RT @GeorgeMonbiot: The science is clear on this issue. EXISTING energy infrastructure will push us past 1.5C of global heating. Expansion i…
@Andrew_Adonis The science is clear on this issue. EXISTING energy infrastructure will push us past 1.5C of global heating. , if we want a habitable planet. We need to start shutting it down. Starting with much of our airport capacity. https://t.co/SF8Xrul
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: The science is clear on this issue. EXISTING energy infrastructure will push us past 1.5C of global heating. Expansion i…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: The science is clear on this issue. EXISTING energy infrastructure will push us past 1.5C of global heating. Expansion i…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: The science is clear on this issue. EXISTING energy infrastructure will push us past 1.5C of global heating. Expansion i…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: The science is clear on this issue. EXISTING energy infrastructure will push us past 1.5C of global heating. Expansion i…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: The science is clear on this issue. EXISTING energy infrastructure will push us past 1.5C of global heating. Expansion i…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: The science is clear on this issue. EXISTING energy infrastructure will push us past 1.5C of global heating. Expansion i…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: The science is clear on this issue. EXISTING energy infrastructure will push us past 1.5C of global heating. Expansion i…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: The science is clear on this issue. EXISTING energy infrastructure will push us past 1.5C of global heating. Expansion i…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: The science is clear on this issue. EXISTING energy infrastructure will push us past 1.5C of global heating. Expansion i…
The science is clear on this issue. EXISTING energy infrastructure will push us past 1.5C of global heating. Expansion is out of the question, if we want a habitable planet. We need to start shutting it down. Starting with much of our airport capacity. htt
@EricCrampton @bjjanssen @marcdaalder Economists have a rather different conception of efficiency than non-economists. If cost-effectiveness means the creation of stranded assets, involving pointless resource use & forfeited wealth, then that isn't the
RT @AlistairChisho4: Constant reminder. https://t.co/mOfUdOoIuQ
Constant reminder.
RT @EricHolthaus: Important new study: It's not enough just to "keep it in the ground". We've got to systematically dismantle the fossil fu…
RT @EricHolthaus: Important new study: It's not enough just to "keep it in the ground". We've got to systematically dismantle the fossil fu…
RT @EricHolthaus: Important new study: It's not enough just to "keep it in the ground". We've got to systematically dismantle the fossil fu…
RT @Peters_Glen: “Our study is dead simple, we wanted to know what happens if we don’t build any more fossil-fuel-burning stuff as of 2018”…
RT @EricHolthaus: Important new study: It's not enough just to "keep it in the ground". We've got to systematically dismantle the fossil fu…
RT @EricHolthaus: Important new study: It's not enough just to "keep it in the ground". We've got to systematically dismantle the fossil fu…
RT @Peters_Glen: “Our study is dead simple, we wanted to know what happens if we don’t build any more fossil-fuel-burning stuff as of 2018”…
RT @Peters_Glen: “Our study is dead simple, we wanted to know what happens if we don’t build any more fossil-fuel-burning stuff as of 2018”…
RT @EricHolthaus: Important new study: It's not enough just to "keep it in the ground". We've got to systematically dismantle the fossil fu…
RT @EricHolthaus: Important new study: It's not enough just to "keep it in the ground". We've got to systematically dismantle the fossil fu…
RT @EricHolthaus: Important new study: It's not enough just to "keep it in the ground". We've got to systematically dismantle the fossil fu…
RT @Peters_Glen: “Our study is dead simple, we wanted to know what happens if we don’t build any more fossil-fuel-burning stuff as of 2018”…
Committed emissions from existing energy infrastructure jeopardize 1.5 °C climate target | Nature https://t.co/C83rIxycYm
@Economissive Also doesn’t get around the substantive point that, this late in game, low carbon price permits spectacular misallocations of capital, either in terms of harm or forfeiture... https://t.co/aIyoiFWi2z https://t.co/qBXJnojuZN
RT @ngottliebphoto: @GLClancy @CoastalGasLink Goldman downgrades Exxon: https://t.co/VkHpa4tP4d, Cramer says fossil fuels dead: https://t.c…
@GLClancy @CoastalGasLink Goldman downgrades Exxon: https://t.co/VkHpa4tP4d, Cramer says fossil fuels dead: https://t.co/w1G0lTVGpo, Nature paper says must stop building fossil fuel infra: https://t.co/F35mN1VvCM, IPCC report says we're on track for +3.2C,
@B778 @DrSimEvans @CarbonBrief with a probability of 66 to 50 per cent (420–580 gigatonnes CO2)5, and perhaps two-thirds of the remaining carbon budget if mean warming is to be limited to less than 2 °C 2/2 https://t.co/DQqS7GKYaT
