RT @NatureDigest: 【Nature ハイライト:1.5℃目標のための炭素予算を上回る化石燃料インフラの排出量】「約束されている」将来のCO2排出量は、平均気温の上昇を1.5℃に抑えるための残りの全炭素予算を既に上回っている可能性が高く、2℃未満に抑えるための炭素…
RT @NatureDigest: 【Nature ハイライト:1.5℃目標のための炭素予算を上回る化石燃料インフラの排出量】「約束されている」将来のCO2排出量は、平均気温の上昇を1.5℃に抑えるための残りの全炭素予算を既に上回っている可能性が高く、2℃未満に抑えるための炭素…
RT @uro9000: Nature ハイライト:1.5℃目標のための炭素予算を上回る化石燃料インフラの排出量 | Nature | Nature Research: https://t.co/Ex0diXjZvy
RT @NatureJapan: Nature ハイライト:1.5℃目標のための炭素予算を上回る化石燃料インフラの排出量 | Nature https://t.co/wswjvm5MKp #気候科学
RT @SteveDavisUCI: Typically outstanding @TheEconomist coverage of this topic, includes some graphics from @DanTong12 et al's 2019 @Nature…
RT @SteveDavisUCI: Typically outstanding @TheEconomist coverage of this topic, includes some graphics from @DanTong12 et al's 2019 @Nature…
RT @SteveDavisUCI: Typically outstanding @TheEconomist coverage of this topic, includes some graphics from @DanTong12 et al's 2019 @Nature…
RT @SteveDavisUCI: Typically outstanding @TheEconomist coverage of this topic, includes some graphics from @DanTong12 et al's 2019 @Nature…
RT @SteveDavisUCI: Typically outstanding @TheEconomist coverage of this topic, includes some graphics from @DanTong12 et al's 2019 @Nature…
RT @SteveDavisUCI: Typically outstanding @TheEconomist coverage of this topic, includes some graphics from @DanTong12 et al's 2019 @Nature…
Typically outstanding @TheEconomist coverage of this topic, includes some graphics from @DanTong12 et al's 2019 @Nature paper as well as data from our friends at the @GlobalEnergyMon https://t.co/DNSDXIlAQ6
RT @mark_lynas: New Nature paper out today https://t.co/oAF7nep6ur states very clearly what is needed if governments are serious about lim…
RT @AlanOC_Green: A reminder: https://t.co/GjyDfKDfvE
A reminder: https://t.co/GjyDfKDfvE
@BlairKing_ca @ElizabethMay @FortisBC @Dave_Eby @geoffmeggs @jjhorgan @GeorgeHeyman @BruceRalston @JustinTrudeau @JonathanWNV @SeamusORegan 2/ Emissions from existing oil and gas infrastructure jeopardizes the 1.5°Celsius target. No new fossil fuel infrast
@DanielSamperO La verdad, Daniel, el mundo (o mejor, la supervivencia de las especies superiores) en términos ambientales tiene pocas posibilidades de cambiar su rumbo. Con Trump se aceleraría el proceso, eso sí. https://t.co/9qDMF2HJaI
Committed emissions from existing energy infrastructure jeopardize 1.5 °C climate target | Nature https://t.co/CXKjSvuYLF
RT @mark_lynas: New Nature paper out today https://t.co/oAF7nep6ur states very clearly what is needed if governments are serious about lim…
RT @MySea2Sky: Retweeting because our politicians don't seem to understand this basic concept. Listen up @jjhorgan @GeorgeHeyman @BruceRa…
RT @MySea2Sky: Retweeting because our politicians don't seem to understand this basic concept. Listen up @jjhorgan @GeorgeHeyman @BruceRa…
Retweeting because our politicians don't seem to understand this basic concept. Listen up @jjhorgan @GeorgeHeyman @BruceRalston. We cannot develop new fossil fuel infrastructure in a #ClimateEmergency. #StopWoodfibreLNG #bcpoli
RT @mark_lynas: New Nature paper out today https://t.co/oAF7nep6ur states very clearly what is needed if governments are serious about lim…
RT @AlanOC_Green: Action on this whole thing won't be easy, by any stretch, but wait until we get the the bill for inaction. This thread…
Action on this whole thing won't be easy, by any stretch, but wait until we get the the bill for inaction. This thread by Mark Lynas describes this particular issue really well. https://t.co/OZhSAWDAwp 10/11
RT @maxcordiez: To meet our #climate targets, we have not only to stop building fossil-fuel dependent infrastructures but also to shut down…
RT @maxcordiez: To meet our #climate targets, we have not only to stop building fossil-fuel dependent infrastructures but also to shut down…
RT @maxcordiez: To meet our #climate targets, we have not only to stop building fossil-fuel dependent infrastructures but also to shut down…
