RT @KenCaldeira: The @NewYorker published a controversial article by Jonathan Franzen citing our paper. https://t.co/JRuT4meb0Z Our paper…
RT @mark_lynas: New Nature paper out today https://t.co/oAF7nep6ur states very clearly what is needed if governments are serious about lim…
@pat_data_man @hausfath Committed emissions from existing energy infrastructure *alone* takes us past reduction targets for 1.5C. (On top of that there are thousands of new projects underway). https://t.co/Xv5HLFjYEd
RT @KenCaldeira: The @NewYorker published a controversial article by Jonathan Franzen citing our paper. https://t.co/JRuT4meb0Z Our paper…
RT @KenCaldeira: The @NewYorker published a controversial article by Jonathan Franzen citing our paper. https://t.co/JRuT4meb0Z Our paper…
RT @KarlAlexPauls: Author disputing the hot take: https://t.co/aNjAl8kxBd
RT @KenCaldeira: The @NewYorker published a controversial article by Jonathan Franzen citing our paper. https://t.co/JRuT4meb0Z Our paper…
RT @KenCaldeira: The @NewYorker published a controversial article by Jonathan Franzen citing our paper. https://t.co/JRuT4meb0Z Our paper…
RT @KenCaldeira: The @NewYorker published a controversial article by Jonathan Franzen citing our paper. https://t.co/JRuT4meb0Z Our paper…
RT @Tsinghua_Uni: Researchers from #Tsinghua and the University of California, Irvine, found that committed emissions from the existing ene…
RT @KenCaldeira: The @NewYorker published a controversial article by Jonathan Franzen citing our paper. https://t.co/JRuT4meb0Z Our paper…
RT @KenCaldeira: The @NewYorker published a controversial article by Jonathan Franzen citing our paper. https://t.co/JRuT4meb0Z Our paper…
RT @KenCaldeira: The @NewYorker published a controversial article by Jonathan Franzen citing our paper. https://t.co/JRuT4meb0Z Our paper…
RT @KenCaldeira: The @NewYorker published a controversial article by Jonathan Franzen citing our paper. https://t.co/JRuT4meb0Z Our paper…
RT @KenCaldeira: The @NewYorker published a controversial article by Jonathan Franzen citing our paper. https://t.co/JRuT4meb0Z Our paper…
RT @KenCaldeira: The @NewYorker published a controversial article by Jonathan Franzen citing our paper. https://t.co/JRuT4meb0Z Our paper…
RT @KenCaldeira: The @NewYorker published a controversial article by Jonathan Franzen citing our paper. https://t.co/JRuT4meb0Z Our paper…
RT @KenCaldeira: The @NewYorker published a controversial article by Jonathan Franzen citing our paper. https://t.co/JRuT4meb0Z Our paper…
RT @KenCaldeira: The @NewYorker published a controversial article by Jonathan Franzen citing our paper. https://t.co/JRuT4meb0Z Our paper…
RT @KenCaldeira: The @NewYorker published a controversial article by Jonathan Franzen citing our paper. https://t.co/JRuT4meb0Z Our paper…
RT @KenCaldeira: The @NewYorker published a controversial article by Jonathan Franzen citing our paper. https://t.co/JRuT4meb0Z Our paper…
⏳🍿
RT @KenCaldeira: The @NewYorker published a controversial article by Jonathan Franzen citing our paper. https://t.co/JRuT4meb0Z Our paper…
RT @KenCaldeira: The @NewYorker published a controversial article by Jonathan Franzen citing our paper. https://t.co/JRuT4meb0Z Our paper…
Urgent and existential, we all agree. But existential pessimism is not the prescription. Plus, no argument like this should violate scientific accuracy. As Ken says, this paper did not portend "catastrophe." Unrepentant optimist, I place my money on
RT @KenCaldeira: The @NewYorker published a controversial article by Jonathan Franzen citing our paper. https://t.co/JRuT4meb0Z Our paper…