RT @KA_Nicholas: Reality check from science: To stabilize climate around +1.5deg warming we need to shut down existing fossil infrastruct…
RT @KA_Nicholas: Reality check from science: To stabilize climate around +1.5deg warming we need to shut down existing fossil infrastruct…
RT @KA_Nicholas: Reality check from science: To stabilize climate around +1.5deg warming we need to shut down existing fossil infrastruct…
RT @KA_Nicholas: Reality check from science: To stabilize climate around +1.5deg warming we need to shut down existing fossil infrastruct…
RT @KA_Nicholas: Reality check from science: To stabilize climate around +1.5deg warming we need to shut down existing fossil infrastruct…
RT @KA_Nicholas: Reality check from science: To stabilize climate around +1.5deg warming we need to shut down existing fossil infrastruct…
RT @KA_Nicholas: Reality check from science: To stabilize climate around +1.5deg warming we need to shut down existing fossil infrastruct…
RT @KA_Nicholas: Reality check from science: To stabilize climate around +1.5deg warming we need to shut down existing fossil infrastruct…
RT @KA_Nicholas: Reality check from science: To stabilize climate around +1.5deg warming we need to shut down existing fossil infrastruct…
RT @KA_Nicholas: Reality check from science: To stabilize climate around +1.5deg warming we need to shut down existing fossil infrastruct…
RT @KA_Nicholas: Reality check from science: To stabilize climate around +1.5deg warming we need to shut down existing fossil infrastruct…
RT @KA_Nicholas: Reality check from science: To stabilize climate around +1.5deg warming we need to shut down existing fossil infrastruct…
RT @KA_Nicholas: Reality check from science: To stabilize climate around +1.5deg warming we need to shut down existing fossil infrastruct…
RT @KA_Nicholas: Reality check from science: To stabilize climate around +1.5deg warming we need to shut down existing fossil infrastruct…
RT @KA_Nicholas: Reality check from science: To stabilize climate around +1.5deg warming we need to shut down existing fossil infrastruct…
RT @KA_Nicholas: Reality check from science: To stabilize climate around +1.5deg warming we need to shut down existing fossil infrastruct…
RT @KA_Nicholas: Reality check from science: To stabilize climate around +1.5deg warming we need to shut down existing fossil infrastruct…
RT @KA_Nicholas: Reality check from science: To stabilize climate around +1.5deg warming we need to shut down existing fossil infrastruct…
Reality check from science: To stabilize climate around +1.5deg warming we need to shut down existing fossil infrastructure early and build no new infrastructure (1) so Arctic oil drilling and pipelines are a very bad idea (1)https://t.co/24FyraCfSM
@leninology - is far greater. Off course this doesn't mean that it's worthless but given that there are many important research articles on climate that gets published in Nature but goes unreported, well... I don't think BBC did a piece on this for example
RT @mark_lynas: New Nature paper out today https://t.co/oAF7nep6ur states very clearly what is needed if governments are serious about lim…
I can remember the top eight and a half, plus most of the commentaries. Journalists like @dpcarrington and @MattMcGrathBBC must be doing a good job. On mitigation, it's a pity there wasn't more discussion of https://t.co/5VsNXmbE2J than of tree planting C
RT @enlem: In 2019, the academic paper on #ClimateChange that caused the 2nd highest buzz on Twitter was about the dangerous amount of emis…
RT @enlem: In 2019, the academic paper on #ClimateChange that caused the 2nd highest buzz on Twitter was about the dangerous amount of emis…
In 2019, the academic paper on #ClimateChange that caused the 2nd highest buzz on Twitter was about the dangerous amount of emissions locked in by current energy infrastructure. Thanks @CarbonBrief for the analysis and @DanTong12 et al! https://t.co/mWNrKf
RT @mark_lynas: New Nature paper out today https://t.co/oAF7nep6ur states very clearly what is needed if governments are serious about lim…
Here the direct link to th paper: https://t.co/hDH6Zdv2ji
How committed are we to #climatechange? Very, but the wrong kind of committment. https://t.co/5tYqxUrdlX (not very recent but great) 1/4
@cristobalbm
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: This is likely to be the most important thread on #ClimateBreakdown you've ever read. Please share widely.
Not being aware of the substantial risks that come with every new fossil fuel infrastructure project is.... a privilege to say the least. https://t.co/NrE6uQlzGL
@rachelmalena I don't understand how economics is allowed to continue to play this shell game as though physics doesn't apply to them. The economics exist WITHIN OUR CARBON BUDGET. That's the economics. https://t.co/dGAG56Fx9E
RT @LDarkbranch: @ohgodits_ste @DaRedGobbo @arachnochist @sunny_hundal The ignorance and arrogance is staggering, MaRkET soLuTiOnS🤦♀️ Here…
@ohgodits_ste @DaRedGobbo @arachnochist @sunny_hundal The ignorance and arrogance is staggering, MaRkET soLuTiOnS🤦♀️ Here Sunny start educating yourself: 🔴https://t.co/evhKISN1e0 🔴https://t.co/kJkrtu5bUj An this doesn't even go into deforestation and soil
The numbers...
