RT @ravenscimaven: “Britney will pump out a lot of good data, but gradually, with her music, her intermittent marriages and pregnancies, no…
R U OK science? When Britney Spears comes to my lab 🤢 🤯 https://t.co/vldwD1ZQr7
RT @MaryPoffenroth: Looks like @Nature just became @TheOnion ... 🤦♀️ "When Britney Spears comes to my lab" is incredibly misogynistic, as…
RT @ravenscimaven: “Britney will pump out a lot of good data, but gradually, with her music, her intermittent marriages and pregnancies, no…
@camurphy3 this is the status quo. Misogyny in medicine, hidden in plain sight. Also, a factual error: I can confirm with confidence that there is no one at St. Jude who “will realize that beneath that spandex and body glitter is the heart of a dedicated
Cringing hard, is there any way to report this to someone, anyone? @SusannaLHarris @xiaofei_lin @IWS_Network @WomeninSTEM___? #AcademicChatter #sexism https://t.co/reDf8gcalT
Have we gotten any answers on how this got published? Is this some prank or is it actually a paper that got through all the usual publication obstacles? Is this what all papers are like in some field?
@TrackingActions @camurphy3 @Nature @nature take that monstruosity down. It’s beyond any caricature of sexism. https://t.co/fli8G2t1uT
RT @camurphy3: What - and I cannot emphasize this enough - the fuck is this? https://t.co/Oz12Mp7om9
RT @nisslbodies: WTAF is this and why would Nature publish it? https://t.co/i6TAm4livD
Fantastic! https://t.co/tpw48PYmo2
In NATURE. 1 citation too 😂😂😂
RT @Rachel_K_Meade: Nature must retract this article. It is not only immensely misogynistic and harmful to #WomenInSTEM but also perpetua…
RT @SocraticaKim: Thank you @ravenscimaven for bringing this article to my attention. If everyone who objects to this kind of gross treatme…
RT @BaharTuncgenc: #AcademicTwitter, #WomenInSTEM please help me... what on earth is the moral of this @Nature article?!? Conservative dre…
RT @LeaMcGeever: My spin on this @Nature article: When Anthony Fauci comes to my lab. Now that's what I call misogyny culture! https://t.c…
I just... don’t view Nat*re as that desirable of a place to publish anymore. This piece of absolute creepiness is not the first strike.
RT @YoYoItsZo: What, and I cannot stress this enough, the fuck. This is one of the most bizarre, creepy things I’ve read and it’s published…
RT @CathSuter: Dear @Nature please remove this offensive article https://t.co/DMq5kNrULZ And do better.
Ummm, apparently Nature published fan fiction now.....
RT @susan_heavey: I've never managed to get a paper into Nature. But then again, I've never tried submitting a misogynistic daydream. 🙄 #ho…
@PantheraLeigha @E_Carlen @Nature It appears to be very real... and from 2008. https://t.co/HPL0euUt1j
Pardon my french but the fuck is this shit...
RT @Dr_L_McCulloch: This is a little weird and disturbing to read. Why is this in @nature when science should be becoming more inclusive an…
RT @camurphy3: What - and I cannot emphasize this enough - the fuck is this? https://t.co/Oz12Mp7om9
This article is still up on Nature btw. Just when I think nothing can shock me anymore, life throws gems like these at me. Wow. I'm too angry rn to put into words my feelings about this. https://t.co/wHfrEby7p7 https://t.co/s95xVvycLS
Published in 2008 in Nature and freely accessible. Why @Nature why? #TakeItDown. I do not even understand the point of this except misogyny?
Why does this even exist???!!
RT @camurphy3: What - and I cannot emphasize this enough - the fuck is this? https://t.co/Oz12Mp7om9
RT @paulisci: Why you shouldn't always be impressed when someone says they have a Nature publication.
RT @camurphy3: What - and I cannot emphasize this enough - the fuck is this? https://t.co/Oz12Mp7om9
This 2008 article is absurdly misogynistic, and I can't imagine why/how it was published. https://t.co/qwdceoIJNm
Why you shouldn't always be impressed when someone says they have a Nature publication.
This is the grossest thing I have ever read. Like a sexist Britney Spears LSU fan fiction? Ew. So creeped out right now.
The fuck Nature?
RT @camurphy3: What - and I cannot emphasize this enough - the fuck is this? https://t.co/Oz12Mp7om9
How to put a whole generation of women off science in one article, the fact this is in nature is beyond insane 🤦🏼♀️
This piece was offensive and stupid in 2008.
RT @susan_heavey: I've never managed to get a paper into Nature. But then again, I've never tried submitting a misogynistic daydream. 🙄 #ho…
@LeaMcGeever @Nature Why was this article ever published, and in a "prestigious" journal? https://t.co/KQtIkdJxVd
what the actual fuck
RT @susan_heavey: I've never managed to get a paper into Nature. But then again, I've never tried submitting a misogynistic daydream. 🙄 #ho…
It’s too hot in Seattle for me to process this raw effluvium. https://t.co/3TX9NkNqdE
What in the cringey science fanfic did I just read?
Wow they just publish anything in nature nowadays…they’ve taken the #PublishOrPerish mindset toooo far smh https://t.co/7MnjkhcpcP
RT @chris_bail: Quite possibly the most disturbing “journal article” I’ve ever read.
This reads like fanfic from someone who believes so little of women and so highly of himself that only he can show someone like Britney (and we know exactly why he chose Britney of all people) the joys of science...