@KenCaldeira @AlonzoLyons @KatieSchoolov @SEI_Erickson @DavidEdmonds100 @DrJaneFlegal @climateMorrow @EcoSenseNow @sabhlok @mumonamission5 @CNBC @JohnBrennan @CFR_org Ken, I just saw this paper in Nature, where you are a co-author in along list of authors:
RT @KenCaldeira: The @NewYorker published a controversial article by Jonathan Franzen citing our paper. https://t.co/JRuT4meb0Z Our paper…
@PierreTherrie14 @DawnRoseTurner Hey hard but do able. For starters.. > Transferring all FF subsidies over to renewables & low emissions system. > Stop all FF expansion immediately. https://t.co/Lsesqk7UEB
RT @KenCaldeira: The @NewYorker published a controversial article by Jonathan Franzen citing our paper. https://t.co/JRuT4meb0Z Our paper…
RT @KenCaldeira: The @NewYorker published a controversial article by Jonathan Franzen citing our paper. https://t.co/JRuT4meb0Z Our paper…
RT @KenCaldeira: The @NewYorker published a controversial article by Jonathan Franzen citing our paper. https://t.co/JRuT4meb0Z Our paper…
Author disputing the hot take: https://t.co/aNjAl8kxBd
RT @KenCaldeira: The @NewYorker published a controversial article by Jonathan Franzen citing our paper. https://t.co/JRuT4meb0Z Our paper…
RT @KenCaldeira: The @NewYorker published a controversial article by Jonathan Franzen citing our paper. https://t.co/JRuT4meb0Z Our paper…
RT @KenCaldeira: The @NewYorker published a controversial article by Jonathan Franzen citing our paper. https://t.co/JRuT4meb0Z Our paper…
RT @KenCaldeira: The @NewYorker published a controversial article by Jonathan Franzen citing our paper. https://t.co/JRuT4meb0Z Our paper…
RT @KenCaldeira: The @NewYorker published a controversial article by Jonathan Franzen citing our paper. https://t.co/JRuT4meb0Z Our paper…
RT @KenCaldeira: The @NewYorker published a controversial article by Jonathan Franzen citing our paper. https://t.co/JRuT4meb0Z Our paper…
RT @KenCaldeira: The @NewYorker published a controversial article by Jonathan Franzen citing our paper. https://t.co/JRuT4meb0Z Our paper…
RT @KenCaldeira: The @NewYorker published a controversial article by Jonathan Franzen citing our paper. https://t.co/JRuT4meb0Z Our paper…
RT @KenCaldeira: The @NewYorker published a controversial article by Jonathan Franzen citing our paper. https://t.co/JRuT4meb0Z Our paper…
RT @KenCaldeira: The @NewYorker published a controversial article by Jonathan Franzen citing our paper. https://t.co/JRuT4meb0Z Our paper…
RT @KenCaldeira: The @NewYorker published a controversial article by Jonathan Franzen citing our paper. https://t.co/JRuT4meb0Z Our paper…
RT @KenCaldeira: The @NewYorker published a controversial article by Jonathan Franzen citing our paper. https://t.co/JRuT4meb0Z Our paper…
RT @KenCaldeira: The @NewYorker published a controversial article by Jonathan Franzen citing our paper. https://t.co/JRuT4meb0Z Our paper…
RT @KenCaldeira: The @NewYorker published a controversial article by Jonathan Franzen citing our paper. https://t.co/JRuT4meb0Z Our paper…
RT @KenCaldeira: The @NewYorker published a controversial article by Jonathan Franzen citing our paper. https://t.co/JRuT4meb0Z Our paper…
The @NewYorker published a controversial article by Jonathan Franzen citing our paper. https://t.co/JRuT4meb0Z Our paper discussed the 1.5 C target, not the 'threshold of catastrophe'. #climate #energy @CarnegieScience @DanTong12 @SteveDavisUCI http