2019 science papers on #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis in the order of altmetrics: #6 https://t.co/YrGIvyIicD
In which 'committed' carbon emissions (i.e. existing & under development fossil fuel energy infrastructure) exceed remaining carbon budget to limit warming to 1.5C, Meaning no new infrastructure can be built, some existing must be retired. 151/#365pape
RT @mark_lynas: New Nature paper out today https://t.co/oAF7nep6ur states very clearly what is needed if governments are serious about lim…
RT @charliesmithvcr: I think it's safe to assume that W. Brett Wilson isn't a subscriber to Nature. https://t.co/BdW1qXA6j0 @SoniaFurstenau…
RT @charliesmithvcr: I think it's safe to assume that W. Brett Wilson isn't a subscriber to Nature. https://t.co/BdW1qXA6j0 @SoniaFurstenau…
RT @charliesmithvcr: I think it's safe to assume that W. Brett Wilson isn't a subscriber to Nature. https://t.co/BdW1qXA6j0 @SoniaFurstenau…
Does he address ethical coal?
RT @charliesmithvcr: I think it's safe to assume that W. Brett Wilson isn't a subscriber to Nature. https://t.co/BdW1qXA6j0 @SoniaFurstenau…
RT @charliesmithvcr: I think it's safe to assume that W. Brett Wilson isn't a subscriber to Nature. https://t.co/BdW1qXA6j0 @SoniaFurstenau…
RT @charliesmithvcr: I think it's safe to assume that W. Brett Wilson isn't a subscriber to Nature. https://t.co/BdW1qXA6j0 @SoniaFurstenau…
RT @charliesmithvcr: I think it's safe to assume that W. Brett Wilson isn't a subscriber to Nature. https://t.co/BdW1qXA6j0 @SoniaFurstenau…
RT @charliesmithvcr: I think it's safe to assume that W. Brett Wilson isn't a subscriber to Nature. https://t.co/BdW1qXA6j0 @SoniaFurstenau…
RT @charliesmithvcr: I think it's safe to assume that W. Brett Wilson isn't a subscriber to Nature. https://t.co/BdW1qXA6j0 @SoniaFurstenau…
RT @charliesmithvcr: I think it's safe to assume that W. Brett Wilson isn't a subscriber to Nature. https://t.co/BdW1qXA6j0 @SoniaFurstenau…
I think it's safe to assume that W. Brett Wilson isn't a subscriber to Nature. https://t.co/BdW1qXA6j0 @SoniaFurstenau @Eric_Doherty
RT @mark_lynas: New Nature paper out today https://t.co/oAF7nep6ur states very clearly what is needed if governments are serious about lim…
RT @mark_lynas: New Nature paper out today https://t.co/oAF7nep6ur states very clearly what is needed if governments are serious about lim…
Committed emissions from existing energy infrastructure jeopardize 1.5 °C climate target | Nature - https://t.co/YTHgSRDgv2
RT @nature: The committed future CO2 emissions from proposed and existing energy infrastructure represent more than the entire remaining ca…
We need #ClimateActionNow #KeepItInTheGround
RT @leahstokes: @MichaelWWara Here's the research. Yes it assumes things don't shut down early. But in practice, stranded costs are very ha…
RT @leahstokes: @CostaSamaras Want to see the research that 1.5 °C is unlikely without dramatic changes now? "Committed emissions from exi…
RT @leahstokes: @CostaSamaras Want to see the research that 1.5 °C is unlikely without dramatic changes now? "Committed emissions from exi…
RT @leahstokes: @CostaSamaras Want to see the research that 1.5 °C is unlikely without dramatic changes now? "Committed emissions from exi…
RT @leahstokes: @CostaSamaras Want to see the research that 1.5 °C is unlikely without dramatic changes now? "Committed emissions from exi…
<< our estimates suggest that little or no new CO2-emitting infrastructure can be commissioned, and that existing infrastructure may need to be retired early >>
@MichaelWWara Here's the research. Yes it assumes things don't shut down early. But in practice, stranded costs are very hard to deal with. Hence building new fossil fuel infrastructure is bad regardless of how long it operates. https://t.co/tclWtIsnQY
RT @leahstokes: @CostaSamaras Want to see the research that 1.5 °C is unlikely without dramatic changes now? "Committed emissions from exi…
@CostaSamaras Want to see the research that 1.5 °C is unlikely without dramatic changes now? "Committed emissions from existing and proposed energy infrastructure (about 846 gigatonnes CO2) thus represent more than the entire carbon budget that remains" f
@craigaltemose This isn't about "privilege" or "deciding." It's about what the science actually shows about what we are doing vs what we need to be doing to keep warming to 1.5° C... https://t.co/tclWtIsnQY
@FrackHazReveal @BeccaSLester @MassGovernor @FERC And that is only the tip of iceberg. We're expanding the global fossil fuel infrastructure when we should be shrinking it. See Tong et al. "Committed emissions from existing energy infrastructure jeopardize