Ilya Kashnitsky
Yet another valid re-analysis from Saul Newman and Simon Eastealhttps://doi.org/10.1101/124800
Yet another valid re-analysis from Saul Newman and Simon Eastealhttps://doi.org/10.1101/124800
another opinion piece published here:https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2016/12/09/how-weak-science-slipped-past-through-review-and-landed-in-a-top-journal-a1535637
I think the best explanation comes from Adam Lenart's analyis (https://github.com/adamlenart/rstuff/blob/master/supercentenarian/sample_size...
The sensational statement of this paper is, in my opinion, not supported with the analysis. I wrote my arguments in a post-publication review at Publonshttps://publons...
There is an interesting writeup on this paper, including an interview with the reviewers, online: https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2016/12/09/how-weak-science-slipped-past-through-review-and-landed-in-a-top-j…
Figure 6 of the paper does not represent the GRG data it is based on.
Reanalysis of the evidence for a limit to human…
A cohort is not representative of…
Comments about Vijg Letter and Olshansky commentary in Nature 5 October 2016…