RT @SuperScienceGrl: This now-retracted paper simply didn't provide any useful conclusions, and the assumptions were woeful. As the editors…
【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of female mentors on the future productivity of female trainees. https://t.co/qIU89Vp72i
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
it. "Upon publication, it became clear that the concerns had not been sufficiently addressed.." (editorial note https://t.co/0mHHsBU5O5) To me, that reads like they don't have any say in this??? Shouldn't that be clarified _before_ publication? And wouldn'
I am still struggling and a bit uncomfortable with the retraction. I read the paper and I really think it is sloppy and careless, and mentoring policy should definitely not be based on it. The disregard of alternative explanations is quite striking. If I
Regarding mentorship and a retracted paper 👇https://t.co/g5R4Q4tw6F
Just read the editorial regarding the criticized paper after an e-mail from Dr. @elisader to our response paper from students here at @AarhusUni and I am incredibly happy about the outcome with clear editorial guideline updates! @pernille_brams @WiggersJan
This now-retracted paper simply didn't provide any useful conclusions, and the assumptions were woeful. As the editors hint, about as useful as the measures of impact we see for comparing academics. I don't have a coauthorship with any of my top 10 mentors
We love to see it: https://t.co/c57fi0kXAD
Today in “mob rule and sexism in science”: Nature Communications
Glad this insult to the the amazing #WomenInSTEM has been retracted. Embarrassing that it was published in the first place
The recent @NatureComms paper on mentorship is retracted. Given the fatal flaws in methodology and interpretation, this is the right decision. https://t.co/drjQifXvHV
Disappointing. The research methods were scrutinized after outcries over the "uncomfortable" conclusion as "scientific" support while tagging "womeninscience" ⏤ a back-end mechanism of discrimination. Further reading: https://t.co/kIw4OlMRik
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
RT @RocioDeanna: Finally retracted! 💪 https://t.co/8suKcFriTf
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @NicoleBarbaro: Nature Comms releases updated peer review guidelines for social and behavioral science studies that may cause concern af…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
The article has been retracted. Let’s hope for more solid research on mentoring https://t.co/4T5nyFiJkC
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
RT @Ale_Bortolus: El #Género no tiene ningún conflicto con la #Tutoría en #Academia, ... a menos que Ud introduzca el conflicto con una per…
RT @jenpluznick: The @NatureComms paper which (erroneously) concluded that women in science fare better if they have male mentors has been…
It would have been nice to see the reports of the three additional reviewers. You can see my unofficial one here https://t.co/qg5UPtUmQB
RT @DaviesswPhD: Happy to see this paper retracted and it has been exciting to witness the academic community reflecting on mentorship. Hap…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
Kudos to @NatureComms for performing this investigation. https://t.co/cIwEEbGKPu
Retraction of paper on the role of gender on mentoring relationships, or more accurately, the role of gender in co-authorships. At least it started some important conversations but lots of work to be done!
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @RocioDeanna: Finally retracted! 💪 https://t.co/8suKcFriTf
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
RT @DaviesswPhD: Happy to see this paper retracted and it has been exciting to witness the academic community reflecting on mentorship. Hap…
RT @DaviesswPhD: Happy to see this paper retracted and it has been exciting to witness the academic community reflecting on mentorship. Hap…
RT @KrishnanYamuna: Ok: That article which said if you have a female mentor you’re screwed? It’s retracted. Thank you those who led from th…
RT @angiegomeza: Retractado! Excelentes noticias! @CientificasEC https://t.co/HgAquSUWQd
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @AmandaVincent1: Nature Comms has retracted shoddy article on mentorship. Its editorial about this retraction is worth reading. Some of…
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
This paper has since been retracted by @NatureComms: https://t.co/xgWj53Ljcg
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @MaintainGenome: Authors retract the Nature Communication paper with faulty conclusions about mentorship and editors reflect on the resp…
RT @DaviesswPhD: Happy to see this paper retracted and it has been exciting to witness the academic community reflecting on mentorship. Hap…
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
RT @network_alba: At the ALBA Network, we are very happy our letter had the intended impact, and we encourage @NatureComms in reviewing the…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
With regard to the previously described paper on women's mentorship in academia and the poorly reached conclusion that junior academics should seek male mentorship: "...the paper’s conclusions in their current form do not stand, and the authors have retrac
Nature Comms has retracted shoddy article on mentorship. Its editorial about this retraction is worth reading. Some of it made me sigh (really ?!) but some of it was encouraging. https://t.co/XPfdiqm6ri
RT @network_alba: At the ALBA Network, we are very happy our letter had the intended impact, and we encourage @NatureComms in reviewing the…
RT @argplantwomen: Finally, retracted💪💪 @NatureComms @argplantwomen @ASPB_WiPB @500womensci @365BotanyWomen @WomenScienceRFS https://t…
🎉
RT @peiferlabunc: Glad to see this retracted but the fact that it was publishe din the original form casts serious doubt on the quality of…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
Mentorship is a key component of both career and personal development, and this is a reminder that thoughtful and rigorously vetted analysis is necessary to assess its true impact @NatureComms #retracted #WomenInSTEM https://t.co/V6zVUtJKfL
When the new religion ruins science.
Good!
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
Nature Communications retracts much-criticized paper on mentorship https://t.co/aRneZeSIbu
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
they should lose any claim to relevance
When politics stifles science, the quest for truth suffers.
RT @peiferlabunc: Glad to see this retracted but the fact that it was publishe din the original form casts serious doubt on the quality of…
RT @Insect_Sciences: https://t.co/Y4D9swgBew @network_alba @pollyp1 @HarmitMalik The paper is retracted!
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
Best Christmas gift ever @NatureComms! Thank you for doing the right thing!!
'the operationalisation of mentorship quality, based on the number of citations and network centrality of mentors, was not validated' https://t.co/RnqMYYmnQ4 Nature paper on mentorship officially retracted.
@SMDS_research You'll be pleased to see this has now been retracted! https://t.co/KKIahvHpUs
RT @NicoleBarbaro: Nature Comms releases updated peer review guidelines for social and behavioral science studies that may cause concern af…
RT @DaviesswPhD: Happy to see this paper retracted and it has been exciting to witness the academic community reflecting on mentorship. Hap…
RT @NicoleBarbaro: Nature Comms releases updated peer review guidelines for social and behavioral science studies that may cause concern af…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
The authors have retracted their article linking women to less successful mentorship. Due to unaccounted bias undermining their conclusions. Raises a few questions about what happened during initial review when these concerns were first raised.
RT @NicoleBarbaro: Nature Comms releases updated peer review guidelines for social and behavioral science studies that may cause concern af…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @NicoleBarbaro: Nature Comms releases updated peer review guidelines for social and behavioral science studies that may cause concern af…
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
The paper from Alshebli et al. on #mentoring has been RETRACTED by @NatureComms 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽
well done @NatureComms https://t.co/POiXzvJlJg
E a fragilidade da hipótese base da relação entre coautoria e mentoria foi exatamente o ponto principal que levou ao cancelamento do artigo. https://t.co/TNaYSHwTQP
Oh good. They retracted. https://t.co/m4snIRBF5q