RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
Nature’s reputation is significantly affected since the article discussed was published, but this is a step the right direction! https://t.co/ntc58psSqh
More from Nature editors on the retraction decision. "criticisms from readers revolved around the validity of the conclusions in light of the available data, assumptions made and methodology used. In particular..." https://t.co/tvDmc8H8Tt @nature #Academic
RT @network_alba: At the ALBA Network, we are very happy our letter had the intended impact, and we encourage @NatureComms in reviewing the…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @GabeFilippelli: So, remember that paper in @NatureComms arguing that female faculty make bad mentors? Retracted Not because the "find…
RT @GabeFilippelli: So, remember that paper in @NatureComms arguing that female faculty make bad mentors? Retracted Not because the "find…
RT @GabeFilippelli: So, remember that paper in @NatureComms arguing that female faculty make bad mentors? Retracted Not because the "find…
Haven’t read the retraction note because, paywall, but I think this is good news?
RT @CatherineFreije: Mentorship is a key component of both career and personal development, and this is a reminder that thoughtful and rigo…
RT @MaintainGenome: Authors retract the Nature Communication paper with faulty conclusions about mentorship and editors reflect on the resp…
RT @ImHardcory: 1. The paper 'The association between early career informal mentorship in academic collaborations and junior author perform…
RT @claire_horwell: THAT paper has been retracted, after investigation by @NatureComms. Poor research with unsupported conclusions. Should…
RT @GabeFilippelli: So, remember that paper in @NatureComms arguing that female faculty make bad mentors? Retracted Not because the "find…
Proper order.
RT @claire_horwell: THAT paper has been retracted, after investigation by @NatureComms. Poor research with unsupported conclusions. Should…
THAT paper has been retracted, after investigation by @NatureComms. Poor research with unsupported conclusions. Should never have been published. As a female mentor and mentee, I hope this paper has not harmed anyone; we must continue to support each other
So, remember that paper in @NatureComms arguing that female faculty make bad mentors? Retracted Not because the "findings" were unpopular, but because the science was wrong Frankly, surprised that it got through peer review based on this analysis https:
RT @CatherineFreije: Mentorship is a key component of both career and personal development, and this is a reminder that thoughtful and rigo…
In an editorial accompanying the retraction, the editors argue that this was not a case of retracting a paper just because some found it distasteful, but that there were serious issues in the methods. https://t.co/jrfx8TpLdF
"Readers criticised the use of co-authorship as a measure of mentorship, and citations as a measure of success of the mentoring relationship." Did it need retracting due to unvalidated #bibliometrics? I don't know, but after post-publication #peerreview th
RT @KrishnanYamuna: Ok: That article which said if you have a female mentor you’re screwed? It’s retracted. Thank you those who led from th…
RT @KrishnanYamuna: Ok: That article which said if you have a female mentor you’re screwed? It’s retracted. Thank you those who led from th…
RT @KrishnanYamuna: Ok: That article which said if you have a female mentor you’re screwed? It’s retracted. Thank you those who led from th…
RT @KrishnanYamuna: Ok: That article which said if you have a female mentor you’re screwed? It’s retracted. Thank you those who led from th…
RT @KrishnanYamuna: Ok: That article which said if you have a female mentor you’re screwed? It’s retracted. Thank you those who led from th…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @MaintainGenome: Authors retract the Nature Communication paper with faulty conclusions about mentorship and editors reflect on the resp…
RT @evivyop: Je ne suis pas certain que cette révolution culturelle soit un grand bond en avant ! Quand je vois dit que je suis atterré pa…
RT @millerjm86: Well, over a month later and the "problematic" #WomenInSTEM paper from @NatureComms has been retracted https://t.co/vwqP6k…
A controversial article in which the authors claim that female academics with female mentors have worse career trajectories has been retracted from @NatureComms. The editors makes note that this was a result of concerns with the methods. https://t.co/Y5w
RT @Raamana_: LOL @NatureComms's non-apology for "any unintended harm" for saying female mentors are terrible. I'd accept a honest "our cli…
RT @AmandaVincent1: Nature Comms has retracted shoddy article on mentorship. Its editorial about this retraction is worth reading. Some of…
RT @squazzoni: These authors could have dispensed more "would" and "could" in their text instead of causal claims, if any, but this controv…
RT @squazzoni: These authors could have dispensed more "would" and "could" in their text instead of causal claims, if any, but this controv…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
@ianhazlitt Los críticos sí señalaron errores concretos, como se puede leer en el editorial de Nature Communications, y de hecho refutan directamente esa acusación: https://t.co/O9vQ2k05Wj https://t.co/Zs3yNr0xoJ
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @squazzoni: These authors could have dispensed more "would" and "could" in their text instead of causal claims, if any, but this controv…
These authors could have dispensed more "would" and "could" in their text instead of causal claims, if any, but this controversy has gone too far. This was not a paper to be retracted. We have replications for alternative measurements and to assess alterna
RT @AliseCurin: En el especial de @Barbijaputa de ayer, comentamos entre brujas el reciente artículo científico de Nature sobre las mentora…
RT @sNeuroble: The authors have retracted their article linking women to less successful mentorship. Due to unaccounted bias undermining th…
The infamous @nature article about the pitfalls of female mentorship has been retracted. The editors have published this comment regarding the retraction, which happened yesterday. https://t.co/uvOaaYmRa1
You can find Nature's obsequiously transparent ridiculous justification for the retraction here: https://t.co/C1LhFazu6p
And here: https://t.co/PM7TI7zlaf
Links here: https://t.co/PM7TI7zlaf
RT @thegeekgineer: Amigos de @pcoffeebreak , hablaréis sobre este cambio editorial? alrededor hay mucho ruido y como siempre... poca señal…
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
https://t.co/VvgqqdBpYL… hmmmmmmm so is the other paper gonna be removed as well that used same other and same methodology? Or is that OK since you liked the outcome? Lol "science"... astrology more like it. Read my palm?
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…