@cbcnewsbc #AbruptClimateChange guys #TellTheTruth #ClimateEmergency Call @bcndp out on LNG expansion.. #cdnmedia thread: @mark_lynas climate breakdown.. no new fossil fuel infrastructure anywhere, ever, right now. https://t.co/eiYc56ElJV
Researchers from #Tsinghua and the University of California, Irvine, found that committed emissions from the existing energy infrastructure jeopardizes the 1.5 °C #climate target. https://t.co/MUpVV68FYB https://t.co/Z5V4BtN6dd
RT @timinmitcham: Brown coal fails constantly and often at the worst times, gas is expensive and increasing supply has made it more so, and…
RT @mark_lynas: New Nature paper out today https://t.co/oAF7nep6ur states very clearly what is needed if governments are serious about lim…
RT @XRIthaca: Scientific conclusion... "No new fossil fuel infrastructure, anywhere, ever. From now on." https://t.co/58NGsHdJnR
RT @timinmitcham: Brown coal fails constantly and often at the worst times, gas is expensive and increasing supply has made it more so, and…
RT @timinmitcham: Brown coal fails constantly and often at the worst times, gas is expensive and increasing supply has made it more so, and…
RT @timinmitcham: Brown coal fails constantly and often at the worst times, gas is expensive and increasing supply has made it more so, and…
RT @timinmitcham: Brown coal fails constantly and often at the worst times, gas is expensive and increasing supply has made it more so, and…
Scientific conclusion... "No new fossil fuel infrastructure, anywhere, ever. From now on."
@LawlerOfMayfair @Harold_Steves @jjhorgan Not at all.. there can't be any expansion of ghg emissions & related infrastructure. Don't u get Existential Climate Emergency? thread: Mark lynas climate breakdown.. no new fossil fuel infrastructure anywher
RT @mark_lynas: New Nature paper out today https://t.co/oAF7nep6ur states very clearly what is needed if governments are serious about lim…
Committed emissions from existing energy infrastructure jeopardize 1.5 °C climate target https://t.co/KmYAQyfVrv
thread: Mark lynas climate breakdown.. no new fossil fuel infrastructure anywhere, ever, right now. https://t.co/YqJswxm37u
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: This is likely to be the most important thread on #ClimateBreakdown you've ever read. Please share widely. https://t.co…
RT @mark_lynas: New Nature paper out today https://t.co/oAF7nep6ur states very clearly what is needed if governments are serious about lim…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: This is likely to be the most important thread on #ClimateBreakdown you've ever read. Please share widely. https://t.co…
RT @SteveDavisUCI: A chat with Ailsa Chang about @DanTong12's new paper (https://t.co/DNSDXIDceG) on #CommittedEmissions and the inertia of…
A chat with Ailsa Chang about @DanTong12's new paper (https://t.co/DNSDXIDceG) on #CommittedEmissions and the inertia of fossil fuel infrastructure: https://t.co/pldUM7UKsf https://t.co/wHuM1qHDr6
We must retire fossil fuel plants early, even before their projected service life ends. https://t.co/aetr5TSn8R
Wieder eine hochrangige Studie, die zum Ergebnis kommt, dass jegliche CO2-emittierende Infrastruktur frühzeitig zurückgebaut werden muss, um das Pariser #Klimaabkommen überhaupt noch einhalten zu können. #Klimawandel @CDU @spdde @CSU https://t.co/j7Z5GGttT
「パリ協定の気候目標を満たすには、CO2を排出する新たなインフラは、ほとんどあるいは全く稼働できず、既存のインフラをより早く引退させるか、炭素回収貯留技術を組み込む必要がある」 気候科学: 1.5℃目標のための炭素予算を上回る化石燃料インフラの排出量(Nature) https://t.co/yNLuPhGX6V
RT @KA_Nicholas: The “sustainable” use for #fossilfuels = rapidly phase them out. There’s no more carbon budget for Arctic drilling. A rece…
