RT @NicoleBarbaro: Nature Comms releases updated peer review guidelines for social and behavioral science studies that may cause concern af…
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
RT @peiferlabunc: Glad to see this retracted but the fact that it was publishe din the original form casts serious doubt on the quality of…
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
Good riddance!
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
Authors retract the Nature Communication paper with faulty conclusions about mentorship and editors reflect on the response from the scientific community https://t.co/1GC3aaloK5 https://t.co/Om8wntMdFk
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
RT @millerjm86: Well, over a month later and the "problematic" #WomenInSTEM paper from @NatureComms has been retracted https://t.co/vwqP6k…
This excuse from @NatureComms doesn't exactly fill one with confidence: "We selected the paper for publication because we believe that mentorship in academia is an important and understudied area of research." https://t.co/DX6S8wP3OI
At the ALBA Network, we are very happy our letter had the intended impact, and we encourage @NatureComms in reviewing their editorial practices and their reinforced commitment to equity and inclusion in research.
Good news!
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
RT @millerjm86: Well, over a month later and the "problematic" #WomenInSTEM paper from @NatureComms has been retracted https://t.co/vwqP6k…
The infamous Nat Comms mentorship paper has been retracted (by the authors). The journal explains the process and indicates changes in internal guidelines of handling "sensitive research". Potential harm is to be taken into account. https://t.co/6nptpuC8TD
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
RT @RocioDeanna: Finally retracted! 💪
RT @millerjm86: Well, over a month later and the "problematic" #WomenInSTEM paper from @NatureComms has been retracted https://t.co/vwqP6k…
RT @RocioDeanna: Finally retracted! 💪 https://t.co/8suKcFriTf
Finally, retracted💪💪 @NatureComms @argplantwomen @ASPB_WiPB @500womensci @365BotanyWomen @WomenScienceRFS
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
Well, over a month later and the "problematic" #WomenInSTEM paper from @NatureComms has been retracted https://t.co/vwqP6kWewJ Note from the authors https://t.co/4fFXwoREk6 1/
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
RT @DaviesswPhD: Happy to see this paper retracted and it has been exciting to witness the academic community reflecting on mentorship. Hap…
LOL @NatureComms's non-apology for "any unintended harm" for saying female mentors are terrible. I'd accept a honest "our clickbait editorial policy publishing bad science despite reviewers' concern was caught. We won't do it again" #phdchat #PeerReview h
RT @KrishnanYamuna: Ok: That article which said if you have a female mentor you’re screwed? It’s retracted. Thank you those who led from th…
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
Should not have been published in the first place but at least the right outcome has followed, and the paper retracted 👏👏👏https://t.co/lInhoz9Zfe
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
RT @peiferlabunc: Glad to see this retracted but the fact that it was publishe din the original form casts serious doubt on the quality of…
RT @schneiderleonid: .@NatureComms declares British eugenics as solid science, but sexism by Arabs will not be tolerated. https://t.co/BQDS…
https://t.co/Y4D9swgBew @network_alba @pollyp1 @HarmitMalik The paper is retracted!
“Simply being uncomfortable with the conclusions of a published paper, would and should not lead to retraction on this basis alone...In this case, the conclusions turned out not to be supported, and we apologise to the research community for any unintended
RT @peiferlabunc: Glad to see this retracted but the fact that it was publishe din the original form casts serious doubt on the quality of…
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
Glad to see this retracted but the fact that it was publishe din the original form casts serious doubt on the quality of review @NatureComms https://t.co/NGjVEIGswr
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
RT @Ale_Bortolus: El #Género no tiene ningún conflicto con la #Tutoría en #Academia, ... a menos que Ud introduzca el conflicto con una per…
RT @RocioDeanna: Finally retracted! 💪
RT @NicoleBarbaro: Nature Comms releases updated peer review guidelines for social and behavioral science studies that may cause concern af…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
Wow -- so retraction comes from inability to directly associate co-author with mentorship, not gross misinterpretation of the data......
Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-authorship cannot be extended to informal mentorship... As such, the paper’s conclusions in their current form do not stand” https://t.co/FWB
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @KrishnanYamuna: Ok: That article which said if you have a female mentor you’re screwed? It’s retracted. Thank you those who led from th…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @DaviesswPhD: Happy to see this paper retracted and it has been exciting to witness the academic community reflecting on mentorship. Hap…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
Retracted
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
In accompanying editorial the journal argues that retraction was not driven by the public outrage. But I cannot shake off the feeling that the retraction is somewhat vanilla... 6/ https://t.co/XoSWKfucqd
RT @Ale_Bortolus: El #Género no tiene ningún conflicto con la #Tutoría en #Academia, ... a menos que Ud introduzca el conflicto con una per…
Good to see this flawed and harmful article retracted. Hope both authors and editors will be more thoughtful in the future about avoiding sexist biases and confounds creeping into research.
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
Happy to see this paper retracted and it has been exciting to witness the academic community reflecting on mentorship. Happy Monday y'all!
RT @Ale_Bortolus: El #Género no tiene ningún conflicto con la #Tutoría en #Academia, ... a menos que Ud introduzca el conflicto con una per…
A not sorry sorry? The paper has been retracted (not worth adding more clicks to the authors' paper so not posting)....And it's led Nature Comm. to evaluate their review process......but still Regarding mentorship https://t.co/rKje4N6zyT
It seems that the last breath of 2020 is putting some things back in their place. This very unfortunate paper is still very illustrative on how "mentorship" or "excellence" is missunderstood and (another) evidence on how gender-biased are publication recor
Nature Comms releases updated peer review guidelines for social and behavioral science studies that may cause concern after the controversial ‘female mentorship’ paper was published in Nov, which the authors have now retracted on Dec 21. https://t.co/PU0o
RT @KrishnanYamuna: Ok: That article which said if you have a female mentor you’re screwed? It’s retracted. Thank you those who led from th…
Good news, the Nature Comms paper about mentorship has been retracted. Thank you! https://t.co/AD1KCALwaH
RT @jenpluznick: The @NatureComms paper which (erroneously) concluded that women in science fare better if they have male mentors has been…
The @NatureComms paper which (erroneously) concluded that women in science fare better if they have male mentors has been retracted.
Ok: That article which said if you have a female mentor you’re screwed? It’s retracted. Thank you those who led from the front. @pollyp1 @HarmitMalik
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
And finally Retracted !!!
Retractado! Excelentes noticias! @CientificasEC
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @RocioDeanna: Finally retracted! 💪 https://t.co/8suKcFriTf
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
Finally retracted! 💪
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
The retractation of this paper is an excellent news for those who truely devote time to true mentoring 👏👍
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
Oooh it's been retracted. Good.