RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
@HarknessMoodlab @SarivanAnders @QueensPsyc
A win for science! 🙏
RT @NicoleBarbaro: Nature Comms releases updated peer review guidelines for social and behavioral science studies that may cause concern af…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
And there is also an editorial with welcome editorial initiatives. https://t.co/2yLOjA6lEB https://t.co/YXnSoVjyD0
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @SVergult: Regarding mentorship and a retracted paper 👇https://t.co/g5R4Q4tw6F
RT @SVergult: Regarding mentorship and a retracted paper 👇https://t.co/g5R4Q4tw6F
Well done! 👏
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
"In this case, the conclusions turned out not to be supported, and we apologise to the research community for any unintended harm derived from the publication of this paper." https://t.co/ts8Cft5xwU
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
Glad to see they retracted this methodologically flawed and highly offensive paper
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @EPoe187: Elite science journals are so woke that they are terrified that publishing certain results is “harmful” to perceived victims g…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @NicoleBarbaro: Nature Comms releases updated peer review guidelines for social and behavioral science studies that may cause concern af…
"The publication of a paper on mentorship, now retracted, led us to reflect on our editorial processes and strengthened our determination in supporting diversity, equity and inclusion in research." @NatureComms https://t.co/qAUXWPKSdg
RT @CMHenstridge: @SMDS_research You'll be pleased to see this has now been retracted! https://t.co/KKIahvHpUs
RT @EPoe187: Elite science journals are so woke that they are terrified that publishing certain results is “harmful” to perceived victims g…
Retracted. The scientific community at work. https://t.co/PQx34V1wP3
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @millerjm86: Well, over a month later and the "problematic" #WomenInSTEM paper from @NatureComms has been retracted https://t.co/vwqP6k…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
"The Authors are retracting this Article in response to criticisms about the assumptions underpinning the Article in terms of the identification of mentorship relationships and the measure of mentorship quality, challenging the interpretation of the conclu
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RETRACTED. Merry Christmas everyone
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @beane_laura: Retraction of paper on the role of gender on mentoring relationships, or more accurately, the role of gender in co-authors…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
I see Nature has reevaluated the "mentorship" paper that had come under criticism. I also see that the comment thread is full of people crying censorship! and left-wing mob! I doubt that any of them have read and understood the reviewer reports. 1/
It’s about time 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
This is just unsustainable.
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
Finalmente se retira artículo que mencionaba conclusiones sesgadas en contra de las mentorías de académicas mujeres por sobre las de hombres
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @jenpluznick: The @NatureComms paper which (erroneously) concluded that women in science fare better if they have male mentors has been…
The publication of a paper on mentorship, now retracted, led us to reflect on our editorial processes and strengthened our determination in supporting diversity, equity and inclusion in research. https://t.co/fTGKjCSTl4
RT @MariaPiquerR: The paper from Alshebli et al. on #mentoring has been RETRACTED by @NatureComms 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
Not sure I understand the retraction note? We're the data correct? Was an issue of interpretation? Why the mentorship/co-authorship concern was not spotted in the first round of revison? What they mean by 'operationalisation'? 🤔
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @NicoleBarbaro: Nature Comms releases updated peer review guidelines for social and behavioral science studies that may cause concern af…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
RT @argplantwomen: Finally, retracted💪💪 @NatureComms @argplantwomen @ASPB_WiPB @500womensci @365BotanyWomen @WomenScienceRFS
RT @LucoReini: Good news, the Nature Comms paper about mentorship has been retracted. Thank you! https://t.co/AD1KCALwaH
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @jenpluznick: The @NatureComms paper which (erroneously) concluded that women in science fare better if they have male mentors has been…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @TOOEdit: Identity politics canceling science: "As part of these guidelines, we recognise that it is essential to ensure that such studi…
RT @DaviesswPhD: Happy to see this paper retracted and it has been exciting to witness the academic community reflecting on mentorship. Hap…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @angiegomeza: Retractado! Excelentes noticias! @CientificasEC
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @angiegomeza: Retractado! Excelentes noticias! @CientificasEC
RT @millerjm86: Well, over a month later and the "problematic" #WomenInSTEM paper from @NatureComms has been retracted https://t.co/vwqP6k…
Lysenko smiles... https://t.co/xylZwvgZzv
RT @Johanna_A_Joyce: @NatureComms The @NatureComms retraction has come today, following an independent investigation. Now, lets begin to t…
RT @Johanna_A_Joyce: @NatureComms The @NatureComms retraction has come today, following an independent investigation. Now, lets begin to t…
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
A small step forward after a giant leap back. #womeninscience #WomenInMedicine https://t.co/RAaLPfLWVs
@NatureComms has retracted 'The association between early career informal mentorship in academic collaborations and junior author performance' https://t.co/LOR4qRcNzO
@NatureComms The @NatureComms retraction has come today, following an independent investigation. Now, lets begin to try & fix all the damage that was done.. #WomeninSTEM https://t.co/POsOGwFwoQ
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
Well about time
Hallelujah 🙏🏻
Good news, but the damage has been done
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @network_alba: At the ALBA Network, we are very happy our letter had the intended impact, and we encourage @NatureComms in reviewing the…
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
A month later: “...Not supported by data”!!!
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
"Simply being uncomfortable with the conclusions of a published paper, would and should not lead to retraction on this basis alone. If the research question is important, and the conclusions sound and valid, however controversial, there can be merit..." ht
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
Remember: not having the privilege(s) of a 1st world straight white male doesn't make you a worse mentor. Science needs to step up diversity and inclusion. ⚧️♀️♂️ Cheers #PhDlife/#Phdvoice/@OpenAcademics ! 👯♂️👫👭👬🧑🤝🧑 🥼🧬🧫🧪⚗️🔬🔭 ❤️🧡💛💚💙💜🤎🖤🤍
Yes! Thanks to those voices who spoke out! Mentorship by women and of women is just as successful and supportive! Regarding mentorship | Nature Communications https://t.co/lWK5iGNrbX
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @network_alba: At the ALBA Network, we are very happy our letter had the intended impact, and we encourage @NatureComms in reviewing the…
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…