RT @maxcordiez: To meet our #climate targets, we have not only to stop building fossil-fuel dependent infrastructures but also to shut down…
RT @maxcordiez: To meet our #climate targets, we have not only to stop building fossil-fuel dependent infrastructures but also to shut down…
RT @maxcordiez: To meet our #climate targets, we have not only to stop building fossil-fuel dependent infrastructures but also to shut down…
RT @maxcordiez: To meet our #climate targets, we have not only to stop building fossil-fuel dependent infrastructures but also to shut down…
RT @maxcordiez: To meet our #climate targets, we have not only to stop building fossil-fuel dependent infrastructures but also to shut down…
RT @maxcordiez: To meet our #climate targets, we have not only to stop building fossil-fuel dependent infrastructures but also to shut down…
RT @maxcordiez: To meet our #climate targets, we have not only to stop building fossil-fuel dependent infrastructures but also to shut down…
RT @maxcordiez: To meet our #climate targets, we have not only to stop building fossil-fuel dependent infrastructures but also to shut down…
RT @maxcordiez: To meet our #climate targets, we have not only to stop building fossil-fuel dependent infrastructures but also to shut down…
To meet our #climate targets, we have not only to stop building fossil-fuel dependent infrastructures but also to shut down some of the currently existing ones before the end of their life. Source: https://t.co/ctrmOIKofj https://t.co/CM7lkgVAId
@Thomas_Auriel @IEA This is consistent with this article published last year in Nature. To meet our climate goals, we have not only to stop building fossil-fuel dependent infrastructures but also to shut down some of the currently existing ones before the
There's way more to read regards the background of climate change/global warming: E.g. why we can't build any more fossil fuel infrastructure: https://t.co/t7js9vc8f5 This video from Will Steffen is stark (and old now), but sets the scene well: https://t
According to "Committed emissions from existing energy infrastructure jeopardize 1.5°C climate target" published in @Nature in 2019, the Paris Agreement will fail if the current fossil infrastructure keeps working as planned. It must be retired early. http
Wissenschaft so: -Weltweites Budget für 1,5 Grad ab 2019: 280 Mrd Tonnen -CO2 Emissionen alleine aus bereits existierenden und geplanten Kraftwerken ab 2019: 840 Mrd Tonnen Stuttgart so: Erstmal 18 km Gasnetz ausbauen Wir so: Hä? Das ist doch auch fossil
Graphique : D. Tong et al, Nature 572, pages 373–377 (2019) https://t.co/ctrmOIKofj
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: This is likely to be the most important thread on #ClimateBreakdown you've ever read. Please share widely. https://t.co…
We're definitely going over 1.5 C (2.7 F), probably going to exceed 2C (3.6 F). Like, not even a question anymore. It's guaranteed without significant carbon capture. Fuck. https://t.co/v6HsXPxfw3
See Tong et al for a quantitative assessment of the impact of committed coal plants https://t.co/v2FRAleSh8
@Holdenheim1 @HouTxPensFan @BanjoHero @aishaismad @ChristineRJames @morgan_murphy https://t.co/AEUCvYcdhj we cannot stop using them all immediately because that is impossible but we need to halt all future projects to expand use of fossil fuels, and retir
According to "Committed emissions from existing energy infrastructure jeopardize 1.5°C climate target" published in @Nature in 2019, the Paris Agreement will fail if the current fossil infrastructure keeps working as planned. It must be retired early. http
According to "Committed emissions from existing energy infrastructure jeopardize 1.5°C climate target", the Paris Agreement will fail if the current fossil infrastructure keeps working as planned. It must be retired early. https://t.co/q1T6KT54Uc
