RT @ravenscimaven: I was a minor when I started college. 16! I am so disgusted by this article. I would have been so disturbed being an @LS…
RT @ravenscimaven: “A particularly harrowing incident involving an autotitrator and a Lycra stretch top will induce her to dress more conse…
RT @ravenscimaven: “Britney will pump out a lot of good data, but gradually, with her music, her intermittent marriages and pregnancies, no…
Most of us couldn’t get anything published in nature but this was printed in 2008. This is disgusting
RT @ravenscimaven: “Britney will pump out a lot of good data, but gradually, with her music, her intermittent marriages and pregnancies, no…
RT @JenBalacco: I almost cannot believe what I just read @Nature. Unquestionably unacceptable, today and in 2008. Gross.
This piece sucks and it sucks that people saw fit to not only write it but actually publish it. Just... cancel all dudes. https://t.co/LkgbGZjlEE
RT @camurphy3: What - and I cannot emphasize this enough - the fuck is this? https://t.co/Oz12Mp7om9
RT @ravenscimaven: I was a minor when I started college. 16! I am so disgusted by this article. I would have been so disturbed being an @LS…
RT @ravenscimaven: “Britney will pump out a lot of good data, but gradually, with her music, her intermittent marriages and pregnancies, no…
I’m having flashbacks. It seems we’re living the same misogynistic time as when James Watson imagined Rosalind Franklin wearing a bit of lipstick to increase her appeal.... 😔
We can do better than avoiding this guy. Next tweet in this thread has his identity and his dept chair’s email: drop her a line.
RT @camurphy3: What - and I cannot emphasize this enough - the fuck is this? https://t.co/Oz12Mp7om9
WTF
Surely we can do better than that? A letter to their dept chair?
RT @ravenscimaven: “Britney will pump out a lot of good data, but gradually, with her music, her intermittent marriages and pregnancies, no…
RT @chrstn_e: from the "high impact" echelon of academia. gross. i'm going back to bed. way too early for this nonsense https://t.co/H3Lz5r…
Nature is publishing weird fanfiction? Wtf
How is this real?
WTF is this?
RT @GunnarBj: What opposite-of-fresh hell is this, Nature? https://t.co/dOLtMZpmKx
RT @ravenscimaven: “Britney will pump out a lot of good data, but gradually, with her music, her intermittent marriages and pregnancies, no…
Thank god this is from 1878 but still.
.@Nature published this in 2008. I missed it then. What. The. Actual. Fuck. Explain yourselves.
RT @evornithology: This is so dumb. Vince LiCata at LSU is dumb for writing it and Nature is dumb for publishing it.
I .... what?!?! What is this?!?!? This can’t be real. Is this a joke? A terrible, not funny at all joke?
I, I don’t understand what’s going on here… 😐 https://t.co/P3F4YLWsyl
RT @Helena_LB: I have no idea what I just read. https://t.co/8d8E8FOhNX
Nature must retract this article. It is not only immensely misogynistic and harmful to #WomenInSTEM but also perpetuates harm against a victim of abuse. So much for peer review 🤦🏻♀️
RT @nanopharmNC: when will Nature stop publishing this kind of trash....and we wonder why women aren't taken seriously
This is real, a 2008 publication in Nature entitled " When Britney Spears comes to my lab"
Wow, Rachel showed this to me and it's the most wildly sexist and patronizing thing I've read in a long time.
Tell me you, as an academic, think you're superior to everyone else, without telling me you think you're superior to everyone else...
RT @camurphy3: What - and I cannot emphasize this enough - the fuck is this? https://t.co/Oz12Mp7om9
RT @nisslbodies: WTAF is this and why would Nature publish it? https://t.co/i6TAm4livD
Excuse THE FUCK? https://t.co/dtQ5hVxRvj
What opposite-of-fresh hell is this, Nature? https://t.co/dOLtMZpmKx
RT @nisslbodies: WTAF is this and why would Nature publish it? https://t.co/i6TAm4livD
What the fuck
This is so dumb. Vince LiCata at LSU is dumb for writing it and Nature is dumb for publishing it.
RT @steppebioarch: Creepy, offensive, and sexist. At least this prof waves his red flags 🚩so people can avoid working with or for him….. ht…
RT @nisslbodies: WTAF is this and why would Nature publish it? https://t.co/i6TAm4livD
@dilophosour Here's the link. I'm still confused what the purpose of the article is. https://t.co/ELC4Vhw9WT
RT @Helena_LB: I have no idea what I just read. https://t.co/8d8E8FOhNX
RT @camurphy3: What - and I cannot emphasize this enough - the fuck is this? https://t.co/Oz12Mp7om9
RT @camurphy3: What - and I cannot emphasize this enough - the fuck is this? https://t.co/Oz12Mp7om9
RT @camurphy3: What - and I cannot emphasize this enough - the fuck is this? https://t.co/Oz12Mp7om9
RT @Dr_L_McCulloch: This is a little weird and disturbing to read. Why is this in @nature when science should be becoming more inclusive an…
What even is this?! https://t.co/VE3LjuRlA5
RT @AlyssaShearer4: thank you @Nature for publishing this misogynistic trash. Do you think this is how to get young women interested in STE…
RT @MadS100tist: Let's all agree we men should not write Editorials PERIOD
RT @ravenscimaven: I was a minor when I started college. 16! I am so disgusted by this article. I would have been so disturbed being an @LS…
RT @camurphy3: What - and I cannot emphasize this enough - the fuck is this? https://t.co/Oz12Mp7om9
RT @ravenscimaven: “Britney will pump out a lot of good data, but gradually, with her music, her intermittent marriages and pregnancies, no…
If Nature publishes this kind of stuff, I think I'll have 1000000% chances to have my papers published in there. What the hell?
