↓ Skip to main content

Evidence for a limit to human lifespan

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
284 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
840 Mendeley
citeulike
10 CiteULike
Title
Evidence for a limit to human lifespan
Published in
Nature, October 2016
DOI 10.1038/nature19793
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiao Dong, Brandon Milholland, Jan Vijg

Abstract

Driven by technological progress, human life expectancy has increased greatly since the nineteenth century. Demographic evidence has revealed an ongoing reduction in old-age mortality and a rise of the maximum age at death, which may gradually extend human longevity. Together with observations that lifespan in various animal species is flexible and can be increased by genetic or pharmaceutical intervention, these results have led to suggestions that longevity may not be subject to strict, species-specific genetic constraints. Here, by analysing global demographic data, we show that improvements in survival with age tend to decline after age 100, and that the age at death of the world's oldest person has not increased since the 1990s. Our results strongly suggest that the maximum lifespan of humans is fixed and subject to natural constraints.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,136 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 840 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
France 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
China 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 813 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 164 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 150 18%
Student > Bachelor 121 14%
Student > Master 92 11%
Professor 58 7%
Other 159 19%
Unknown 96 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 172 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 170 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 100 12%
Social Sciences 42 5%
Neuroscience 41 5%
Other 185 22%
Unknown 130 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3286. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,362
of 21,236,872 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#158
of 87,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12
of 292,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#3
of 1,036 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,236,872 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 87,491 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 97.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,371 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,036 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.