RT @AlistairChisho4: The numbers... https://t.co/mOfUdOoIuQ
RT @knforfuture: Nur leider machen Sie in Wirklichkeit gar nichts. Quellen: IPCC S.R. 1.5 und https://t.co/rP8jEt6Hi1
Nur leider machen Sie in Wirklichkeit gar nichts. Quellen: IPCC S.R. 1.5 und https://t.co/rP8jEt6Hi1
RT @Bankfieldbecky: & a more recent survey by Tong et al which looks at 1.5 °C “Committed emissions from existing energy infrastructure je…
RT @Bankfieldbecky: & a more recent survey by Tong et al which looks at 1.5 °C “Committed emissions from existing energy infrastructure je…
RT @Bankfieldbecky: & a more recent survey by Tong et al which looks at 1.5 °C “Committed emissions from existing energy infrastructure je…
RT @Bankfieldbecky: & a more recent survey by Tong et al which looks at 1.5 °C “Committed emissions from existing energy infrastructure je…
RT @Bankfieldbecky: & a more recent survey by Tong et al which looks at 1.5 °C “Committed emissions from existing energy infrastructure je…
RT @Bankfieldbecky: & a more recent survey by Tong et al which looks at 1.5 °C “Committed emissions from existing energy infrastructure je…
RT @Bankfieldbecky: & a more recent survey by Tong et al which looks at 1.5 °C “Committed emissions from existing energy infrastructure je…
& a more recent survey by Tong et al which looks at 1.5 °C “Committed emissions from existing energy infrastructure jeopardize 1.5 °C climate target” – as the title suggests, there’s no room for more fossil infrastructure https://t.co/H0CDC4q1MW 5/
@Bankfieldbecky This is related by @SteveDavisUCI and colleges... Committed emissions from existing energy infrastructure jeopardize 1.5 °C climate target https://t.co/oKrlHBSbKV
@JonathanWNV Science says: Existing oil + gas infrastructure jeopardizes the 1.5°C target. This means we cannot build NEW fossil fuel infrastructure, & existing infrastructure may need to be retired early or retrofitted with carbon capture & stor
RT @mark_lynas: New Nature paper out today https://t.co/oAF7nep6ur states very clearly what is needed if governments are serious about lim…
1) Existing oil and gas infrastructure jeopardizes the 1.5°Celsius target. This means we cannot build NEW fossil fuel infrastructure, and existing infrastructure may need to be retired early or retrofitted with carbon capture and storage technology. htt
RT @maxcordiez: Âge qu'avaient en 2018 les capacités électrogènes mondiales à combustibles fossiles. De nombreuses centrales à #charbon so…
RT @mark_lynas: New Nature paper out today https://t.co/oAF7nep6ur states very clearly what is needed if governments are serious about lim…
@jgkoomey You've seen this paper, right, Tong et al 2019, where we've already burnt through our 1.5C carbon budget if we build and operate all planned power and industry? https://t.co/v2FRAleSh8
Any further fossil fuel energy infrastructure must be considered against the remaining carbon budget for the 1.5-degree climate goal. Some recent energy infrastructure analyses: Belt and Road Initiative: https://t.co/iCvMThOZN2 Energy infrastructure: ht
RT @maxcordiez: Âge qu'avaient en 2018 les capacités électrogènes mondiales à combustibles fossiles. De nombreuses centrales à #charbon so…
RT @maxcordiez: Âge qu'avaient en 2018 les capacités électrogènes mondiales à combustibles fossiles. De nombreuses centrales à #charbon so…
“Committed emissions from existing energy infrastructure jeopardize 1.5°C climate target.” This means that we cannot build new fossil fuel infrastructure if we want to achieve our climate targets. #StopWoodfibreLNG #bcpoli #cdnpoli https://t.co/sRYMbNz
RT @maxcordiez: Âge qu'avaient en 2018 les capacités électrogènes mondiales à combustibles fossiles. De nombreuses centrales à #charbon so…
RT @maxcordiez: Âge qu'avaient en 2018 les capacités électrogènes mondiales à combustibles fossiles. De nombreuses centrales à #charbon so…