@SimonMaxfield8 @Fandreastico @DawnTJ90 @trevormarr1 @notjoemccarthy @tan123 @oliverhole_ @Leigh252425 @google__ads @GretaThunberg @AndrewScheer @JustinTrudeau First three pages of google scholar: https://t.co/LDxOXjZoXj https://t.co/CckYI3MQCG https://
@AvWLovgreen @NancySavall @BjornLomborg That's not entirely correct. Off the grid-solution are often both easier and cheaper to install than fossil fuel powered solutions. Also, we cant expand the fossil fuel infrastructure - unless you do not care about c
RT @gecko39: Committed emissions from existing energy infrastructure jeopardize 1.5 °C climate target PDF https://t.co/U7bdsO9CKz https:…
Committed emissions from existing energy infrastructure jeopardize 1.5 °C climate target PDF https://t.co/U7bdsO9CKz https://t.co/e9QuYvXKYl https://t.co/fVCzOeHtxn
Committed emissions from existing energy infrastructure jeopardize 1.5 °C climate target https://t.co/e9QuYvXKYl
中国ってさ、社会システム的に環境問題を解決する取り組みが難しいよね。と、ここまで書いてなんでツイッターとか中国では禁止されてるか理解した。
RT @maxcordiez: Le saviez-vous ? L'âge moyen des centrales à charbon en Chine et en Inde est respectivement de 11,1 et 12,2 ans. Peu de cha…
RT @mark_lynas: New Nature paper out today https://t.co/oAF7nep6ur states very clearly what is needed if governments are serious about lim…
RT @maxcordiez: Le saviez-vous ? L'âge moyen des centrales à charbon en Chine et en Inde est respectivement de 11,1 et 12,2 ans. Peu de cha…
RT @ClimateBen: 'ALL PLANNED, PERMITTED AND UNDER CONSTRUCTION fossil infrastructure must be CANCELLED' and some existing 'power plants, ca…
RT @maxcordiez: Le saviez-vous ? L'âge moyen des centrales à charbon en Chine et en Inde est respectivement de 11,1 et 12,2 ans. Peu de cha…
RT @maxcordiez: Le saviez-vous ? L'âge moyen des centrales à charbon en Chine et en Inde est respectivement de 11,1 et 12,2 ans. Peu de cha…
RT @maxcordiez: Le saviez-vous ? L'âge moyen des centrales à charbon en Chine et en Inde est respectivement de 11,1 et 12,2 ans. Peu de cha…
RT @maxcordiez: Le saviez-vous ? L'âge moyen des centrales à charbon en Chine et en Inde est respectivement de 11,1 et 12,2 ans. Peu de cha…
RT @maxcordiez: Le saviez-vous ? L'âge moyen des centrales à charbon en Chine et en Inde est respectivement de 11,1 et 12,2 ans. Peu de cha…
@NOGEPA @veranderwens @Energeia_Nieuws @milieudefensie Als we een kans willen bewaren om onder de 1.5C te blijven en de planeet een beetje leefbaar te houden is er bovendien helemaal geen ruimte voor nieuwe investeringen olie & gaswinning - dus ook nie
RT @maxcordiez: Le saviez-vous ? L'âge moyen des centrales à charbon en Chine et en Inde est respectivement de 11,1 et 12,2 ans. Peu de cha…
RT @maxcordiez: Le saviez-vous ? L'âge moyen des centrales à charbon en Chine et en Inde est respectivement de 11,1 et 12,2 ans. Peu de cha…
RT @maxcordiez: Le saviez-vous ? L'âge moyen des centrales à charbon en Chine et en Inde est respectivement de 11,1 et 12,2 ans. Peu de cha…
RT @maxcordiez: Le saviez-vous ? L'âge moyen des centrales à charbon en Chine et en Inde est respectivement de 11,1 et 12,2 ans. Peu de cha…
RT @maxcordiez: Le saviez-vous ? L'âge moyen des centrales à charbon en Chine et en Inde est respectivement de 11,1 et 12,2 ans. Peu de cha…
RT @maxcordiez: Le saviez-vous ? L'âge moyen des centrales à charbon en Chine et en Inde est respectivement de 11,1 et 12,2 ans. Peu de cha…
RT @maxcordiez: Le saviez-vous ? L'âge moyen des centrales à charbon en Chine et en Inde est respectivement de 11,1 et 12,2 ans. Peu de cha…