please...
RT @CathSuter: Dear @Nature please remove this offensive article https://t.co/DMq5kNrULZ And do better.
RT @Fischblog: OK, bis vor 20 Sekunden dachte ich, das wär ein Witz. 😳 Was zum Henker? https://t.co/ANgFLwiohV
RT @camurphy3: What - and I cannot emphasize this enough - the fuck is this? https://t.co/Oz12Mp7om9
RT @Fischblog: OK, bis vor 20 Sekunden dachte ich, das wär ein Witz. 😳 Was zum Henker? https://t.co/ANgFLwiohV
Ich präsentiere den offiziellen Start des Sommerlochs: Empörungswelle über einen uralten Schundartikel im Fachmagazin @NaturePortfolio
RT @Fischblog: OK, bis vor 20 Sekunden dachte ich, das wär ein Witz. 😳 Was zum Henker? https://t.co/ANgFLwiohV
RT @Fischblog: OK, bis vor 20 Sekunden dachte ich, das wär ein Witz. 😳 Was zum Henker? https://t.co/ANgFLwiohV
Finns det någon på vetenskapstwitter som kan förklara den här för mig: https://t.co/fWpALxCVnX
What the hell is this? I also wasn't aware writing bizarre fiction was a way to get a nature paper.
RT @Fischblog: OK, bis vor 20 Sekunden dachte ich, das wär ein Witz. 😳 Was zum Henker?
Even though this came from @NatureFutures, a "creative outlet", this is prime /r/MenWritingWomen material.
RT @Fischblog: OK, bis vor 20 Sekunden dachte ich, das wär ein Witz. 😳 Was zum Henker? https://t.co/ANgFLwiohV
OK, bis vor 20 Sekunden dachte ich, das wär ein Witz. 😳 Was zum Henker?
RT @NinaStrohminger: This article ("When Britney Spears comes to my lab") published in NATURE (!) is so absurdly creepy and sexist I can't…
Man I cannot believe that Nature published this. Why am I an academic where my research will likely never have value bc in the wrong ethnicity and gender to be noticed but this Britney Spears fanfic can hit it big. just
This is downright misogynistic. I really cannot believe this is actually for real.
RT @camurphy3: What - and I cannot emphasize this enough - the fuck is this? https://t.co/Oz12Mp7om9
RT @CathSuter: Dear @Nature please remove this offensive article https://t.co/DMq5kNrULZ And do better.
RT @camurphy3: What - and I cannot emphasize this enough - the fuck is this? https://t.co/Oz12Mp7om9
RT @camurphy3: What - and I cannot emphasize this enough - the fuck is this? https://t.co/Oz12Mp7om9
RT @CathSuter: Dear @Nature please remove this offensive article https://t.co/DMq5kNrULZ And do better.
RT @ehdezsanabria: Cringing hard, is there any way to report this to someone, anyone? @SusannaLHarris @xiaofei_lin @IWS_Network @WomeninSTE…
@Nature did you loose your mind?! @britneyspears
RT @ravenscimaven: I was a minor when I started college. 16! I am so disgusted by this article. I would have been so disturbed being an @LS…
Seriously?! Published in @Nature ??!
RT @CathSuter: Dear @Nature please remove this offensive article https://t.co/DMq5kNrULZ And do better.
RT @LiisaGalea: Published in 2008 in Nature and freely accessible. Why @Nature why? #TakeItDown. I do not even understand the point of th…
Reading this made me want to commit a crime 🤮
Seriously, check it out yourself: https://t.co/qwocstfKh1
Ya know, I feel like I better understand why nature rejected my article. There just wasn't enough sexism in it smh. Live and learn.
RT @CathSuter: Dear @Nature please remove this offensive article https://t.co/DMq5kNrULZ And do better.
RT @CathSuter: Dear @Nature please remove this offensive article https://t.co/DMq5kNrULZ And do better.
RT @susan_heavey: I've never managed to get a paper into Nature. But then again, I've never tried submitting a misogynistic daydream. 🙄 #ho…
RT @lauren_dewsbury: WTF is this crap and how on earth is it published in @Nature of all places? Someone help me understand.
RT @whereisdaz: R U OK science? When Britney Spears comes to my lab 🤢 🤯 https://t.co/vldwD1ZQr7