RT @maxcordiez: Âge qu'avaient en 2018 les capacités électrogènes mondiales à combustibles fossiles. De nombreuses centrales à #charbon so…
RT @maxcordiez: Âge qu'avaient en 2018 les capacités électrogènes mondiales à combustibles fossiles. De nombreuses centrales à #charbon so…
RT @maxcordiez: Âge qu'avaient en 2018 les capacités électrogènes mondiales à combustibles fossiles. De nombreuses centrales à #charbon so…
RT @maxcordiez: Âge qu'avaient en 2018 les capacités électrogènes mondiales à combustibles fossiles. De nombreuses centrales à #charbon so…
RT @maxcordiez: Âge qu'avaient en 2018 les capacités électrogènes mondiales à combustibles fossiles. De nombreuses centrales à #charbon so…
RT @maxcordiez: Âge qu'avaient en 2018 les capacités électrogènes mondiales à combustibles fossiles. De nombreuses centrales à #charbon so…
RT @maxcordiez: Âge qu'avaient en 2018 les capacités électrogènes mondiales à combustibles fossiles. De nombreuses centrales à #charbon so…
RT @maxcordiez: Âge qu'avaient en 2018 les capacités électrogènes mondiales à combustibles fossiles. De nombreuses centrales à #charbon so…
RT @maxcordiez: Âge qu'avaient en 2018 les capacités électrogènes mondiales à combustibles fossiles. De nombreuses centrales à #charbon so…
RT @maxcordiez: Âge qu'avaient en 2018 les capacités électrogènes mondiales à combustibles fossiles. De nombreuses centrales à #charbon so…
RT @maxcordiez: Âge qu'avaient en 2018 les capacités électrogènes mondiales à combustibles fossiles. De nombreuses centrales à #charbon so…
RT @maxcordiez: Âge qu'avaient en 2018 les capacités électrogènes mondiales à combustibles fossiles. De nombreuses centrales à #charbon so…
RT @maxcordiez: Âge qu'avaient en 2018 les capacités électrogènes mondiales à combustibles fossiles. De nombreuses centrales à #charbon so…
Âge qu'avaient en 2018 les capacités électrogènes mondiales à combustibles fossiles. De nombreuses centrales à #charbon sont jeunes et devront être retirées du service avant leur fin de vie pour espérer contenir le réchauffement sous 2°C. Graphique : htt
RT @AlistairChisho4: The numbers... https://t.co/mOfUdOoIuQ
Une étude publiée dans Nature a fait le calcul pour 2018. Elle évalue le bilan carbone à 658 GtCO2 (de 226 à 1479 GtCO2 selon les taux d'utilisation et durées de vie envisagées). [2/X] Source : D. Tong et al., Nature, 572, 373–377, 2019, https://t.co/ctr
RT @KetanJ0: What does the science say about extracting mind-boggling quantities of carbon from the ground so it can eventually be burnt?…
RT @KetanJ0: What does the science say about extracting mind-boggling quantities of carbon from the ground so it can eventually be burnt?…
RT @KetanJ0: What does the science say about extracting mind-boggling quantities of carbon from the ground so it can eventually be burnt?…
RT @KetanJ0: What does the science say about extracting mind-boggling quantities of carbon from the ground so it can eventually be burnt?…
RT @KetanJ0: What does the science say about extracting mind-boggling quantities of carbon from the ground so it can eventually be burnt?…
RT @KetanJ0: What does the science say about extracting mind-boggling quantities of carbon from the ground so it can eventually be burnt?…
RT @KetanJ0: What does the science say about extracting mind-boggling quantities of carbon from the ground so it can eventually be burnt?…
RT @KetanJ0: What does the science say about extracting mind-boggling quantities of carbon from the ground so it can eventually be burnt?…
RT @KetanJ0: What does the science say about extracting mind-boggling quantities of carbon from the ground so it can eventually be burnt?…
RT @mark_lynas: New Nature paper out today https://t.co/oAF7nep6ur states very clearly what is needed if governments are serious about lim…
RT @mark_lynas: New Nature paper out today https://t.co/oAF7nep6ur states very clearly what is needed if governments are serious about lim…