Finally gave this a read and i am so confused. Why? What is this?
When Britney Spears comes to my lab | Nature https://t.co/H3PLlTpKPD
So *this* is how you get published in Nature https://t.co/19bItSoiTF
Absolutely disgusting misogyny aside, I'm so confused about why this exists. What did the author hope to gain by writing this? Why tf did Nature publish this?
Doesn’t surprise me coming from the same journal that declared women mentors in science lead to worse career prospects…
RT @susan_heavey: I've never managed to get a paper into Nature. But then again, I've never tried submitting a misogynistic daydream. 🙄 #ho…
No fr wtf 🤣
RT @camurphy3: What - and I cannot emphasize this enough - the fuck is this? https://t.co/Oz12Mp7om9
RT @susan_heavey: I've never managed to get a paper into Nature. But then again, I've never tried submitting a misogynistic daydream. 🙄 #ho…
RT @ravenscimaven: “Britney will pump out a lot of good data, but gradually, with her music, her intermittent marriages and pregnancies, no…
Cite this weirdly horny, Amelia-Bedelia-like, Britney Spears nature article as my cause of death
RT @camurphy3: What - and I cannot emphasize this enough - the fuck is this? https://t.co/Oz12Mp7om9
RT @camurphy3: What - and I cannot emphasize this enough - the fuck is this? https://t.co/Oz12Mp7om9
RT @FluffyDoom: Associate professor publishes paper in Nature, a weird fanfic about Brittany Spears https://t.co/7YvMBFoan5
Quite possibly the most disturbing “journal article” I’ve ever read.
RT @johnpmillscom: I’m all for the use of creative non-fiction in academia to break down barriers and connect with different groups. This i…
What’s the JIF of Nature?
What the actual heck is this
RT @ravenscimaven: “Britney will pump out a lot of good data, but gradually, with her music, her intermittent marriages and pregnancies, no…
From 2008... And nobody noticed this before... 🤯
Wtaf is this article?! This went through peer review?
RT @ravenscimaven: “Britney will pump out a lot of good data, but gradually, with her music, her intermittent marriages and pregnancies, no…
This isn’t paywalled, but by the time you get to the end you’ll sure wish it had been.
Everyone involved with this is gross
¿Qué acabo de leer? 😶😐 https://t.co/gCSXtjvIeh
@ProfRobHoward Journal choice is not always fool proof - this from nature https://t.co/sbbSXWixkT
Imagine being a female student of this professor who writes about a young woman like this in a journal. Or a female scientist trying to get published by @Nature. h/t @ravenscimaven https://t.co/B82fMlSTuw https://t.co/wYfe4XapNC
I thought this was a joke. A faith shattering one. But tis real.
¿Qué coño hace una revista STEM "opinando" sobre la vida de una artista? Qué asco que hasta @Nature haya sido participe del bullying que le montaron a Britney en 2008. Qué asco el hombrecito "científico" que escribió ese artículo. The real what the fuck!
I feel sooo bad for anyone seeing this who's had a legitimate paper rejected from Nature before
RT @camurphy3: What - and I cannot emphasize this enough - the fuck is this? https://t.co/Oz12Mp7om9
RT @NinaStrohminger: This article ("When Britney Spears comes to my lab") published in NATURE (!) is so absurdly creepy and sexist I can't…
RT @SchiavoneSays: Seriously how did this get published in @Nature? Makes me wonder how many women had their submissions rejected from Na…
Seriously how did this get published in @Nature? Makes me wonder how many women had their submissions rejected from Nature around this time only to see this sexist, condescending, and objectifying fan fiction get accepted.
I don't know what's worse... A) the fact this is published in a *scientific* journal B) someone (one person) has actually cited this
RT @0_minyaaa: 🤢🤮I cannot express how grossed out I was while reading it. I couldn't even finish it. Yeah sure it was "published" in 2008.…
RT @kirstinferguson: In 2008 when the world was gawking as #BritneySpears experienced serious mental health issues, the respected science j…
RT @camurphy3: What - and I cannot emphasize this enough - the fuck is this? https://t.co/Oz12Mp7om9
RT @camurphy3: What - and I cannot emphasize this enough - the fuck is this? https://t.co/Oz12Mp7om9
RT @susan_heavey: I've never managed to get a paper into Nature. But then again, I've never tried submitting a misogynistic daydream. 🙄 #ho…
I’m all for the use of creative non-fiction in academia to break down barriers and connect with different groups. This is a bit creepy though. And in Nature. Who submits this to Nature? Don’t ever tell me I have to get a ‘Nature paper’ again.
This was published in Nature in 2008. We have come so far...and yet people wonder why women leave science and academia.
RT @ravenscimaven: “Britney will pump out a lot of good data, but gradually, with her music, her intermittent marriages and pregnancies, no…
RT @camurphy3: What - and I cannot emphasize this enough - the fuck is this? https://t.co/Oz12Mp7om9
Wtf!
A reminder to academics that the internet is very much a permanent place and your bad takes from 13 years ago can and will return to disgrace you.
RT @camurphy3: What - and I cannot emphasize this enough - the fuck is this? https://t.co/Oz12Mp7om9
“I'll teach Britney not to chew gum over the experiments, how to untangle her hair from the pH meter”. Scathingly sexist article. Only 13 years ago from a leading international journal. Gender equality has come a long way since then but not far enough. htt
what the hell is this "article"