Am I reading a smart article from New Yorker?
RT @camurphy3: What - and I cannot emphasize this enough - the fuck is this? https://t.co/Oz12Mp7om9
RT @camurphy3: What - and I cannot emphasize this enough - the fuck is this? https://t.co/Oz12Mp7om9
This is from 2008 but also don’t they retract bad papers?
Incredibly on brand for LSU. What is surprising is of *all* the things Nature could’ve dedicated their time and resources to, they chose this. 🙄
RT @steppebioarch: Creepy, offensive, and sexist. At least this prof waves his red flags 🚩so people can avoid working with or for him….. ht…
Dear @Nature: why would you publish this sexist drivel?
RT @ravenscimaven: “Britney will pump out a lot of good data, but gradually, with her music, her intermittent marriages and pregnancies, no…
RT @Scientific_Bird: Hilariously bizarre essay published in Nature in 2008 Source: https://t.co/apjI0VyoRP https://t.co/rUKU24XTK9
RT @ravenscimaven: “Britney will pump out a lot of good data, but gradually, with her music, her intermittent marriages and pregnancies, no…
RT @ravenscimaven: “Britney will pump out a lot of good data, but gradually, with her music, her intermittent marriages and pregnancies, no…
Reading this column in @Nature today about Britney Spears. I am not sure if I am wtf too explicit and borderline too much detail on what she is wearing or amazed by this funny Sci fi piece. What if she now moved to university in Louisiana? #FreeBrittney ht
What kind of weird misogynistic fanfiction is this??
@Nature instead of this crap, what about taking my next article providing important leads for lung probiotics. Thanks in adv ! I need it for getting a tenure since no one will settle for anything less than your “high quality” journal.
.@lsuscience - Do you have anything to say about this misogynistic drivel from one of your endowed professors?
RT @ravenscimaven: “Britney will pump out a lot of good data, but gradually, with her music, her intermittent marriages and pregnancies, no…
@nature, this was awful when it was published and is awful now. Do better. Gross.
The irony isn't lost on me that Nature would publish something at the expense of a victim of a number of controlling abusive relationships. https://t.co/fRnCEtp70S
RT @camurphy3: What - and I cannot emphasize this enough - the fuck is this? https://t.co/Oz12Mp7om9
?¿
This is a little weird and disturbing to read. Why is this in @nature when science should be becoming more inclusive and not written from the view of "funny" misogyny and the patriarchy https://t.co/d5H8vDUcDH
What the... https://t.co/CsvxVKL8B7
WTAF! @Nature This is not funny by any standards (and I'm fully aware that I have high standards as a humourless German). It's disgusting and cringey. Just don't publish stuff like this, please!
RT @ravenscimaven: “Britney will pump out a lot of good data, but gradually, with her music, her intermittent marriages and pregnancies, no…
Didn't realise nature published wattpad fan fics..
RT @nisslbodies: WTAF is this and why would Nature publish it? https://t.co/i6TAm4livD
What da fxxk did I just read???
I am so deadly confused right now
This is one of the most bizarre things I've ever read. Holy hell what is wrong with academics.
RT @steppebioarch: Creepy, offensive, and sexist. At least this prof waves his red flags 🚩so people can avoid working with or for him….. ht…
What. https://t.co/KA5uPF4muj
Was there a publishing fee? If so, why? If not, why? How bizarre.
RT @camurphy3: What - and I cannot emphasize this enough - the fuck is this? https://t.co/Oz12Mp7om9
Wow, this is a particularly nauseating mixture of condescension and stereotyping, well done for pointing it out @palankarr #heforshe
What the actual fuck.
RT @ravenscimaven: I was a minor when I started college. 16! I am so disgusted by this article. I would have been so disturbed being an @LS…
When you can barely publish things in small journals but this dude published Britney Spears fanfic in Nature back in 2008
This Nature article is insaneeeeeee in all the worst ways
RT @ravenscimaven: “Britney will pump out a lot of good data, but gradually, with her music, her intermittent marriages and pregnancies, no…
RT @forensictoxguy: Nature journal is bullshit now and was in 2008 and was before that too. It’s always been bullshit.
WHAT IS THIS???? 👁👄👁 🙈🙉🙊 https://t.co/20xQQSbDif
So especially in light of what we now know about Britney's conservatorship, this hot 2008 take on how girls are silly and must be taught to wear better clothing and keep their legs shut to be scientists is... 🤮🤮🤮🤮
Misogyny in academia, Exhibit A. Apparently Nature endorses male PIs objectifying and sexualizing young women in their labs.
RT @Scientific_Bird: Hilariously bizarre essay published in Nature in 2008 Source: https://t.co/apjI0VyoRP https://t.co/rUKU24XTK9
RT @camurphy3: What - and I cannot emphasize this enough - the fuck is this? https://t.co/Oz12Mp7om9