| Title |
Thermal constraints on in vivo optogenetic manipulations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Neuroscience, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41593-019-0422-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Scott F. Owen, Max H. Liu, Anatol C. Kreitzer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 116 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 20 | 17% |
| Japan | 17 | 15% |
| Germany | 5 | 4% |
| Mexico | 3 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 55 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 82 | 71% |
| Scientists | 32 | 28% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 652 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 652 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 156 | 24% |
| Researcher | 116 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 75 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 55 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 27 | 4% |
| Other | 84 | 13% |
| Unknown | 139 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 263 | 40% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 77 | 12% |
| Engineering | 44 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 27 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 3% |
| Other | 62 | 10% |
| Unknown | 157 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2023.
All research outputs
#561,548
of 25,856,713 outputs
Outputs from Nature Neuroscience
#1,032
of 5,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,856
of 369,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Neuroscience
#26
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,856,713 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 58.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.