RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
@jmgs_es Por favor, acuda usted a las fuentes oficiales y tenga el valor de si lo considera eliminar o rectificar su tweet ante las evidencias (cosa muy científica) https://t.co/HsVImvemii https://t.co/9e09LUHzwE
Amigos de @pcoffeebreak , hablaréis sobre este cambio editorial? alrededor hay mucho ruido y como siempre... poca señal :) sería de gran ayuda entenderlo!
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @KrishnanYamuna: Ok: That article which said if you have a female mentor you’re screwed? It’s retracted. Thank you those who led from th…
🎉🥳
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @AliseCurin: En el especial de @Barbijaputa de ayer, comentamos entre brujas el reciente artículo científico de Nature sobre las mentora…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @AliseCurin: En el especial de @Barbijaputa de ayer, comentamos entre brujas el reciente artículo científico de Nature sobre las mentora…
RT @AliseCurin: En el especial de @Barbijaputa de ayer, comentamos entre brujas el reciente artículo científico de Nature sobre las mentora…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
The @NatureComms article has now been retracted - right thing to do but too little too late?
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
Nature elaboró esto https://t.co/EQVIjLcm7V
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
RT @DrManuelSolino: Remember: not having the privilege(s) of a 1st world straight white male doesn't make you a worse mentor. Science needs…
En el especial de @Barbijaputa de ayer, comentamos entre brujas el reciente artículo científico de Nature sobre las mentoras. Los aquelarres a veces funcionan compañeras! Ha sido retractado: https://t.co/L0PoeO36H2
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @JessTiffen: RETRACTED. Merry Christmas everyone
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
Retracted, with a note that says "we believe that all the key findings of the paper with regards to co-authorship between junior and senior researchers are still valid". Isn't it important to discuss the many points on which the paper is incorrect?
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
Nature Comms tightens review standards, but still does not insist on sharing data and code for empirical or experimental papers.
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
Yesss!!!! Best early Christmas Present ever! This case demonstrates how important it is to Speak Up in Academia!
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @DrMel_T: Good.
good
Je ne suis pas certain que cette révolution culturelle soit un grand bond en avant ! Quand je vois dit que je suis atterré par où va le monde scientifique. Va falloir serrer les dents et ne plus laisser le n'importe quoi proliférer. https://t.co/TXuDhLU
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @SVergult: Regarding mentorship and a retracted paper 👇https://t.co/g5R4Q4tw6F
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
似非科学はいつでも大概酷いが、これはとりわけ酷い。
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @DrMel_T: Good.
Good.
RT @NicoleBarbaro: Nature Comms releases updated peer review guidelines for social and behavioral science studies that may cause concern af…
RETRACTED
Great work from many standing up for careful dismantling of false interpretations and unwarranted bias.
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @sNeuroble: The authors have retracted their article linking women to less successful mentorship. Due to unaccounted bias undermining th…
RT @sNeuroble: The authors have retracted their article linking women to less successful mentorship. Due to unaccounted bias undermining th…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @sNeuroble: The authors have retracted their article linking women to less successful mentorship. Due to unaccounted bias undermining th…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @NatureComms: Our latest editorial https://t.co/tnJnSMe1UN reports the context and outcome of our investigation on this paper https://t.…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
"Simply being uncomfortable with the conclusions of a published paper, would and should not lead to retraction on this basis alone." - @NatureComms https://t.co/nmzAmRGEcJ
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @NicoleBarbaro: Nature Comms releases updated peer review guidelines for social and behavioral science studies that may cause concern af…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
RT @KeikoUTorii: 【論文撤回】女性指導者に指導された女性研究者は成功しづらい、と結論した@NatureComms 論文が撤回される。Retraction of the paper, which claimed a negative impact of femal…
Thank goodness
RT @ALorenaPassa: Paper published by @NatureComms on #mentorship and female mentors has been retracted. Mentorship by women academics will…
Paper published by @NatureComms on #mentorship and female mentors has been retracted. Mentorship by women academics will be highlighted soon. https://t.co/2lZyNdcZVD
RT @ingrid_pollen: Retracted https://t.co/5fFKVwI4nm
RT @NicoleBarbaro: Nature Comms releases updated peer review guidelines for social and behavioral science studies that may cause concern af…
The outcome wrt a much criticized manuscript on mentorship in academia is that it has now been retracted ..... plus there are lessons to be learnt for the editors https://t.co/BioHI4Gsv3
Not only the paper was retracted, but @NatureComms also reviewed its editorial policies and practices for papers related to human behavior and culture. https://t.co/kCcXX2vi1w
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…
RT @DaviesswPhD: Happy to see this paper retracted and it has been exciting to witness the academic community reflecting on mentorship. Hap…
RT @raskinsar: The article has been retracted. Let’s hope for more solid research on mentoring https://t.co/4T5nyFiJkC
RT @meganinlisbon: Retracted. Thank you @NatureComms “Any conclusions that might be drawn on biases in citations in the context of co-autho…